Intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes

Pier Carlo Zorzato, Stefano Uccella, Giulia Biancotto, Mariachiara Bosco, Anna Festi, Massimo Piergiuseppe Franchi, Simone Garzon
In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023 · vol. 230(2) , pp. 185–198.e4 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.004 · PMID:37704174 · W4386649121
review OA: hybrid CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant association between intrauterine manipulator use during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and recurrence-free survival, overall survival, or positive peritoneal cytology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effects on oncologic outcomes of intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed by an expert librarian in multiple electronic databases from inception to January 31, 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies in the English language that compared oncologic outcomes (recurrence-free, cause-specific, or overall survival) between endometrial cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with vs without the use of an intrauterine manipulator. Studies comparing only peritoneal cytology status or lymphovascular space invasion were summarized for completeness. No selection criteria were applied to the study design. METHODS: Four reviewers independently reviewed studies for inclusion, assessed their risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for oncologic outcomes using the random effect model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I 2 tests. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger test. RESULTS: Out of 350 identified references, we included 2 randomized controlled trials and 12 observational studies for a total of 14 studies and 5,019 patients. The use of an intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was associated with a pooled hazard ratio for recurrence of 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.99e2.33; P.05; I 2 31%; chi square P value.22). Pooled hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.25e8.76; P.62; I 2 67%; chi square P value.08) when only randomized controlled trials were considered. Pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.65e1.76; P0.79; I 2 44%; chi square P val-ue.17). The rate of positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion did not differ using an intrauterine manipulator. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine manipulator use during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was neither significantly associated with recurrence-free and overall survival nor with positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion, but further prospective studies are needed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (53)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK