Right Caudate Volume and Executive Functions in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Background The caudate and putamen have previously been implicated in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, previous studies have not investigated the relationship between the caudate and putamen with executive function (EF). The current study investigated the clinical relevance of the caudate and putamen with respect to EF. Method We studied 49 children (24 ADHD/25 typically developing children (TDC)). All participants in the ADHD group had to undergo a 48-hour stimulant medication washout period. Participants completed cognitive tasks related to working memory/inhibition and underwent a T1-weighted MRI sequence. All parents completed behaviour rating scales using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance, Pearson correlations, and linear regressions. Results Children with ADHD demonstrated a higher frequency of perseverative errors compared to TDC ( p <. 05), and their parents reported significantly more EF challenges (p <.001). No difference was observed in the working memory tasks. No significant volumetric differences were seen in the caudate or the putamen. A linear regression model suggested that the right caudate volume accounted for 10.3% of the variance in emotion regulation as reported by parents on the BRIEF-2 in the overall sample. Discussion We observed significant EF challenges without volumetric differences. However, the right caudate was correlated to parent ratings of emotional regulation, highlighting the need to consider emotional regulation difficulties in ADHD.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (67)
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.026 via crossref
- doi:10.3174/ajnr.a3843 via crossref
- doi:10.1196/annals.1412.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1023/a:1012233310098 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/00004583-201005000-00011 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01710.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00505-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.5.757 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102368 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0022219410371676 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/070674371205700206 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1087054718824985 via crossref
- doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0215 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1534 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/ebmental-2018-300050 via crossref
- doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11101521.towards via crossref
- doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00787-020-01545-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/t15082-000 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/dmcn.13753 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.033 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1745691620904771 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0954579421000559 via crossref
- doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2280 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/brainsci12081051 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/jcpp.12899 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.200033797 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg087 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0033291714001664 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/t79467-000 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/10870547221110918 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00787-007-0603-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10802-018-0438-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30049-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18091033 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0027205 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1087054716663632 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0734282909333945 via crossref
- doi:10.1503/jpn.210186 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10802-018-0438-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9492-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01401-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1478-7547-3-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.025 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0033291701004706 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/ije/dyt261 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9215-y via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0954579421001449 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00100 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/09297049.2019.1617262 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02394-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0033291712001869 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0707741104 via crossref
- doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070966 via crossref
- doi:10.4088/jcp.09m05305whi via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1087054713504133 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/09297040802070929 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1542/peds.2019-2528 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1087054712455501 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-06T01:00:31.712070+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0