Homeostatic plasticity rules that compensate for cell size are susceptible to channel deletion
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-4.0
Abstract
Neurons can increase in size dramatically during growth. In many species neurons must preserve their intrinsic dynamics and physiological function across several length scales. For example, neurons in crustacean central pattern generators generate similar activity patterns despite multiple-fold increases in their size and changes in morphology. This scale invariance hints at regulation mechanisms that compensate for size changes by somehow altering membrane currents. Using conductance-based neuron models, we asked whether simple activity-dependent feedback can maintain intrinsic voltage dynamics in a neuron as its size is varied. Despite relying only on a single sensor that measures time-averaged intracellular calcium as a proxy for activity, we found that this regulation mechanism could regulate conductance densities of ion channels, and was robust to changes in the size of the neuron. By mapping changes in cell size onto perturbations in the space of conductance densities of all channels, we show how robustness to size change coexists with sensitivity to perturbations that alter the ratios of maximum conductances of different ion channel types. Our findings suggest that biological regulation that is optimized for coping with expected perturbations such as size changes will be vulnerable to other kinds of perturbations such as channel deletions.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (86)
- doi:10.1152/jn.01043.2002 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011992 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.170.3965.1409 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3271-3_12 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn2150 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0022-1910(00)00078-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3679-04.2005 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.1992.67.2.332 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0280-14.2014 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-08-05703.1995 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(84)84244-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79494-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135751 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.847 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/9165 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.278 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.890 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.899 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01786.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80111-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990607)408:3<335::aid-cne3>3.0.co;2-w via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.034 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-14-05229.2001 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/089976699300016359 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00412.2001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3098-09.2010 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.035 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.41877 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.2154851 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.04.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76544-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990607)408:3<318::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-s via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn2040 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1204763 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.45717 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/45238 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.8456317 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature09333 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-19-07394.2000 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02309.1998 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014977 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1010674108 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.1036 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00263.2003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00978-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2018.01.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.181024 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1309966110 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.210179 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.1850 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.23508 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-18-07823.1999 via crossref
- doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.153460 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00641.2003 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90099-x via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.1999.82.4.2006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(90)82533-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn1639 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0705827104 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.103 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.91.24.11308 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93919-o via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-0-387-22459-6_11 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.02-03-00284.1982 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90095-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1096202 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3929-04.2005 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1313898110 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1443-12.2012 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4438-08.2009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.067 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005736 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.8178157 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn1327 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.041 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01521-0 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.20556 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/neu.480241205 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11538-017-0286-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005686 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-19T06:35:20.445540+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0