A Dual-Sequence MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Efficacy in Adenomyosis Treatment
A dual-sequence MRI radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.84 in predicting high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation efficacy for adenomyosis, outperforming single-sequence approaches and demonstrating potential clinical utility for anticipating treatment outcomes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study developed a dual-sequence MRI-based radiomics model to predict the therapeutic efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in patients with adenomyosis. The researchers analyzed data from 114 individuals, extracting features from MRI images and combining them with clinical variables to construct a logistic regression model for assessing treatment success. Results indicated that the combined model achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 for predicting over 50% ablation efficacy, demonstrating superior net benefit compared to single-sequence models. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — specifically utilizing advanced imaging techniques to improve prediction of non-invasive surgical outcomes for this condition.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,902 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:14:29.962126+00:00