Evolution of characteristics of MASLD with and without diabetes: A meta- analysis of placebo arms
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract Background: We explored the changes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) severity over time by analyzing data from the placebo arms of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly in relation to the presence of diabetes. Methods: RCTs on MASLD that included a placebo arm were identified using a systematic search of the literature. The primary outcomes were the changes in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Results: The meta-analysis included 8 RCTs involving 386 patients without diabetes and 24 RCTs involving 637 patients with diabetes. The pooled estimate of mean change in steatosis grade by histology was -0.1 in patients without diabetes, and -0.37 in patients with diabetes (P=0.066). The mean change in fibrosis stage by histology was 0.05 in patients without diabetes, and -0.03 in patients with diabetes (P=0.359). The mean change in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score was -0.55 in patients without diabetes, and -1.50 in patients with diabetes (P=0.100).The mean change in ALT (-20.22 IU/L vs. -4.48 IU/L) and AST (-10.67 IU/L vs. -2.58 IU/L) were significantly larger in patients without diabetes compared to those with diabetes (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the placebo arm, patients with diabetes showed greater improvement in liver steatosis than those without diabetes.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (47)
- doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.012 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hep.32315 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.011 via crossref
- doi:10.3350/cmh.2022.0095 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hep.31014 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.39057.406644.68 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-25 via crossref
- doi:10.1503/cmaj.060410 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61933-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907929 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1756283x09105462 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hep.20092 via crossref
- doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.141 via crossref
- doi:10.7326/m15-1774 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25701-5 via crossref
- doi:10.2337/dc19-0167 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/mcg.0000000000000099 via crossref
- doi:10.1056/nejmoa060326 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/dom.13584 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01888.x via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00125-018-4675-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0638-y via crossref
- doi:10.2337/dc19-0641 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/dom.12680 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12933-021-01237-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00125-019-05021-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00125-016-4100-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/dom.13487 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/dom.13268 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4956-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00125-021-05628-8 via crossref
- doi:10.2337/dc10-0856 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2014.03.041 via crossref
- doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.7008 via crossref
- doi:10.2337/dc18-0165 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00125-020-05265-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109781 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.05.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30186-2 via crossref
- doi:10.2337/dc18-1569 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12876-022-02550-0 via crossref
- doi:10.3350/cmh.2021.0383 via crossref
- doi:10.2337/dc22-2048 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.h4672 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:53.260688+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0