Selective Control of Parasitic Nematodes Using Bioactivated Nematicides
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Parasitic nematodes are a major threat to global food security, particularly as the world amasses 10 billion people amidst limited arable land. Most traditional nematicides have been banned due to poor nematode-selectivity, leaving farmers with inadequate controls. Here, we use the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to identify a family of selective imidazothiazole nematicides, called selectivins, that undergo cytochrome p450-dependent bioactivation exclusively in nematodes. At low parts-per-million concentrations, selectivins perform comparably well with commercial nematicides to control root infection by Meloidogyne incognita – the world’s most destructive plant-parasitic nematode. Tests against a wide range of phylogenetically diverse non-target systems demonstrate that selectivins are more nematode-selective than nearly all marketed nematicides. Thus, selectivins are first-in-class bioactivated nematode controls that provide efficacy as well as much-needed nematode selectivity.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (54)
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/biosci/bix010 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/epp.12050 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt.1482 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44210-5_6 via crossref
- doi:10.21307/jofnem-2020-025 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/nrm.12083 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/aab.12397 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ncomms8485 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m404370200 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000442. via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.109.6.2993 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.97.6.2674 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature06722 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.05.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.026 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/106.2.227 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/2091084a0 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0912327107 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.380 via crossref
- doi:10.4155/fmc.12.197 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq295 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31215-w via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2012.02.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.01973-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.redox.2019.101171 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.109.149922 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/ijms17020257 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2012.09.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.104.039826 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-643 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ps.5891 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-525 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.12.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r43 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.53 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/agronomy10091387 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.02.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.109.140095 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2016.03.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(98)00170-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61381-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.283 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.032 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.07.023 via crossref
- doi:10.21307/jofnem-2018-008 via crossref
- doi:10.1094/phyto-11-18-0420-r via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(02)50954-x via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00044-016-1658-z via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jlac.19616430121 via crossref
- doi:10.1134/s107042801412029x via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-24T06:27:27.956157+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0