Re-Engineering P(V) Chemical Warfare: Harnessing Stereogenic Phosphorus-Azoles for Protein Ligand Discovery In Vivo
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Full text
56,214 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 7 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
P(V) electrophiles such as tabun, sarin, soman, and VX are notorious for their lethality and nefarious
intent in chemical warfare. Consequently, these deadly agents have largely been abandoned except for
fluorophosphonate tool compounds that were repurposed for activity-based protein profiling (ABPP).
Stereogenic P(V) centers hold strong potential as enabling scaffolds for synthetic and medicinal chemistry
due to their inherent chirality and favorable bioavailability but are limited principally by potent off-target
toxicity. Herein, we developed phosphorus-azole exchange (PhAzE) chemistry for tuning reactivity of the
stereogenic P(V) pharmacophore to increase selectivity and mitigate off-target activity in cells and animal
models. We demonstrate ultrapotent (300 pM in cells, 1 mg kg
-1 in mice), enantioselective, covalent
inhibition of the serine hydrolases DPP8/9 with PhAzE ligand in cells and in vivo; no overt toxicity was
detected in mice treated daily over the course of a week. These finding show the P(V) electrophile can
potently and enantioselectively engage a target protein without a deadly outcome, charting a path towards
broader adoption of these agents in laboratory and industry settings.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Introduction
Among the chemical warfare agents employed throughout modern history, the organophosphorus
compounds VX, tabun, sarin, and soman are notorious for their potent lethality. As P(V) electrophiles,
these molecules can react covalently with biological targets, most notably enzymes involved in
neurotransmission (Figure 1A).1 Sarin was stockpiled in large quantities in Germany during World War II,
though it was never used on the European battlefield. Efforts to understand its deadly mechanism revealed
that sarin, like tabun and soman, irreversibly inhibits acetylcholinesterase, the enzyme responsible for
breaking down the neurotransmitter acetylcholine.2-3 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition leads to uncontrolled
accumulation of acetylcholine at neuromuscular junctions and synapses, resulting in muscle paralysis,
convulsions, respiratory failure, and ultimately death. The widespread condemnation of nerve agents
culminated in global banning of the development, production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons.4-
5 This tragic legacy has largely stigmatized this compound class, precluding its further exploration for
drug development despite potent in vivo activity.
While ill-suited for medicine because of toxicity, the P(V) electrophile has been successfully
deployed for academic investigations. Fluorophosphonates covalently modify the catalytic serine in active
sites of most, if not all, metabolic serine hydrolases that when coupled to proteomic readouts can facilitate
activity-based protein profiling (ABPP, Figure S1A).6-8 This functional proteomic method has enabled
basic discoveries in serine hydrolase biology, which led to inhibitor and drug development (Figure S1A).9-
19 Moreover, the success of fluorophosphonates was foundational for exploring additional electrophiles
for covalent targeting of reactive cysteines and less nucleophilic sites harboring, for example, a tyrosine,
lysine or histidine (Figure S1A).
20-27 The adoption of covalency into mainstream drug discovery
campaigns had produced precision therapeutics such as ibrutinib, sotorasib, and others that exploit
strategically located or mutated residues for selective and durable target protein engagement.
28 20, 29 More
recently, stereoselective labeling with electrophilic compounds offers a promising strategy to improve
proteome-wide selectivity (Figure S1B).24, 30-37 However, because the electrophiles themselves are achiral,
stereoselectivity relies on bulky, chiral substituents near the reactive site.35-36, 38 Rare examples like a
chiral sulfonimidoyl fluoride demonstrate that chirality at the electrophilic center alone can drive
enantioselective protein modification.
39,40
P(V) electrophiles are uniquely positioned to enable enantioselective covalent modification of
biomolecules, offering a direct strategy to interrogate and exploit chirality at the electrophilic center
(Figure S1C).
41 Only a few studies have explored stereoselective P(V)-based reactivity in complex
proteomes. Notable examples include sulphostin, a chiral natural product that inhibits dipeptidyl
peptidases 4, 8 and 9 (DPP4/8/9)
42-45 and the antiviral pro-drug (S)-remdesivir, which is more potent than
the (R)-stereoisomer, likely due to CES1-mediated stereoselective hydrolysis (Figure S1C).46-48 Yet, both
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
molecules contain multiple stereocenters, limiting mechanistic understanding on whether the P(V)
electrophile alone drives stereoselectivity. The use of P(V) chirality has been demonstrated in part through
pioneering work in the development of chiral phosphorothioate “ψ -reagents” to synthesize antisense
oligonucleotides (ASOs) with chiral backbones,49-54 nucleoside thioisosteres,55 and chemoselective
phosphorylation reagents for alcohols56 and serine residues.57 These studies underscore the value of chiral
P(V) centers in drug development. Phosphorothioate chemistry was recently extended to include
tryptoline-based covalent ligands targeting various nucleophilic residues; however, these reagents were
racemic at the P(V) center.58
Herein, we disclose the development of phosphorus-azole exchange (PhAzE) chemistry as a
potent and safe stereogenic P(V) electrophile for enantioselective targeting of enzymes in vivo. The
selection of an azole leaving group mitigated toxicity inherent to phosphoryl-fluorides while facilitating
the design of picomolar inhibitors that enantioselectively engaged serine hydrolases DPP8/9 in the brain
of treated mice. Importantly, daily dosing of the DPP8/9 PhAzE molecule over the course of a week did
not produce overt toxicity or engagement with acetylcholinesterase as measured by quantitative
chemoproteomics. PhAzE chemistry bridges the gap to therapeutics using stereogenic P(V) electrophiles
and repositions this toxic pharmacophore for synthetic and therapeutic investigations.
Figure 1. Development of PhAzE as a stereogenic P(V) electrophile for therapeutic investigation.
Schematic of re-engineering phosphoryl-fluoride chemistry (A) to develop highly tunable enantioselective
Phosphorus-Azole Exchange (PhAzE) chemistry (B).
Results
Initially, we tested whether enantiomers of fluorophosphonate (FP)-alkyne could be utilized for
enantioselective ABPP. These studies would assess the extent to which a less sterically hindered
stereogenic P(V) electrophile could facilitate enantioselective recognition of enzyme active sites. THP1
cells were treated with 20 µM (-)- or (+)-FP-alkyne followed by cell lysis, copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne
cycloaddition (CuAAC)
59-63 conjugation of biotin-azide, avidin enrichment, and tandem mass tag (TMT)-
based quantitative ABPP (See Supporting Information).64-65 Despite detection of 40+ family members,
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
only a single serine hydrolase displayed enantioselective binding as defined by a >50% difference in
enrichment signals between (-) and (+) enantiomers ((+)/(-) ratio of >1 or <0.5; Figure 2B and S2A).
Next, we assessed the effects of rigidifying the electrophile using a previously reported cyclic
phosphoryl-fluoride strategy
66 to incorporate recognition elements akin to ψ -reagents49. After purification
of enantiomers, we treated THP1 cells with (-)- or (+)-RJG-2273 and observed substantially enhanced
enantioselective ABPP labeling (9 or 4 serine hydrolases displaying enantioselective binding,
respectively; Figure 2B and S2B).
While the cyclic phosphoryl-fluoride strategy improved enantioselectivity, this probe retained the
potent acetylcholinesterase (ACHE) inhibitory activity inherent to P(V) electrophiles (Figure 2C and
S3E).
66-67 We considered alternative leaving groups (LGs) as a means to temper the electrophile and
mitigate covalent binding to ACHE. Azoles are effective and tunable nucleofuges to activate carbonyl15-17
and sulfonyl electrophiles for reactions at protein sites.20, 24, 68-79 Initially, we installed a 1,2,4-triazole in
place of fluoride to produce RJG-2259A for mediating protein reactions via phosphorus-azole exchange
(PhAzE) chemistry. We purified enantiomers and tested activity of the enantiomeric probes in THP1
monocytes and observed covalent binding to >20 serine hydrolases (Figure 2B), but negligible
enantioselectivity (Figure S2C). Replacing the triazole with a purine and purifying the resulting
enantiomers produced alkynyl probes (-)- and (+)RJG-3241, the latter of which enantioselectively
enriched 3 serine hydrolases in THP1 cells (Figure 2B and S2D).
Next, we treated live Neuro-2A (N2a) mouse neuroblastoma cells with varying concentrations of
(-)- or (+)-FP-Alkyne, -RJG-2273, -RJG-2259A, or -RJG-3241 to further assess enantioselective serine
hydrolase binding and ACHE off-target activity in living cells. Importantly, PhAzE probes RJG-2259A
and -3241 exhibited reduced inhibitory activity towards ACHE compared with phosphoryl-fluorides
(Figure 2C and S3E). As expected, (-)- and (+)FP-Alkyne completely inhibited ACHE activity at 1 µM in
live N2a cells (Figure 2C and S3E). Akin to the LC-MS/MS data, we found (-)RJG-2273 was a more
potent inhibitor of ACHE biochemical activity compared to (+)RJG-2273, whereas both enantiomers of
RJG-2259A and -3241 were weak inhibitors of ACHE (Figure 2B and S3E). In contrast, (+)RJG-2273
was a more potent inhibitor of FAAH biochemical activity, supporting the importance of P(V) chirality
for recognition and covalent inactivation of serine hydrolases (Figure 2C and S3E).
We also observed subnanomolar, enantioselective inhibition of FAAH with (-)FP-Alkyne
compared to the (+)FP-Alkyne (Figure 2C). We observed comparable inhibition of FAAH biochemical
activity (Figure 2C and S3E) and fluorophosphonate-rhodamine (FP-Rh) labeling (Figure S3C) with (-)-
and (+)RJG-2259A, suggesting RJG-2259A is a covalent inhibitor of serine hydrolases. In contrast,
(+)RJG-3241 was a ~10-fold more potent dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) inhibitor compared to (-)RJG-3241,
and we observed negligible inhibition with FP-Alkyne, RJG-2273, and RJG-2259A, thus highlighting the
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
tunability of the PhAzE scaffold for enantioselective reactivity and specificity. Notably, several proteins
were enantioselectively inhibited by (-)- or (+)FP-Alkyne and -RJG-2273 at lower concentrations as
observed by gel-based competitive ABPP with FP-Rh (Figure S3A,B).
Figure 2. Enantioselective targeting of serine hydrolases with PhAzE. (A) Drawings of (-)- or (+)FP-
Alkyne, RJG-2273, RJG-2259A, and RJG-3241 with respective specific rotation values or crystal
structures. (B) Bar graph showing total and >50% enantioselectively enriched serine hydrolases from live
THP1 monocytes treated with 20 µM ( -)- or (+)-enantiomers. Data is representative of three independent
biological replicates See Supporting Information Figure 2 for complete graph of enriched serine
hydrolases. (C) Table of IC50 values of derived from biochemical assays. Live N2a cells were treated with
respective enantiomers of compounds for 4 hours at 37 °C, then lysate was used to perform
acetylcholinesterase (ACHE), fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)
biochemical assays. See Supporting Information for experimental details.
To initiate development of PhAzE ligands, we envisaged a structure-activity relationship (SAR)
that would explore N-substitutions and azole LGs capable of potent inhibition of diverse serine hydrolase
targets. The sp3-rich cyclopropyl moiety80 was installed to produced N-cyclopropyl or N-
cyclopropylmethyl analogs RJG-3130-1 and -3045, respectively (Figure 3A). We treated live N2a cells
with RJG-2273, RJG-3130-1, or RJG-3045 (1 µM compounds) followed by cell lysis, labeling of
proteomes with FP-biotin, and TMT-based quantitative ABPP to assess inhibitory activity against the
serine hydrolase family.6 FP-biotin labeled proteins were enriched by avidin chromatography, multiplexed
using TMT, and quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, see
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supporting Information for additional details).64-65 Phosphoryl-fluoride molecule RJG-2273 inhibited
ACHE, whereas no inhibition was observed with PhAzE compounds RJG-3130-1 or RJG-3045 (Figure
3B). Both RJG-3130-1 or RJG-3045 showed comparable inhibitory activity against DPP8, APEH, and
DPP9 (competition ratio or CR <0.5, 50% inactivation; Figure 3B and Figure S4). A dose response study
in live N2a cells revealed RJG-3130-1 was about a 10-fold more potent inhibitor of DPPs and APEH
compared to RJG-3045 (IC50 ≈ 8.5 nM for DPPs and APEH, Figure 3C, D and Figure S5).
RJG-3130-1 was selected for further development given its superior activity against serine
peptidases. We synthesized several PhAzE molecules based on the RJG-3130 scaffold but further
diversified by various azole LGs. PhAzE ligands were tested directly in live N2a cells to assess serine
hydrolase inactivation as determined by FP-Rh-mediated, gel-based competitive ABPP and blockade of
biochemical activity using substrate assays (1-1000 nM, 4 hours; Figure S6 and S7). We found RJG-3130-
9 was a subnanomolar inhibitor of DPP probe labeling with apparent selectivity for DPPs over APEH
compared to RJG-3130-8; neither compound showed activity towards ACHE (Figure S7). Compared with
existing APEH (AA74-1
15) and DPP8/9 (talabostat81-83) inhibitors, RJG-3130-9 was clearly a scaffold
more optimized for DPP inactivation (Figure 3E and S7B). Note that two isomers of RJG-3130-9 were
isolated after purification; the first isomer, presumed to be the N7-regioisomer, degraded quickly and was
therefore not tested (Figure S8).
Widening the dose range revealed RJG-3130-9 is a picomolar inhibitor (~300 pM) of the ~100
kDa band matching the molecular weight of DPP8/9 in live cells (Figure 3E and S9A,B). Considering the
existence of at least seven known DPPs
83-84, we next performed TMT-based competitive ABPP to assess
DPP and serine hydrolase family-wide selectivity of compounds. Treatment of N2a cells with RJG-3130-
9 resulted in significant blockade of DPP8 and 9 probe labeling across all concentrations tested (1 – 1000
nM, Figure 3F and S10B-E). Off-target activity (e.g., APEH, ACOT2, CES) of RJG-3130-9 was only
observed at higher concentrations and absent at lower concentrations that retained potent DPP8/9
inactivation (>50% blockade at 1 nM RJG-3130-9, Figure S10E). Notably, RJG-3130-9 was able to
achieve a similar degree of DPP8 and 9 inhibition at a 1000X lower concentration compared to talabostat
in live cells (Figure 3G).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 3. Developing PhAzE chiral ligands for ultrapotent enzyme inactivation. ( A) Phosphoryl-
fluoride molecule RJG-2273 and non-alkynyl ligands RJG-3130-1 and RJG-3045. ( B) Graph of inhibited
proteins quantified using Tandem Mass-Tag (TMT) LC-MS/MS. Live N2a cells were treated with 1µM
RJG-2273, RJG-3130-1, or RJG-3045. The red dashed box highlights inhibition of acetylcholinesterase
(ACHE) with RJG-2273, but not PhAzE ligands. Data is representative of three independent biological
replicates. See Supporting Information Figure S4 for complete list of serine hydrolases. ( C) SDS-PAGE
based competition experiment using FP-Rh as a probe and a dose response of PhAzE ligands in live N2a
cells. See Supporting Information Figure 5 for full length gel. ( D) Graph of dose response curves derived
from dividing raw fluorescence values of treatments over vehicle from Figure 3C. ( E) Drawing of lead
DPP inhibitor RJG-3130-9 and a table of IC
50 values for APEH and DPPs obtained from dose response
curves derived from dividing raw fluorescence values of treatments over vehicle and biochemical assays
(See Supporting Information Figure 9 for full length gel and graphs). ( F) Dose response curves of
inhibited proteins derived from competition ratios using TMT abundances, e.g. , competition ratio (3130-
9/V ehicle), of proteins inhibited by RJG-3130-9 in live THP1 monocytes. (G) Graph comparing inhibition
of DPP8 and 9, but not DPPs 2/7, 3, PREP, or PRCP, with 1 µM talabostat or 1 nM RJG-3130-9. %
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Inhibition was calculated using the competition ratio (CR) of (compound / vehicle). See Supporting
Information Figure 9 for volcano plots.
Next, we investigated chiral purification to determine whether PhAzE ligands display
enantioselective binding activity. We initiated efforts with chiral purification of RJG-3130-1 to test if the
RJG-3130 scaffold was advantageous compared to alkynyl probe RJG-2259A (Figure 2). Although
enantiomeric excess (e.e.) was >98% after chiral purification, (-)- and (+)RJG-3130-1 began to racemize
during concentration to dryness (Figure 4A and S11A,B). We attempted chiral purification of RJG-3130-3
containing an imidazole LG that is more basic and presumably more stable because of reduced
electrophilicity (Figure S6B); however, almost complete racemization occurred upon concentration
(Figure 4A and S11C,D). RJG-3130-9, which is modified with a bulkier purine LG, was readily purified
by chiral supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and retained e.e. after concentrating to dryness (Figure
4A and S11E,F). We solved the crystal structure of (+)RJG-3130-9 by microcrystal electron diffraction
(microED) and observed (S)-configuration at the P(V) electrophile and the N9-substituted regioisomer
(Figure 4B). In addition, the N20 nitrogen is directed at the benzene ring at an angle of 124°, and N20 is
~2.8 Å from the bond between carbons C5-C6 and ~3.6 Å from C5, which is within range of a n –
π *
interaction and is near the summed van der Waals radii of 3.44 Å between N and C (Figure 4B).85-86
We analyzed inhibition of DPPs with (-)- or (+)RJG-3130-9 in THP1 soluble lysate initially by
gel-based competitive ABPP. (+)RJG-3130-9 displayed ultrapotent, time-dependent blockade of DPP
probe labeling, supporting an irreversible covalent inactivation mechanism (Figure S12A, B). We
compared inhibitory activity of (-)- and (+)RJG-3130-9 at 1 nM and found initial evidence for
enantioselectivity at all time points tested (Figure S12C). Next, we evaluated whether the enantioselective
blockade of probe labeling translated into DPP biochemical inactivation. (+)RJG-3130-9 displayed dose
and time-dependent inhibition of DPPs achieving an estimated potency value (IC
50) of 160 pM (4-hour
treatment). (-)RJG-3130-9, in contrast, exhibited moderately potent inhibition with a ~7-15-fold reduction
in potency across the different treatment times tested (Figure S12D-F).
Next, we treated THP1 cells with (-)- or (+)RJG-3130-9 at varying concentrations to test whether
the observed enantioselective activity against DPPs in vitro was recapitulated in live cells. Akin to in vitro
findings, we detected >50% inhibition of DPP8/9 with (+)RJG-3130-9 compared to <25% inhibition with
(-)RJG-3130-9 at 1 nM as measured by TMT-based competitive ABPP (Figure 4C and S13D, E).
Additional DPPs identified were not significantly inhibited at 1 nM (Figure 4C). At higher concentrations
of (-)- and (+)RJG-3130-9, we observed PREP, CES1, and CES2 off-target activity, which was not
enantioselective and largely eliminated at lower concentrations where (+)RJG-3130-9 retained potent
DPP8/9 blockade (Figure 4C, S13C,F,G).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Given the promising cellular activity of PhAzE chiral ligands, we pursued assessment of in vivo
activity with (-) and (+)RJG-3130-9. To the best of our knowledge, enantioselective covalent ligands
published to date and stereogenic P(V) electrophiles – excluding nefarious intent with fluorophosphonates
– have not been tested for enantioselective covalent modification of proteins in vivo. Mice were treated
with vehicle, (-)-, or (+)RJG-3130-9 for 4 hours (1 mg/kg) or 7 days (10 or 1 mg/kg). Tissue was
harvested and samples were multiplexed for quantitation of protein inhibition after 4 hours or 7 days of
treatment via 6- or 16-plex TMT-based competitive ABPP, respectively.
Strikingly, we discovered only DPP8/9 were significantly inhibited by >50% in the brains of
(+)RJG-3130-9-treated mice, whereas negligible inhibition was observed with (-)RJG-3130-9 across the
48 serine hydrolases quantified (Figure 4D and S14). These findings support the ability of PhAzE ligands
to cross the blood-brain barrier and enantioselectively engage target proteins. Importantly, minimal-to-no
ACHE inhibition was observed after acute (4 hours) or chronic dosing consisting of a 7-day treatment
regime with 1 or 10 mg/kg (-)- or (+)RJG-3130-9 (Figure 4D,F). We did not observe changes in body
weight of mice treated with RJG-3130-9 enantiomers, providing initial evidence of a promising safety
profile for PhAzE in vivo (Figure 4E and S15). Finally, we compared the competition binding profile of
10 and 1 mg/kg (-)- or (+)RJG-3130-9 after 7 days of treatment. At the higher dose (10 mg/kg), we
detected only APEH and BCHE as additional competed targets of (+)RJG-3130-9 (Figure 4F and S16A).
At lower concentrations (1 mg/kg), DPP8/9 remained the only significantly and enantioselectively
competed targets of (+)RJG-3130-9 (>50% competition, Figure 4F and S16B).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 4. Enantioselective targeting of proteins in vivo with brain-penetrant PhAzE ligands. ( A)
RJG-3130-1, -3, and -9 were synthesized as racemates and respective enantiomers purified by
supercritical fluid chromatography. Enantiomers of RJG-3130-1 and -3 isomerized upon concentration,
whereas RJG-3130-9 retained enantiomeric excess (e.e.). (B) Drawing of (S)-(+)RJG-3130-9 and a crystal
structure characterized by microED. The distance between N 4 and C5 is 3.59 Å (black dashed line) and
N4 and the bond between C5 and C6 is 2.89 Å (red dashed line). ( C) Bar graph representing DPPs
identified in a 16-plex TMT LC-MS/MS experiment using samples from live THP1 monocytes treated
with vehicle or 1 nM (-)- or (+)RJG-3130-9. See Supporting Information Figure 13 for full dose response
graphs. Data is representative of three independent biological replicates. ( D) Bar graph of serine
hydrolases enriched from brain tissue of mice treated with vehicle or 1 mg/kg of ( -)- or (+ )RJG-3130-9
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
for 4 hours. Samples were combined with TMT 6-plex and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. See Supporting
Information Figure 14 for complete graph of enriched serine hydrolases. Data is representative of three
independent biological replicates. ( E) Average weights of mice over a seven-day treatment with vehicle,
10 or 1 mg/kg (-)RJG-3130-9, or 10 or 1 mg/kg (+)RJG-3130-9. See Supporting Information Figure 15
for additional graphs. ( F) Bar graph of serine hydrolases enriched from brain tissue of mice treated with
vehicle, 10 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg of ( -)- or ( +)RJG-3130-9 for 7 days. Samples were combined with TMT
16-plex and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Data is representative of three independent biological replicates.
See Supporting Information Figure 16 for complete graph of enriched serine hydrolases.
Discussion
Despite their utility in chemical biology, fluorophosphonates and related P(V) electrophiles
remain challenging to deploy more broadly due to their inherent toxicity and origins as lethal nerve
agents, leaving no clear path for translational applications. If toxicity could be mitigated, stereogenic P(V)
hubs would serve as enabling starting points for synthetic organic chemistry and drug discovery because
of their potent bioavailability and inherent chirality. The latter feature is highly desirable for drug
development
30-31, 49 but often relies on bulky chiral substitutions adjacent or distal to achiral
electrophiles,34-39, 58, 87 with only a few examples of chirality at the electrophile.40 Here, we developed a
stereogenic P(V) electrophile dubbed PhAzE for safe and enantioselective protein inactivation in vivo,
repositioning these agents from deadly poisons to valuable leads for therapeutic discovery.
We discovered that chiral phosphoryl-fluorides including FP-based agents could achieve
enantioselective targeting of serine hydrolases but largely retained potent ACHE binding activity (Figure
2). The switch from an acyclic
6 to cyclic P(V) electrophile66 improved enantioselectivity and reduced
ACHE inactivation (Figure 2C and S3E). These promising findings along with the relative ease for
accessing the tunable and constrained stereogenic P(V) electrophile in RJG-2273 prompted development
of PhAzE analogs bearing azole LGs. Azoles are effective LGs for tunable activation of electrophilic
protein modification
17-20, 24, 68, 88-93 providing a testable path to reduce toxicity of the P(V) electrophile by
selectivity optimization. We tested this hypothesis by synthesizing stereogenic PhAzE probes and
discovered that the purine azole mitigated ACHE off-target activity while retaining sufficient
enantioselective binding activity for downstream ligand discovery efforts (Figure 2C, S2, and S3).
The initial PhAzE design using a triazole LG ((-)- and (+)RJG-2259A) showed cellular activity
but low enantioselectivity, prompting exploration of additional azoles. The natural metabolite purine
emerged as an effective LG for enantioselective protein modification. We speculate that the bulkier nature
of purines compared with the triazole could be contributing to improved enantioselectivity; future studies
expanding on the SAR of PhAzE will further support this hypothesis. Nonetheless, we were encouraged
to see a significant improvement in enantioselectively enriched serine hydrolases and differential, potent
inhibition of DPP biochemical activity with RJG-3241 that was not observed with the phosphoryl-fluoride
probes FP-Alkyne or RJG-2273 (Figure 2C and S3E).
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Given the enantioselective activity of RJG-3241, we transitioned from probe to ligand
optimization to assess whether PhAzE could achieve enantioselective inactivation across the serine
hydrolase superfamily. Our SAR campaign characterized RJG-3130-9 as a picomolar DPP8/9 inhibitor
with good selectivity over APEH and no inhibition of ACHE in live cells (Figure 3E, S7 and S9).
Comparison of RJG-3130-9 with the existing DPP8/9 inhibitor talabostat revealed the PhAzE ligand
could achieve similar target engagement at ~1,000-fold lower concentrations than this clinical candidate
(Figure 3G).
Although chiral purification of phosphoryl-fluorides was straightforward, we had to overcome
several challenges with chiral purification of PhAzE. Partial or complete racemization of RJG-3130-1
(1,2,4-triazole LG) or RJG-3130-3 (imidazole LG) was observed upon concentration of fractions after
chiral purification, respectively, a surprising result given the relative ease in purifying enantiomers of
PhAzE probe RJG-2259A (Figure 2). Ultimately, we observed that (-) and (+)RJG-3130-9 retained >99%
e.e. after concentration; these chiral ligands exhibited time-dependent, enantioselective inhibition of
DPP8/9 in THP1 monocytes and soluble lysate (Figure 4C and S12, respectively). Crystallography
revealed (+)RJG-3130-9 exists in a (S)-configuration, the purine is substituted at N9, and this regioisomer
is stabilized by an intramolecular n –
π interaction (Figure 4B).86 Similar to enantioselective enrichment
of serine hydrolases with (+)RJG-3241, (+)RJG-3130-9 enantioselectively inhibited DPP8 and 9 by
>50% compared to negligible inhibition with (-)RJG-3130-9 at the same concentration (1 nM compounds,
Figure 4C and S13).
Finally, we demonstrated covalent and enantioselective inhibition in vivo with a chiral P(V)
electrophile. The DPP8/9 selectivity and enantioselectivity of (+)RJG-3130-9 detected in cells was
recapitulated in brain proteomes from treated mice. Specifically, (+)RJG-3130-9 (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal
or i.p.) inhibited FP-biotin probe labeling of DPP8/9 by >50% with minimal to no inhibition of the >40
serine hydrolases detected in brain. Notably, ACHE was not inhibited in mice treated under acute (4
hours) and more chronic exposure (7 days) at 1 or 10 mg/kg i.p. treatment (Figure 4D,F , S14, and S16).
We did not detect overt changes in the weight of mice in any PhAzE treatment group (Figure 4E and
S15). The lack of ACHE inhibitory activity combined with stable body weight under prolonged treatment
provides early but critical evidence of in vivo safety for the PhAzE compound class. These findings
represent, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of enantioselective inhibition of proteins in vivo
with a P(V) electrophile that was not deadly.
By extension, the improved safety profile of PhAzE chemistry paves the way for designing
stereogenic PhAzE molecules that are readily available for synthetic organic chemistry. The availability
of phosphoryl-chlorides is lacking compared to sulfonyl-chloride congeners used for various synthetic
chemistry applications including the synthesis of sulfonyl-fluorides that are now widely used in synthetic
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
and medicinal chemistry.94 Phosphorus-fluoride exchange (PFEx) click chemistry was recently published
as a versatile and efficient P(V) electrophilic hub for synthesizing phosphoryl moieties.66 Synthesis of
PFEx molecules requires precautions such as harsh quenching conditions and plasticware when using
fluorides that are toxic and known to etch/damage glassware, respectively.95 Similar to results we
presented above, PFEx molecules are potent inhibitors of ACHE activity that require scientists to take
precautions to prevent accidental exposure,
66 thus limiting their potential for commercial availability and
general accessibility. We envision that PhAzE chemistry presented herein has the potential to be translated
to synthetic organic chemistry applications with minimal-to-no additional requirements to achieve
chemical transformations similar to PFEx.66
Conclusions
In summary, we re-engineered fluorophosphonates by substituting the fluoride for azole leaving groups to
produce potent, enantioselective, and in vivo-active PhAzE ligands for covalent ligand and potential
therapeutic discovery. We optimized PhAzE to achieve picomolar and enantioselective inhibition of serine
hydrolases in live cells. Moreover, (S)-(+)RJG-3130-9 enantioselectively inhibited DPP8/9 in vivo,
marking these findings as, to the best of our knowledge, the first disclosure of enantioselective and non-
deadly covalent inhibition in vivo with a P(V) electrophile.
Acknowledgements
We thank all members of the Hsu lab for review of this manuscript. We thank Peimin Fan and Yonghong
Li (Pharmaron Inc.) for small molecule synthesis, chiral purification, and microED.
Contributions
R.J.G. and K.-L.H conceived the study. R.J.G. synthesized and characterized all PhAzE compounds, as
well as RJG-2273, and supervised synthesis and characterization of FP-biotin and chiral compounds.
R.J.G. performed all experiments including tissue culture and cellular treatments, live animal treatments
and tissue harvesting, biochemical assays, gel-ABPP, LC-MS/MS ABPP to generate proteomic data, and
analysis of proteomic data. M.L.W. and O.L.M. designed the biotin enrichment protocol and LC-MS/MS
methods. S.V . performed X-ray crystallography. K.-L.H. supervised the study. All authors edited and
approved the paper.
Competing Interests
K.-L.H. is a founder and scientific advisory board member of Hyku Biosciences. A patent application has
been filed on the work presented in this manuscript.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
References
(1) Labaška, M.; Gál, M.; Mackuľ ak, T.; et al. Neutralizing the threat: A comprehensive review of
chemical warfare agent decontamination strategies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12 (6), 114243.
(2) Everts, S. The Nazi origins of deadly nerve gases. C&EN Global Enterprise 2016, 94 (41), 26-28.
(3) V oros, C.; Dias, J.; Timperley, C. M.; et al. The risk associated with organophosphorus nerve agents:
from their discovery to their unavoidable threat, current medical countermeasures and perspectives.
Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2024, 395, 110973.
(4) History, Looking back helps us look forward, OPCW. https://www.opcw.org/about-us/history
(accessed 12th September 2025).
(5) Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
W eapons and on their Destruction, OPCW (n.d.). https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention
(accessed.
(6) Liu, Y .; Patricelli, M. P.; Cravatt, B. F. Activity-based protein profiling: The serine hydrolases. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96 (26), 14694-14699.
(7) Long, J. Z.; Cravatt, B. F. The Metabolic Serine Hydrolases and Their Functions in Mammalian
Physiology and Disease. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111 (10), 6022-6063.
(8) Bachovchin, D. A.; Koblan, L. W.; Wu, W .; et al. A high-throughput, multiplexed assay for
superfamily-wide profiling of enzyme activity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10 (8), 656-663.
(9) Egmond, N. v.; Straub, V . M.; Stelt, M. v. d. Targeting Endocannabinoid Signaling: FAAH and MAG
Lipase Inhibitors. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2021, 61 (1), 441-463.
(10) Long, J. Z.; Li, W.; Booker, L.; et al. Selective blockade of 2-arachidonoylglycerol hydrolysis
produces cannabinoid behavioral effects. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5 (1), 37-44.
(11) Blankman, J. L.; Cravatt, B. F. Chemical Probes of Endocannabinoid Metabolism. Pharmacol. Rev.
2013, 65 (2), 849-871.
(12) Niphakis, M. J.; Cognetta, A. B.; Chang, J. W.; et al. Evaluation of NHS Carbamates as a Potent and
Selective Class of Endocannabinoid Hydrolase Inhibitors. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, 4 (9), 1322-1332.
(13) Chang, Jae W.; Niphakis, Micah J.; Lum, Kenneth M.; et al. Highly Selective Inhibitors of
Monoacylglycerol Lipase Bearing a Reactive Group that Is Bioisosteric with Endocannabinoid Substrates.
Chem. Biol. 2012, 19 (5), 579-588.
(14) Cisar, J. S.; Weber, O. D.; Clapper, J. R.; et al. Identification of ABX-1431, a Selective Inhibitor of
Monoacylglycerol Lipase and Clinical Candidate for Treatment of Neurological Disorders. J. Med. Chem.
2018, 61 (20), 9062-9084.
(15) Adibekian, A.; Martin, B. R.; Wang, C.; et al. Click-generated triazole ureas as ultrapotent in vivo–
active serine hydrolase inhibitors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7 (7), 469-478.
(16) Adibekian, A.; Martin, B. R.; Chang, J. W.; et al. Confirming Target Engagement for Reversible
Inhibitors in Vivo by Kinetically Tuned Activity-Based Probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (25), 10345-
10348.
(17) Hsu, K.-L.; Tsuboi, K.; Adibekian, A.; et al. DAGL
β inhibition perturbs a lipid network involved in
macrophage inflammatory responses. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8 (12), 999-1007.
(18) Hsu, K.-L.; Tsuboi, K.; Whitby, L. R.; et al. Development and Optimization of Piperidyl-1,2,3-
Triazole Ureas as Selective Chemical Probes of Endocannabinoid Biosynthesis. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56
(21), 8257-8269.
(19) Hsu, K.-L.; Tsuboi, K.; Chang, J. W.; et al. Discovery and Optimization of Piperidyl-1,2,3-Triazole
Ureas as Potent, Selective, and in Vivo-Active Inhibitors of
α /β -Hydrolase Domain Containing 6
(ABHD6). J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56 (21), 8270-8279.
(20) Grams, R. J.; Hsu, K.-L. Reactive chemistry for covalent probe and therapeutic development. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 2022.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
(21) Narayanan, A.; Jones, L. H. Sulfonyl fluorides as privileged warheads in chemical biology. Chem.
Sci. 2015, 6 (5), 2650-2659, 10.1039/C5SC00408J.
(22) Jones, L. H. Advances in sulfonyl exchange chemical biology: expanding druggable target space.
Chem. Sci. 2025, 16 (23), 10119-10140, 10.1039/D5SC02647D.
(23) Boike, L.; Henning, N. J.; Nomura, D. K. Advances in covalent drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug
Discov. 2022, 21 (12), 881-898.
(24) Kim, G.; Grams, R. J.; Hsu, K.-L. Advancing Covalent Ligand and Drug Discovery beyond
Cysteine. Chem. Rev. 2025, 125 (14), 6653-6684.
(25) Jones, L. H. Chapter Four - Design of next-generation covalent inhibitors: Targeting residues beyond
cysteine. In Annu. Rep. Med. Chem., Ward, R. A., Grimster, N. P. Eds.; Vol. 56; Academic Press, 2021; pp
95-134.
(26) Gehringer, M.; Laufer, S. A. Emerging and Re-Emerging Warheads for Targeted Covalent Inhibitors:
Applications in Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62 (12), 5673-5724.
(27) Niphakis, M. J.; Cravatt, B. F. Ligand discovery by activity-based protein profiling. Cell Chem. Biol.
2024, 31 (9), 1636-1651.
(28) Canon, J.; Rex, K.; Saiki, A. Y .; et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-
tumour immunity. Nature 2019, 575 (7781), 217-223.
(29) Backus, K. M.; Correia, B. E.; Lum, K. M.; et al. Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native
biological systems. Nature 2016, 534 (7608), 570-574.
(30) Agranat, I.; Caner, H.; Caldwell, J. Putting chirality to work: the strategy of chiral switches. Nat. Rev.
Drug Discov. 2002, 1 (10), 753-768.
(31) Nguyen, L. A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C. Chiral drugs: an overview. Int. J. Biomed. Sci.. 2006, 2, 85-
100.
(32) Sui, J.; Zhang, J.; Ching, C. B.; Chen, W . N. Expanding proteomics into the analysis of chiral drugs.
Mol. BioSyst. 2009, 5 (6), 603-608, 10.1039/B903858B.
(33) Sanna, M. G.; Wang, S.-K.; Gonzalez-Cabrera, P. J.; et al. Enhancement of capillary leakage and
restoration of lymphocyte egress by a chiral S1P1 antagonist in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2 (8), 434-
441.
(34) Rosen, H. T.; Li, K.; Stieger, C. E.; et al. Sulfinyl Aziridines as Stereoselective Covalent
Destabilizing Degraders of the Oncogenic Transcription Factor MYC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64
(48), e202508518.
(35) Zhang, Y .; Liu, Z.; Hirschi, M.; et al. An allosteric cyclin E-CDK2 site mapped by paralog hopping
with covalent probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2025, 21 (3), 420-431.
(36) Njomen, E.; Hayward, R. E.; DeMeester, K. E.; et al. Multi-tiered chemical proteomic maps of
tryptoline acrylamide–protein interactions in cancer cells. Nat. Chem. 2024, 16 (
10), 1592-1604.
(37) Wang, Y .; Dix, M. M.; Bianco, G.; et al. Expedited mapping of the ligandable proteome using fully
functionalized enantiomeric probe pairs. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11 (12), 1113-1123.
(38) Liu, Z.; Remsberg, J. R.; Li, H.; et al. Proteomic Ligandability Maps of Spirocycle Acrylamide
Stereoprobes Identify Covalent ERCC3 Degraders. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146 (15), 10393-10406.
(39) Chen, Y .; Craven, G. B.; Kamber, R. A.; et al. Direct mapping of ligandable tyrosines and lysines in
cells with chiral sulfonyl fluoride probes. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15 (11), 1616-1625.
(40) Huang, H.-s.; Yuan, Y .; Wang, W.; et al. Enantioselective Synthesis of Chiral Sulfonimidoyl
Fluorides Facilitates Stereospecific SuFEx Click Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64 (4),
e202415873.
(41) Knouse, K. W.; Flood, D. T.; V antourout, J. C.; et al. Nature Chose Phosphates and Chemists Should
Too: How Emerging P(V) Methods Can Augment Existing Strategies. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7 (9), 1473-
1485.
(42) Sewald, L.; Tabak, W. W. A.; Fehr, L.; et al. Sulphostin-inspired N-phosphonopiperidones as
selective covalent DPP8 and DPP9 inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16 (1), 3208.
(43) Akiyama, T.; Abe, M.; Harada, S.; et al. Sulphostin, a Potent Inhibitor for Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV
from Streptomyces sp. MK251-43F3. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54, 744-746.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
(44) Abe, M.; Akiyama, T.; Umezawa, Y .; et al. Synthesis and biological activity of sulphostin analogues,
novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13 (3), 785-797.
(45) Abe, M.; Akiyama, T.; Nakamura, H.; et al. First Synthesis and Determination of the Absolute
Configuration of Sulphostin, a Novel Inhibitor of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV . J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67 (6),
999-1004.
(46) Kokic, G.; Hillen, H. S.; Tegunov, D.; et al. Mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase stalling by
remdesivir. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1), 279.
(47) Warren, T. K.; Jordan, R.; Lo, M. K.; et al. Therapeutic efficacy of the small molecule GS-5734
against Ebola virus in rhesus monkeys. Nature 2016, 531 (7594), 381-385.
(48) Hu, H.; Mady Traore, M. D.; Li, R.; et al. Optimization of the Prodrug Moiety of Remdesivir to
Improve Lung Exposure/Selectivity and Enhance Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65
(18), 12044-12054.
(49) Knouse, K. W.; deGruyter, J. N.; Schmidt, M. A.; et al. Unlocking P(V): Reagents for chiral
phosphorothioate synthesis. Science 2018, 361 (6408), 1234-1238.
(50) Nassir, M.; Gherardi, L.; Redman, R. L.; et al. An Improved P(V) Thio-Oligonucleotide Synthesis
Platform. Org. Lett. 2025, 27 (1), 97-102.
(51) Obexer, R.; Nassir, M.; Moody, E. R.; et al. Modern approaches to therapeutic oligonucleotide
manufacturing. Science 2024, 384 (6692), eadl4015.
(52) Huang, Y .; Knouse, K. W.; Qiu, S.; et al. A P(V) platform for oligonucleotide synthesis. Science
2021, 373 (6560), 1265-1270.
(53) Flood, D. T.; Knouse, K. W.; V antourout, J. C.; et al. Synthetic Elaboration of Native DNA by RASS
(SENDR). ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6 (10), 1789-1799.
(54) Xu, D.; Rivas-Bascón, N.; Padial, N. M.; et al. Enantiodivergent Formation of C–P Bonds: Synthesis
of P-Chiral Phosphines and Methylphosphonate Oligonucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (12),
5785-5792.
(55) Zhang, H.-J.; Ociepa, M.; Nassir, M.; et al. Stereocontrolled access to thioisosteres of nucleoside di-
and triphosphates. Nat. Chem. 2024, 16 (2), 249-258.
(56) Ociepa, M.; Knouse, K. W.; He, D.; et al. Mild and Chemoselective Phosphorylation of Alcohols
Using a
Ψ -Reagent. Org. Lett. 2021, 23 (24), 9337-9342.
(57) Vantourout, J. C.; Adusumalli, S. R.; Knouse, K. W.; et al. Serine-Selective Bioconjugation. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (41), 17236-17242.
(58) Sharma, H. A.; Bielecki, M.; Holm, M. A.; et al. Proteomic Ligandability Maps of Phosphorus(V)
Stereoprobes Identify Covalent TLCD1 Inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147 (18), 15554-15566.
(59) Rostovtsev, V. V .; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V . V .; Sharpless, K. B. A Stepwise Huisgen Cycloaddition
Process: Copper(I)-Catalyzed Regioselective “Ligation” of Azides and Terminal Alkynes. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (14), 2596-2599.
(60) Meldal, M.; Tornøe, C. W. Cu-Catalyzed Azide−Alkyne Cycloaddition. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108 (8),
2952-3015.
(61) Speers, A. E.; Adam, G. C.; Cravatt, B. F. Activity-Based Protein Profiling in Vivo Using a
Copper(I)-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne [3 + 2] Cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (16), 4686-4687.
(62) Speers, A. E.; Cravatt, B. F. Profiling Enzyme Activities In Vivo Using Click Chemistry Methods.
Chemistry & Biology 2004, 11 (4), 535-546.
(63) Speers, A. E.; Cravatt, B. F. Chemical Strategies for Activity-Based Proteomics. ChemBioChem
2004, 5 (1), 41-47.
(64) Rauniyar, N.; Yates, J. R. Isobaric Labeling-Based Relative Quantification in Shotgun Proteomics. J.
Proteome Res. 2014, 13 (12), 5293-5309.
(65) O’Connell, J. D.; Paulo, J. A.; O’Brien, J. J.; Gygi, S. P. Proteome-Wide Evaluation of Two Common
Protein Quantification Methods. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17 (5), 1934-1942.
(66) Sun, S.; Homer, J. A.; Smedley, C. J.; et al. Phosphorus fluoride exchange: Multidimensional
catalytic click chemistry from phosphorus connective hubs. Chem 2023, 9 (8), 2128-2143.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
(67) Chappell, W . P.; Schur, N.; V ogel, J. A.; et al. Poison to promise: The resurgence of
organophosphorus fluoride chemistry. Chem 2024, 10 (6), 1644-1654.
(68) Hahm, H. S.; Toroitich, E. K.; Borne, A. L.; et al. Global targeting of functional tyrosines using
sulfur-triazole exchange chemistry. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16 (2), 150-159.
(69) Toroitich, E. K.; Ciancone, A. M.; Hahm, H. S.; et al. Discovery of a Cell-Active SuTEx Ligand of
Prostaglandin Reductase 2. ChemBioChem 2021, 22 (12), 2134-2139.
(70) Borne, A. L.; Brulet, J. W.; Y uan, K.; Hsu, K.-L. Development and biological applications of sulfur–
triazole exchange (SuTEx) chemistry. RSC Chem. Biol. 2021, 2 (2), 322-337, 10.1039/D0CB00180E.
(71) Brulet, J. W.; Borne, A. L.; Y uan, K.; et al. Liganding Functional Tyrosine Sites on Proteins Using
Sulfur–Triazole Exchange Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (18), 8270-8280.
(72) Huang, T.; Hosseinibarkooie, S.; Borne, A. L.; et al. Chemoproteomic profiling of kinases in live
cells using electrophilic sulfonyl triazole probes. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12 (9), 3295-3307,
10.1039/D0SC06623K.
(73) McCloud, R. L.; Yuan, K.; Mahoney, K. E.; et al. Direct Target Site Identification of a Sulfonyl–
Triazole Covalent Kinase Probe by LC-MS Chemical Proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2021.
(74) Justin Grams, R.; Y uan, K.; Founds, M. W.; et al. Imidazoles are Tunable Nucleofuges for
Developing Tyrosine-Reactive Electrophiles. ChemBioChem 2024, 25 (16), e202400382.
(75) Ciancone, A. M.; Seo, K. W.; Chen, M.; et al. Global Discovery of Covalent Modulators of
Ribonucleoprotein Granules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145 (20), 11056-11066.
(76) Ciancone, A. M.; Hosseinibarkooie, S.; Bai, D. L.; et al. Global profiling identifies a stress-
responsive tyrosine site on EDC3 regulating biomolecular condensate formation. Cell Chem. Biol. 2022,
29 (12), 1709-1720.e1707.
(77) Founds, M. W.; Murtagh, O. L.; Grams, R. J.; et al. Human PTGR2 Inactivation Alters Eicosanoid
Metabolism and Cytokine Response of Inflammatory Macrophages. ACS Chem. Biol. 2025, 20 (6), 1426-
1434.
(78) Grams, R. J.; Wolfe, W. J.; Seal, R. J.; et al. Discovery and Optimization of a Covalent AKR1C3
Inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 68 (9), 9465-9478.
(79) Cruite, J. T.; Nowak, R. P.; Donovan, K. A.; et al. Covalent Stapling of the Cereblon Sensor Loop
Histidine Using Sulfur-Heterocycle Exchange. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14 (11), 1576-1581.
(80) Talele, T. T. The “Cyclopropyl Fragment” is a Versatile Player that Frequently Appears in
Preclinical/Clinical Drug Molecules. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59 (19), 8712-8756.
(81) Okondo, M. C.; Johnson, D. C.; Sridharan, R.; et al. DPP8 and DPP9 inhibition induces pro-caspase-
1-dependent monocyte and macrophage pyroptosis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13 (1), 46-53.
(82) Okondo, M. C.; Rao, S. D.; Taabazuing, C. Y .; et al. Inhibition of Dpp8/9 Activates the Nlrp1b
Inflammasome. Cell Chem. Biol. 2018, 25 (
3), 262-267.e265.
(83) Lankas, G. R.; Leiting, B.; Roy, R. S.; et al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibition for the Treatment of
Type 2 Diabetes: Potential Importance of Selectivity Over Dipeptidyl Peptidases 8 and 9. Diabetes 2005,
54 (10), 2988-2994.
(84) Waumans, Y .; Baerts, L.; Kehoe, K.; et al. The Dipeptidyl Peptidase Family, Prolyl Oligopeptidase
and Prolyl Carboxypeptidase in the Immune System and Inflammatory Disease, including
Atherosclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2015, V olume 6 - 2015, Review.
(85) Dance, I. Distance criteria for crystal packing analysis of supramolecular motifs. New J. Chem. 2003,
27 (1), 22-27, 10.1039/B206867B.
(86) Newberry, R. W.; Raines, R. T. The n
→π * Interaction. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50 (8), 1838-1846.
(87) Ogasawara, D.; Konrad, D. B.; Tan, Z. Y .; et al. Chemical tools to expand the ligandable proteome:
Diversity-oriented synthesis-based photoreactive stereoprobes. Cell Chem. Biol. 2024, 31 (12), 2138-
2155.e2132.
(88) Chen, M.; Shin, M.; Ware, T. B.; et al. Endocannabinoid biosynthetic enzymes regulate pain response
via LKB1–AMPK signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2023, 120 (52), e2304900120.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
(89) Wilkerson, J. L.; Ghosh, S.; Bagdas, D.; et al. Diacylglycerol lipase β inhibition reverses nociceptive
behaviour in mouse models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 173 (10),
1678-1692.
(90) Buczynski, M. W.; Herman, M. A.; Hsu, K.-L.; et al. Diacylglycerol lipase disinhibits VTA dopamine
neurons during chronic nicotine exposure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016, 113 (4), 1086-1091.
(91) Cao, J. K.; Viray, K.; Shin, M.; et al. ABHD6 Inhibition Rescues a Sex-Dependent Deficit in Motor
Coordination in The HdhQ200/200 Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease. J. Neurol. Neurol. Disord.
2021, 7 (1), 106.
(92) Manterola, A.; Bernal-Chico, A.; Cipriani, R.; et al. Re-examining the potential of targeting ABHD6
in multiple sclerosis: Efficacy of systemic and peripherally restricted inhibitors in experimental
autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Neuropharmacology 2018, 141, 181-191.
(93) Manterola, A.; Bernal-Chico, A.; Cipriani, R.; et al. Deregulation of the endocannabinoid system and
therapeutic potential of ABHD6 blockade in the cuprizone model of demyelination. Biochem. Pharmacol.
2018, 157, 189-201.
(94) Dong, J.; Krasnova, L.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Sulfur(VI) Fluoride Exchange (SuFEx):
Another Good Reaction for Click Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (36), 9430-9448.
(95) Homer, J. A.; Sun, S.; Koelln, R. A.; Moses, J. E. Protocol for producing phosphoramidate using
phosphorus fluoride exchange click chemistry. STAR Protoc. 2024, 5 (1), 102824.
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted January 28, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702106doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (91)
- Discovery and Optimization of a Covalent AKR1C3 Inhibitor. via crossref
- doi:10.1021/cen-09441-scitech2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2024.110973 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.96.26.14694 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/cr200075y via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.1578 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-030220-112741 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.129 via crossref
- doi:10.1124/pr.112.006387 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/cn400116z via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.03.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00951 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.579 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/ja303400u via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.1105 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jm400898x via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jm400899c via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tips.2021.12.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1039/c5sc00408j via crossref
- doi:10.1039/d5sc02647d via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00542-z via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00001 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01153 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.08.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature18002 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrd915 via crossref
- doi:10.59566/ijbs.2006.2085 via crossref
- doi:10.1039/b903858b via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio804 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/anie.202508518 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01738-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41557-024-01601-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41557-019-0351-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jacs.3c13448 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41557-023-01281-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/anie.202415873 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acscentsci.1c00487 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58493-z via crossref
- doi:10.7164/antibiotics.54.744 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.10.036 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/np030491b via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20542-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature17180 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00758 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aau3369 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.4c03980 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.adl4015 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.abi9727 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00680 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13898 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41557-023-01347-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02736 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jacs.0c05595 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jacs.5c01944 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::aid-anie2596>3.0.co;2-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/cr0783479 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/ja034490h via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.03.012 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cbic.200300721 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/pr500880b via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00016 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2023.05.013 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2024.04.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0404-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cbic.202000879 via crossref
- doi:10.1039/d0cb00180e via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00648 via crossref
- doi:10.1039/d0sc06623k via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01591 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/cbic.202400382 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/jacs.3c00165 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.11.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acschembio.5c00231 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00371 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00472 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nchembio.2229 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.013 via crossref
- doi:10.2337/diabetes.54.10.2988 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00387 via crossref
- doi:10.1039/b206867b via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00121 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.10.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2304900120 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/bph.13469 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1522672113 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.08.038 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2018.07.042 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/anie.201309399 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.114243 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102824 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-22T06:34:31.056775+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0