The Importance of Anti-Correlations in Graph Theory Based Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a significant growth in the number of applications of machine learning (ML) techniques to the study and identification of neurological disorders. These methods rely heavily on what features are made available to the ML algorithm. Features such as graph theoretical metrics of resting-state fMRI-based brain networks have proven useful. However, the computation of functional brain networks relies on making an arbitrary choice about whether the obtained anti-correlations, representing the strengths of functional connections in the brain, should be discarded or not. In this study, we examine how this choice affects the performance of a support vector machine (SVM) model for classifying autism spectrum disorder. We extracted graph theoretical features using three different pipelines for constructing the functional network graph. These pipelines primarily used positive weights, negative weights (anti-correlations) and only the absolute value of weights of the correlation matrix derived from fMRI time-series. Our results suggest that in the presence of Global Signal Regression (GSR) the features extracted from anti-correlations play a major role in improving model performance. However, this does not undermine the importance of features from other pipelines.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (39)
- doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.11.1167 via crossref
- doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.3/gdichter via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.027 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00019 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn2618 via crossref
- doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3263 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9448-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1109/aisp.2017.8324124 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.01018 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.052 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2012.11.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/mp.2013.78 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00041 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/11866763_8 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/jamia.2001.0080401 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02294395 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.021 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2984809 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2346101 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.047 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.90777.2008 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012 via crossref
- doi:10.31887/dcns.2013.15.3/osporns via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00016 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-06T01:00:39.481274+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0