How can we aid in the diagnosis of endometriosis?

article OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-10

This paper reviews how non-invasive imaging and emerging biomarkers support endometriosis diagnosis while laparoscopy confirms cases, noting that evolving guidelines highlight the need for consensus on optimal diagnostic pathways.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-10 · read from full text

This paper examines the current landscape of endometriosis diagnosis, emphasizing the role of non-invasive imaging techniques such as ultrasounds and magnetic resonance imaging alongside emerging biomarkers. It notes that while these methods support initial assessment, laparoscopy remains the definitive confirmatory tool when clinical suspicion is high but imaging is inconclusive. The authors highlight that diagnostic guidelines are currently evolving and stress the urgent need for international consensus to standardize optimal diagnostic pathways across different healthcare settings. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on improving diagnostic accuracy through better integration of imaging, biomarkers, and standardized clinical guidelines.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis diagnosis can be supported by non-invasive imaging (ultrasounds, MRI) and emerging biomarkers, with laparoscopy serving as a confirmatory tool when needed. Guidelines are evolving, highlighting the need for consensus on optimal diagnostic pathways.
Full text 553 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Published October 15, 2025 | Version v1 Other Open How can we aid in the diagnosis of endometriosis? Description Endometriosis diagnosis can be supported by non-invasive imaging (ultrasounds, MRI) and emerging biomarkers, with laparoscopy serving as a confirmatory tool when needed. Guidelines are evolving, highlighting the need for consensus on optimal diagnostic pathways. Files f024b7f2-251c-4200-8c01-be67e1c461bc.pdf Files (18.4 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:8572b6d4a5b848cd040879b0499760b5 | 18.4 kB | Preview Download |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK