The BRCA1-BARD1 complex associates with the synaptonemal complex and pro-crossover factors and influences RAD-51 dynamics duringCaenorhabditis elegansmeiosis
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
During meiosis, the maternal and paternal homologous chromosomes must align along their entire length and recombine to achieve faithful segregation in the gametes. Meiotic recombination is accomplished through the formation of DNA double-strand breaks, a subset of which can mature into crossovers to link the parental homologous chromosomes and promote their segregation. Breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility protein BRCA1 and its heterodimeric partner BARD1 play a pivotal role in DNA repair in mitotic cells; however, their functions in gametogenesis are less well understood. Here we show that localization of BRC-1 and BRD-1 ( Caenorhabditis elegans orthologues of BRCA1 and BARD1) is dynamic during meiotic prophase I; they ultimately becoming concentrated at regions surrounding the presumptive crossover sites, co-localizing with the pro-crossover factors COSA-1, MSH-5 and ZHP-3. The synaptonemal complex is essential for BRC-1 loading onto chromosomes but recombination is not. BRC-1 forms an in vivo complex with the synaptonemal complex component SYP-3 and the crossover-promoting factor MSH-5. Furthermore, BRC-1 is essential for efficient stage-specific recruitment of the RAD-51 recombinase to DNA damage sites when synapsis is impaired and upon induction of exogenous DNA double-strand breaks. Taken together, our data provide new insights into the localization and meiotic function of the BRC-1–BRD-1 complex and highlight their essential role in DNA double-strand break repair during gametogenesis. Author summary Sexually reproducing species rely on meiosis to transmit their genetic information across generations. Parental chromosomes (homologues) undergo many distinctive processes in their complex journey from attachment to segregation. The physiological induction of DNA double strand breaks is crucial for promoting correct chromosome segregation: they are needed to activate the DNA repair machinery responsible for creating physical connections, or crossovers (COs), between the homologues. In turn, crossovers promote the accurate segregation of the chromosomes in daughter cells. The BRCA1–BARD1 complex has a pivotal role during DNA repair in somatic cells and is exclusively located on unaligned chromosomal regions during mammalian meiosis. We show that in Caenorhabditis elegans , BRCA1 and BARD1 localize to chromosomes at all stages of meiotic prophase I and are enriched at presumptive crossover sites. We found that BRCA1 promotes DNA loading of the repair factor RAD-51 in specific mutant backgrounds and upon exogenous damage induction. Our data provide evidence for a direct physical association between BRCA1 and pro-crossover factors (including the synaptonemal complex) and identify an important role for BRCA1 in stimulating meiotic DNA repair. Further studies are necessary to identify the substrates acted upon by BRCA1–BARD1 complex to maintain genome stability in the gametes.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (83)
- doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016626 via crossref
- doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.178.1 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001219 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003674 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003679 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00232-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.1011602 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/bies.1145 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81481-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1042/bst0340523 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.035 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.08.026 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/153.3.1271 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/156.2.617 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/5075 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.272.48.30345 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.201401122 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.052 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000235 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/mcb.24.18.7998-8006.2004 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00029-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/genetics/160.2.471 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00412-003-0237-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.1338505 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.1694108 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.1691208 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e12-11-0841 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.13.17.2258 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/mcb.25.8.3127-3139.2005 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016600 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.58 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206208 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.1050003 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/1526-968x(200102)29:2<72::aid-gene1007>3.0.co;2-b via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ng0296-191 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81302-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204363 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.10.14.1835 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.11.10.1226 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.879201 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1202243 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.201311050 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.029 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401167 via crossref
- doi:10.1534/genetics.115.179382 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nmeth.2532 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601102 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ng1484 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.032 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81847-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m408879200 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m200769200 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.03.025 via crossref
- doi:10.1534/genetics.107.072413 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000669 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.011 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006670 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jim.2007.10.012 via crossref
- doi:10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3647 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.032 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601916 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.035 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0243 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600622 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.c600051200 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0508295103 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002412 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0702805104 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003276 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/bies.201400107 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.158 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(00)27297-2 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.23437 via crossref
- doi:10.1534/genetics.113.158295 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005872 via crossref
- doi:10.1534/genetics.114.164152 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.013425 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-01T01:00:45.702279+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0