Unbiased profiling of multipotency landscapes reveals spatial modulators of clonal fate biases
preprint
OA: gold
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated summary
This study profiled mouse embryonic clones to reveal a body-wide gradient of clonal fate biases influenced by spatial transcription factor programs and the Hedgehog pathway.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The proportion of cell types varies systematically across the body, but it remains unclear how individual progenitor cells integrate positional information to establish patterns of cellular composition. In this study we profile the clonal landscape of the embryo, using single-cell lineage tracing of mouse embryos from neurulation until mid-gestation. To analyze the complex clonal patterns derived from highly multipotent progenitors, we developed clone2vec , which uses unsupervised learning to categorize individual clones into lineages based on shared transcriptional context. This revealed a body-wide gradient of clonal fate biases, in which anatomical position and clonal composition are mutually predictive. Comparison of clonal lineages revealed spatial transcription factor programs associated with dynamic cell biasing towards skeletal versus non-skeletal fates. Mosaic combinatorial perturbations targeting the Hedgehog pathway generated clones in which positional identity was mismatched with clonal composition, suggesting a potential signaling influence on somite patterning. We explore the effects of position and heterochrony on fate biases in cranial, trunk, and caudal neural crest clones. Altogether, our work demonstrates an effective practical approach for dissecting mechanisms of lineage specification.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (84)
- Distinct Gene Regulatory Dynamics Drive Skeletogenic Cell Fate Convergence During Vertebrate Embryogenesis via crossref
- Neuromesodermal progenitor origin of trunk neural crest<i>in vivo</i> via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature06293 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt.4103 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aaf7907 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.07.018 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.048 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt.4124 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0223-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aas9536 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.017 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.08.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100043 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01011-x via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00818-x via crossref
- doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05858.x via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2000238117 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.119768 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.35786 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(200002)22:2<138::aid-bies5>3.0.co;2-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.007567 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/jdb6040031 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.07.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0096 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nmeth.4463 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41639-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00487.x via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.165498 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.200533 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38953-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.041509 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600060 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.03.024 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.035 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.124.16.3077 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.094680 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.014 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ncomms7709 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/dneu.20826 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.017 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/335161a0 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22146-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.003814 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00465-y via crossref
- doi:10.1111/dgd.12199 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.782445 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00473.x via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.25902 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.34465.028 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s40851-014-0007-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.aaw3381 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01209-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02303-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/sciadv.add0695 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040899 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00049 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s13227-018-0103-4 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.854422 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/jeb.14.3.335 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrg2902 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.176065 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.40232 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2021.06.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.12.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature25969 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01814-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z via crossref
- doi:10.21105/joss.00861 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt.3192 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25957-x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty916 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.05.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac746 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nmeth.3971 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nmeth.4628 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.181495 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27150-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.002 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-19T06:35:12.926037+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0