SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of T2-weighted Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Purpose To develop a deep learning tool for the automatic segmentation of T2-weighted intramedullary lesions in spinal cord injury (SCI). Material and Methods This retrospective study included a cohort of SCI patients from three sites enrolled between July 2002 and February 2023. A deep learning model, SCIseg , was trained in a three-phase process involving active learning for the automatic segmentation of intramedullary SCI lesions and the spinal cord. The data consisted of T2-weighted MRI acquired using different scanner manufacturers with heterogeneous image resolutions (isotropic/anisotropic), orientations (axial/sagittal), lesion etiologies (traumatic/ischemic/hemorrhagic) and lesions spread across the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. The segmentations from the proposed model were visually and quantitatively compared with other open-source baselines. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare quantitative MRI biomarkers (lesion volume, lesion length, and maximal axial damage ratio) computed from manual lesion masks and those obtained automatically with SCIseg predictions. Results MRI data from 191 SCI patients (mean age, 48.1 years ± 17.9 [SD]; 142 males) were used for model training and evaluation. SCIseg achieved the best segmentation performance for both the cord and lesions. There was no statistically significant difference between lesion length and maximal axial damage ratio computed from manually annotated lesions and those obtained using SCIseg . Conclusion Automatic segmentation of intramedullary lesions commonly seen in SCI replaces the tedious manual annotation process and enables the extraction of relevant lesion morphometrics in large cohorts. The proposed model segments lesions across different etiologies, scanner manufacturers, and heterogeneous image resolutions. SCIseg is open-source and accessible through the Spinal Cord Toolbox. Summary Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and T2-weighted lesions in spinal cord injury on MRI scans across different treatment strategies, lesion etiologies, sites, scanner manufacturers, and heterogeneous image resolutions. Key Results An open-source, automatic method, SCIseg , was trained and evaluated on a dataset of 191 spinal cord injury patients from three sites for the segmentation of the spinal cord and T2-weighted lesions. SCIseg generalizes across traumatic and non-traumatic lesions, scanner manufacturers, and heterogeneous image resolutions, enabling the automatic extraction of lesion morphometrics in large multi-site cohorts. Quantitative MRI biomarkers, namely, lesion length and maximal axial damage ratio derived from the automatic predictions showed no statistically significant difference when compared with manual ground truth, implying reliability in SCIseg’s predictions.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (40)
- doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30138-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0270-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1545968320939569 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sc.2012.165 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/jnnp.67.5.567 via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000008318 via crossref
- doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060583 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00586-023-07560-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ana.24932 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41393-020-00561-w via crossref
- doi:10.1177/2192568217703666 via crossref
- doi:10.3174/ajnr.a5162 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0303-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ana.26281 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007642 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1545968320971787 via crossref
- doi:10.14245/ns.1938390.195 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102046 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09854-1 via crossref
- doi:10.3174/ajnr.a6020 via crossref
- doi:10.46292/sci2702-1 via crossref
- doi:10.46292/sci21-00018 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.089 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.44 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102062 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.051 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31911-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ima.22859 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sc.2017.18 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41394-019-0164-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002234 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000012643 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-25T06:33:45.511640+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0