Limitation
on
jumping 7 (2,10) 10 (7,10) 4 (2,9) <0.001
loss in
physical work 9 (3,10) 10 (9,10) 8 (3,10) <0.001
FAOS
Pain 100 (69,100) 100 (89,100) 93 (69,100) 0.007 Symptom 93 (39,100) 100 (75,100) 89 (39,100) 0.009
Activity of
daily life 100 (88,100) 100 (91,100) 98 (88,100) 0.012
Sport and
recreation 88 (45,100) 100 (75,100) 75 (45,90) <0.001
Foot-and
ankle-related
QOL
69 (31,100) 91 (69,100) 56 (31,88) <0.001
HRT
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
(LSI%) Concentric
power 80.8 (23.5,189.9) 80.6 (52.9,115.9) 82.1 (23.5,189.9) ns
Total work 71.5 (24.3,288.0) 77.7 (57.5,119.6) 68.2 (24.3,288.0) ns Repetition 90.5 (45.8,275) 96.7 (71.4,114.3) 82.7 (45.8,275.0) ns
Average
height 81.8 (37.6,110.5) 81.8 (65.1,110.5) 81.9 (37.6,104.0) ns
Table 1. The clinical and functional characteristics of ATR patients included in study. TTS = time to
surgery; BMI = body mass index; ATRS = Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (0-100, and 0-10 for
each subscale, worst = 0); FAOS = Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (0-100, worst = 0 for each
category); HRT = Heal Rise Test (0-100, worst = 0 for each category); QOL = Quality of Life; LSI =
Limb Symmetry Index). Data presented as median with lower and upper interquartile ranges.
Comparison between good versus poor outcome was measured by Mann-Whitney U test. A p value <
0.05 was set for statistical significance between group.
Quantitative Proteomic Characterization of Good and Poor Outcome Patients
To identify proteins that are potentially prognostic of good and poor Achilles tendon
repair, proteins from the tissue samples were extracted and subsequently separated
using reverse phase liquid chromatography. The proteome of the extracted proteins was
developed using mass spectroscopy as detailed in the methods section. The proteomic
data was then grouped based on the 1-year clinical outcomes for the patients (Svedman
et al., 2018). The computational data analysis detected 855 unique proteins, including
769 shared proteins across the good and poor outcome groups (Figure 1a). Among the
shared proteomic file, 51 differentially expressed proteins were identified with 10
down- and 41 up-regulated proteins in good when compared with poor outcome
subgroup (Figure 1b). By analysis of enrichment factor, it was observed that the most
enriched processes for the down-regulated proteins included myofibril assembly and
skeletal tissue development. The up-regulated proteins were mostly involved in
extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, collagen metabolism, and inflammatory and
immune responses (Figure 1c).
A highly enriched protein-protein interaction among the 10 down-regulated proteins
was detected, highlighting potential biological processes of skeletal tissue
development, myofibril assembly and muscular development (Figure 1d). The protein-
protein interaction among 41 up-regulated markers was also identified, which revealed
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
that these proteins are mainly involved in ECM organization, tissue development and
protein metabolis m (Figure 1e). GSEA of the 51 (10 down - and 41 up -regulated
proteins) differentially expressed proteins detected collagen binding, ECM regulation,
metabolic pathways, as well processes involved in wound healing, cell migration and
proliferation, and connective tissue development as potential enriched pathways
(Figure 1f-q).
Figure 1. Quantitative proteomic file of injured human Achilles tendon.
a) Venn plot of overlapping and distinct proteomes of patients with good (G) and poor (P) outcome. n =
20 in each group; b) Volcano diagram with differentially expressed proteins. The X coordinate represents
Log2 fold change (FC) and the Y coordinate to -Log10 (p-value). Each dot represents a protein with red
= up-regulated, green =down-regulated and, black = non-differentially expressed proteins; c) Bar plot of
differentially expressed proteins with matched biological processes. Size of bar represents the number; -
log10 FDR was used as reliability, red = up-regulated while green = down-regulated proteins ;
Enrichment factor shows the ratio of pathway related proteins to the whole identified proteome. Protein-
protein interactions among d) down-regulated, and e) up-regulated proteins. STRING v11.0 was used to
analyze functional enrichment. Relevant biological processes are presented with different colors ; f-q)
GSEA plots of the highly involved pathways related to differentially expressed proteins.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Detection of Predictive Biomarkers for Dense Connective Tissue Repair
To identify potential prognostic biomarkers, a multiple -regression analysis using the
proteomic and clinical and functional data was performed. As a result, two up-regulated
proteins, eEF2 (Figure 2a-c) and fibrillin-2 (FBN2) (Figure 2d-f) were identified, both
of which were positively associated with improved ATRS and average heel rise height.
However, only eEF2 with an area under the curve ( AUC) value of 0.86 (> 0.85) , as
compared to FBN2 with an AUC of 0.69, exhibited a strong prediction of good clinical
outcome (Figure 2g).
To confirm the proteomic data findings for eEF2, western blot analysis was conducted
on tissue biop sies collected from same patient cohort used for MS which revealed
significantly higher eEF2 levels in good compared to poor outcome patients (Figure
2k). We further studied the ratio of phosphorylated-eEF2 (p-eEF2)/total eEF2 as eEF-
2 kinase can modulate the a ctivity of p-eEF2 (Knight et al., 2021) . However, no
statistical difference was detected among good and poor outcome patients based on both
MS and WB data analysis (Supplementary Figure 1). Furthermore, a strong positive
association was observed between eEF2 and 1 -year clinical outcome (Figure 2i).
Together with a strong prognostic significance of the AUC value of 0.9 (Figure 2j),
eEF2 was selected as the best prognostic biomarker of Achilles tendon repair and
subjected to further mechanistic analyses.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 2. Prognostic biomarker selection and verification in injured Achilles tendon tissues.
Association of eEF2 expression with a) ATRS and, b) average heal rise, n = 40 ; c) eEF2 expression
between good outcome (GO, n = 20) and poor outcome (PO, n = 20) patients, data presented as mean ±
SD, *** p < 0.001; Association among FBN2 and d) ATRS and, e) average heal rise, n = 40; f) FBN2
levels among good outcome (GO, n = 20) and poor outcome ( PO, n = 2 0) patients, data presented as
mean ± SD, *** p < 0.001; g) AUC for eEF2 to report its predictive significance, n = 40; h ) Semi-
quantitative analysis of eEF2 western blot analysis among good outcome (GO, n = 9) and poor outcome
(PO, n = 9 ) patient samples, data presented as mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, n = 9 per group ; i) Positive
association between eEF2 and 1 -year healing outcome based on western blot analysis, n = 18; j) AUC
value of eEF2 based on western blot analysis, n = 18; k) Western blot image of eEF2 and beta-actin (-
actin) in good (G) and poor (P) outcome patients.
eEF2 Regulates Collagen Expression During Dense Connective Tissue Repair
To visualize the localization and to confirm eEF2 expression in tissue biopsies ,
immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) analysis were performed.
Both IHC (Figure 3 a-c) and IF (Figure d-f) analyses clearly demonstrated higher eEF2
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
expression in the good compared to the poor outcome patients . Further, IHC and IF
based semi-quantitative analyses demonstrated that eEF2, which is both a nuclear and
cytoplasmic protein (Yao et al., 2014, Sagnol et al., 2014) , was mostly located in the
ECM area of the tendon tissue (Figure 3 a -b, d -e). To identify how eEF2 improves
healing in connective tissues after injury, the association between eEF2 and a classical
marker of tendon repair, Collagen type I a1 (Col1a1) was analyzed. Western blotting
from protein lysates gen erated from biopsies used for the MS analysis were used for
Col1a1 expression in patients with good and poor outcome. The analysis demonstrated
higher Col1a1 expression among patients with better outcome (Figure 3 f, g ), in
accordance with the findings for eEF2 (Figure 1 k). The up-regulation of both eEF2
(Figure 1h, k) and Col1a1 was observed in the good compared with the poor outcome
group (Figure 2g, h). Interestingly, a strong relationship was observed between eEF2
and Col1a1 (r = 0.61, p = 0.007, Figure 3i) levels, suggesting that eEF2 may mediate
Col1a1 production to enhance tendon repair.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 3. eEF2 expression and localization in tissue biopsies and association with Col1a1.
Immunohistochemistry of the eEF2 in a) good outcome (GO) and, b) poor outcome (PO) patients, Scale
bars = 100 µm; c) Semi-quantitative analysis of eEF2 expression in the good outcome (GO) and poor
outcome (PO) patient samples presented as integrated optical density (IOD), data reported as mean ±
SD, *** p < 0.001, n = 9 per group. eEF2 immunofluorescence signal in a d) good outcome (GO) and,
e) poor outcome (PO) patient sample. Scale bars = 100 µm; f) Western blot analysis and g) semi-
quantitative analysis of Col1a1 expression in good and poor outcome patients. Signal intensity was used
for quantitative analysis, and the intensity of the house-keeping gene (beta-actin) used for normalization;
h) Association among eEF2 and Col1a1 expression, n = 18.
eEF2 Enhances Dense Connective Tissue Repair during Inflammation by
Improving Autophagy
Autophagy, which is a self -renewal mechanism that can degrade and recycle cellular
components, plays an essential role in various phases of wound healing (An et al., 2018,
Han et al., 2015, Vescarelli et al., 2017) . Specifically, in the inflammatory phase
autophagy prevents excessive inflammation and can also regulate collagen synthesis
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
(Ren et al., 2022) . The bioinformatic analysis , based on the proteomic data also
identified that autophagy and collagen expression were improved by eEF2, highlighting
a potential role of this novel biomarker during the inflammatory stage of tendon repair
(Supplementary Figure 2). Thus, an inflammatory fibroblast injury model was created
to confirm and further explore whether eEF2 regulates collagen production by
mediating autophagy during the inflammatory phase of repair. An inflammat ion-
induced decline of Col1a1 was detected, and Col1a1 expression was reduced following
silencing of eEF2 expression in the cells (Supplementary Figure 3).
Autophagy was induced in the human fibroblast cell line and in primary fibroblast s,
leading to an increase in microtubule-associated proteins light chain 3-II (LC3-II) and
the ratio of LC3-II/I. The expression of LC3-II and the ratio of LC3-II/I in the fibroblast
cell line TERT166 and in primary fibroblasts were significantly reduced when eEF2
was knocked down with si -eEF2, suggesting a positive effect of eEF2 on autophagy
(Figure 4a-d). Further exploration of this relationship demonstrated that autophagy led
to increases in Col1a1 expression and that this up-regulation was significantly reduced
by knocking down eEF2 (Figure 4e-h, i-l). Interestingly, the up- or down-regulation of
autophagy and subsequent Col1a1 production resulting from si-eEF2 was
approximately equal to the effect induced by an autophagy inhibitor (3 -MA) (Figure
4e-l), demonstrating an essential impact of eEF2 on autophagy.
These experimental findings confirmed and expanded the results of the bioinformatic
analysis regarding the relationship between eEF2 and autophagy. To our knowledge,
this is the first exploration of mechanistic function of eEF2 during regenerative process,
highlighting that eEF2 improve s Col1a1 production potentially by up -regulating
autophagy during inflammation.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
eEF2 Enhances Dense Connective Tissue Repair during Inflammation by Reducing
Cell Death and Apoptosis
After tissue injury, the inflammatory stage of healing is comprised of multiple
biological processes that are crucial towards tissue repair(Tsuchiya, 2021, Arulselvan
et al., 2016, Litwiniuk et al., 2016) . Among these processes, we identified that eEF2
not only improved autophagy but also promoted apoptotic process es during tissue
repair (Supplementary Figure 2). To confirm the preliminary findings from the
bioinformatic and statistical analysis, the ratio of dead/live cells was assessed in two si-
eEF2 inflammatory fibroblast models.
The experimental data demonstrated that induction of inflammation led to increase in
the ratio of dead/live cells for both primary fibroblasts and the fibroblast cell line
(Figure 4m-p). Further, TNF-induced an up-regulation of dead/live ratio that was even
higher than when eEF2 was silenced (Figure 4m-p). In addition, the increased ratio of
dead/live fibroblasts lead to higher rates of apoptotic cells as observed by caspase-3/7
activity (Figure 4q -t). He nce, this stepwise assessment corroborated that eEF2
decreases cell death and reduce s the apoptotic process, highlighting eEF2 as a multi-
functional biomarker of tissue repair during the inflammatory stage. Moreover,
identical findings from the primary fibroblasts and the fibroblast cell line strengthen the
concept that eEF2 plays a vital role by reducing cell death/apoptosis during the
inflammatory phase of DCT repair.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 4. eEF2 enhances healing processes in TNF-induced inflammatory fibroblast models.
a-f) eEF2 affects Col1a1 expression through autophagy in primary fibroblasts. a, b) Representative
Western blot images and semi-quantitative analysis of LC3 -II and LC3-II/LC3-I ratio , c -f)
Representative Western blot (c) and confocal images (e) along with semi -quantitative analysis of
Col1a1(d, f) in cells treated with normal medium, starved medium for autophagy, si -eEF2 and 3 -MA
incubation based on autophagy , TNF was used afterward to create an inflammatory model ; g-l) eEF2
affects Col1a1 synthesis by autophagy in fibroblast cell line. g, h) Representative Western blot images
and semi-quantitative analysis of LC3 -II and LC3-II/LC3-I ratio. Representative Western blot (i) and
confocal images (k) along with semi-quantitative analysis of Col1a1 (l, j) synthesis in cells treated with
normal medium, starved stimulation for autophagy, si -eEF2 and 3-MA incubation based on autophagy;
Semi-quantitative analysis demonstrated eEF2 enhanced autophagy and then increased Col1a1 synthesis
during inflammation. Signal intensity (a -d, g-j) and fluorescent green intensity (e -f, k-l) were used for
semi-quantitative analysis; m-t) Representative images captured by fluorescent microscope demonstrated
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
the cell death and apoptosis when treated with normal condition, TNF and si-eEF2 & TNF: si-eEF2
increases the ratio of dead/live cells among primary fibroblast (m, n) and fibroblast cell line ( o, p); si-
eEF2 positively associate with cell apoptosis among primary fibroblasts (q, s) and fibroblast cell line (r,
t); The ratio of dead/live cells was reported by percentage and the apoptotic level of cells was presented
by fluorescent green intensity. Data reported as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, scale
bars = 100 µm, 3 replicates were used for quantitative analysis.
eEF2 Improves Dense Connective Tissue Repair by Enhancing Cell Proliferation
DCTs repair is a complex process in which the inflammatory phase of healing is
successively replaced by proliferative healing p rocesses and matrix deposition . Our
recent finding based on the proliferative stage of healing (Chen et al., 2022) also
detected an increased eEF2 expression in the healing tendons at two weeks post repair
surgery. Interestingly, analysis of the MS-based quantitative proteomic data from the
early proliferating healing phase; 2 -weeks post -surgery, detected elevated levels of
eEF2 in the healing compared to intact Achilles tendons (Figure 5 a). To further
understand the role of eEF2 on proliferative healing processes, the effects of si -eEF2
on proliferating fibroblasts in un-challenged cell line as well in primary fibroblasts were
studied.
Our first analysis showed a decline in Col1a1 production by knocking down eEF2
(Figure 5 b-c, d -e), suggesting an association of eEF2 to this repair-related matrix
protein. Quantitative image analysis demonstrated an eEF2-induced cell proliferation
among cells treated with si -eEF2 (Figure 5f -i). These observations confirmed and
strengthened the preliminary finding, and also extended on the potential role of eEF2
from inflammatory to the early proliferative stages of tendon tissue repair.
eEF2 Improves Dense Connective Tissue Repair by Reducing Cell Death and
Apoptosis during Proliferation
Cell death is an essential yet opposing biological process in relation with proliferation
(Guo and Hay, 1999, Oh et al., 2012) , while apopto sis is the outcome of cell death.
However, the knowledge base for the potentially synchronized regulation of cell
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
apoptotic- and proliferative processes during tissue repair is limited. For the next step
of the analysis, the impact of eEF2 on the coordinated cell proliferation and apoptosis
leading to connective tissue repair was explored using unchallenged fibroblast models.
The experimental observations indicate an opposite effect of eEF2 on cell death when
compared with cell proliferation as demonstrated by increases in the ratio of dead/live
cells when cells were treated with si -eEF2 (Figure 5j-m). The pathway to cell death
was corroborated by demonstrating an increased apoptotic ratio of cells following
treatment with si-eEF2 (Figure 5n-q).
Here, these findings for the first-time report that eEF2 induces fibroblast proliferation,
and at the same time reduces cell death and apoptosis to improve connective tissue
repair and outcomes during an early phase of healing. These observations extended the
role of eEF2 at cellular level, but also highlighted its mechanistic function during the
early proliferative phase of tissue repair.
eEF2 Improves Dense Connective Tissue Repair by Enhancing Cell Migration
during Proliferation
During wound healing, fibroblast migration to the site of injury is a crucial step to
initiate the proliferative healing process (Fronza et al., 2009) . Our bioinformatic
analysis also observed that eEF2 expression was positively associated with cell
migration molecules (Supplementary Figure 4). Thus, we assess ed whether eEF2
enhances cell migration during the proliferation phase of tissue healing. For the se
experiments, in-vitro wound models were used in which a scratch was created in
monolayer cultured fibroblasts using both the primary cells and the cell line, treated
with or without si-eEF2. The findings confirmed the earlier bioinformatic analysis by
demonstration of a reduced cell migration area and ratio among cells transfected with
si-eEF2 (Figure 5r-w). Quantitative analysis of the results demonstrated a significantly
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
(p = 0.01) slower (30%) migration rate in eEF2 knock down cells in comparison with a
47% rate in normal cells when primary cells were used. When the cell line was used in
studies, the migration rate was 33% in the si-eEF2 treated cells versus a 55% rate in the
control cells. The consistent findings between primary fibroblasts and a fibroblast cell
line further support a mechanistic role for eEF2 in cell migration during connective
tissue repair.
Figure 5. eEF2 enhances fibroblast proliferative processe.
a) eEF2 expression from micro-dialysate MS data, micro-dialysate collected from the intact and healing
Achilles tendons, 2 weeks post-surgery, *** p < 0.001, n = 28 in each group; b-e) Representative confocal
images and semi-quantitative analysis of Col1a1 in b,c) primary fibroblasts and, d,e) fibroblast cell line,
with and without si-eEF2, data reported as mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, scale bars = 100 µm, n = 3 replicates;
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
f-i) Representative immunofluorescence images and number of proliferating f,h) primary fibroblasts and
g,i) fibroblast cell line, with and without si-eEF2. Data reported as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01,
*** p < 0.001, scale bars = 100 µm, n =3 replicates; j-m) Representative immunofluorescence images
and ratio of dead/live cells from, j,k) primary fibroblasts, and l,m) fibroblast cell line, with and without
si-eEF2. Data reported as mean ± SD, *** p < 0.001, scale bars = 100 µm, n = 3 replicates; n-q)
Representative immunofluorescence images and number of apoptotic cells from n,o) primary fibroblasts,
and p,q) fibroblast cell line, with and without si -eEF2. Data reported as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p <
0.01, scale bars = 100 µm, n =3 replicates; r-w) Representative images and quantitative analysis of cell
migration rate assessed at 0 and 24 hours in r-t) primary fibroblast, and u-w) fibroblast cell line, with and
without si-eEF2. Data reported as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, scale bars = 100
µm, n =3 replicates.
Figure 6. Potential mechanisms and eEF2 mode of action during inflammation and proliferation phases
of dense connective tissue repair.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Reference
ABDUL ALIM, M., DOMEIJ-ARVERUD, E., NILSSON, G., EDMAN, G. & ACKERMANN, P. W.
2018. Achilles tendon rupture healing is enhanced by intermittent pneumatic
compression upregulating collagen type I synthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol
Arthrosc, 26, 2021-2029.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
ACKERMANN, P. W., DOMEIJ-ARVERUD, E., LECLERC, P., AMOUDROUZ, P. & NADER, G. A.
2013. Anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in early human tendon repair. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21, 1801-6.
ADDIS, R., CRUCIANI, S., SANTANIELLO, S., BELLU, E., SARAIS, G., VENTURA, C., MAIOLI, M. &
PINTORE, G. 2020. Fibroblast Proliferation and Migration in Wound Healing by
Phytochemicals: Evidence for a Novel Synergic Outcome. Int J Med Sci, 17, 1030-
1042.
ALIM, M. A., SVEDMAN, S., EDMAN, G. & ACKERMANN, P. W. 2016. Procollagen markers in
microdialysate can predict patient outcome after Achilles tendon rupture. BMJ Open
Sport Exerc Med, 2, e000114.
AN, Y., LIU, W. J., XUE, P., MA, Y., ZHANG, L. Q., ZHU, B., QI, M., LI, L. Y., ZHANG, Y. J., WANG,
Q. T. & JIN, Y. 2018. Autophagy promotes MSC-mediated vascularization in
cutaneous wound healing via regulation of VEGF secretion. Cell Death Dis, 9, 58.
ANDERSON-BAUCUM, E., PINEROS, A. R., KULKARNI, A., WEBB-ROBERTSON, B. J., MAIER, B.,
ANDERSON, R. M., WU, W., TERSEY, S. A., MASTRACCI, T. L., CASIMIRO, I.,
SCHEUNER, D., METZ, T. O., NAKAYASU, E. S., EVANS-MOLINA, C. & MIRMIRA, R. G.
2021. Deoxyhypusine synthase promotes a pro-inflammatory macrophage
phenotype. Cell Metab, 33, 1883-1893 e7.
ARULSELVAN, P., FARD, M. T., TAN, W. S., GOTHAI, S., FAKURAZI, S., NORHAIZAN, M. E. &
KUMAR, S. S. 2016. Role of Antioxidants and Natural Products in Inflammation. Oxid
Med Cell Longev, 2016, 5276130.
BAINBRIDGE, P. 2013. Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts. J Wound Care, 22, 407-8,
410-12.
BARANZINI, N., PULZE, L., TETTAMANTI, G., ACQUATI, F. & GRIMALDI, A. 2021. HvRNASET2
Regulate Connective Tissue and Collagen I Remodeling During Wound Healing
Process. Front Physiol, 12, 632506.
CHEN, J., SVENSSON, J., SUNDBERG, C. J., AHMED, A. S. & ACKERMANN, P. W. 2021. FGF
gene expression in injured tendons as a prognostic biomarker of 1-year patient
outcome after Achilles tendon repair. J Exp Orthop, 8, 20.
CHEN, J., WANG, J., HART, D. A., AHMED, A. S. & ACKERMANN, P. W. 2022. Complement
factor D as a predictor of Achilles tendon healing and long-term patient outcomes.
FASEB J, 36, e22365.
CHOI, H., SIMPSON, D., WANG, D., PRESCOTT, M., PITSILLIDES, A. A., DUDHIA, J., CLEGG, P.
D., PING, P. P. & THORPE, C. T. 2020. Heterogeneity of proteome dynamics between
connective tissue phases of adult tendon. Elife, 9.
CHU, J., LU, M., PFEIFER, C. G., ALT, V. & DOCHEVA, D. 2020. Rebuilding Tendons: A Concise
Review on the Potential of Dermal Fibroblasts. Cells, 9.
DENG, Z., LUO, P., LAI, W., SONG, T., PENG, J. & WEI, H. K. 2017. Myostatin inhibits eEF2K-
eEF2 by regulating AMPK to suppress protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun, 494, 278-284.
FISCHER, A., WANNEMACHER, J., CHRIST, S., KOOPMANS, T., KADRI, S., ZHAO, J., GOUDA, M.,
YE, H., MUCK-HAUSL, M., KRENN, P. W., MACHENS, H. G., FASSLER, R., NEUMANN, P.
A., HAUCK, S. M. & RINKEVICH, Y. 2022. Neutrophils direct preexisting matrix to
initiate repair in damaged tissues. Nat Immunol, 23, 518-531.
FRONZA, M., HEINZMANN, B., HAMBURGER, M., LAUFER, S. & MERFORT, I. 2009.
Determination of the wound healing effect of Calendula extracts using the scratch
assay with 3T3 fibroblasts. J Ethnopharmacol, 126, 463-7.
GROL, M. W., HAELTERMAN, N. A., LIM, J., MUNIVEZ, E. M., ARCHER, M., HUDSON, D. M.,
TUFA, S. F., KEENE, D. R., LEI, K., PARK, D., KUZAWA, C. D., AMBROSE, C. G., EYRE, D.
R. & LEE, B. H. 2021. Tendon and motor phenotypes in the Crtap(-/-) mouse model
of recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Elife, 10.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
GUO, M. & HAY, B. A. 1999. Cell proliferation and apoptosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 11, 745-52.
HAN, Y. F., SUN, T. J., HAN, Y. Q., XU, G., LIU, J. & TAO, R. 2015. Clinical perspectives on
mesenchymal stem cells promoting wound healing in diabetes mellitus patients by
inducing autophagy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 19, 2666-70.
HUSSEIN, A. I., MANCINI, C., LYBRAND, K. E., COOKE, M. E., MATHENY, H. E., HOGUE, B. L.,
TORNETTA, P., 3RD & GERSTENFELD, L. C. 2018. Serum proteomic assessment of the
progression of fracture healing. J Orthop Res, 36, 1153-1163.
KALECI, B. & KOYUTURK, M. 2020. Efficacy of resveratrol in the wound healing process by
reducing oxidative stress and promoting fibroblast cell proliferation and migration.
Dermatol Ther, 33, e14357.
KIM, M. S., PINTO, S. M., GETNET, D., NIRUJOGI, R. S., MANDA, S. S., CHAERKADY, R.,
MADUGUNDU, A. K., KELKAR, D. S., ISSERLIN, R., JAIN, S., THOMAS, J. K.,
MUTHUSAMY, B., LEAL-ROJAS, P., KUMAR, P., SAHASRABUDDHE, N. A.,
BALAKRISHNAN, L., ADVANI, J., GEORGE, B., RENUSE, S., SELVAN, L. D., PATIL, A. H.,
NANJAPPA, V., RADHAKRISHNAN, A., PRASAD, S., SUBBANNAYYA, T., RAJU, R.,
KUMAR, M., SREENIVASAMURTHY, S. K., MARIMUTHU, A., SATHE, G. J., CHAVAN, S.,
DATTA, K. K., SUBBANNAYYA, Y., SAHU, A., YELAMANCHI, S. D., JAYARAM, S.,
RAJAGOPALAN, P., SHARMA, J., MURTHY, K. R., SYED, N., GOEL, R., KHAN, A. A.,
AHMAD, S., DEY, G., MUDGAL, K., CHATTERJEE, A., HUANG, T. C., ZHONG, J., WU, X.,
SHAW, P. G., FREED, D., ZAHARI, M. S., MUKHERJEE, K. K., SHANKAR, S.,
MAHADEVAN, A., LAM, H., MITCHELL, C. J., SHANKAR, S. K., SATISHCHANDRA, P.,
SCHROEDER, J. T., SIRDESHMUKH, R., MAITRA, A., LEACH, S. D., DRAKE, C. G.,
HALUSHKA, M. K., PRASAD, T. S., HRUBAN, R. H., KERR, C. L., BADER, G. D.,
IACOBUZIO-DONAHUE, C. A., GOWDA, H. & PANDEY, A. 2014. A draft map of the
human proteome. Nature, 509, 575-81.
KNIGHT, J. R., VLAHOV, N., GAY, D. M., RIDGWAY, R. A., FALLER, W. J., PROUD, C., MALLUCCI,
G. R., VON DER HAAR, T., SMALES, C. M., WILLIS, A. E. & SANSOM, O. J. 2021.
Rpl24(Bst) mutation suppresses colorectal cancer by promoting eEF2
phosphorylation via eEF2K. Elife, 10.
KONG, A. T., LEPREVOST, F. V., AVTONOMOV, D. M., MELLACHERUVU, D. & NESVIZHSKII, A. I.
2017. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass
spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods, 14, 513-520.
KOOS, J. A. & BASSETT, A. 2018. Genetics Home Reference: A Review. Med Ref Serv Q, 37,
292-299.
KOSKINEN, S. O. A., HEINEMEIER, K. M., OLESEN, J. L., LANGBERG, H. & KJAER, M. 2004.
Physical exercise can influence local levels of matrix metalloproteinases and their
inhibitors in tendon-related connective tissue. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96,
861-864.
LANDEN, N. X., LI, D. & STAHLE, M. 2016. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a
critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci, 73, 3861-85.
LEE, J. M., HWANG, J. W., KIM, M. J., JUNG, S. Y., KIM, K. S., AHN, E. H., MIN, K. & CHOI, Y. S.
2021. Mitochondrial Transplantation Modulates Inflammation and Apoptosis,
Alleviating Tendinopathy Both In Vivo and In Vitro. Antioxidants (Basel), 10.
LI, B. & WANG, J. H. 2011. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing: force generation
and measurement. J Tissue Viability, 20, 108-20.
LITWINIUK, M., KREJNER, A., SPEYRER, M. S., GAUTO, A. R. & GRZELA, T. 2016. Hyaluronic
Acid in Inflammation and Tissue Regeneration. Wounds, 28, 78-88.
LIU, J. Y., LUO, C. Q., YIN, Z. Q., LI, P., WANG, S. H., CHEN, J., HE, Q. Y. & ZHOU, J. D. 2016.
Downregulation of let-7b promotes COL1A1 and COL1A2 expression in dermis and
skin fibroblasts during heat wound repair. Molecular Medicine Reports, 13, 2683-
2688.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
MAFFULLI, N., MOLLER, H. D. & EVANS, C. H. 2002. Tendon healing: can it be optimised? Br J
Sports Med, 36, 315-6.
MAZZONE, M. F. & MCCUE, T. 2002. Common conditions of the achilles tendon. Am Fam
Physician, 65, 1805-10.
MYHRVOLD, S. B., BROUWER, E. F., ANDRESEN, T. K. M., RYDEVIK, K., AMUNDSEN, M.,
GRUN, W., BUTT, F., VALBERG, M., ULSTEIN, S. & HOELSBREKKEN, S. E. 2022.
Nonoperative or Surgical Treatment of Acute Achilles' Tendon Rupture. N Engl J
Med, 386, 1409-1420.
OH, S. J., ERB, H. H., HOBISCH, A., SANTER, F. R. & CULIG, Z. 2012. Sorafenib decreases
proliferation and induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells by inhibition of the
androgen receptor and Akt signaling pathways. Endocr Relat Cancer, 19, 305-19.
ONG, C. T., KHOO, Y. T., MUKHOPADHYAY, A., MASILAMANI, J., DO, D. V., LIM, I. J. & PHAN,
T. T. 2010. Comparative proteomic analysis between normal skin and keloid scar.
British Journal of Dermatology, 162, 1302-1315.
PIRES DA SILVA, J., MONCEAUX, K., GUILBERT, A., GRESSETTE, M., PIQUEREAU, J.,
NOVOTOVA, M., VENTURA-CLAPIER, R., GARNIER, A. & LEMAIRE, C. 2020. SIRT1
Protects the Heart from ER Stress-Induced Injury by Promoting eEF2K/eEF2-
Dependent Autophagy. Cells, 9.
QU, F., PINTAURO, M. P., HAUGHAN, J. E., HENNING, E. A., ESTERHAI, J. L., SCHAER, T. P.,
MAUCK, R. L. & FISHER, M. B. 2015. Repair of dense connective tissues via
biomaterial-mediated matrix reprogramming of the wound interface. Biomaterials,
39, 85-94.
REN, H., ZHAO, F., ZHANG, Q., HUANG, X. & WANG, Z. 2022. Autophagy and skin wound
healing. Burns Trauma, 10, tkac003.
ROSE, A. J., ALSTED, T. J., JENSEN, T. E., KOBBERO, J. B., MAARBJERG, S. J., JENSEN, J. &
RICHTER, E. A. 2009. A Ca(2+)-calmodulin-eEF2K-eEF2 signalling cascade, but not
AMPK, contributes to the suppression of skeletal muscle protein synthesis during
contractions. J Physiol, 587, 1547-63.
SAGNOL, S., YANG, Y., BESSIN, Y., ALLEMAND, F., HAPKOVA, I., NOTARNICOLA, C., GUICHOU,
J. F., FAURE, S., LABESSE, G. & DE SANTA BARBARA, P. 2014. Homodimerization of
RBPMS2 through a new RRM-interaction motif is necessary to control smooth
muscle plasticity. Nucleic Acids Res, 42, 10173-84.
SARASWATI, S., MARROW, S. M. W., WATCH, L. A. & YOUNG, P. P. 2019. Identification of a
pro-angiogenic functional role for FSP1-positive fibroblast subtype in wound healing.
Nat Commun, 10, 3027.
SAXENA, S., VEKARIA, H., SULLIVAN, P. G. & SEIFERT, A. W. 2019. Connective tissue
fibroblasts from highly regenerative mammals are refractory to ROS-induced cellular
senescence. Nat Commun, 10, 4400.
SCHWANHAUSSER, B., BUSSE, D., LI, N., DITTMAR, G., SCHUCHHARDT, J., WOLF, J., CHEN, W.
& SELBACH, M. 2011. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control.
Nature, 473, 337-42.
SHAH, J. M., OMAR, E., PAI, D. R. & SOOD, S. 2012. Cellular events and biomarkers of wound
healing. Indian J Plast Surg, 45, 220-8.
SHI, N., CHEN, X., LIU, R., WANG, D., SU, M., WANG, Q., HE, A. & GU, H. 2018. Eukaryotic
elongation factors 2 promotes tumor cell proliferation and correlates with poor
prognosis in ovarian cancer. Tissue Cell, 53, 53-60.
SVEDMAN, S., JUTHBERG, R., EDMAN, G. & ACKERMANN, P. W. 2018. Reduced Time to
Surgery Improves Patient-Reported Outcome After Achilles Tendon Rupture. Am J
Sports Med, 46, 2929-2934.
TCHOUKALOVA, Y. D., ZACHARIAS, S. R. C., MITCHELL, N., MADSEN, C., MYERS, C. E.,
GADALLA, D., SKINNER, J., KOPACZKA, K., GRAMIGNOLI, R. & LOTT, D. G. 2022.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Human amniotic epithelial cell transplantation improves scar remodeling in a rabbit
model of acute vocal fold injury: a pilot study. Stem Cell Res Ther, 13, 31.
TRACY, L. E., MINASIAN, R. A. & CATERSON, E. J. 2016. Extracellular Matrix and Dermal
Fibroblast Function in the Healing Wound. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 5, 119-
136.
TSUCHIYA, K. 2021. Switching from Apoptosis to Pyroptosis: Gasdermin-Elicited
Inflammation and Antitumor Immunity. Int J Mol Sci, 22.
VESCARELLI, E., PILLONI, A., DOMINICI, F., PONTECORVI, P., ANGELONI, A., POLIMENI, A.,
CECCARELLI, S. & MARCHESE, C. 2017. Autophagy activation is required for
myofibroblast differentiation during healing of oral mucosa. Journal of Clinical
Periodontology, 44, 1039-1050.
WILHELM, M., SCHLEGL, J., HAHNE, H., GHOLAMI, A. M., LIEBERENZ, M., SAVITSKI, M. M.,
ZIEGLER, E., BUTZMANN, L., GESSULAT, S., MARX, H., MATHIESON, T., LEMEER, S.,
SCHNATBAUM, K., REIMER, U., WENSCHUH, H., MOLLENHAUER, M., SLOTTA-
HUSPENINA, J., BOESE, J. H., BANTSCHEFF, M., GERSTMAIR, A., FAERBER, F. &
KUSTER, B. 2014. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature,
509, 582-7.
WONG, T., MCGRATH, J. A. & NAVSARIA, H. 2007. The role of fibroblasts in tissue
engineering and regeneration. Br J Dermatol, 156, 1149-55.
XIE, Z. Y., XIAO, Z. H. & WANG, F. F. 2018. Inhibition of autophagy reverses alcohol-induced
hepatic stellate cells activation through activation of Nrf2-Keap1-ARE signaling
pathway. Biochimie, 147, 55-62.
YANG, Y., LIN, Z., CHENG, J., DING, S., MAO, W. W., SHI, S., LIANG, B. & JIANG, L. 2020. The
roles of autophagy in osteogenic differentiation in rat ligamentum fibroblasts:
Evidence and possible implications. FASEB J, 34, 8876-8886.
YAO, Q., LIU, B. Q., LI, H., MCGARRIGLE, D., XING, B. W., ZHOU, M. T., WANG, Z., ZHANG, J. J.,
HUANG, X. Y. & GUO, L. 2014. C-terminal Src kinase (Csk)-mediated phosphorylation
of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) promotes proteolytic cleavage and nuclear
translocation of eEF2. J Biol Chem, 289, 12666-78.
ZHANG, L., WANG, K., LEI, Y., LI, Q., NICE, E. C. & HUANG, C. 2015. Redox signaling: Potential
arbitrator of autophagy and apoptosis in therapeutic response. Free Radic Biol Med,
89, 452-65.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Original Western blot image of Col1a1 in human tissue, n=18
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Original Western blot image of Col1a1 (220kDa) in primary fibroblast and fibroblast cell line:
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Original Western blot image of eef2 in human tissues, n=18
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint
Original Western blot image of LC3-I and II in primary fibroblast and fibroblast cell line:
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted December 11, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.10.519857doi: bioRxiv preprint