A multicentre point prevalence survey of patterns and quality of antibiotic prescribing in Indonesian hospitals
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Synopsis Background Antibiotic misuse and overuse are a major driver of antimicrobial resistance, but systematic data in Indonesia are scarce. Objectives To evaluate patterns and quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing in six acute-care hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. Methods We conducted a hospital-wide point prevalence survey (PPS) between March and August 2019, using Global-PPS and WHO-PPS protocols. The analysis focused on antibacterials for systemic use (antibiotics). Results Of 1602 inpatients, 993 (62.0%) received ≥1 antimicrobials. Of 1666 antimicrobial prescriptions, 1273 (76.4%) were antibiotics. Most common reasons for prescribing were pneumonia (27.7%), skin and soft tissue infections (8.3%), gastrointestinal prophylaxis (7.9%), and gastrointestinal infections (5.4%). The most common indication was community-acquired infection (42.6%), followed by surgical prophylaxis (22.6%), hospital-acquired infection (18.5%), medical prophylaxis (9.6%), unknown (4.6%) and other indications (2.1%). The most prescribed antibiotic classes were third-generation cephalosporins (44.3%), fluoroquinolones (13.5%), carbapenems (7.4%), penicillins with B-lactamase inhibitor (6.8%) and aminoglycosides (6.0%). According to the WHO AWaRe classification, Watch antibiotics accounted for 67.4%, followed by 28.0% Access, 2.4% Reserve, and 2.2% Unclassified. Reason for prescribing, stop/review date and planned duration were poorly documented. Hospital antibiotic guidelines were not available for 28.1% of prescriptions, and guideline compliance was 52.2% (478/915). Parenteral administration was high (85.1%). Targeted (non-empirical) prescriptions comprised 8.1% (44/542) for community-acquired infections and 26.8% (63/235) for hospital-acquired infections. Conclusions Our data indicate a high rate of parenteral, empiric use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Indonesian hospitals, coupled with poor documentation and guideline adherence. The findings suggest important areas for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (17)
- doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70780-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17907-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1717295115 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkx260 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62004-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkv418 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30186-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30332-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.040 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.05.014 via crossref
- doi:10.20473/ijtid.v4i4.222 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/14787210.2019.1581063 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2014.07.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.020 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jac/dkq430 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00065-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30724-7 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-23T06:34:51.765347+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0