Reverse Dynamics Analysis of Contact Force and Muscle Activities during the Golf Swing after Total Hip Arthroplasty
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
There are no reports on hip kinetics including contact forces and muscle activities during the golf swing after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of three-dimensional dynamics during the golf swing. Ten unilateral primary THA patients participated in motion capture test of their driver golf swing. The driver swing produced approximately 20–30° of rotation in both lead and trail replaced hips. The mean hip contact forces (HCFs) of lead and trail replaced hips were 5.1 and 6.6 x body weight, respectively. Left and right THAs showed similar HCFs of lead and trail hips. More than 60% of the Percent maximum voluntary isometric contraction was found in bilateral iliopsoas muscles in all unilateral THA. Three factors [male sex, higher modified Harris Hip Score, and lower HCF of surgical side] had a negative effect on the golf-related replacement hip pain. Golf is an admissible sport after THA because driver swings do not contribute excessive rotation or contact forces to hip prostheses. HCF could be reduced through swing adjustments, which may allow patients with golf-related replacement hip pain to develop a comfortable golf game free from pain. Subject terms total hip arthroplasty, golf, motion analysis, contact force, muscle activity
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (42)
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60457-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1302/0301-620x.96b8.32813 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0363546511424386 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10047-021-01297-x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.035 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0363546516641917 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80093-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80022-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0363546516637179 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1123/jab.2015-0021 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.09.041 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2091-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00264-018-4158-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1053/jpmn.2001.23746 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bjsm.28.4.256 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/02640410601113239 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.034 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00471-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.06.024 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/ptj/86.5.683 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jbmr.2483 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/14763141.2021.1945672 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/14763141.2017.1354064 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.04.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1519/00124278-200702000-00024 via crossref
- doi:10.1123/japa.12.2.144 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0363546514555698 via crossref
- doi:10.1055/s-2003-41175 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.033 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2362-z via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0021-9290(93)90058-m via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0363546513506866 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/00042752-199507000-00005 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1070-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000000667 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/14763141.2012.738699 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/14763141.2018.1480727 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-01T01:00:46.592009+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0