Stents versus Bypass Surgery – 3-Year Mortality Risk of Patients with Coronary Interventions Aged 50+ in Germany

Abstract ObjectivesDue to demographic aging, the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is expected to increase in the future, resulting in a growing demand for stent and bypass interventions. This study aims to investigate the mortality risk of patients following conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or endovascular procedure by the implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES).MethodsBased on a random sample of 250,000 members of Germany’s largest health insurance ‘Allgemeine Ortskrankenkassen’ (AOK) from 2004 to 2015, incident CAD patients were analyzed by Cox Proportional-Hazard models. Risk adjustment was made for sex, age, other cardiac diseases, non-cardiovascular comorbidities and years since intervention. Due to later admission of DES and thus a shorter observation time, mortality was examined for 3 years since the intervention. ResultsBMS represented the most frequent procedure (48%). We found similar proportions of CABG (19%) and DES interventions (23%). After risk adjustment, the models showed a 21% (p=0.004) lower mortality risk of patients with DES and also a 21% (p=0.002) lower mortality risk of CABG patients compared to persons with BMS.ConclusionBased on a large-scale dataset, our study demonstrated survival advantages of CABG and DES interventions over BMS, with no differences between the DES and CABG groups. The results help to assess the risks of coronary interventions. Aspects of quality of life, severity of postoperative physical limitations, duration of rehabilitation, patients’ preferences, and aspects of cost-effectiveness for hospitals and society should be further considered.