Auditory corticofugal neurons transmit auditory and non-auditory information during behavior
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-4.0
Abstract
Layer 5 pyramidal neurons of sensory cortices project “corticofugal” axons to myriad sub-cortical targets, thereby broadcasting high-level signals important for perception and learning. Recent studies suggest dendritic Ca 2+ spikes as key biophysical mechanisms supporting corticofugal neuron function: These long-lasting events drive burst firing, thereby initiating uniquely powerful signals to modulate sub-cortical representations and trigger learning-related plasticity. However, the behavioral relevance of corticofugal dendritic spikes is poorly understood. We shed light on this issue using 2-photon Ca 2+ imaging of auditory corticofugal dendrites as mice of either sex engage in a GO/NO-GO sound-discrimination task. Unexpectedly, only a minority of dendritic spikes were triggered by behaviorally relevant sounds under our conditions. Task related dendritic activity instead mostly followed sound cue termination and co-occurred with mice’s instrumental licking during the answer period of behavioral trials, irrespective of reward consumption. Temporally selective, optogenetic silencing of corticofugal neurons during the trial answer period impaired auditory discrimination learning. Thus, auditory corticofugal systems’ contribution to learning and plasticity may be partially non-sensory in nature. Significance Statement The auditory cortex sends a massive “feedback” projection to the inferior colliculus (IC) which controls IC neuron plasticity and some types of perceptual learning. Precisely what signals are fed back during behavior is unclear. Using multiphoton imaging of auditory cortico-collicular neurons as mice engage in a sound discrimination task, we find that activity coincides more with mice’s instrumental actions rather than sound cues. Dendritic Ca 2+ spikes and burst firing contributed to this non-auditory activity, which is notable given that dendritic spikes instruct synaptic plasticity in many other circuits. Accordingly, optogenetic silencing of corticofugal neurons during mice’s instrumental actions impaired discriminative learning. Auditory corticofugal neurons may thus transmit significant non-auditory information that contributes to learning-related plasticity.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (100)
- Burst-dependent synaptic plasticity can coordinate learning in hierarchical circuits via crossref
- Force tuning explains changes in phasic dopamine signaling during stimulus-reward learning via crossref
- Midbrain encodes sound detection behavior without auditory cortex via crossref
- Mixed representations of sound and action in the auditory midbrain via crossref
- Suite2p: beyond 10,000 neurons with standard two-photon microscopy via crossref
- Unsigned temporal difference errors in cortical L5 dendrites during learning via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094225 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1000159107 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.4062 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aan3846 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-11-04589.1993 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.023 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-11-04428.2002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.027 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.026 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aaz3136 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0735-7044.107.4.539 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.525 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.048 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.49145 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.55761 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature22324 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001392 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0712008105 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.43281 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.15441 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007079 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00112.2005 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0836-14.2015 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.46966 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-22-09500.1998 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-04-01348.2000 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.103 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.093 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1171958 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.02.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/18686 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109927 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.73289 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.006 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.48622 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10070-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature19818 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.069 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature09086 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.013 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.231 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5401-05.2006 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cne.902220206 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0502-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1971-13.2013 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.043 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1720995115 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.031 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1595-17.2018 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.72730 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.026 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj5167 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5466-08.2009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.027 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.4596 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.037 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3771-05.2006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80059-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0254-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061948 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.2484 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.59247 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fncir.2023.1210057 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature13724 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.11.013 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1112-20.2020 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.10.053 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.72240 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aav7893 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00933-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0677-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aah6066 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/eneuro.0046-22.2022 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0064-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.014 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/h0058700 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.021. via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23884-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.719 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cne.24423 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.138453 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.035 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.42974 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19981019)400:2<147::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature11601 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.036 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/255 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.52228 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.64457 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2624-20.2021 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-27T06:32:56.436451+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0