An observational study to assess effectiveness of POSSUM and P-POSSUM score for prediction of morbidity and mortality after surgery for ileal perforation
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Background: Perforative peritonitis is the most common surgical emergency. Most common perforation is seen in ileum, followed by duodenum, stomach, appendix, jejunum and colon. The methods of source control for ileal perforations include primary closure, resection, and anastomosis of small gut or diverting stoma, depending on the site and number of perforations, severity of peritonitis, and general condition of the patient. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the POSSUM and P-POSSUM score in predicting morbidity and mortality following surgery for ileal perforation. And evaluate the correlation between the physiological factors and operative findings leading to morbidity and mortality for ileal perforation. Method: The study included all cases of ileal perforation undergoing surgery. Predicted morbidity and mortality scores were calculated based on physiologic and Operatives cores using POSSUM & P-POSSUM equations. Result: A total 40 patients were included in present study. Mean POSSUM morbidity was 95.45, while mean POSSUM mortality was 69.28. Significant association was found between physiological and operative score with fair correlation. Expected morbidity and mortality determined by POSSUM score showed values significantly above the observed ones. P-POSSUM score systems was effective in predicting mortality. Conclusion: POSSUM and P-POSSUM score can be used as good stratification tool for predicting morbidity and mortality in cases of ileal perforation respectively.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (16)
- doi:10.1007/s12262-012-0609-2 via crossref
- doi:10.4103/2141-9248.121220 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02561708 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1749-7922-1-26 via crossref
- doi:10.1155/2015/351548 via crossref
- doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_256_20 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/bjs.1800511207 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bjan.2018.01.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02483010 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01979.x via crossref
- doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20164796 via crossref
- doi:10.21276/aimdr.2017.3.4.sg13 via crossref
- doi:10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2227 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.005 via crossref
- doi:10.2147/cia.s258659 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-25T06:34:03.123422+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0