Eye-movements as a signature of age-related differences in global planning strategies for spatial navigation
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
The ability to efficiently find alternatives routes when faced with unexpected obstacles along our path is among the most compelling evidence of the flexibility of human behaviour. Although a plethora of plausible computations have been put forward to elucidate how the brain accomplishes efficient goal-oriented navigation, the mechanisms that guide an effective re-planning when facing obstructions are still largely undetermined. There is a fair consensus in postulating that possible alternatives routes are internally replayed sampling from past experiences, however, there is currently no account of the criterion according to which those memories are replayed. Here, we posit that paths, which are expected to be more rewarding are replayed more often and that eye movements are the explicit manifestation of this re-planning strategy. In other words, the visual sampling statistics reflects the retrieval of available routes on a mental representation of the environment. To test our hypothesis, we measured the ability of both young and old human subjects to solve a virtual version of the Tolman maze, while we recorded their eye movements. We used reinforcement learning (RL) to corroborate that eye movements statistics was crucially subtending the decision making process involved in re-planning and that the incorporation of this additional information to the algorithm was necessary to reproduce the behavioral performance of both screened populations.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (75)
- doi:10.1080/09658210802077348 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.025 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.037. via crossref
- doi:10.1080/87565649409540578 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1419274111 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3241-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-08-02793.2001 via crossref
- doi:10.1109/vrais.1995.512478 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnagi.2012.00028 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163508 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/geronb/54b.1.s49 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00092 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.021 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn1560 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.013 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature04587 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnagi.2013.00094 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1164685 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0030844 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.034 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002235 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00080 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1690 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.086 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/0898929054475190 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.012 via crossref
- doi:10.3758/bf03195300 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2013.01.023 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.040 via crossref
- doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000007 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ncomms14652 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0956797613498260 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3761-07.2007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002055 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005753 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.028 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.037 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00836 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2610-16.2016 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2015.01.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002045 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9120-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0735-7044.116.5.851 via crossref
- doi:10.1076/1382-5585(200006)7:2;1-u;ft086 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.016 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.06063 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3987-14.2015 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn802 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1159775 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature12112 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1182553 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005768 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hipo.22425 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00288 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033485 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4647-10.2011 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00125 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.037 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-141-3.50030-4 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00312 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/h0061626 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.02.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1100225108 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.372 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1223252 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3414-13.2014 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.042 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:52.300179+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0