In vivoselection for formate dehydrogenases with high efficiency and specificity towards NADP+
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Efficient regeneration of cofactors is vital for the establishment of continuous biocatalytic processes. Formate is an ideal electron donor for cofactor regeneration due to its general availability, low reduction potential, and benign byproduct (CO 2 ). However, formate dehydrogenases (FDHs) are usual specific to NAD + , such that NADPH regeneration with formate is challenging. Previous studies reported naturally occurring FDHs or engineered FDHs that accept NADP + , but these enzymes show low kinetic efficiencies and specificities. Here, we harness the power of natural selection to engineer FDH variants to simultaneously optimize three properties: kinetic efficiency with NADP + , specificity towards NADP + , and affinity towards formate. By simultaneously mutating multiple residues of FDH from Pseudomonas sp. 101, which exhibits no initial activity towards NADP + , we generate a library of >10 6 variants. We introduce this library into an E. coli strain that cannot produce NADPH. By selecting for growth with formate as sole NADPH source, we isolate several enzyme variants that support efficient NADPH regeneration. We find that the kinetically superior enzyme variant, harboring five mutations, has 5-fold higher efficiency and 13-fold higher specificity than the best enzyme previously engineered, while retaining high affinity towards formate. By using molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal the contribution of each mutation to the superior kinetics of this variant. We further determine how non-additive epistatic effects improve multiple parameters simultaneously. Our work demonstrates the capacity of in vivo selection to identify superior enzyme variants carrying multiple mutations which would be almost impossible to find using conventional screening methods.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (60)
- doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2019.05.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.07.449 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cbic.201402550 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/elsc.200900027 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.02.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1042/bcj20170377 via crossref
- doi:10.1023/a:1005610414179 via crossref
- doi:10.1042/bj20020379 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06533.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.03.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4142-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071581 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00253-015-6695-x via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10529-018-2568-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.186 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0006-291x(75)90856-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1475-2859-4-25 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00313 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1188 via crossref
- doi:10.32607/20758251-2015-7-1-60-69 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00188 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.05.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/anie.201901491 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1053-3_13 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/srep10654 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchem.1113 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/sb300037w via crossref
- doi:10.1021/sb5002399 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47376-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1053-3_7 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cbic.200800371 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1534873100 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00194 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b00389 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b01113 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.06.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aah5237 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bej.2016.10.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jp8025896 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/febs.13282 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/anie.201207842 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/pro.2876 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35033-y via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1901979116 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00131 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m311657200 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41589-020-0473-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2018.04.026 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7366-8_6 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/gku1189 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jcc.20035 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/j100142a004 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jcc.540110404 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.155 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.013 via crossref
- doi:10.1103/physreva.38.3098 via crossref
- doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-24T06:27:41.342438+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0