The government of masks in sentinel territories against Covid-19: Dakar and Seine-Saint-Denis
preprint
OA: gold
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
The pandemic of Covid-19 has led to reluctance or resistance to wear a mask in countries that made it compulsory. The acceptance to wear a mask against respiratory diseases depends on conceptions of scientific authority and of the personality in the public space. It has material and symbolic dimensions that can be covered under the term “government of masks”. We have questioned populations on these two aspects in territories we call sentinel because they are more exposed than others to emerging infectious diseases: Dakar (Senegal) and Seine-Saint-Denis (France). Our results show that the perception of the state is different in these territories and determines the uses of masks against Covid-19. While in Seine-Saint-Denis, the state provides more masks than in Dakar, the trust in the efficacy of mask wearing is lower. From a symbolic point of view, the mask is for many people an intrusion of the state into the private sphere, which hinders physical contact between family members. On the contrary, from the material point of view, the mask is a need that manifests the presence of the welfare state to watch over the health of the population. A state that is both more coercive and more protective produces a lower level of adherence to mask-wearing recommendations than a state where prescribing authorities, particularly religious, are more diverse, and where individuals must obtain masks themselves.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (25)
- doi:10.1007/s10900-021-01004-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247313 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01466.x via crossref
- doi:10.1353/wsq.2012.0004 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.m1435 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240785 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2014564118 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110417 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdab018 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/10810730.2020.1867257 via crossref
- doi:10.13128/smp-11964 via crossref
- doi:10.1525/9780520968417 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0537 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/01459740.2017.1423072 via crossref
- doi:10.4103/shb.shb_23_20 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s41603-020-00117-z via crossref
- doi:10.3390/ijerph17249298 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/bjs.18004720312 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/09581596.2014.923815 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31207-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/00333549101250s308 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004068 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-06T01:00:29.103564+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0