Contemporaneity of the past in stochastic intergenerational homeostasis
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
What recurring patterns of behaviors are hidden in the stochastic intergenerational dynamics of individual bacterial cells in different environments? Embracing the inherently stochastic nature of the homeostasis process, first we reconceptualize homeostasis as representing a “standing pattern of variation in trajectory space” of a naturally occurring adaptive complex system (rather than the simple “set-point” of a self-regulating apparatus), then delineate two mechanistically distinct potential routes to achieving homeostasis (either elastic, reflexive, memory-free adaptation or plastic, reflective, memoryful adaptation) and show that both schemes are simultaneously utilized during multigenerational stochastic growth and division of an individual cell. From experimental data we identify an intergenerational scaling law which directly yields the exact stochastic map governing stochastic intergenerational cell size homeostasis of individual bacterial cells. Its broad applicability across bacterial species, growth conditions, and microenvironments suggests that the organizational motif representing the nature of coupling of growth to division is effectively the same in all of these scenarios, despite apparent differences in actualization through molecular circuitry. The precise parameters characterizing the intergenerational scaling law vary from condition to condition and provide early hints of two tradeoffs: precision-speed and precision-energy.
Full text
1,555 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
What recurring patterns of behaviors are hidden in the stochastic intergenerational dynamics of individual bacterial cells in different environments? Embracing the inherently stochastic nature of the homeostasis process, first we reconceptualize homeostasis as representing a “standing pattern of variation in trajectory space” of a naturally occurring adaptive complex system (rather than the simple “set-point” of a self-regulating apparatus), then delineate two mechanistically distinct potential routes to achieving homeostasis (either elastic, reflexive, memory-free adaptation or plastic, reflective, memoryful adaptation) and show that both schemes are simultaneously utilized during multigenerational stochastic growth and division of an individual cell. From experimental data we identify an intergenerational scaling law which directly yields the exact stochastic map governing stochastic intergenerational cell size homeostasis of individual bacterial cells. Its broad applicability across bacterial species, growth conditions, and microenvironments suggests that the organizational motif representing the nature of coupling of growth to division is effectively the same in all of these scenarios, despite apparent differences in actualization through molecular circuitry. The precise parameters characterizing the intergenerational scaling law vary from condition to condition and provide early hints of two tradeoffs: precision-speed and precision-energy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (23)
- Emergent simplicities in an individual cell’s stochastic response to disruptive change via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1103/physreve.79.031911 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1403232111 via crossref
- doi:10.1103/physreve.110.024405 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tim.2014.12.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/febs.12014 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.046 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.79 via crossref
- doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.208102 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.062 via crossref
- doi:10.1103/vfhg-gksh via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1615526115 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010905 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1245075 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nphys2276 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00200 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e23-11-0452 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-05T01:00:45.097353+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-10T06:41:27.906138+00:00