Natively Oxidized Amino Acid Residues in the Spinach Cytochromeb6fComplex
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
The cytochrome b 6 f complex of oxygenic photosynthesis produces substantial levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). It has been observed that the ROS production rate by b 6 f is 10-20 fold higher than that observed for the analogous respiratory cytochrome bc 1 complex. The types of ROS produced (O 2 •− , 1 O 2 , and, possibly, H 2 O 2 ) and the site(s) of ROS production within the b 6 f complex has been the subject of some debate. Proposed sources of ROS have include the heme bp , PQ p •− (possible sources for O 2 •− ), the Rieske iron-sulfur cluster (possible source of O 2 •− and/or H 2 O 2 ), Chl a (possible source of 1 O 2 ) and heme C n (possible source of O 2 •− and/or H2O2). Our working hypothesis is that amino acid residues proximal to the ROS production sites will be more susceptible to oxidative modification than distant residues. In the current study, we have identified natively oxidized amino acid residues in the subunits of the spinach cytochrome b 6 f complex. The oxidized residues were identified by tandem mass spectrometry using the MassMatrix Program. Our results indicate that numerous residues, principally localized near p -side cofactors and Chl a , were oxidatively modified. We hypothesize that these sites are sources for ROS generation in the spinach cytochrome b 6 f complex.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (42)
- doi:10.1126/science.1090165 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m809196200 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature02155 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m305461200 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m105454200 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/bi702299b via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.003221 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb09603.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.05.005 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01950 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1618922114 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.03.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11099-011-0008-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/bi4013534 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.07.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02850-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.11.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.069609 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77523-x via crossref
- doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.058693 via crossref
- doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2000)0710103cbfcaa2.0.co2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2009.09.012 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/ja905171c via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00471 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/rcm.4855 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb06379.x via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.76.1.111 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/elps.11501601234 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/elps.200305800 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/bi300650n via crossref
- doi:10.1002/pmic.200700322 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0003-9861(87)90071-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1023/b:pres.0000030425.69092.4f via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0606369104 via crossref
- doi:10.4161/psb.22455 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03991.x via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.112.201491 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0508102102 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01391.x via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1222248110 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-02T01:00:42.057952+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-10T06:43:36.850308+00:00