Assessment of Occupational Hazards in midwifery setting and Factors Related to the Midwives' Quality of Work-Life: Multicenter Study in IRAN

Assessment of Occupational Hazards in midwifery setting and Factors Related to the Midwives' Quality of Work-Life: Multicenter Study in IRAN | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Assessment of Occupational Hazards in midwifery setting and Factors Related to the Midwives' Quality of Work-Life: Multicenter Study in IRAN Nasibe Sharifi, Azita Fathnezhad-Kazemi, Nazanin Rezaei, Masoumeh Yaralizadeh, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5317166/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Feb, 2025 Read the published version in BMC Nursing → Version 1 posted 10 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Midwifery is one of the key professions in maintaining community health and is important in providing maternal and child healthcare. As a high-risk profession, it involves numerous occupational hazards and challenges that can affect the quality of work life. This study investigated the occupational hazards and factors related to midwives' quality of work life. Method This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 in Iran, involving midwives working in hospitals (teaching and non-teaching) and health centers. Sampling was done in multiple stages in two large cities, Tabriz and Ahvaz. All midwifery staff meeting the inclusion criteria participated in the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire, and the analysis was performed using SPSS version 24. Results Finally, the information of 580 participants was analyzed. The mean (± SD) age was 39.21 (± 9.09), with 83% of participants holding a bachelor's degree in midwifery, and the majority were hospital employees. The mean (± SD) occupational hazard score was 3.76 (± 0.87), with ergonomic and biological hazards having the highest mean scores, 4.22 and 4.10, respectively, making them the most significant occupational hazards. Preliminary results showed that the mean scores for job stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life were 232.35 (high), 41.09 (moderate), and 95.34, respectively. In the regression model, job satisfaction, age, and work experience were significantly associated with quality of work life, with job satisfaction having the strongest influence (β = 0.376, P < 0.0013). As job satisfaction increased, the quality of work life also improved. However, work experience had a negative impact, indicating that as work experience increased, quality of work life decreased (β=-0.296, P < 0.001). Conclusion Regular assessment of working conditions and the quality of work life is essential, and special attention should be paid to reducing occupational hazards. Given the high levels of job stress and dissatisfaction, there is a need for planning and policy-making to provide psychological support to manage stress, increase professional support, optimize the work environment, and manage physical demands. Occupational hazards quality of work life job stress job satisfaction midwife Background Midwifery is one of the key professions responsible for safeguarding community health, playing a critical role in maternal and child healthcare, reproductive health services, preventing complications, and ultimately reducing mortality rates in women and children [ 1 ]. More than 80% of women's healthcare services are provided by midwives [ 2 ]. In Iran, the profession of midwifery is assigned to women, based on both religious beliefs and cultural norms, despite the significant physical and mental pressures they face, which have different roles according to their position [ 2 , 3 ]. Work is a significant aspect of every individual’s life, and the level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with one’s job can affect different aspects of personal life and, ultimately, the effectiveness of care provided [ 4 ]. Healthcare organizations, which are responsible for prevention, care, and treatment, have a special position in society. However, undesirable and challenging work environments, along with strenuous tasks, can lead to both physical and mental disorders and job dissatisfaction among healthcare providers, which can have serious consequences [ 5 ]. This, in turn, affects the quality of services provided to patients. As a high-risk profession, midwifery faces numerous occupational hazards and challenges [ 6 , 7 ]. Some of these challenges arise from the complex nature of the work itself, which places significant pressure on midwives, while others stem from the strenuous nature of the job and exposure to occupational hazards [ 8 , 9 ]. In the midwifery profession, job-related stress is due to the heavy workload and long hours, the emotional demands of the job, dealing with women who require complex care, working in traditional environments with a shortage of midwives, fear of punishment related to negative outcomes, lack of recognition, and financial burdens, especially when women are unable to afford their care. These are among the many challenges midwives face in their work [ 6 , 10 , 11 ]. From the point of view of working midwives, the difficulty of midwifery plays a significant role in the occurrence of midwifery errors [ 12 ]. According to researchers, midwifery has been introduced as an emotionally demanding job, where caring for women and their families amidst social complexities exposes midwives to anxiety, pain, fear, and grief. Working in such challenging situations creates problems for midwives, and it is not surprising that low morale and job-related stress are significant concerns in the midwifery workforce [ 9 , 13 ]. Today, work-related stress has become a common and costly problem in the workplace [ 14 ]. Dealing with multiple challenges leads to increased stress, dissatisfaction, lack of motivation, despair, and job burnout among midwives, which reduces their involvement in providing optimal care [ 9 , 15 , 16 ]. Studies have shown that stressful working conditions lead to increased absenteeism, misconduct, and employee turnover [ 17 ]. On the other hand, healthcare providers also face multiple occupational hazards, including biological, chemical, physical, ergonomic, and psychological risks [ 18 ]. According to reports, midwives experience physical and medical limitations and problems, including the risk of hospital-acquired infections, often due to the lack or improper use of personal protective equipment [ 1 ]. Research findings indicate that job dissatisfaction among midwives is primarily related to their work environment, job security, and benefits, and in some regions, different strategies have been implemented to improve motivation, such as improving working conditions, continuous monitoring, and offering more educational opportunities [ 1 , 14 ]. A review of the literature highlights the importance of addressing the challenges and risks associated with midwifery to design appropriate strategies to prevent accidents and job burnout, which impact the health of individuals. Addressing these issues is an organizational necessity [ 7 ]. To achieve organizational health, it is essential to focus on the quality of work life for employees, providing a suitable environment that fulfills personal aspirations and creates a motivating space for the execution of tasks. Understanding the work conditions and challenges faced by those providing care to women and newborns is crucial for improving care. The present study was conducted to examine the occupational hazards and factors related to the quality of work life of midwives working in healthcare centers. Methods The present study was a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study conducted in 2023 in Iran, focusing on midwives working in hospitals and healthcare centers. The study population consisted of all midwifery personnel employed at healthcare and treatment centers in two cities, Ahvaz and Tabriz. Inclusion criteria included midwives with at least one year of work experience in hospitals and healthcare centers, and the absence of any physical or mental illnesses. Exclusion criteria were lack of consent to participate in the study and incomplete responses (over 10%) in the questionnaire. Sampling Method and Sample Size The sampling was conducted in multiple stages. In each city, educational hospitals (3 in Tabriz and 2 in Ahvaz) and one non-educational (private) hospital were selected for sampling. For selecting healthcare centers in each city, clusters were first defined (5 clusters in Tabriz and 4 clusters in Ahvaz), and 3 healthcare centers from each cluster were randomly selected using the Randomizer software. Midwives working in these centers were recruited into the study based on availability, following the division of the initial sample size between hospitals and healthcare centers, until the calculated sample size was reached. According to the study’s objectives, the largest sample size was calculated based on the information from the study by Zarrini et al. [ 7 ], focusing on the chemical hazards dimension of the Occupational Hazards Questionnaire, yielding a sample size of 177 participants. Ultimately, considering a design effect of 1.5 and a 10% increase in study precision, the final sample size was calculated as 290 participants for each city. Study parameter: alpha = 0.05, power = 0.90, CI = 95%, m = 2.38, SD = 0/95, d = 6%M $$\:\varvec{n}=\frac{{({\varvec{Z}}_{1}-\frac{\varvec{\alpha\:}}{2})}^{2}\:\times\:{\varvec{s}}^{2}}{{\varvec{d}}^{2}}$$ Data Collection Tools : Demographic and Social Information Questionnaire : This questionnaire included demographic variables of the study participants to complete the research data. The questions covered age, educational qualification, marital status, employment status, years of employment, shift status, workplace, and job position. OSIPOW Occupational Stress Questionnaire : The Osipow Job Stress Questionnaire [ 19 ] is based on a five-point Likert scale and consists of three parts. It was developed by Osipow in 1987 to assess individual stress from six dimensions: 1) Role Overload, 2) Role Insufficiency, 3) Role Ambiguity, 4) Role Boundary, 5) Responsibility, and 6) Physical Environment. Scoring is based on a five-point Likert scale, with options ranging from "Never" (1 point) to "Most of the time" (5 points). The total score can range from 60 to 300, with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress. Overall stress levels are categorized into four groups: low stress (50–99), low to moderate stress (110–149), moderate to severe stress (150–199), and severe stress (200–250). The validity and reliability of the questionnaire have been evaluated in studies conducted in Iran [ 20 , 21 ]. Work-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (WRQoL-2) : This scale was designed by Van Laar et al. to be used in the healthcare sector (22). The questionnaire consists of 34 Likert-scale questions (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Lin et al. reported Cronbach's alpha for all dimensions of the Chinese version to range between 0.71 and 0.88 [ 22 ]. Mazloumi et al. in Iran evaluated the validity and reliability of this questionnaire, with the reliability for various dimensions reported between 0.63 and 0.929 [ 23 ]. Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) : The MSQ consists of 19 items and six subscales: payment system (3 questions), type of job (4 questions), opportunities for advancement (3 questions), organizational climate (2 questions), leadership style (4 questions), and physical conditions (3 questions). It is used to assess job satisfaction. Scoring is done on a Likert scale, where the options "Strongly Disagree," "Disagree," "Neutral," "Agree," and "Strongly Agree" are assigned 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points, respectively [ 24 ]. The total score of the MSQ is obtained by summing up the points for all items. Scores between 19 and 38 indicate low job satisfaction, between 38 and 57 indicate moderate satisfaction, and scores above 57 indicate high job satisfaction. In a study by Jafarjalal et al., the reliability of the MSQ was determined with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88 [ 25 ]. Occupational Hazards Questionnaire : This questionnaire was developed by Arab et al. (2014) [ 26 ] and contains 58 questions on a 5-point Likert scale (1–5 points) in five categories: physical hazards (9 questions), biological hazards (6 questions), chemical hazards (6 questions), ergonomic hazards (8 questions), and psychological, organizational, and social hazards (29 questions). A score between 1 and 2.2 indicates low hazard levels, a score between 2.2001 and 3.4 indicates moderate hazard levels, and a score above 3.4001 to 5 indicates high hazard levels. The overall score for each category is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of questions, and the overall occupational hazards score is obtained by dividing the total score by the number of dimensions. After obtaining approval from the university ethics committee and permission from hospital and healthcare center officials, sampling was initiated by the researchers. Researchers visited midwives at their workplaces, recruited participants based on availability, and after explaining the study objectives and obtaining informed consent, the questionnaires were distributed to the participants for self-reporting. Data analysis Data analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24 software and included descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, and percentage. Regarding occupational hazards, the mean (SD) of each question in different dimensions was calculated, and then the total score for each dimension was reported separately. The independent t -test and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to assess the association between the study’s demographic variables (as an independent variable) and dependent variables (MSQ, OSIPOW, and WRQoL-2). The normal distribution of data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, skewness, and kurtosis. Although the data were slightly skewed, the data were considered normal because skewness and kurtosis were 1 to − 1. Furthermore, Pearson’s correlation test was used to assess the association between the study’s main variables (MSQ, OSIPOW, with WRQoL-2); finally, independent variables including (MSQ, OSIPOW) and sociodemographic variables with P ≤ 0.05 as control variables were inserted into the univariate and multivariate linear regression model (enter method) to predict the effect of them on independent variables. There were 10% missing data which were imputed with the mean substitution method. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results In this study, 580 midwives from Ahvaz and Tabriz participated. The findings indicated that the mean age of the participants was 39.21 years, with a standard deviation of 9.09 years. In terms of education, 83.3% of the participants held a bachelor's degree. The majority were married (69%) and worked in hospitals (64.7%). The most common work experience ranged between 16–20 years (25.3%). Most participants had rotating shifts (60.3%). A statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two cities was only observed regarding marital status and employment type. Initial statistical analysis results between demographic and work characteristics and quality of work-life showed that the mean quality of work-life was higher among individuals aged 20–29 compared to other age groups, and higher among single individuals compared to married and divorced midwives. The mean work-life quality score was significantly lower for divorced participants compared to the other two groups. Additionally, the mean quality of work-life score decreased with increasing years of work experience. For instance, those with 5 to 10 years of experience had higher scores than those with longer work experience. Furthermore, the mean quality of work-life score was significantly higher for those with temporary employment compared to other groups. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean quality of work-life score between participants with fixed shifts compared to those with rotating shifts (97.48 vs. 93.93) (Table 1 ). Table 1 Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Participants in Two Cities and Their Relation with the Main Variables Variable N (%) Tabriz (n = 290) N (%) Ahvaz (n = 290) N (%) MSQ Mean (SD) OSIPOW Mean (SD) WRQoL-2 Mean (SD) Age (year) Mean (SD) 39.21 (9.09) [22–60] 20–29 113 (19.5) 58 (20.0) 55 (19.0) 52.03 (14.39) 227.78 (42.60) 107.48 (21.54) 30–39 168 (29.0) 83 (28.6) 85 ( 29.3) 39.64 (12.51) 231.39 (39.88) 92.80 (21.14) 40–49 235 (40.5) 122 (42.1) 113 (39.0) 38.30 (11.49) 233.04 (41.86) 92.03 (18.69) ≥ 50 64 (11.0) 27 (9.3) 37 (12.8) 35.86 (8.90) 240.38 (30.75) 92.72 (16.48) P- value a 0.570 < 0.001 0.248 < 0.001 Educational status Bachelor 483 (83.3) 238 (82.1) 245 (84.5) 40.81 (13.16) 235.00 (38.76) 94.83 (20.34) Master 82 (14.1) 46 (15.9) 36 (12.4) 40.94 (22.47) 218.78 (45.29) 97.66 (21.95) Ph.D. 15 (2.6) 6 (2.1) 9 (3.1) 51.13 (18.91) 221.13 (49.79) 99.00 (22.43) P- value a 0.383 0.012 0.002 0.406 Marital status Married 400 (69.0) 219 (37.8) 181 (31.2) 39.24 (12.44) 233.54 (41.92) 92.92 (19.77) Single 156 (26.9) 55 (9.5) 101 (17.4) 46.95 (14.11) 226.46 937.19) 102.76 (20.41) Divorced or widow 24 (4.1) 16 (2.8) 8 (1.4) 33.96 (9.50 ) 250.71 (25.99) 87.46 (24.03) P- value a < 0.001 < 0.001 0.013 < 0.001 Job environment Hospitals 375 (64.7) 188 (64.8) 187 (64.5) 40.19 (12.28) 233.86 (38.61) 93.70 (19.96) Healthcare centers 205 (35.3) 102 (35.2) 102 (35.5) 42.76 (14.91) 229.59 (43.45) 98.34 (21.50) P- value a 0.931 0.240 0.036 0.009 Work experience 1–5 131 (22.6) 67 (23.1) 64 (22.1) 51.18 (14.77) 225.13 (43.33) 107.93 (20.72) 6–10 72 (12.4) 40 (13.8) 32 (11.0) 46.64 (13.56) 211.39 (40.51) 99.11 (20.30) 11–15 107 (18.4) 48 (16.6) 59 (20.3) 36.99 (9.89) 239.10 (34.86) 89.61 (20.30) 16–20 147 (25.3) 82 (28.3) 65 (22.4) 35.77 (10.89) 240.61 (40.18) 91.73 (20.72) 21–25 77 (13.3) 37 (12.8) 40 (13.8) 36.07 (10.03) 240.82 (32.76) 89.53 (17.88) ≥ 25 46 (7.9) 16 (5.5) 30 (10.3) 41.09 (13.32) 229.39 (41.98) 88.11 (14.90) P- value a 0.134 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Type of employment Temporary 88 (15.2) 50 (17.2) 38 (13.1) 51.67 (15.31) 237.35 (39.89) 105.82 (19.93) Contractual 234 (40.3) 102 (35.2) 132 (45.5) 36.59 (11.71) 246.83 (31.18) 88.78 (18.79) Lifetime 258 (44.5) 138 (47.6) 120 (41.4) 41.57 (11.79) 217.50 (42.86) 97.71 (20.51) P- value a 0.034 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Type of shift Day shifts only 230 (39.7) 116 (40.0) 114 (39.3) 41.97 (14.39) 227.62 (43.63) 97.48 (21.69) Day & night shifts 350 (60.3) 174 (60.0) 176 (60.7) 40.52 (12.54) 235.45 (37.88) 93.93 (19.79) P- value b 0.865 0.215 0.027 0.042 a ANOVA, b t-test Table 1 Here The results showed that 314 (54.1%) participants had completed a course on occupational hazards, while 266 (45.9%) had not received this training. According to reports, 366 (63.1%) participants experienced musculoskeletal problems. According to Table 2 , the study found that the level of occupational hazards among the midwives surveyed was high, with a mean (SD) score of 3.76 (0.87). Among the dimensions of occupational hazards, ergonomic and biological hazards were identified as the most significant, with mean scores of 4.22 and 4.10, respectively. The mean scores for chemical and physical hazards were also reported to be high, at 3.82 and 3.66, respectively. Psychological, social, and organizational hazards were recognized as the least significant sources of occupational injury among the other dimensions. Table 2 Information about occupational Hazard Risk type Items The mean (SD) score of each question The Mean (SD) total score of dimensions Biological hazards Skin contact with blood or other fluids of the patient 4.45 (1.14) 4.10 (1.09) Injury with sharp objects 4.32 (1.24) Plunging the head of the needle into the body 4.32 (1.25) Infectious diseases 4.28 (1.33) Splashing of blood and body fluids in the eyes and mucous membranes 4.30 (1.30) Broken slides or glass containers containing body fluids of the patient 2.94 (1.06) Chemical hazards Respiratory problems 4.04 (1.49) 3.82 (1.30) Skin sensitivity (dermatitis) 4.08 (1.40) Breathing fumes of disinfectants/sterilizers 4.04 (1.44) Eye contact with fumes of disinfectants/sterilizers 3.98 (1.53) Splashing chemicals in the eyes 3.97 (1.53) Drug/chemical poisoning 2.90 (1.52) Physical hazards Workplace noise pollution 4.35 (1.19) 3..66 (1.05) Improper ventilation of the workplace 4.31 (1.24) Hitting a bed or stretcher 4.26(1.24) Inadequate lighting and lighting of the workplace 4.13 (1.36) Radiation hazards 3.24 (1.39) Slip and fall 3.00 (1.43) Hitting due to heavy objects falling on a part of the body 2.86 (1.18) Being hit or injured by patients or clients 3.87 (1.53) Jumping foreign body in the eye 3.02 (1.17) Ergonomic hazards Standing too much to perform activities related to job duties 4.41 (1.09) 4.22 (0.95) Improper posture while performing tasks 4.37 (1.15) foot pain 4.51 (0.96) Back or back pain 4.52 (0.99) wrist pain 4.37 (1.23) shoulder pain 4.53 (2.38) Arthritis of the neck 4.41 (1.18) Lifting and carrying heavy objects/patients 2.72 (1.03) Psychological-social and organizational risks Disrespect from the patient and the patient's companions 3.05 (1.30) 2.98 (0.54) Chronic fatigue due to work activity 3.82 (1.08) Job stress 4.54 (0.96) Occurrence of job-related depression 4.27 (1.26) Being under the control of the working relationship with doctors 3.54 (1.28) Uncomfortable feeling due to caring for non-same-sex patients 1.32 (0.84) Inappropriate communication with colleagues in the work department (conflict with colleagues) 1.48 (0.91) Inappropriate communication flow with different management levels of the hospital and the health center 1.57 (1.03) sleep disorders 3.61 (1.25) Isolation, bad mood and despair 3.27 (1.38) Addiction to sedatives and psychotropic drugs 1.30 (0.86) Imposing unrelated tasks 1.68 (1.20) Excessive expectations of patients and their families 3.78 (1.18) Involvement of the patient's relatives in providing care measures 3.60 (1.19) Lack of job independence in performing professional duties 4.08 (1.32) The disproportion of the workload of the work department with the number of personnel 3.67 (1.12) Lack of job independence in performing professional duties 3.54 (1.23) Employment discrimination in the workplace 3.01 (0.94) Occurrence of concerns related to the care and education of children due to work 4.24 (1.24) Incompatibility of assigned responsibilities with job description 1.75 (1.21) Feeling unappreciated by managers 2.39 (1.43) Not benefiting from job opportunities according to your abilities 1.89 (1.30) Non-observance of maximum working hours 3.22 (1.12) Uniformity and repetition of the work environment (absence of tone in the work environment) 1.93 (1.35) Lack of support from external organizations (midwifery system, university, etc.) in your job 4.43 (1.05) The society's negative view of midwifery 1.82 (1.21) Interference between work and personal life 4.26 (1.20) The negative view of your spouse and first-class family members towards your work 3.69 (1.56) The negative impact of dealing with very sick patients (end stage) on your mood 1.86 (1.33) In the biological hazards category, aside from exposure to "broken glass or containers containing body fluids," which was classified as a medium hazard, the main occupational injuries reported included skin contact with blood or other bodily fluids, injuries from sharp and cutting objects, needle-stick injuries, infectious diseases, and splashing of fluids into the eyes. In the chemical hazard’s domain, the mean score for drug toxicity was at a medium level, while the other options received high scores. Regarding physical hazards, all options received high scores and were considered significant hazards. Noise pollution and inadequate ventilation scored the highest, with averages of 4.35 and 4.31, respectively. Regarding ergonomic hazards, which were identified as the most important factor, high scores were noted for pain in various body areas, including the shoulders, back, and legs, as well as prolonged standing for job-related tasks and poor posture. Finally, in the psychological, social, and organizational hazards domain, although most items scored above the mean, the highest scores were associated with occupational stress and lack of external support. Table 2 Here Descriptive statistics for occupational stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life are presented in Table 3 . The mean scores obtained were 232.35, 41.9, and 95.34, respectively. In terms of occupational stress, the score was in the severe range, while the mean score for job satisfaction was at a moderate level. Table 3 Descriptive statistics and correlations among primary study variables (N = 580) variables Mean (SD) Range Correlation coefficient 1 2 3 1- MSQ 41.09 (13.32) 21–77 1 -0.556 0.534 2- OSIPOW 232.35 (40.40) 124–287 1 -0.375 3- WRQoL-2 95.34 (20.62) 39–170 1 * P < 0.001 The results of the Pearson correlation test among the main study variables are also shown in Table 3 . According to the Pearson correlation analysis, the relationship between occupational stress and the overall quality of work life was found to be significant, negative, and moderate (r = -0.375, P < 0.001). Additionally, the results indicated a positive and significant correlation between job satisfaction and the quality of work life of midwives. Furthermore, a negative and significant relationship was observed between occupational stress and job satisfaction. Table 3 Hear According to Model 1, the results of univariate regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between stress and job satisfaction with quality of work life. These variables individually predicted 13.9% and 28.4% of the changes in quality of work life, respectively. Specifically, for each standard deviation increase in occupational stress, the quality of work life decreased by 0.375 standard deviations (P = 0.020, β = -0.375). Conversely, for each standard deviation increase in job satisfaction, quality of work life increased by 0.534 standard deviations (P < 0.001, β = 0.534). Multivariate regression analysis in Model 2 indicated that 29.2% of the changes in quality of work life could be explained by the two variables of stress and job satisfaction, with job satisfaction having the greatest impact on quality of work life (P < 0.001, β = 0.471). Finally, in Model 3, when all variables were included in the regression model using the inter method, the results showed that 31.3% of the changes in quality of work life could be explained by the variables entered in the model (R²_adj = 0.313, P < 0.001). The variables of job satisfaction, age, and work experience had significant relationships with quality of work life, with job satisfaction having the most substantial effect (P < 0.001, β = 0.376). This indicates that as job satisfaction increases, quality of work life also increases. However, work experience harmed the quality of work life, such that an increase in work duration was associated with a decrease in quality of work life (P < 0.001, β = -0.296) (Table 4 ). Table 4 Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis of WRQoL-2 Predictors R R 2 R 2 adj P-Value B S.E β 95%CI F Model 1 MSQ 0.534 0.285 0.284 < 0.001 0.827 0.054 0.534 0.720 to 0.934 230.90 OSIPOW 0.375 0.141 0.139 < 0.001 -0.192 0.020 -0.375 -0.230 to -0.153 94.78 Model 2 0.543 0.294 0.292 < 0.001 120.34 MSQ < 0.001 0.730 0.065 0.471 0.602 to 0.858 OSIPOW 0.007 -0.058 0.021 -0.113 -0.100 to -0.016 Model 3 0.568 0.322 0.313 < 0.001 33.914 MSQ < 0.001 0.667 0.072 0.431 0.526 to 0.809 OSIPOW 0.066 -0.044 0.024 -0.086 -0.091 to 0.003 Marital status 0.196 -1.823 1.409 -0.045 -4.591 to 0.944 Age 0.021 0.387 0.167 0.171 0.716 to -0.229 Job environment 0.636 1.410 2.978 0.033 -4.440 to 7.260 Work experience < 0.001 -3.865 0.992 -0.296 -5.813 to -1.917 Type of employment 0.102 -2.034 1.241 -0.071 0.403 to 0.036 Type of shift 0.857 -0.5183 2.865 -0.012 -6.1442 to 5.109 Table 4 Here Discussion The results of the present study, conducted to examine the status of occupational hazards and the relationship between stress levels and job satisfaction with the quality of work life of midwives working in various health-care sectors, revealed that there is no desirable status regarding occupational hazards, work stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life among midwives in both cities. To achieve the study's objectives, the status of occupational hazards was first assessed, with findings indicating high scores in various dimensions of occupational hazards. According to the reports from participating midwives, they experience different occupational hazards at a high level. The investigations showed that ergonomic and biological hazards were reported as the most significant occupational hazards, while psychological, social, and organizational hazards were mentioned as secondary sources of occupational hazards. Among biological hazards, skin contact with blood or other patient fluids, injuries from sharp objects, needle stick injuries, contracting infectious diseases, and splashes of fluids into the eyes were reported as the most important occupational injuries. In the category of chemical hazards, only the mean score for drug toxicity was moderate; the other options received high scores. Regarding physical hazards, noise pollution and inadequate environmental ventilation received the highest scores. In connection with ergonomic hazards, which were identified as the most significant, pain in various body areas including shoulders, back, and legs, standing for prolonged periods during job-related activities, and poor physical posture were also mentioned as high risks. Finally, despite most psychological, social, and organizational hazards obtaining scores above mean, the highest scores pertained to work stress and lack of external support. present study's findings align with other studies that have assessed occupational hazards in groups of nurses and midwives. Numerous studies have reported occupational hazards that health care providers may encounter, with ergonomic hazards like musculoskeletal problems and physical hazards such as inadequate ventilation and noise pollution being identified as the primary risks [ 26 , 27 ]. Common ergonomic hazards include prolonged standing for job-related activities and poor physical posture during work [ 26 ]. In studies involving nurses working in educational hospitals, biological hazards such as exposure to blood and other fluids were reported as high [ 28 ]. Other studies have also indicated that skin contact with blood and other bodily fluids is an occupational hazard faced by midwives and nurses [ 7 , 28 , 29 ]. Fereidooni and colleagues, in a systematic review, reported that the most common occupational hazards include needle stick injuries, contact with infectious materials, and transmission of diseases such as hepatitis and AIDS, which can also lead to psychological harm [ 30 ]. Additionally, Bianchi et al. mentioned factors such as infection risk, post-traumatic stress, and musculoskeletal problems as part of the occupational hazards in midwifery [ 31 ]. Leinweber and colleagues, in their study on Australian midwives, indicated that harsh working conditions and post-traumatic stress symptoms among midwives may have significant consequences, such as reducing empathetic abilities and emotional care, potentially contributing to feelings of lack of support among women during childbirth [ 32 ]. Adatara and colleagues, through a qualitative study on the challenges faced by midwives in Ghana, referred to various themes, one of which was the lack of necessary physical infrastructure [ 33 ]. Based on study results, issues such as the risk of infections, musculoskeletal problems, and psychological and physical discomfort due to night shifts and traumatic events during childbirth are challenges faced by midwives, and unfortunately, occupational hazards in midwifery are often underestimated. To mitigate occupational hazards, regular training courses on ergonomic principles and biological hazards associated with midwifery work environments should be conducted, raising awareness and establishing serious policies on prevention and personal protective measures against biological agents, such as providing and mandating the use of protective equipment and proper management of biological materials. Additionally, attention to the equipment used in midwives' work environments, which should align with their body size and needs, as well as efforts to optimize the workspace to reduce physical strains, could be appropriate measures. Another finding of this study indicated that the scores obtained from work stress and job satisfaction of participants were in the severe and moderate ranges, respectively. Furthermore, the mean score for the quality of work life among participants was also at a moderate level. The results of other studies related to work stress and job satisfaction in Iran align with present findings [ 34 , 35 ]. The results of a study by Kordi and colleagues in Iran indicated that the mean score for work stress and work capability was 149 and 38.81, respectively, with a negative correlation between work stress and work capability; midwives experiencing higher work stress showed poorer work capability. They concluded that preventive measures should be taken to eliminate or reduce work stress and increase the work capability of Iranian midwives, although identifying sources of work stress is essential for adopting appropriate stress management strategies [ 36 ]. In a study examining the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and job satisfaction and work stress among midwives working in health care centers, the results indicated a significant direct correlation between organizational behavior and job satisfaction and an inverse correlation with work stress [ 37 ]. Midwives and all health personnel who work night shifts or at unconventional hours or in rotating shifts are considered sensitive occupations, and given the role of midwives in providing quality services to mothers and children, evaluating their working conditions is crucial. Special attention must be given to these individuals to ensure that work stress does not negatively impact their performance and abilities. By reducing and managing stress, they can enhance their job satisfaction and improve their work quality. In a study by Peter and colleagues [ 38 ] on midwives working in a maternity ward and women’s department of a public hospital in Switzerland, it was reported that compared to other health professions, the desire to leave the profession is higher among younger generations of midwives. This finding has been corroborated in other studies, where researchers indicated that work stress, inadequate working conditions, and insufficient rewards for individuals working in health care centers—especially in midwifery and nursing environments, which are heavily influenced by work-related stress and have higher emotional demands—lead to a greater likelihood of premature departure from the job [ 39 , 40 ]. This is an important finding for heads of institutions and policymakers, who must implement strategies to reduce work stress among midwives to retain them in their workplaces. Additionally, broader studies should design and implement interventions to reduce work-related stress and increase job satisfaction among midwives. It has been shown that training stress coping skills, including stress management, can effectively reduce levels of work stress. However, reducing stress without addressing professional, occupational, organizational, and environmental factors will not lead to job satisfaction [ 41 ]. Therefore, it is recommended to create a supportive environment and appropriate welfare conditions to reduce work stress, and by holding relevant training courses on stress management and enhancing communication skills, psychological support can be provided to help reduce stress. Furthermore, creating career advancement opportunities and recognizing good performance can also be effective. It should be noted that all measures that lead to improved working conditions, enhanced psychological and social support, and increased professional support can lead to increased job satisfaction, ultimately contributing to increased productivity in healthcare organizations and improved service quality for mothers and children. Finally, another finding of the study regarding the factors affecting the quality of work life of midwives indicated the need for appropriate measures to improve this variable, given the moderate overall score for quality of work life among participants. Overall, other studies have also shown that the quality of work life for healthcare providers, particularly midwives, is not very favorable [ 5 , 42 ]. Therefore, paying attention to the factors involved is essential, as it closely relates to the quality and capability of organizations in delivering health services to clients. Addressing the quality of work life of employees fosters positive attitudes toward their work and organization, enhancing productivity, internal motivation, and organizational effectiveness [ 43 ]. The examination of the relationship between this quality of work life with demographic characteristics, stress status, and job satisfaction revealed that the quality of work life among midwives aged 20 to 29 years, single individuals, and those with temporary employment status were higher compared to older ages, married individuals, and those with formal employment status. Additionally, with increasing work experience (length of service), the mean score of quality of work life decreased, such that the mean score of this variable in the group with 5 to 10 years of work experience was higher than that of individuals with more extended work experience, and a statistically significant difference was also found in the mean score of quality of work life among participants with fixed shifts compared to those with rotating shifts. In another study in Iran, the score obtained for the quality of work life of midwives was low, and a correlation was found between quality of work life and the mean weekly working hours and satisfaction with workload in shifts, but no relationship was observed between quality of work life and demographic characteristics such as age, education, marital status, or number of children [ 5 ]. Additionally, considering the low quality of life scores among married individuals, it can be said that married people may experience lower work quality due to stress from other family responsibilities and increased workload. Shift work can disrupt family and social life, leading to a decline in work-life quality. Furthermore, according to various studies and what we extracted from our study, midwives working in delivery rooms reported lower work quality and job satisfaction, along with higher job stress compared to midwives employed in health centers and clinics [ 35 , 44 , 45 ]. This could be due to midwives in delivery rooms facing conditions such as dealing with emergency and unpredictable situations, excessive noise in the workplace, rotating shifts, long working hours, wages that are disproportionate to their responsibilities, and pressure from heavy workloads, which can all affect their perception of work-life quality. In a study by Talasaz and colleagues, the mean work-life quality score for midwives in healthcare centers was 18.67, while for those in delivery rooms, it was 16.62, indicating lower work quality among the staff. According to them, efforts to enhance work-life quality lead to greater commitment among employees and contribute to the growth and dynamism of the organization [ 44 ]. A study by Rouleau and colleagues, conducted on midwives working in Senegal, found that their greatest dissatisfaction was related to aspects of the work environment [ 45 ]. Given these working conditions, it is evident that job factors significantly affect work-life quality; high work pressure in midwifery reduces work-life quality. Our study also indicated that there were statistically significant inverse and direct relationships between the main variables of stress and job satisfaction with midwives' work-life quality. Specifically, as job stress perception increases, work-life quality decreases, and as job satisfaction increases, work-life quality improves. Ultimately, in the regression model presented, examining various variables revealed that job satisfaction, age, and work experience (length of service) had significant relationships with work-life quality, with job satisfaction having the greatest impact. The next influential variable, work experience, had a negative effect on work-life quality, such that as the duration of employment increased, work-life quality decreased. Enhancing work-life quality can contribute to economic, social, and cultural development and improve individuals' health levels. The more control an individual has over events, the lower their stress levels will be, which in turn will increase their efficiency. Researchers believe that work-life quality is related to an individual's attitude toward their job; the more mutual trust, attention, appreciation, and suitable opportunities for employees are provided by managers in the workplace, the more belief in better job performance individuals will develop, which will also help reduce job-related stress [ 46 , 47 ]. Given the relationship between job conditions, such as stressful environments, and job satisfaction with quality of life, the recommendations made for reducing stress and increasing job satisfaction can contribute to improving quality of life. These activities include creating a safe working environment, promoting physical health, addressing mental health by providing psychological support and encouraging teamwork, establishing a work-life balance such as flexible working hours and appropriate leave, providing educational and professional development opportunities, increasing wages and benefits, creating a regular reward system, implementing stress reduction programs, and periodically assessing work-life quality through regular surveys. Implementing all these suggestions will require proper policy-making and planning. Limitations This study was a cross-sectional study, which is not considered suitable for examining causal relationships among variables. Although this study was conducted in two major cities in Iran and involved a sufficient number of midwives, it would be better to conduct similar studies in other regions of Iran, as different conditions may prevail. Additionally, other influencing variables on stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life should also be considered, and their simultaneous effects should be examined in studies designed with path analysis. Furthermore, the current study, which assessed the existing situation through a questionnaire, may have limitations; conducting qualitative studies and observing job conditions could provide a better analysis of the current state. Conclusion Overall, based on the results obtained, midwives work in an environment with many occupational hazards, and ergonomic and biological risks are of significant importance to them. This group of healthcare providers experiences high occupational stress and has moderate job satisfaction and quality of life. Considering the impact of factors such as stress, job satisfaction, age, and duration of service of midwives on their quality of work life, actions such as regular assessments of the quality of work life and appropriate policy-making to improve job conditions—such as stress management, attention to mental health, increasing professional support, optimizing the work environment, and establishing incentive systems—can lead to an enhancement of midwives' quality of work life. Abbreviations OSIPOW Occupational Stress Questionnaire MSQ Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire WRQoL-2 Work-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Declarations Acknowledgments We thank all midwives who participated in the study. We also appreciate the support from the Islamic Azad University of Tabriz Medical Sciences. Ethics approval and consent to participate Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before the completion of the survey. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Azad University of Tabriz Medical Sciences, Iran (code number: IR.IAU.TABRIZ.REC.1400.113). All the methods were carried out under relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding This study received no specific grant from any funding agency. Availability of data and materials The datasets are available from the corresponding authors on request. Contributions A. Fn-K developed the study concept and study design. Testing and data collection were performed by N.R., M.Y. and Z.PM. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by A. Fn-K. N.Sh and A.R Z drafted the manuscript, and A. Fn-K provided critical revisions. All authors approved the submission of the final version of the manuscript. Clinical Trial Number: Not Applicable References Pettersson KO. Major challenges of midwifery in Africa. Afr J Midwifery Women's Health. 2008;2(2):100–3. Hashemi Nejad N, Rahimi Moghadam S, Mohammadian M, Amiri F. Survey of relationship between mental health and job stress among midwives who were working in hospitals of Kerman, Iran, 2011. Iran J Obstet Gynecol infertility. 2013;16(64):1–9. Molaie B, Mohamadi M, Habibi A, Zamanzadeh V, Dadkhah B, Molavi P, Mozaffari N. A study of job stress and its related causes among employed women in Ardabil city. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2011;11(1):76–85. Manoukian A, PEDRAM RS, Monjamed Z, Faghihzadeh S. Comparison between oncology and labor delivery nurse’s job satisfaction. HAYAT 2007, 13(3). Sharifzadeh M, Naghibi Nasab M, Keyvanlo Shahrestanaki A, Fazel N, Tabarraie Y. Quality of work life of midwives in sabzevar. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2017;23(6):848–55. Ismaila Y, Bayes S, Geraghty S. 'Going off track': The consequences of barriers to Ghanaian midwives’ ability to provide quality care. 2020. Zarrini KA, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L, Vakili M, Kavosi A. Evaluation of occupational hazards for nurses in intensive care units of tertiary care centers. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2018;5(4):153–8. Geraghty S, Speelman C, Bayes S. Fighting a losing battle: Midwives experiences of workplace stress. Women Birth. 2019;32(3):e297–306. Hunter B, Warren L. Midwives׳ experiences of workplace resilience. Midwifery. 2014;30(8):926–34. Gholamzadeh S, Sharif F, Rad FD. Sources of occupational stress and coping strategies among nurses who work in Admission and Emergency Departments of Hospitals related to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Nurs midwifery Res. 2011;16(1):41. Park Y-M, Kim SY. Impacts of job stress and cognitive failure on patient safety incidents among hospital nurses. Saf health work. 2013;4(4):210–5. Cheraghi A, Riazi H, Emamhadi M, Jambarsang S. Occupational factors related to midwifery faults from the viewpoint of midwives working in tehran city, Iran. Iran J Forensic Med. 2020;26(2):131–7. Hunter B. Mapping the emotional terrain of midwifery: what can we see and what lies ahead? Int J Work Organisation Emot. 2010;3(3):253–69. van Pelt S, Massar K, van der Eem L, Shields-Zeeman L, de Wit JB, Ruiter RA. If you don’t have enough equipment, you’re not going to provide quality services: healthcare workers’ perceptions on improving the quality of antenatal care in rural Tanzania. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100232. Mizuno M. Confusion and ethical issues surrounding the role of Japanese midwives in childbirth and abortion: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(4):502–6. Tibandebage P, Kida T, Mackintosh M, Ikingura J. Can managers empower nurse-midwives to improve maternal health care? A comparison of two resource‐poor hospitals in Tanzania. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2016;31(4):379–95. Mselle LT, Kohi TW, Dol J. Barriers and facilitators to humanizing birth care in Tanzania: findings from semi-structured interviews with midwives and obstetricians. Reproductive health. 2018;15:1–10. Izadi N, Piruznia R. Occupational health hazards among health care workers. Public Health Open Access. 2018;2(1):1–3. Osipow SH, Spokane AR. Occupational stress inventory-revised. Odessa FL: Psychol 1998:1–15. Hoboubi N, Choobineh A, Ghanavati FK, Keshavarzi S, Hosseini AA. The impact of job stress and job satisfaction on workforce productivity in an Iranian petrochemical industry. Saf health work. 2017;8(1):67–71. Najimi A, Goudarzi AM, Sharifirad G. Causes of job stress in nurses: A cross-sectional study. Iran J Nurs midwifery Res. 2012;17(4):301–5. Lin S, Chaiear N, Khiewyoo J, Wu B, Johns NP. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the work-related quality of life scale-2 in the nursing profession. Saf health work. 2013;4(1):37–45. Mazloumi A, Kazemi Z, Mehrdad R, Shahri MHK, Hossein MP. Validity and reliability of WRQoL-2 questionnaire for assessment of nurses' quality of work life. J Health Saf Work 2017, 7(2). Hancer M, George RT. Job satisfaction of restaurant employees: An empirical investigation using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. J Hospitality Tourism Res. 2003;27(1):85–100. Jafarjalal E, Ghafari M, Firouzeh MM, Farahaninia M. Intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of job satisfaction in the nursing staff: A cross-sectional study. Arvand J Health Med Sci. 2017;2(1):7–14. Arab M, Hoseini M, Panahi M, Khalili Z. Occupational nursing hazards in the emergency department in training hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. HOSPITAL 2015, 14(2). Ghahremani E, Parandeh A, Vafadar Z, Ebadi A. Survey of the occupational hazards and related factors in health care workers in military hospitals during 2016–2017. J Military Med. 2018;20(1):56–64. Tabatabee S, Afroozi M, Nejatzadegan Z, Asadi M, Goharimehr M, Kalhor R, Torshizi YF. The analysis of occupational hazards and their etiology among the employees of Teaching Hospital of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Iran Occup Health. 2014;11(2):35–44. AGHAKHANI N, CHERAGHI R, ALINEJAD V. Prevalence and factors of occupational accidents in nurses of educational and treatment centers of Urmia University of medical sciences, Urmia, 2016. Nurs Midwifery J. 2017;15(4):270–80. Fereidouni Z, Dehghan A, Najafi Kalyani M. Common causes associated with occupational injuries in Iranian health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Int J Med Reviews. 2018;5(2):77–81. Bianchi T, Belingheri M, Nespoli A, De Vito G, Riva MA. Occupational risks in midwifery: from Bernardino Ramazzini to modern times. Saf health work. 2019;10(2):245–7. Leinweber J, Creedy DK, Rowe H, Gamble J. A socioecological model of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives. Midwifery. 2017;45:7–13. Adatara P, Amooba PA, Afaya A, Salia SM, Avane MA, Kuug A, Maalman RS-E, Atakro CA, Attachie IT, Atachie C. Challenges experienced by midwives working in rural communities in the Upper East Region of Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1–8. Oncel S, Ozer ZC, Efe E. Work-related stress, burnout and job satisfaction in Turkish midwives. Social Behav Personality: Int J. 2007;35(3):317–28. Sabooteh S, Shahnazi H, Sharifirad G, Hassanzadeh A. The survey of relationship between job stress and job satisfaction of midwives who working in Isfahan maternities. J Health Syst Res. 2013;9(7):682–92. Kordi M, Mohamadirizi S, Shakeri MT, Modares Gharavi M, Salehi Fadardi J. The relationship between occupational stress and work ability among midwives in Mashhad, Iran. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2014;2(3):188–94. Nourani Saadoldin S, Kohansal Daghian Z, Esmaily H, Hooshmand E. The relationship between organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction, and occupational stress among midwives working in healthcare centers of Mashhad, Iran, 2014. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2016;4(2):622–30. Peter KA, Meier-Kaeppeli B, Pehlke-Milde J, Grylka-Baeschlin S. Work-related stress and intention to leave among midwives working in Swiss maternity hospitals–a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1–10. Hämmig O. Explaining burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals–a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–11. Peter KA, Hahn S, Schols JM, Halfens RJ. Work-related stress among health professionals in Swiss acute care and rehabilitation hospitals—A cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(15–16):3064–81. Jahromi MK, Minaei S, Abdollahifard S, Maddahfar M. The effect of stress management on occupational stress and satisfaction among midwives in obstetrics and gynecology hospital wards in Iran. Global J health Sci. 2016;8(9):91. Czekirda M, Chruściel P, Czekirda N, Jarosz MJ. Psychosocial aspect of quality of life among working and unemployed nurses and midwives. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(3):472–6. Aruldoss A, Kowalski KB, Parayitam S. The relationship between quality of work life and work-life-balance mediating role of job stress, job satisfaction and job commitment: evidence from India. J Adv Manage Res. 2021;18(1):36–62. Hadizadeh Talasaz Z, Nourani Saadoddin S, Shakeri MT. Evaluation of the relationship between the quality of work life and organizational commitment among midwives working in health-medical centers and maternity of teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences from 2013–2014. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2014;17(129):1–9. Rouleau D, Fournier P, Philibert A, Mbengue B, Dumont A. The effects of midwives’ job satisfaction on burnout, intention to quit and turnover: a longitudinal study in Senegal. Hum Resour health. 2012;10:1–14. Babapour A-R, Gahassab-Mozaffari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. Nurses’ job stress and its impact on quality of life and caring behaviors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):75. Sukmayuda BC, Kustiawan U. The Effect of Workplace Empowerment, Quality of Work-Life, Work-Life Balance, Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Job Satisfaction. ijd-demos 2022, 4(1). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Feb, 2025 Read the published version in BMC Nursing → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 08 Jan, 2025 Reviews received at journal 02 Jan, 2025 Reviews received at journal 20 Nov, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 17 Nov, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 16 Nov, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 13 Nov, 2024 Editor invited by journal 05 Nov, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 01 Nov, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 01 Nov, 2024 First submitted to journal 23 Oct, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5317166","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":375208988,"identity":"7766358d-4121-4ecb-aeb0-3b166ebabe91","order_by":0,"name":"Nasibe Sharifi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ilam University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nasibe","middleName":"","lastName":"Sharifi","suffix":""},{"id":375208990,"identity":"2e8c1a60-82ec-42c5-9ddd-11973f7fcc24","order_by":1,"name":"Azita Fathnezhad-Kazemi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Tabriz Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Azita","middleName":"","lastName":"Fathnezhad-Kazemi","suffix":""},{"id":375208991,"identity":"11510b04-f5f9-4bea-9237-965f0e5587bd","order_by":2,"name":"Nazanin Rezaei","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ilam University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nazanin","middleName":"","lastName":"Rezaei","suffix":""},{"id":375208992,"identity":"8a306d3a-f2d7-4ad6-a4e1-779130c4ff7b","order_by":3,"name":"Masoumeh Yaralizadeh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Masoumeh","middleName":"","lastName":"Yaralizadeh","suffix":""},{"id":375208993,"identity":"69072c81-2fa6-4c44-937d-383b1f7618c1","order_by":4,"name":"Zahra PourMohammad","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"29 Bahman Hospital, Iranian Social Security Organization","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zahra","middleName":"","lastName":"PourMohammad","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-10-23 08:38:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5317166/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5317166/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02784-9","type":"published","date":"2025-02-04T15:57:50+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":75930458,"identity":"bdacb64b-cb4c-4bb6-9aa9-1eea9ba1b6bc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-10 16:12:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1413059,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5317166/v1/df2fca65-4740-4454-b640-4c3a1112b90e.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Assessment of Occupational Hazards in midwifery setting and Factors Related to the Midwives' Quality of Work-Life: Multicenter Study in IRAN","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eMidwifery is one of the key professions responsible for safeguarding community health, playing a critical role in maternal and child healthcare, reproductive health services, preventing complications, and ultimately reducing mortality rates in women and children [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. More than 80% of women's healthcare services are provided by midwives [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. In Iran, the profession of midwifery is assigned to women, based on both religious beliefs and cultural norms, despite the significant physical and mental pressures they face, which have different roles according to their position [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. Work is a significant aspect of every individual\u0026rsquo;s life, and the level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with one\u0026rsquo;s job can affect different aspects of personal life and, ultimately, the effectiveness of care provided [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. Healthcare organizations, which are responsible for prevention, care, and treatment, have a special position in society. However, undesirable and challenging work environments, along with strenuous tasks, can lead to both physical and mental disorders and job dissatisfaction among healthcare providers, which can have serious consequences [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. This, in turn, affects the quality of services provided to patients. As a high-risk profession, midwifery faces numerous occupational hazards and challenges [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. Some of these challenges arise from the complex nature of the work itself, which places significant pressure on midwives, while others stem from the strenuous nature of the job and exposure to occupational hazards [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. In the midwifery profession, job-related stress is due to the heavy workload and long hours, the emotional demands of the job, dealing with women who require complex care, working in traditional environments with a shortage of midwives, fear of punishment related to negative outcomes, lack of recognition, and financial burdens, especially when women are unable to afford their care. These are among the many challenges midwives face in their work [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. From the point of view of working midwives, the difficulty of midwifery plays a significant role in the occurrence of midwifery errors [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. According to researchers, midwifery has been introduced as an emotionally demanding job, where caring for women and their families amidst social complexities exposes midwives to anxiety, pain, fear, and grief. Working in such challenging situations creates problems for midwives, and it is not surprising that low morale and job-related stress are significant concerns in the midwifery workforce [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eToday, work-related stress has become a common and costly problem in the workplace [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Dealing with multiple challenges leads to increased stress, dissatisfaction, lack of motivation, despair, and job burnout among midwives, which reduces their involvement in providing optimal care [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. Studies have shown that stressful working conditions lead to increased absenteeism, misconduct, and employee turnover [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. On the other hand, healthcare providers also face multiple occupational hazards, including biological, chemical, physical, ergonomic, and psychological risks [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. According to reports, midwives experience physical and medical limitations and problems, including the risk of hospital-acquired infections, often due to the lack or improper use of personal protective equipment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Research findings indicate that job dissatisfaction among midwives is primarily related to their work environment, job security, and benefits, and in some regions, different strategies have been implemented to improve motivation, such as improving working conditions, continuous monitoring, and offering more educational opportunities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA review of the literature highlights the importance of addressing the challenges and risks associated with midwifery to design appropriate strategies to prevent accidents and job burnout, which impact the health of individuals. Addressing these issues is an organizational necessity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. To achieve organizational health, it is essential to focus on the quality of work life for employees, providing a suitable environment that fulfills personal aspirations and creates a motivating space for the execution of tasks. Understanding the work conditions and challenges faced by those providing care to women and newborns is crucial for improving care. The present study was conducted to examine the occupational hazards and factors related to the quality of work life of midwives working in healthcare centers.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe present study was a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study conducted in 2023 in Iran, focusing on midwives working in hospitals and healthcare centers. The study population consisted of all midwifery personnel employed at healthcare and treatment centers in two cities, Ahvaz and Tabriz. Inclusion criteria included midwives with at least one year of work experience in hospitals and healthcare centers, and the absence of any physical or mental illnesses. Exclusion criteria were lack of consent to participate in the study and incomplete responses (over 10%) in the questionnaire.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSampling Method and Sample Size\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sampling was conducted in multiple stages. In each city, educational hospitals (3 in Tabriz and 2 in Ahvaz) and one non-educational (private) hospital were selected for sampling. For selecting healthcare centers in each city, clusters were first defined (5 clusters in Tabriz and 4 clusters in Ahvaz), and 3 healthcare centers from each cluster were randomly selected using the Randomizer software. Midwives working in these centers were recruited into the study based on availability, following the division of the initial sample size between hospitals and healthcare centers, until the calculated sample size was reached.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to the study\u0026rsquo;s objectives, the largest sample size was calculated based on the information from the study by Zarrini et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e], focusing on the chemical hazards dimension of the Occupational Hazards Questionnaire, yielding a sample size of 177 participants. Ultimately, considering a design effect of 1.5 and a 10% increase in study precision, the final sample size was calculated as 290 participants for each city.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy parameter: alpha\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.05, power\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.90, CI\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;95%, \u003cem\u003em\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2.38, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0/95, \u003cem\u003ed\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6%M\u003cdiv id=\"Equa\" class=\"Equation\"\u003e\u003cdiv format=\"TEX\" class=\"mathdisplay\" id=\"FileID_Equa\" name=\"EquationSource\"\u003e\n$$\\:\\varvec{n}=\\frac{{({\\varvec{Z}}_{1}-\\frac{\\varvec{\\alpha\\:}}{2})}^{2}\\:\\times\\:{\\varvec{s}}^{2}}{{\\varvec{d}}^{2}}$$\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eData Collection Tools\u003c/b\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eDemographic and Social Information Questionnaire\u003c/b\u003e: This questionnaire included demographic variables of the study participants to complete the research data. The questions covered age, educational qualification, marital status, employment status, years of employment, shift status, workplace, and job position.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eOSIPOW Occupational Stress Questionnaire\u003c/b\u003e: The Osipow Job Stress Questionnaire [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e] is based on a five-point Likert scale and consists of three parts. It was developed by Osipow in 1987 to assess individual stress from six dimensions: 1) Role Overload, 2) Role Insufficiency, 3) Role Ambiguity, 4) Role Boundary, 5) Responsibility, and 6) Physical Environment. Scoring is based on a five-point Likert scale, with options ranging from \"Never\" (1 point) to \"Most of the time\" (5 points). The total score can range from 60 to 300, with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress. Overall stress levels are categorized into four groups: low stress (50\u0026ndash;99), low to moderate stress (110\u0026ndash;149), moderate to severe stress (150\u0026ndash;199), and severe stress (200\u0026ndash;250). The validity and reliability of the questionnaire have been evaluated in studies conducted in Iran [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eWork-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (WRQoL-2)\u003c/b\u003e: This scale was designed by Van Laar et al. to be used in the healthcare sector (22). The questionnaire consists of 34 Likert-scale questions (1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Strongly Disagree, 5\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Strongly Agree). Lin et al. reported Cronbach's alpha for all dimensions of the Chinese version to range between 0.71 and 0.88 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Mazloumi et al. in Iran evaluated the validity and reliability of this questionnaire, with the reliability for various dimensions reported between 0.63 and 0.929 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eMinnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ)\u003c/b\u003e: The MSQ consists of 19 items and six subscales: payment system (3 questions), type of job (4 questions), opportunities for advancement (3 questions), organizational climate (2 questions), leadership style (4 questions), and physical conditions (3 questions). It is used to assess job satisfaction. Scoring is done on a Likert scale, where the options \"Strongly Disagree,\" \"Disagree,\" \"Neutral,\" \"Agree,\" and \"Strongly Agree\" are assigned 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points, respectively [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. The total score of the MSQ is obtained by summing up the points for all items. Scores between 19 and 38 indicate low job satisfaction, between 38 and 57 indicate moderate satisfaction, and scores above 57 indicate high job satisfaction. In a study by Jafarjalal et al., the reliability of the MSQ was determined with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eOccupational Hazards Questionnaire\u003c/b\u003e: This questionnaire was developed by Arab et al. (2014) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e] and contains 58 questions on a 5-point Likert scale (1\u0026ndash;5 points) in five categories: physical hazards (9 questions), biological hazards (6 questions), chemical hazards (6 questions), ergonomic hazards (8 questions), and psychological, organizational, and social hazards (29 questions). A score between 1 and 2.2 indicates low hazard levels, a score between 2.2001 and 3.4 indicates moderate hazard levels, and a score above 3.4001 to 5 indicates high hazard levels. The overall score for each category is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of questions, and the overall occupational hazards score is obtained by dividing the total score by the number of dimensions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter obtaining approval from the university ethics committee and permission from hospital and healthcare center officials, sampling was initiated by the researchers. Researchers visited midwives at their workplaces, recruited participants based on availability, and after explaining the study objectives and obtaining informed consent, the questionnaires were distributed to the participants for self-reporting.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eData analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24 software and included descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, and percentage. Regarding occupational hazards, the mean (SD) of each question in different dimensions was calculated, and then the total score for each dimension was reported separately. The independent \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e-test and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to assess the association between the study\u0026rsquo;s demographic variables (as an independent variable) and dependent variables (MSQ, OSIPOW, and WRQoL-2). The normal distribution of data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, skewness, and kurtosis. Although the data were slightly skewed, the data were considered normal because skewness and kurtosis were 1 to \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1. Furthermore, Pearson\u0026rsquo;s correlation test was used to assess the association between the study\u0026rsquo;s main variables (MSQ, OSIPOW, with WRQoL-2); finally, independent variables including (MSQ, OSIPOW) and sociodemographic variables with P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05 as control variables were inserted into the univariate and multivariate linear regression model (enter method) to predict the effect of them on independent variables. There were 10% missing data which were imputed with the mean substitution method. \u003cem\u003eP-values\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 were considered significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this study, 580 midwives from Ahvaz and Tabriz participated. The findings indicated that the mean age of the participants was 39.21 years, with a standard deviation of 9.09 years.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn terms of education, 83.3% of the participants held a bachelor's degree. The majority were married (69%) and worked in hospitals (64.7%). The most common work experience ranged between 16\u0026ndash;20 years (25.3%). Most participants had rotating shifts (60.3%). A statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two cities was only observed regarding marital status and employment type.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInitial statistical analysis results between demographic and work characteristics and quality of work-life showed that the mean quality of work-life was higher among individuals aged 20\u0026ndash;29 compared to other age groups, and higher among single individuals compared to married and divorced midwives. The mean work-life quality score was significantly lower for divorced participants compared to the other two groups. Additionally, the mean quality of work-life score decreased with increasing years of work experience. For instance, those with 5 to 10 years of experience had higher scores than those with longer work experience. Furthermore, the mean quality of work-life score was significantly higher for those with temporary employment compared to other groups. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean quality of work-life score between participants with fixed shifts compared to those with rotating shifts (97.48 vs. 93.93) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSociodemographic Characteristics of the Participants in Two Cities and Their Relation with the Main Variables\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eN (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTabriz\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;290)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eN (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAhvaz\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;290)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eN (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSQ\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean (SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOSIPOW\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean (SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWRQoL-2\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean (SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge (year) Mean (SD)\u003c/b\u003e 39.21 (9.09) [22\u0026ndash;60]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u0026ndash;29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e113 (19.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58 (20.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55 (19.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52.03 (14.39)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e227.78 (42.60)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e107.48 (21.54)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30\u0026ndash;39\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e168 (29.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85 ( 29.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.64 (12.51)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e231.39 (39.88)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.80 (21.14)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u0026ndash;49\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e235 (40.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e122 (42.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e113 (39.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38.30 (11.49)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e233.04 (41.86)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.03 (18.69)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e64 (11.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27 (9.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37 (12.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35.86 (8.90)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e240.38 (30.75)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.72 (16.48)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.570\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.248\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEducational status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBachelor\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e483 (83.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e238 (82.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e245 (84.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40.81 (13.16)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e235.00 (38.76)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94.83 (20.34)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaster\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e82 (14.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46 (15.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36 (12.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40.94 (22.47)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e218.78 (45.29)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e97.66 (21.95)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePh.D.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15 (2.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (2.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 (3.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51.13 (18.91)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e221.13 (49.79)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.00 (22.43)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.383\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.002\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.406\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMarital status\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarried\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e400 (69.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e219 (37.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e181 (31.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.24 (12.44)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e233.54 (41.92)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.92 (19.77)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e156 (26.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55 (9.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101 (17.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.95 (14.11)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e226.46 937.19)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e102.76 (20.41)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDivorced or widow\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24 (4.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16 (2.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8 (1.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33.96 (9.50 )\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e250.71 (25.99)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e87.46 (24.03)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"6\" nameend=\"c6\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJob environment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHospitals\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e375 (64.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e188 (64.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e187 (64.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40.19 (12.28)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e233.86 (38.61)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e93.70 (19.96)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHealthcare centers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e205 (35.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e102 (35.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e102 (35.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.76 (14.91)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e229.59 (43.45)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e98.34 (21.50)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.931\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.240\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.036\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWork experience\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e131 (22.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e67 (23.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e64 (22.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51.18 (14.77)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e225.13 (43.33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e107.93 (20.72)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u0026ndash;10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e72 (12.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 (13.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32 (11.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.64 (13.56)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e211.39 (40.51)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99.11 (20.30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u0026ndash;15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e107 (18.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e48 (16.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e59 (20.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.99 (9.89)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e239.10 (34.86)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e89.61 (20.30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u0026ndash;20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e147 (25.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e82 (28.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e65 (22.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35.77 (10.89)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e240.61 (40.18)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91.73 (20.72)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u0026ndash;25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e77 (13.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37 (12.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 (13.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.07 (10.03)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e240.82 (32.76)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e89.53 (17.88)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46 (7.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16 (5.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30 (10.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41.09 (13.32)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e229.39 (41.98)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88.11 (14.90)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.134\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eType of employment\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemporary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88 (15.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50 (17.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38 (13.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51.67 (15.31)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e237.35 (39.89)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e105.82 (19.93)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eContractual\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e234 (40.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e102 (35.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e132 (45.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.59 (11.71)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e246.83 (31.18)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88.78 (18.79)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLifetime\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e258 (44.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e138 (47.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e120 (41.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41.57 (11.79)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e217.50 (42.86)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e97.71 (20.51)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003ea\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.034\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eType of shift\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDay shifts only\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e230 (39.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e116 (40.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e114 (39.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41.97 (14.39)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e227.62 (43.63)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e97.48 (21.69)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDay \u0026amp; night shifts\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e350 (60.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e174 (60.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e176 (60.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40.52 (12.54)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e235.45 (37.88)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e93.93 (19.79)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP- value\u003c/b\u003e \u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003eb\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.865\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.215\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.027\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.042\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"7\"\u003e\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003eANOVA, \u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e t-test\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results showed that 314 (54.1%) participants had completed a course on occupational hazards, while 266 (45.9%) had not received this training. According to reports, 366 (63.1%) participants experienced musculoskeletal problems. According to Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, the study found that the level of occupational hazards among the midwives surveyed was high, with a mean (SD) score of 3.76 (0.87). Among the dimensions of occupational hazards, ergonomic and biological hazards were identified as the most significant, with mean scores of 4.22 and 4.10, respectively. The mean scores for chemical and physical hazards were also reported to be high, at 3.82 and 3.66, respectively. Psychological, social, and organizational hazards were recognized as the least significant sources of occupational injury among the other dimensions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInformation about occupational Hazard\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRisk type\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eItems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mean (SD) score of each question\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mean (SD) total score of dimensions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"5\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBiological hazards\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSkin contact with blood or other fluids of the patient\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.45 (1.14)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"5\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.10 (1.09)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInjury with sharp objects\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.32 (1.24)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlunging the head of the needle into the body\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.32 (1.25)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInfectious diseases\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.28 (1.33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSplashing of blood and body fluids in the eyes and mucous membranes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.30 (1.30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBroken slides or glass containers containing body fluids of the patient\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.94 (1.06)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"5\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eChemical hazards\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRespiratory problems\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.04 (1.49)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"5\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.82 (1.30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSkin sensitivity (dermatitis)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.08 (1.40)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBreathing fumes of disinfectants/sterilizers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.04 (1.44)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEye contact with fumes of disinfectants/sterilizers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.98 (1.53)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSplashing chemicals in the eyes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.97 (1.53)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDrug/chemical poisoning\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.90 (1.52)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"8\" rowspan=\"9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePhysical hazards\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWorkplace noise pollution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.35 (1.19)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"8\" rowspan=\"9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3..66 (1.05)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproper ventilation of the workplace\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.31 (1.24)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHitting a bed or stretcher\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.26(1.24)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInadequate lighting and lighting of the workplace\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.13 (1.36)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRadiation hazards\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.24 (1.39)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSlip and fall\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.00 (1.43)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHitting due to heavy objects falling on a part of the body\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.86 (1.18)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeing hit or injured by patients or clients\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.87 (1.53)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJumping foreign body in the eye\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.02 (1.17)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"7\" rowspan=\"8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eErgonomic hazards\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStanding too much to perform activities related to job duties\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.41 (1.09)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"7\" rowspan=\"8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.22 (0.95)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproper posture while performing tasks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.37 (1.15)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003efoot pain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.51 (0.96)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBack or back pain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.52 (0.99)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ewrist pain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.37 (1.23)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eshoulder pain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.53 (2.38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eArthritis of the neck\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.41 (1.18)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLifting and carrying heavy objects/patients\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.72 (1.03)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"28\" rowspan=\"29\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePsychological-social and organizational risks\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDisrespect from the patient and the patient's companions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.05 (1.30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"22\" rowspan=\"23\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.98 (0.54)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChronic fatigue due to work activity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.82 (1.08)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJob stress\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.54 (0.96)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOccurrence of job-related depression\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.27 (1.26)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeing under the control of the working relationship with doctors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.54 (1.28)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUncomfortable feeling due to caring for non-same-sex patients\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.32 (0.84)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInappropriate communication with colleagues in the work department (conflict with colleagues)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.48 (0.91)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInappropriate communication flow with different management levels of the hospital and the health center\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.57 (1.03)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esleep disorders\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.61 (1.25)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIsolation, bad mood and despair\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.27 (1.38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAddiction to sedatives and psychotropic drugs\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.30 (0.86)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImposing unrelated tasks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.68 (1.20)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExcessive expectations of patients and their families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.78 (1.18)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInvolvement of the patient's relatives in providing care measures\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.60 (1.19)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack of job independence in performing professional duties\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.08 (1.32)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe disproportion of the workload of the work department with the number of personnel\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.67 (1.12)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack of job independence in performing professional duties\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.54 (1.23)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmployment discrimination in the workplace\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.01 (0.94)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOccurrence of concerns related to the care and education of children due to work\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.24 (1.24)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIncompatibility of assigned responsibilities with job description\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.75 (1.21)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeling unappreciated by managers\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.39 (1.43)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot benefiting from job opportunities according to your abilities\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.89 (1.30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-observance of maximum working hours\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.22 (1.12)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniformity and repetition of the work environment (absence of tone in the work environment)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.93 (1.35)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"5\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLack of support from external organizations (midwifery system, university, etc.) in your job\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.43 (1.05)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe society's negative view of midwifery\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.82 (1.21)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterference between work and personal life\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.26 (1.20)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe negative view of your spouse and first-class family members towards your work\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.69 (1.56)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe negative impact of dealing with very sick patients (end stage) on your mood\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.86 (1.33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the biological hazards category, aside from exposure to \"broken glass or containers containing body fluids,\" which was classified as a medium hazard, the main occupational injuries reported included skin contact with blood or other bodily fluids, injuries from sharp and cutting objects, needle-stick injuries, infectious diseases, and splashing of fluids into the eyes. In the chemical hazard\u0026rsquo;s domain, the mean score for drug toxicity was at a medium level, while the other options received high scores. Regarding physical hazards, all options received high scores and were considered significant hazards. Noise pollution and inadequate ventilation scored the highest, with averages of 4.35 and 4.31, respectively. Regarding ergonomic hazards, which were identified as the most important factor, high scores were noted for pain in various body areas, including the shoulders, back, and legs, as well as prolonged standing for job-related tasks and poor posture. Finally, in the psychological, social, and organizational hazards domain, although most items scored above the mean, the highest scores were associated with occupational stress and lack of external support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive statistics for occupational stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life are presented in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. The mean scores obtained were 232.35, 41.9, and 95.34, respectively. In terms of occupational stress, the score was in the severe range, while the mean score for job satisfaction was at a moderate level.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive statistics and correlations among primary study variables (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;580)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003evariables\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean (SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRange\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c6\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorrelation coefficient\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1- MSQ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41.09 (13.32)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u0026ndash;77\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.556\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.534\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2- OSIPOW\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e232.35 (40.40)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e124\u0026ndash;287\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.375\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3- WRQoL-2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e95.34 (20.62)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39\u0026ndash;170\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eP\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results of the Pearson correlation test among the main study variables are also shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. According to the Pearson correlation analysis, the relationship between occupational stress and the overall quality of work life was found to be significant, negative, and moderate (r = -0.375, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). Additionally, the results indicated a positive and significant correlation between job satisfaction and the quality of work life of midwives. Furthermore, a negative and significant relationship was observed between occupational stress and job satisfaction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eHear\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccording to Model 1, the results of univariate regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between stress and job satisfaction with quality of work life. These variables individually predicted 13.9% and 28.4% of the changes in quality of work life, respectively. Specifically, for each standard deviation increase in occupational stress, the quality of work life decreased by 0.375 standard deviations (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.020, β = -0.375). Conversely, for each standard deviation increase in job satisfaction, quality of work life increased by 0.534 standard deviations (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.534).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultivariate regression analysis in Model 2 indicated that 29.2% of the changes in quality of work life could be explained by the two variables of stress and job satisfaction, with job satisfaction having the greatest impact on quality of work life (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.471).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, in Model 3, when all variables were included in the regression model using the inter method, the results showed that 31.3% of the changes in quality of work life could be explained by the variables entered in the model (R\u0026sup2;_adj\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.313, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). The variables of job satisfaction, age, and work experience had significant relationships with quality of work life, with job satisfaction having the most substantial effect (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.376). This indicates that as job satisfaction increases, quality of work life also increases. However, work experience harmed the quality of work life, such that an increase in work duration was associated with a decrease in quality of work life (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001, β = -0.296) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnivariate and multivariate linear regression analysis of WRQoL-2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"10\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePredictors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eR\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eR\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003eadj\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-Value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eS.E\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eβ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e95%CI\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSQ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.534\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.285\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.284\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.827\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.054\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.534\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.720 to 0.934\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e230.90\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOSIPOW\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.375\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.141\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.139\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.192\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.375\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.230 to -0.153\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94.78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.543\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.294\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.292\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e120.34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSQ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.730\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.065\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.471\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.602 to 0.858\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOSIPOW\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.058\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.113\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.100 to -0.016\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eModel 3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.568\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.322\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.313\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33.914\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSQ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.667\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.072\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.431\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.526 to 0.809\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOSIPOW\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.066\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.044\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.086\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.091 to 0.003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarital status\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.196\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.823\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.409\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.045\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-4.591 to 0.944\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.387\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.167\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.171\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.716 to -0.229\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJob environment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.636\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.410\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.978\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.033\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-4.440 to 7.260\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWork experience\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-3.865\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.992\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.296\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-5.813 to -1.917\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType of employment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.102\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.034\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.241\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.071\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.403 to 0.036\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType of shift\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.857\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.5183\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.865\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-6.1442 to 5.109\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe results of the present study, conducted to examine the status of occupational hazards and the relationship between stress levels and job satisfaction with the quality of work life of midwives working in various health-care sectors, revealed that there is no desirable status regarding occupational hazards, work stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life among midwives in both cities. To achieve the study's objectives, the status of occupational hazards was first assessed, with findings indicating high scores in various dimensions of occupational hazards. According to the reports from participating midwives, they experience different occupational hazards at a high level. The investigations showed that ergonomic and biological hazards were reported as the most significant occupational hazards, while psychological, social, and organizational hazards were mentioned as secondary sources of occupational hazards. Among biological hazards, skin contact with blood or other patient fluids, injuries from sharp objects, needle stick injuries, contracting infectious diseases, and splashes of fluids into the eyes were reported as the most important occupational injuries. In the category of chemical hazards, only the mean score for drug toxicity was moderate; the other options received high scores. Regarding physical hazards, noise pollution and inadequate environmental ventilation received the highest scores. In connection with ergonomic hazards, which were identified as the most significant, pain in various body areas including shoulders, back, and legs, standing for prolonged periods during job-related activities, and poor physical posture were also mentioned as high risks. Finally, despite most psychological, social, and organizational hazards obtaining scores above mean, the highest scores pertained to work stress and lack of external support. present study's findings align with other studies that have assessed occupational hazards in groups of nurses and midwives. Numerous studies have reported occupational hazards that health care providers may encounter, with ergonomic hazards like musculoskeletal problems and physical hazards such as inadequate ventilation and noise pollution being identified as the primary risks [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Common ergonomic hazards include prolonged standing for job-related activities and poor physical posture during work [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. In studies involving nurses working in educational hospitals, biological hazards such as exposure to blood and other fluids were reported as high [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Other studies have also indicated that skin contact with blood and other bodily fluids is an occupational hazard faced by midwives and nurses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. Fereidooni and colleagues, in a systematic review, reported that the most common occupational hazards include needle stick injuries, contact with infectious materials, and transmission of diseases such as hepatitis and AIDS, which can also lead to psychological harm [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. Additionally, Bianchi et al. mentioned factors such as infection risk, post-traumatic stress, and musculoskeletal problems as part of the occupational hazards in midwifery [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. Leinweber and colleagues, in their study on Australian midwives, indicated that harsh working conditions and post-traumatic stress symptoms among midwives may have significant consequences, such as reducing empathetic abilities and emotional care, potentially contributing to feelings of lack of support among women during childbirth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. Adatara and colleagues, through a qualitative study on the challenges faced by midwives in Ghana, referred to various themes, one of which was the lack of necessary physical infrastructure [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on study results, issues such as the risk of infections, musculoskeletal problems, and psychological and physical discomfort due to night shifts and traumatic events during childbirth are challenges faced by midwives, and unfortunately, occupational hazards in midwifery are often underestimated. To mitigate occupational hazards, regular training courses on ergonomic principles and biological hazards associated with midwifery work environments should be conducted, raising awareness and establishing serious policies on prevention and personal protective measures against biological agents, such as providing and mandating the use of protective equipment and proper management of biological materials. Additionally, attention to the equipment used in midwives' work environments, which should align with their body size and needs, as well as efforts to optimize the workspace to reduce physical strains, could be appropriate measures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother finding of this study indicated that the scores obtained from work stress and job satisfaction of participants were in the severe and moderate ranges, respectively. Furthermore, the mean score for the quality of work life among participants was also at a moderate level. The results of other studies related to work stress and job satisfaction in Iran align with present findings [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. The results of a study by Kordi and colleagues in Iran indicated that the mean score for work stress and work capability was 149 and 38.81, respectively, with a negative correlation between work stress and work capability; midwives experiencing higher work stress showed poorer work capability. They concluded that preventive measures should be taken to eliminate or reduce work stress and increase the work capability of Iranian midwives, although identifying sources of work stress is essential for adopting appropriate stress management strategies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. In a study examining the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and job satisfaction and work stress among midwives working in health care centers, the results indicated a significant direct correlation between organizational behavior and job satisfaction and an inverse correlation with work stress [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. Midwives and all health personnel who work night shifts or at unconventional hours or in rotating shifts are considered sensitive occupations, and given the role of midwives in providing quality services to mothers and children, evaluating their working conditions is crucial. Special attention must be given to these individuals to ensure that work stress does not negatively impact their performance and abilities. By reducing and managing stress, they can enhance their job satisfaction and improve their work quality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a study by Peter and colleagues [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e] on midwives working in a maternity ward and women\u0026rsquo;s department of a public hospital in Switzerland, it was reported that compared to other health professions, the desire to leave the profession is higher among younger generations of midwives. This finding has been corroborated in other studies, where researchers indicated that work stress, inadequate working conditions, and insufficient rewards for individuals working in health care centers\u0026mdash;especially in midwifery and nursing environments, which are heavily influenced by work-related stress and have higher emotional demands\u0026mdash;lead to a greater likelihood of premature departure from the job [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis is an important finding for heads of institutions and policymakers, who must implement strategies to reduce work stress among midwives to retain them in their workplaces. Additionally, broader studies should design and implement interventions to reduce work-related stress and increase job satisfaction among midwives. It has been shown that training stress coping skills, including stress management, can effectively reduce levels of work stress. However, reducing stress without addressing professional, occupational, organizational, and environmental factors will not lead to job satisfaction [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, it is recommended to create a supportive environment and appropriate welfare conditions to reduce work stress, and by holding relevant training courses on stress management and enhancing communication skills, psychological support can be provided to help reduce stress. Furthermore, creating career advancement opportunities and recognizing good performance can also be effective. It should be noted that all measures that lead to improved working conditions, enhanced psychological and social support, and increased professional support can lead to increased job satisfaction, ultimately contributing to increased productivity in healthcare organizations and improved service quality for mothers and children.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, another finding of the study regarding the factors affecting the quality of work life of midwives indicated the need for appropriate measures to improve this variable, given the moderate overall score for quality of work life among participants. Overall, other studies have also shown that the quality of work life for healthcare providers, particularly midwives, is not very favorable [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, paying attention to the factors involved is essential, as it closely relates to the quality and capability of organizations in delivering health services to clients. Addressing the quality of work life of employees fosters positive attitudes toward their work and organization, enhancing productivity, internal motivation, and organizational effectiveness [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. The examination of the relationship between this quality of work life with demographic characteristics, stress status, and job satisfaction revealed that the quality of work life among midwives aged 20 to 29 years, single individuals, and those with temporary employment status were higher compared to older ages, married individuals, and those with formal employment status. Additionally, with increasing work experience (length of service), the mean score of quality of work life decreased, such that the mean score of this variable in the group with 5 to 10 years of work experience was higher than that of individuals with more extended work experience, and a statistically significant difference was also found in the mean score of quality of work life among participants with fixed shifts compared to those with rotating shifts. In another study in Iran, the score obtained for the quality of work life of midwives was low, and a correlation was found between quality of work life and the mean weekly working hours and satisfaction with workload in shifts, but no relationship was observed between quality of work life and demographic characteristics such as age, education, marital status, or number of children [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, considering the low quality of life scores among married individuals, it can be said that married people may experience lower work quality due to stress from other family responsibilities and increased workload. Shift work can disrupt family and social life, leading to a decline in work-life quality. Furthermore, according to various studies and what we extracted from our study, midwives working in delivery rooms reported lower work quality and job satisfaction, along with higher job stress compared to midwives employed in health centers and clinics [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. This could be due to midwives in delivery rooms facing conditions such as dealing with emergency and unpredictable situations, excessive noise in the workplace, rotating shifts, long working hours, wages that are disproportionate to their responsibilities, and pressure from heavy workloads, which can all affect their perception of work-life quality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a study by Talasaz and colleagues, the mean work-life quality score for midwives in healthcare centers was 18.67, while for those in delivery rooms, it was 16.62, indicating lower work quality among the staff. According to them, efforts to enhance work-life quality lead to greater commitment among employees and contribute to the growth and dynamism of the organization [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. A study by Rouleau and colleagues, conducted on midwives working in Senegal, found that their greatest dissatisfaction was related to aspects of the work environment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. Given these working conditions, it is evident that job factors significantly affect work-life quality; high work pressure in midwifery reduces work-life quality. Our study also indicated that there were statistically significant inverse and direct relationships between the main variables of stress and job satisfaction with midwives' work-life quality. Specifically, as job stress perception increases, work-life quality decreases, and as job satisfaction increases, work-life quality improves. Ultimately, in the regression model presented, examining various variables revealed that job satisfaction, age, and work experience (length of service) had significant relationships with work-life quality, with job satisfaction having the greatest impact. The next influential variable, work experience, had a negative effect on work-life quality, such that as the duration of employment increased, work-life quality decreased. Enhancing work-life quality can contribute to economic, social, and cultural development and improve individuals' health levels. The more control an individual has over events, the lower their stress levels will be, which in turn will increase their efficiency. Researchers believe that work-life quality is related to an individual's attitude toward their job; the more mutual trust, attention, appreciation, and suitable opportunities for employees are provided by managers in the workplace, the more belief in better job performance individuals will develop, which will also help reduce job-related stress [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. Given the relationship between job conditions, such as stressful environments, and job satisfaction with quality of life, the recommendations made for reducing stress and increasing job satisfaction can contribute to improving quality of life. These activities include creating a safe working environment, promoting physical health, addressing mental health by providing psychological support and encouraging teamwork, establishing a work-life balance such as flexible working hours and appropriate leave, providing educational and professional development opportunities, increasing wages and benefits, creating a regular reward system, implementing stress reduction programs, and periodically assessing work-life quality through regular surveys. Implementing all these suggestions will require proper policy-making and planning.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eLimitations\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was a cross-sectional study, which is not considered suitable for examining causal relationships among variables. Although this study was conducted in two major cities in Iran and involved a sufficient number of midwives, it would be better to conduct similar studies in other regions of Iran, as different conditions may prevail. Additionally, other influencing variables on stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life should also be considered, and their simultaneous effects should be examined in studies designed with path analysis. Furthermore, the current study, which assessed the existing situation through a questionnaire, may have limitations; conducting qualitative studies and observing job conditions could provide a better analysis of the current state.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOverall, based on the results obtained, midwives work in an environment with many occupational hazards, and ergonomic and biological risks are of significant importance to them. This group of healthcare providers experiences high occupational stress and has moderate job satisfaction and quality of life. Considering the impact of factors such as stress, job satisfaction, age, and duration of service of midwives on their quality of work life, actions such as regular assessments of the quality of work life and appropriate policy-making to improve job conditions\u0026mdash;such as stress management, attention to mental health, increasing professional support, optimizing the work environment, and establishing incentive systems\u0026mdash;can lead to an enhancement of midwives' quality of work life.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionList\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eOSIPOW\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOccupational Stress Questionnaire\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eMSQ\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"DefinitionListEntry\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Term\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eWRQoL-2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Description\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWork-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank all midwives who participated in the study. We also appreciate the support from the Islamic Azad University of Tabriz Medical Sciences.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten informed consent was obtained from each participant before the completion of the survey. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Azad University of Tabriz Medical Sciences, Iran (code number: IR.IAU.TABRIZ.REC.1400.113). All the methods were carried out under relevant guidelines and regulations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study received no specific grant from any funding agency.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets are available from the corresponding authors on request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eContributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA. Fn-K developed the study concept and study design. Testing and data collection were performed by N.R., M.Y. and Z.PM. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by A. Fn-K. N.Sh and A.R Z drafted the manuscript, and A. Fn-K provided critical revisions. All authors approved the submission of the final version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical Trial Number:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eNot Applicable\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePettersson KO. Major challenges of midwifery in Africa. Afr J Midwifery Women's Health. 2008;2(2):100\u0026ndash;3.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHashemi Nejad N, Rahimi Moghadam S, Mohammadian M, Amiri F. Survey of relationship between mental health and job stress among midwives who were working in hospitals of Kerman, Iran, 2011. Iran J Obstet Gynecol infertility. 2013;16(64):1\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMolaie B, Mohamadi M, Habibi A, Zamanzadeh V, Dadkhah B, Molavi P, Mozaffari N. A study of job stress and its related causes among employed women in Ardabil city. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2011;11(1):76\u0026ndash;85.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eManoukian A, PEDRAM RS, Monjamed Z, Faghihzadeh S. Comparison between oncology and labor delivery nurse\u0026rsquo;s job satisfaction. HAYAT 2007, 13(3).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharifzadeh M, Naghibi Nasab M, Keyvanlo Shahrestanaki A, Fazel N, Tabarraie Y. Quality of work life of midwives in sabzevar. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2017;23(6):848\u0026ndash;55.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIsmaila Y, Bayes S, Geraghty S. 'Going off track': The consequences of barriers to Ghanaian midwives\u0026rsquo; ability to provide quality care. 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZarrini KA, Sanagoo A, Jouybari L, Vakili M, Kavosi A. Evaluation of occupational hazards for nurses in intensive care units of tertiary care centers. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2018;5(4):153\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGeraghty S, Speelman C, Bayes S. Fighting a losing battle: Midwives experiences of workplace stress. Women Birth. 2019;32(3):e297\u0026ndash;306.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHunter B, Warren L. Midwives׳ experiences of workplace resilience. Midwifery. 2014;30(8):926\u0026ndash;34.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGholamzadeh S, Sharif F, Rad FD. Sources of occupational stress and coping strategies among nurses who work in Admission and Emergency Departments of Hospitals related to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Nurs midwifery Res. 2011;16(1):41.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePark Y-M, Kim SY. Impacts of job stress and cognitive failure on patient safety incidents among hospital nurses. Saf health work. 2013;4(4):210\u0026ndash;5.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCheraghi A, Riazi H, Emamhadi M, Jambarsang S. Occupational factors related to midwifery faults from the viewpoint of midwives working in tehran city, Iran. Iran J Forensic Med. 2020;26(2):131\u0026ndash;7.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHunter B. Mapping the emotional terrain of midwifery: what can we see and what lies ahead? Int J Work Organisation Emot. 2010;3(3):253\u0026ndash;69.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003evan Pelt S, Massar K, van der Eem L, Shields-Zeeman L, de Wit JB, Ruiter RA. If you don\u0026rsquo;t have enough equipment, you\u0026rsquo;re not going to provide quality services: healthcare workers\u0026rsquo; perceptions on improving the quality of antenatal care in rural Tanzania. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100232.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMizuno M. Confusion and ethical issues surrounding the role of Japanese midwives in childbirth and abortion: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(4):502\u0026ndash;6.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTibandebage P, Kida T, Mackintosh M, Ikingura J. Can managers empower nurse-midwives to improve maternal health care? A comparison of two resource‐poor hospitals in Tanzania. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2016;31(4):379\u0026ndash;95.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMselle LT, Kohi TW, Dol J. Barriers and facilitators to humanizing birth care in Tanzania: findings from semi-structured interviews with midwives and obstetricians. Reproductive health. 2018;15:1\u0026ndash;10.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIzadi N, Piruznia R. Occupational health hazards among health care workers. Public Health Open Access. 2018;2(1):1\u0026ndash;3.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOsipow SH, Spokane AR. Occupational stress inventory-revised. Odessa FL: Psychol 1998:1\u0026ndash;15.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoboubi N, Choobineh A, Ghanavati FK, Keshavarzi S, Hosseini AA. The impact of job stress and job satisfaction on workforce productivity in an Iranian petrochemical industry. Saf health work. 2017;8(1):67\u0026ndash;71.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNajimi A, Goudarzi AM, Sharifirad G. Causes of job stress in nurses: A cross-sectional study. Iran J Nurs midwifery Res. 2012;17(4):301\u0026ndash;5.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin S, Chaiear N, Khiewyoo J, Wu B, Johns NP. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the work-related quality of life scale-2 in the nursing profession. Saf health work. 2013;4(1):37\u0026ndash;45.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMazloumi A, Kazemi Z, Mehrdad R, Shahri MHK, Hossein MP. Validity and reliability of WRQoL-2 questionnaire for assessment of nurses' quality of work life. J Health Saf Work 2017, 7(2).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHancer M, George RT. Job satisfaction of restaurant employees: An empirical investigation using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. J Hospitality Tourism Res. 2003;27(1):85\u0026ndash;100.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJafarjalal E, Ghafari M, Firouzeh MM, Farahaninia M. Intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of job satisfaction in the nursing staff: A cross-sectional study. Arvand J Health Med Sci. 2017;2(1):7\u0026ndash;14.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArab M, Hoseini M, Panahi M, Khalili Z. Occupational nursing hazards in the emergency department in training hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. HOSPITAL 2015, 14(2).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGhahremani E, Parandeh A, Vafadar Z, Ebadi A. Survey of the occupational hazards and related factors in health care workers in military hospitals during 2016\u0026ndash;2017. J Military Med. 2018;20(1):56\u0026ndash;64.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTabatabee S, Afroozi M, Nejatzadegan Z, Asadi M, Goharimehr M, Kalhor R, Torshizi YF. The analysis of occupational hazards and their etiology among the employees of Teaching Hospital of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Iran Occup Health. 2014;11(2):35\u0026ndash;44.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAGHAKHANI N, CHERAGHI R, ALINEJAD V. Prevalence and factors of occupational accidents in nurses of educational and treatment centers of Urmia University of medical sciences, Urmia, 2016. Nurs Midwifery J. 2017;15(4):270\u0026ndash;80.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFereidouni Z, Dehghan A, Najafi Kalyani M. Common causes associated with occupational injuries in Iranian health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Int J Med Reviews. 2018;5(2):77\u0026ndash;81.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBianchi T, Belingheri M, Nespoli A, De Vito G, Riva MA. Occupational risks in midwifery: from Bernardino Ramazzini to modern times. Saf health work. 2019;10(2):245\u0026ndash;7.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeinweber J, Creedy DK, Rowe H, Gamble J. A socioecological model of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives. Midwifery. 2017;45:7\u0026ndash;13.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdatara P, Amooba PA, Afaya A, Salia SM, Avane MA, Kuug A, Maalman RS-E, Atakro CA, Attachie IT, Atachie C. Challenges experienced by midwives working in rural communities in the Upper East Region of Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOncel S, Ozer ZC, Efe E. Work-related stress, burnout and job satisfaction in Turkish midwives. Social Behav Personality: Int J. 2007;35(3):317\u0026ndash;28.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSabooteh S, Shahnazi H, Sharifirad G, Hassanzadeh A. The survey of relationship between job stress and job satisfaction of midwives who working in Isfahan maternities. J Health Syst Res. 2013;9(7):682\u0026ndash;92.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKordi M, Mohamadirizi S, Shakeri MT, Modares Gharavi M, Salehi Fadardi J. The relationship between occupational stress and work ability among midwives in Mashhad, Iran. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2014;2(3):188\u0026ndash;94.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNourani Saadoldin S, Kohansal Daghian Z, Esmaily H, Hooshmand E. The relationship between organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction, and occupational stress among midwives working in healthcare centers of Mashhad, Iran, 2014. J Midwifery Reproductive Health. 2016;4(2):622\u0026ndash;30.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeter KA, Meier-Kaeppeli B, Pehlke-Milde J, Grylka-Baeschlin S. Work-related stress and intention to leave among midwives working in Swiss maternity hospitals\u0026ndash;a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1\u0026ndash;10.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eH\u0026auml;mmig O. Explaining burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals\u0026ndash;a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1\u0026ndash;11.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeter KA, Hahn S, Schols JM, Halfens RJ. Work-related stress among health professionals in Swiss acute care and rehabilitation hospitals\u0026mdash;A cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(15\u0026ndash;16):3064\u0026ndash;81.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJahromi MK, Minaei S, Abdollahifard S, Maddahfar M. The effect of stress management on occupational stress and satisfaction among midwives in obstetrics and gynecology hospital wards in Iran. Global J health Sci. 2016;8(9):91.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCzekirda M, Chruściel P, Czekirda N, Jarosz MJ. Psychosocial aspect of quality of life among working and unemployed nurses and midwives. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(3):472\u0026ndash;6.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAruldoss A, Kowalski KB, Parayitam S. The relationship between quality of work life and work-life-balance mediating role of job stress, job satisfaction and job commitment: evidence from India. J Adv Manage Res. 2021;18(1):36\u0026ndash;62.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHadizadeh Talasaz Z, Nourani Saadoddin S, Shakeri MT. Evaluation of the relationship between the quality of work life and organizational commitment among midwives working in health-medical centers and maternity of teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences from 2013\u0026ndash;2014. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2014;17(129):1\u0026ndash;9.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRouleau D, Fournier P, Philibert A, Mbengue B, Dumont A. The effects of midwives\u0026rsquo; job satisfaction on burnout, intention to quit and turnover: a longitudinal study in Senegal. Hum Resour health. 2012;10:1\u0026ndash;14.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBabapour A-R, Gahassab-Mozaffari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. Nurses\u0026rsquo; job stress and its impact on quality of life and caring behaviors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):75.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSukmayuda BC, Kustiawan U. The Effect of Workplace Empowerment, Quality of Work-Life, Work-Life Balance, Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Job Satisfaction. \u003cem\u003eijd-demos\u003c/em\u003e 2022, 4(1).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-nursing","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"nurs","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Nursing](http://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/nurs/default.aspx","title":"BMC Nursing","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Occupational hazards, quality of work life, job stress, job satisfaction, midwife","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5317166/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5317166/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMidwifery is one of the key professions in maintaining community health and is important in providing maternal and child healthcare. As a high-risk profession, it involves numerous occupational hazards and challenges that can affect the quality of work life. This study investigated the occupational hazards and factors related to midwives' quality of work life.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethod\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 in Iran, involving midwives working in hospitals (teaching and non-teaching) and health centers. Sampling was done in multiple stages in two large cities, Tabriz and Ahvaz. All midwifery staff meeting the inclusion criteria participated in the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire, and the analysis was performed using SPSS version 24.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, the information of 580 participants was analyzed. The mean (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD) age was 39.21 (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.09), with 83% of participants holding a bachelor's degree in midwifery, and the majority were hospital employees. The mean (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD) occupational hazard score was 3.76 (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.87), with ergonomic and biological hazards having the highest mean scores, 4.22 and 4.10, respectively, making them the most significant occupational hazards. Preliminary results showed that the mean scores for job stress, job satisfaction, and quality of work life were 232.35 (high), 41.09 (moderate), and 95.34, respectively. In the regression model, job satisfaction, age, and work experience were significantly associated with quality of work life, with job satisfaction having the strongest influence (β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.376, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0013). As job satisfaction increased, the quality of work life also improved. However, work experience had a negative impact, indicating that as work experience increased, quality of work life decreased (β=-0.296, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegular assessment of working conditions and the quality of work life is essential, and special attention should be paid to reducing occupational hazards. Given the high levels of job stress and dissatisfaction, there is a need for planning and policy-making to provide psychological support to manage stress, increase professional support, optimize the work environment, and manage physical demands.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Assessment of Occupational Hazards in midwifery setting and Factors Related to the Midwives' Quality of Work-Life: Multicenter Study in IRAN","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-11-13 06:51:02","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5317166/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-01-08T07:41:37+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-01-02T16:36:27+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-11-20T16:14:39+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"213496554501078725744359635911185152818","date":"2024-11-18T04:16:58+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"296914477884157882288335305605582393739","date":"2024-11-16T06:01:38+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-11-14T02:39:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2024-11-05T08:35:06+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-11-01T06:34:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-11-01T06:34:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Nursing","date":"2024-10-23T08:27:14+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-nursing","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"nurs","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Nursing](http://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/nurs/default.aspx","title":"BMC Nursing","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"ceb998b1-d478-410c-a5be-245282a3651f","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 13th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-02-10T16:03:16+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5317166","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02784-9","journal":{"identity":"bmc-nursing","isVorOnly":false,"title":"BMC Nursing"},"publishedOn":"2025-02-04 15:57:50","publishedOnDateReadable":"February 4th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-11-13 06:51:02","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02784-9","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02784-9","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5317166","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5317166","identity":"rs-5317166","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}