Dose-finding study of Leuplin depot for prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surge during controlled ovarian stimulation: a pilot study in intrauterine insemination treatment
article
OA: diamond
CC0
AI-generated summary
This pilot study found that a 1/4 dose of Leuplin depot effectively prevented premature LH surges during controlled ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination treatment.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The standard dose of depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) may be too much to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). The purpose of this study was to find out the minimal effective dose of Leuplin depot to prevent premature LH surge in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2007, unexplained infertile patients who were going to undergo IUI were recruited into the study. They were assigned sequentially to one of the following treatment groups. The first 50 patients received the 1/3-dose of Leuplin depot in the midluteal phase of the cycle preceding COS. If no premature LH surge occurred in the 50 patients, the study was continued with 1/4-dose of Leuplin depot in the subsequent 50 patients. Similarly, if no premature LH surge occurred with 1/4 dose, the study was continued with 1/5-dose of Leuplin depot in the following 50 patients. Ovarian stimulation was started with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) at 112.5 IU/d after downregulation, then IUI was performed 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection. RESULTS: Premature LH surge was effectively prevented with 1/3-dose and 1/4-dose of Leuplin depot. Premature LH surge occurred in three of the 50 patients (6%) in the 1/5-dose group. The patients in the 1/4-dose group received a significantly lower amount of hMG and fewer days of COS, compared with the 1/3-dose group. CONCLUSION: The 1/4 dose of Leuplin depot is the minimal effective dose to prevent premature LH surge. Further trial is worthwhile to compare the reducing dose Leuplin depot and daily low-dose leuprolide in in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Funding
- funders
- [{'doi': '10.13039/501100004319', 'name': 'Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital', 'awards': ['SKH-8302-101-DR-15']}]
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility 1998
- Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility 1998
- Clinical outcome of one-third-dose depot triptorelin is the same as half-dose depot triptorelin in the long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation. 2012
- Half-dose, long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Diphereline) is comparable with daily injections of short-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Suprefact) in IVF/ICSI cycles. 2010
References (36)
- Clinical outcome of one-third-dose depot triptorelin is the same as half-dose depot triptorelin in the long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation. via crossref
- Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility via openalex
- Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility via crossref
- Half-dose, long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Diphereline) is comparable with daily injections of short-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Suprefact) in IVF/ICSI cycles. via crossref
- doi:10.5114/aoms.2010.19306 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60066-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00608-1 via openalex
- W6679783912 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.029 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136090 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60435-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55430-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04002-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137832 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dem054 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dem223 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002808.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60435-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dem054 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135817 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00608-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dem223 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55430-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.029 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136090 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137832 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04002-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.167 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57495-0 via crossref
- doi:10.4103/0974-1208.97785 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60066-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57495-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135817 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.167 via openalex
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-23T06:34:54.619706+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:08:44.784461+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK