Agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometrer, a spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography biometrer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer in eyes with cataract

Agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometrer, a spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography biometrer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer in eyes with cataract | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometrer, a spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography biometrer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer in eyes with cataract Saimak Zarei-Ghanavati, Majid Nikpayam, Maral Namdari, Elham Bakhtiari, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049518/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain OCT optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated Swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates. Methods In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Results AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOL Master 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.0.02 and − 0.02 ± 0.03 for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 and 0.10 ± 0.03 (p < 0.05) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 (p < 0.05) and 0.001 ± 0.04 for LT, and − 2.29 ± 0.92 (p 0.75). Bland-Altman analysis showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 in measuring AL. Conclusion Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements can not be considered interchangeable between these devices. cataract biometry agreement Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Introduction In an era of modern cataract surgery, accurate biometric measuremnets of the eye are instrumental for acucurate determination of intraocular lens (IOL) power and optimised refractive outcomes. 1 Axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) can be measured with ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry (PCI), optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and recently optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices. 2 Since the introduction of the IOL Master (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) in 1999, optical biometry has for a long period of time been a gold standard in ocular biometry measurements. 3 IOL Master 700 was the first swept-source OCT (SS-OCT)-based biometry device, which acquired OCT images across the entire length of the eye. 4 Although the IOLMaster 700 provides excellent anterior segment OCT images, it cannot offer high-quality scans of the retina and optic nerve, simultaneously. Lenstar LS 900 (HAAG-STREIT AG, Switzerland) works based on OLCR technology. It combines optical biometry with automated keratometry. 5 The agreement, validity, and interchangeability of IOL master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 have been reported in previous studies. 4,6−8 The recently introduced Revo NX device (OPTOPOL Technology Sp, Poland) is a combination of anterior and posterior segment spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) with optical biometry. 5 The Revo NX is the first Anterior/Posterior OCT system that enables simultaneous measurement of AL, ACD, lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). 9 The biometric measurement provided by the previous version (software version 8.0.3) of Revo NX biometer were found not to be in agreement with Lenstar LS 900. 5 After improving its calibration by the manufacturer, the upgraded version (9.5.0) claims to be able to compete with other devices, and a recent study, comparing the upgraded version of Revo NX optical biometer with the two other validated optical biometers (e.g. IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900) found a good agreement between devices in healthy individuals. 3 This study sought to assess the acquisition success rate and agreement of biometry measurements obtained by REVO NX biometer (software version 9.7.0) with IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 in cataract surgery candidates. Materials And Methods This prospective study was performed on patients presenting for cataract surgery between November 2019 and September 2020 at Noorafarin eye Clinic (Mashhad, Iran). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Science (Ethical code: IR.MUMS.fm.REC.1396.793(. Cataract types and grading were recorded according to Lens Opacities Classification III scoring system (LOCS III). 10 Patients were invited to participate in the study after an explanation of the study and its purpose. All participants gave informed consent to participate in research and the research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. For all patients a full medical and ocular history was taken. All patients underwent a full anterior and posterior segment slit-lamp examination as well as macula and optic disc OCT scans. One hundred patients with cataract over the age of 50 were included. Eyes were excluded if ocular co-morbidities were expected to alter biometry measurements. Eyes with the following pathologies were excluded: pterygium, corneal transplantation, corneal dystrophy, keratoconus and corneal scarring. Patients were also excluded if they were unable to fixate on the fixation target. All biometry examinations were performed in a random order, by one experienced operator between 4–8 PM. During the procedure, patients were asked to steadily fixate to the fixation light and blink to provide a continuous tear layer. All exams were repeated three times and the results were averaged. Focused and high-quality images were included and the results were averaged for the statistical analysis. AL, ACD, LT, and CCT parameters were extracted for the agreement analysis. Instruments The Revo NX SD-OCT device has an axial resolution of 5 mm, a transverse resolution of 12 mm, and a scanning depth of 2.4 mm. It can produce 110,000 scans per second. The optical biometry program within the device measures the AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. It performs 10 B-scans for each measurement to calculate a precise mean value. 9 Lenstar LS-900 OLCR biometer uses a superluminescent diode with 820 nm wavelength to measure the AL, LT, CCT, and ACD, and also provides KR values and pupil size. 11 IOL Master 700 measures AL, and ACD along with CCT and LT using an adjustable 1050 nm laser infrared light and multi-point keratometer, acquiring over 2000 scans per second. 9 Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23 software (SPSS Institute, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and MedCalc software (Version 20; MedCalc Inc., Ostend, Belgium). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the parametric distribution of data. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni posttest were used to assess the difference between devices. The measured data of each device were plotted by Bland - Altman diagram to investigate the qualitative distribution and compare the compatibility or dispersion of data provided by Revo NX compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900. The mean ± 1.96 standard deviation (SD) of the difference between the two measurement techniques, defined the 95% limits of agreement. The mountain plots were used to show the measurement differences between devices. Depending on the numerical value of SD, the agreement range was much narrower or wider. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was defined as the ratio of the variance between subjects to the sum of the pooled intra- and inter-participant variance. ICC more than 0.9 is defined as a high agreement, between 0.7–0.9 considered a good agreement, and an ICC less than 0.7 considered a poor agreement between measurement techniques. 12 A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sample size calculation Based on the previous studies 4 , the sample size calculation performed to detect a mean difference of 0.01 mm of axial length with a standard deviation of 0.02 mm, with a power of 80% and significance level of 0.05 using the Bland-Altman method, revealed a minimum sample size of 83 is needed for each group within a paired analysis. Results One hundred patients (100 eyes) including 55 women (55.0%) and 45 men (45.0%) with a mean age of 61.85 ± 7.90 years (range 50–82 years) were included. AL was successfully measured in 82% of the patients using Revo NX biometer, 91.0% of patients using Lenstar LS 900, and 97.0% of all patients using IOL Master 700. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of ocular biometric parameters measured using the three devices. The mean of LT and ACD were significantly different between the three devices (p < 001 and p = 0.005 respectively). Table 2 shows paired difference and agreement between parameters measured with the three devices. Bonferroni test showed a significant difference between IOL Master and Revo NX in LT measurement (p < 0.05). Also, ACD measured using Revo NX was significantly higher than Lenstar (p = 0.007). Table 1 Demographic characteristics of ocular biometric parameters measured using three devices. AL (mm) LT (mm) ACD (mm) CCT (µm) Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Revo NX 23.46 ± 0.18 21.21–32.67 4.15 ± 0.04 3.34–5.15 3.25 ± 0.05 2.15–4.78 520.02 ± 3.37 438–595 Lenstar LS 900 23.48 ± 0.18 21.27–32.50 4.15 ± 0.05 3.27–5.27 3.15 ± 0.05 2.04–4.76 519.29 ± .3.37 438–601 IOL Master 700 23.48 ± 0.17 21.22–32.48 4.30 ± 0.04 3.29–5.40 3.24 ± 0.05 1.89–4.68 522.31 ± 3.32 441–603 p-value* 0.625 < 0.001 0.005 0.06 *Repeated measures ANOVA Table 2 Mean ± SD, paired differences, and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between parameters measured by Lenstar LS 900), IOL Master 700, and Revo NX biometer. Paired difference* with Revo NX Agreement with Revo NX Lenstar LS 900 IOL Master 700 Lenstar LS 900 IOL Master 700 Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 95%LOA ICC 95%LOA ICC AL (mm) -0.02 ± 0.03 -0.02 ± 0.0.02 -0.46 to 0.43 0.989 -0.35 to 0.31 0.994 LT (mm) 0.001 ± 0.04 -0.15 ± 0.03** -0.55 to 0.53 0.750 -0.69 to 0.39 0.770 ACD (mm) 0.10 ± 0.03** 0.01 ± 0.03 -0.59 to 0.62 0.810 -0.47 to 0.67 0.80 CCT (µm) 0.73 ± 1.43 -2.29 ± 0.92** -26.20 to 27.70 0.910 -19.70 to 15.10 0.960 *Bonferroni multiple comparisons; **p-value < 0.05 All parameters measured with Revo NX biometer were in high agreement with Lenstar and IOL Master (Table 2 ). A high degree of agreement was found between Revo NX and the other 2 biometers in AL and CCT measurements (ICC > 0.90). This agreement was lower but good for LT and ACD measurements (ICC: 0.75–0.81). The agreement of parameters between Optopol OCT, Lenstar, and IOL Master were assessed and represented using the Bland-Altman method (Fig. 1 ). Also, mountain plots showed high agreement between Revo NX and the two other devices for the measured biometric parameters (Fig. 2 ). Discussion In this study, the biometric parameters measured by Revo NX biometer, Lenstar LS 900, and IOL Master 700, were compared in candidates presenting for cataract surgery. A good to a high agreement was found between devices, especially in the measurement of AL and CCT. The agreement of the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 devices has also been previously investigated, and a high agreement between devices and no clinically relevant differences were found. 7 , 8 In the present study, the failure rate of IOL Master 700, Lenstar LS 900, and Revo NX OCT in measuring AL was 3%, 9%, and 18%, respectively. This is in keeping with previous studies showing that SS-OCT-based biometers, demonstrate greater penetration of the cataractous lens. 13 Sikorski et al. also reported a higher failure rate of the SD-OCT Revo NX in measuring AL compared to the SS-OCT IOL Master 700 and proposed this to be due to the difference in OCT technology used by the Revo NX. 12 In the present study, AL measurements obtained by IOL Master 700 were marginally higher than the other devices, but the differences were not clinically and statistically significant. This is similar to the results reported by Kanclerz et al., comparing the same devices in healthy eyes. 3 The authors found a high level of agreement (r value > 0.95) between Revo NX and IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS 900 when measuring AL. Mean difference between − 0.001mm and 0.01 mm for AL measurement has been reported between Revo NX and IOL master 700. 3 , 12 In our study, the mean paired difference between AL measured by Revo NX and IOL Master 700 was − 0.02 mm. Moreover, mean difference of -0.02 mm was also found between Revo NX and lenstar LS 900 which is similar to the results of the study by Kanclerz at al, 3 , 5 who found a mean difference of -0.002 to 0.11 mm when measuring AL in healthy eyes using Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. Previous investigators have proposed a difference of 0.1 mm to be acceptable between AL measurements (almost equivalent to an error of about 0.27 D in intraocular lens power). 14 In terms of CCT, a mean difference between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 of -2.29 µm (p < 0.05) was found. This is similar to previous studies reporting a mean difference between the two devices of -0.80 to -4.40 µm. 3 , 12 The mean difference between Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900 was 0.73 µm which is consistent with other studies reporting a mean difference of between − 0.83 and 3.80 µm. 3 , 5 Although, differences in CCT measurements between these devices are not clinically significant, more difference in the measured CCT using Revo NX and IOL Master 700 has been justified with the several-fold smaller pixel size in Revo NX. 12 The Optopol OCT Revo NX offers a resolution of 5 micrometers, which is more than four times better than the IOL Master 700 and enables it to define the boundaries of the layers of eye tissue more accurately. 12 Due to these capabilities, more accurate measurements can be made in the eyes with structural abnormalities or pathology. In this respect, the Revo NX surpasses the IOL Master 700 in measuring AL in irregularly structured eyes. 12 More studies on the limitations and benefits of this device in comparison to other biometry systems are needed in patients with different cataract types and severities. With respect to ACD, the mean difference of ACD measured with Revo NX and IOL Master 700 was 0.01 mm, and 0.10 mm as measured by the Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. Other studies have reported a mean difference between 0.003 and 0.005 mm between Revo NX and IOL Master 700, and 0.01 to 0.05 mm between Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. 3 , 5 , 12 Depending on AL of the eye, a 0.25 mm error in ACD measurement results in a difference in IOL power between 0.50 to 1.0 D. 15 Based on these findings, the differences in CCT measurements between the above platfroms are likely clinically insignificant. Mean difference of LT between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 was − 0.15mm (p < 0.05), which is significantly more that previously reported (0.001–0.002 mm). 3 , 5 , 12 The mean difference of LT measured with Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900 was 0.001 mm, and significanly less than similar studies which report a mean difference of between 0.008 and 0.03. 3 , 5 , 12 The differences between our results and previous studies is likely related ot the fact that our study was performed on a cataractous group of patients. Dense lens and poor fixation may contribute to the ACD and LT measurment differences found in this study compared to previous studies. However, in the clinical practice, in IOL calculation formula which use LT parameter, a difference of 0.20 mm may change the IOL power by 0.20 dioper. 15 Based on these findings, statistically significant differences between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 may not considered clinically significant. Previous studies show that Revo NX SD-OCT offers high repeatability and reproducibility in measuring ACDand LT in healthy eyes. 5 It has been also reported to have a very strong correlation with the Lenstar LS 900 biometric measurements. However, AL and ACD measured with these devices were not considered interchangeable. 5 Similarly, we found a statistically and clinically significant difference between ACD measured with Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900 (0.10mm), but the AL measurement was in very good agreement. A newer version of Revo NX OCT was used in this study and there was a very good correlation between this device and IOL Master 700 in all measured biometric parameters (according to ICC). Also, narrower LoA was found between parameters measured using Revo NX and IOL Master 700 compared to the Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. Strengths of the study include its prospective nature, the large number of eyes included and the inclusion of only eye per patient. However our study had a number of limitations including a lack of a healthy control group. In conclusion, in eyes with cataract, despite the higher measurement failure rate, the Revo NX biometer showed very good agreement with the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 validated optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements can not be considered interchangeable between these devices. Declarations Acknowledgments This study was supported by the research deputy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (grant number: 960395). Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Funding The authors did not receive any financial support from any public or private sources. The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in a product, method, or material described herein. References Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg . 1993;19(6):700–712. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0 Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2000;26(8):1233–1237. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00376-X Kanclerz P, Hoffer KJ, Przewłócka K, Savini G. Comparison of an upgraded optical biometer with 2 validated optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2021;47(7):859–864. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000541 Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2016;42(8):1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013 Kanclerz P, Hoffer KJ, Rozema JJ, Przewłócka K, Savini G. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2019;45(11):1619–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.002 Shetty N, Kaweri L, Koshy A, Shetty R, Nuijts RMMA, Sinha Roy A. Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2021;47(5):585–592. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000494 Arriola-Villalobos P, Almendral-Gómez J, Garzón N, et al. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Eye . 2017;31(3):437–442. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.241 Song JS, Yoon DY, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean J Ophthalmol KJO . 2020;34(2):126–132. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0102 Kanclerz P. Optical biometry in a commercially available anterior and posterior segment optical coherence tomography device. Clin Exp Optom . 2019;102(5):533–534. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12880 Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960 . 1993;111(6):831–836. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035 Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2010;36(4):644–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007 Sikorski BL, Suchon P. OCT Biometry (B-OCT): A New Method for Measuring Ocular Axial Dimensions. Queiros A, ed. J Ophthalmol . 2019;2019:9192456. doi: 10.1155/2019/9192456 Huang J, Chen H, Li Y, et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry. J Refract Surg . 2019;35(2):115–120. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01 Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand . 2007;85(5):472–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x McLintock Franzco C, Niyazmand H, Seo S, Barrett Franzco G, Nilagiri VK, McKelvie Franzco J. Agreement between two swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg . Published online March 24, 2022. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000942 Additional Declarations (Not answered) Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-2049518","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":140584755,"identity":"b55a0b86-3725-4133-a66a-c7b9ae841998","order_by":0,"name":"Saimak Zarei-Ghanavati","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Saimak","middleName":"","lastName":"Zarei-Ghanavati","suffix":""},{"id":140584756,"identity":"3cf71303-b053-4965-a92c-1cc6d23d997e","order_by":1,"name":"Majid Nikpayam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Majid","middleName":"","lastName":"Nikpayam","suffix":""},{"id":140584757,"identity":"4192d428-090c-4ed5-9b8a-e5325de2d602","order_by":2,"name":"Maral Namdari","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maral","middleName":"","lastName":"Namdari","suffix":""},{"id":140584758,"identity":"b34975f2-91f9-47f5-8abe-29e72fa51ed6","order_by":3,"name":"Elham Bakhtiari","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elham","middleName":"","lastName":"Bakhtiari","suffix":""},{"id":140584759,"identity":"1afcffde-d74c-4490-a15f-e143d8d96fab","order_by":4,"name":"Samira Hassanzadeh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mashhad university of medical sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Samira","middleName":"","lastName":"Hassanzadeh","suffix":""},{"id":140584760,"identity":"3af3914d-42f2-4641-93f4-c23c7bf592b4","order_by":5,"name":"Mohammed Ziaei","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammed","middleName":"","lastName":"Ziaei","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-09-09 15:15:34","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049518/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049518/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":27335850,"identity":"9fac75a9-dc21-4d76-9faf-4b337ad06110","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-10-04 17:55:04","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1173752,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBland-Altman plots demonstrate the agreement between Lenstar LS 900 and IOL Master 700 with REVO NX biometer in measuring AL, LT, ACD, and CCT.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1001.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2049518/v1/931810e24ec6800e190273dc.png"},{"id":27335851,"identity":"9738b084-b0ee-48a5-adf2-af0c936d7209","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-10-04 17:55:04","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":674073,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMountain plots, demonstrate the distribution differences between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 measurements.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2001.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2049518/v1/99054166b8c9dbdadf4532e7.png"},{"id":28270011,"identity":"76211066-dc28-44af-987d-3174d8b9d566","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-10-26 10:35:47","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":739479,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2049518/v1/14204fcd-bc51-4001-9b73-449aa06e205c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"(Not answered)","formattedTitle":"Agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometrer, a spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography biometrer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer in eyes with cataract","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn an era of modern cataract surgery, accurate biometric measuremnets of the eye are instrumental for acucurate determination of intraocular lens (IOL) power and optimised refractive outcomes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Axial length (AL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) can be measured with ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry (PCI), optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and recently optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSince the introduction of the IOL Master (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) in 1999, optical biometry has for a long period of time been a gold standard in ocular biometry measurements.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e IOL Master 700 was the first swept-source OCT (SS-OCT)-based biometry device, which acquired OCT images across the entire length of the eye.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Although the IOLMaster 700 provides excellent anterior segment OCT images, it cannot offer high-quality scans of the retina and optic nerve, simultaneously.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLenstar LS 900 (HAAG-STREIT AG, Switzerland) works based on OLCR technology. It combines optical biometry with automated keratometry.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The agreement, validity, and interchangeability of IOL master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 have been reported in previous studies.\u003csup\u003e4,6\u0026minus;8\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe recently introduced Revo NX device (OPTOPOL Technology Sp, Poland) is a combination of anterior and posterior segment spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) with optical biometry.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The Revo NX is the first Anterior/Posterior OCT system that enables simultaneous measurement of AL, ACD, lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The biometric measurement provided by the previous version (software version 8.0.3) of Revo NX biometer were found not to be in agreement with Lenstar LS 900.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e After improving its calibration by the manufacturer, the upgraded version (9.5.0) claims to be able to compete with other devices, and a recent study, comparing the upgraded version of Revo NX optical biometer with the two other validated optical biometers (e.g. IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900) found a good agreement between devices in healthy individuals.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e This study sought to assess the acquisition success rate and agreement of biometry measurements obtained by REVO NX biometer (software version 9.7.0) with IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 in cataract surgery candidates.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis prospective study was performed on patients presenting for cataract surgery between November 2019 and September 2020 at Noorafarin eye Clinic (Mashhad, Iran). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Science (Ethical code: IR.MUMS.fm.REC.1396.793(. Cataract types and grading were recorded according to Lens Opacities Classification III scoring system (LOCS III). \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Patients were invited to participate in the study after an explanation of the study and its purpose. All participants gave informed consent to participate in research and the research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. For all patients a full medical and ocular history was taken. All patients underwent a full anterior and posterior segment slit-lamp examination as well as macula and optic disc OCT scans.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne hundred patients with cataract over the age of 50 were included. Eyes were excluded if ocular co-morbidities were expected to alter biometry measurements. Eyes with the following pathologies were excluded: pterygium, corneal transplantation, corneal dystrophy, keratoconus and corneal scarring. Patients were also excluded if they were unable to fixate on the fixation target.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll biometry examinations were performed in a random order, by one experienced operator between 4\u0026ndash;8 PM. During the procedure, patients were asked to steadily fixate to the fixation light and blink to provide a continuous tear layer. All exams were repeated three times and the results were averaged. Focused and high-quality images were included and the results were averaged for the statistical analysis. AL, ACD, LT, and CCT parameters were extracted for the agreement analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eInstruments\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Revo NX SD-OCT device has an axial resolution of 5 mm, a transverse resolution of 12 mm, and a scanning depth of 2.4 mm. It can produce 110,000 scans per second. The optical biometry program within the device measures the AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. It performs 10 B-scans for each measurement to calculate a precise mean value.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLenstar LS-900 OLCR biometer uses a superluminescent diode with 820 nm wavelength to measure the AL, LT, CCT, and ACD, and also provides KR values and pupil size.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e IOL Master 700 measures AL, and ACD along with CCT and LT using an adjustable 1050 nm laser infrared light and multi-point keratometer, acquiring over 2000 scans per second.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStatistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23 software (SPSS Institute, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and MedCalc software (Version 20; MedCalc Inc., Ostend, Belgium). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the parametric distribution of data. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni posttest were used to assess the difference between devices. The measured data of each device were plotted by Bland - Altman diagram to investigate the qualitative distribution and compare the compatibility or dispersion of data provided by Revo NX compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900. The mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.96 standard deviation (SD) of the difference between the two measurement techniques, defined the 95% limits of agreement. The mountain plots were used to show the measurement differences between devices. Depending on the numerical value of SD, the agreement range was much narrower or wider. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was defined as the ratio of the variance between subjects to the sum of the pooled intra- and inter-participant variance. ICC more than 0.9 is defined as a high agreement, between 0.7\u0026ndash;0.9 considered a good agreement, and an ICC less than 0.7 considered a poor agreement between measurement techniques.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSample size calculation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the previous studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, the sample size calculation performed to detect a mean difference of 0.01 mm of axial length with a standard deviation of 0.02 mm, with a power of 80% and significance level of 0.05 using the Bland-Altman method, revealed a minimum sample size of 83 is needed for each group within a paired analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eOne hundred patients (100 eyes) including 55 women (55.0%) and 45 men (45.0%) with a mean age of 61.85\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.90 years (range 50\u0026ndash;82 years) were included. AL was successfully measured in 82% of the patients using Revo NX biometer, 91.0% of patients using Lenstar LS 900, and 97.0% of all patients using IOL Master 700. Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e shows baseline characteristics of ocular biometric parameters measured using the three devices. The mean of LT and ACD were significantly different between the three devices (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;001 and p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.005 respectively). Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e shows paired difference and agreement between parameters measured with the three devices. Bonferroni test showed a significant difference between IOL Master and Revo NX in LT measurement (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Also, ACD measured using Revo NX was significantly higher than Lenstar (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.007).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDemographic characteristics of ocular biometric parameters measured using three devices.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"9\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAL (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLT (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eACD (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCCT (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRange\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRange\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRange\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRange\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRevo NX\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.46\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.21\u0026ndash;32.67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.34\u0026ndash;5.15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.15\u0026ndash;4.78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e520.02\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e438\u0026ndash;595\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLenstar LS 900\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.48\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.27\u0026ndash;32.50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.27\u0026ndash;5.27\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.04\u0026ndash;4.76\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e519.29\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;.3.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e438\u0026ndash;601\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIOL Master 700\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.48\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.22\u0026ndash;32.48\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.30\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.29\u0026ndash;5.40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.24\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.89\u0026ndash;4.68\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e522.31\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e441\u0026ndash;603\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ep-value*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.625\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e0.005\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"9\" nameend=\"c9\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e*Repeated measures ANOVA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD, paired differences, and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between parameters measured by Lenstar LS 900), IOL Master 700, and Revo NX biometer.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePaired difference* with Revo NX\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAgreement with Revo NX\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLenstar LS 900\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIOL Master 700\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLenstar LS 900\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIOL Master 700\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e95%LOA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eICC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e95%LOA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eICC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAL (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.02\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.02\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0.02\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.46 to 0.43\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.989\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.35 to 0.31\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.994\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLT (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.001\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03**\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.55 to 0.53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.750\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.69 to 0.39\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.770\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eACD (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.10\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03**\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.59 to 0.62\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.810\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.47 to 0.67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCCT (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.73\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.43\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.29\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.92**\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-26.20 to 27.70\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.910\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-19.70 to 15.10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.960\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e*Bonferroni multiple comparisons; **p-value\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll parameters measured with Revo NX biometer were in high agreement with Lenstar and IOL Master (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). A high degree of agreement was found between Revo NX and the other 2 biometers in AL and CCT measurements (ICC\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.90). This agreement was lower but good for LT and ACD measurements (ICC: 0.75\u0026ndash;0.81).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe agreement of parameters between Optopol OCT, Lenstar, and IOL Master were assessed and represented using the Bland-Altman method (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Also, mountain plots showed high agreement between Revo NX and the two other devices for the measured biometric parameters (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this study, the biometric parameters measured by Revo NX biometer, Lenstar LS 900, and IOL Master 700, were compared in candidates presenting for cataract surgery. A good to a high agreement was found between devices, especially in the measurement of AL and CCT. The agreement of the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 devices has also been previously investigated, and a high agreement between devices and no clinically relevant differences were found. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the present study, the failure rate of IOL Master 700, Lenstar LS 900, and Revo NX OCT in measuring AL was 3%, 9%, and 18%, respectively. This is in keeping with previous studies showing that SS-OCT-based biometers, demonstrate greater penetration of the cataractous lens.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Sikorski et al. also reported a higher failure rate of the SD-OCT Revo NX in measuring AL compared to the SS-OCT IOL Master 700 and proposed this to be due to the difference in OCT technology used by the Revo NX. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the present study, AL measurements obtained by IOL Master 700 were marginally higher than the other devices, but the differences were not clinically and statistically significant. This is similar to the results reported by Kanclerz et al., comparing the same devices in healthy eyes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The authors found a high level of agreement (r value\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.95) between Revo NX and IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS 900 when measuring AL. Mean difference between \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.001mm and 0.01 mm for AL measurement has been reported between Revo NX and IOL master 700. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In our study, the mean paired difference between AL measured by Revo NX and IOL Master 700 was \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.02 mm. Moreover, mean difference of -0.02 mm was also found between Revo NX and lenstar LS 900 which is similar to the results of the study by Kanclerz at al,\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e who found a mean difference of -0.002 to 0.11 mm when measuring AL in healthy eyes using Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. Previous investigators have proposed a difference of 0.1 mm to be acceptable between AL measurements (almost equivalent to an error of about 0.27 D in intraocular lens power).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn terms of CCT, a mean difference between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 of -2.29 \u0026micro;m (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) was found. This is similar to previous studies reporting a mean difference between the two devices of -0.80 to -4.40 \u0026micro;m.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The mean difference between Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900 was 0.73 \u0026micro;m which is consistent with other studies reporting a mean difference of between \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.83 and 3.80 \u0026micro;m. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Although, differences in CCT measurements between these devices are not clinically significant, more difference in the measured CCT using Revo NX and IOL Master 700 has been justified with the several-fold smaller pixel size in Revo NX.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The Optopol OCT Revo NX offers a resolution of 5 micrometers, which is more than four times better than the IOL Master 700 and enables it to define the boundaries of the layers of eye tissue more accurately. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Due to these capabilities, more accurate measurements can be made in the eyes with structural abnormalities or pathology. In this respect, the Revo NX surpasses the IOL Master 700 in measuring AL in irregularly structured eyes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e More studies on the limitations and benefits of this device in comparison to other biometry systems are needed in patients with different cataract types and severities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith respect to ACD, the mean difference of ACD measured with Revo NX and IOL Master 700 was 0.01 mm, and 0.10 mm as measured by the Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. Other studies have reported a mean difference between 0.003 and 0.005 mm between Revo NX and IOL Master 700, and 0.01 to 0.05 mm between Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Depending on AL of the eye, a 0.25 mm error in ACD measurement results in a difference in IOL power between 0.50 to 1.0 D.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Based on these findings, the differences in CCT measurements between the above platfroms are likely clinically insignificant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean difference of LT between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 was \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.15mm (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), which is significantly more that previously reported (0.001\u0026ndash;0.002 mm).\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The mean difference of LT measured with Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900 was 0.001 mm, and significanly less than similar studies which report a mean difference of between 0.008 and 0.03.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The differences between our results and previous studies is likely related ot the fact that our study was performed on a cataractous group of patients. Dense lens and poor fixation may contribute to the ACD and LT measurment differences found in this study compared to previous studies. However, in the clinical practice, in IOL calculation formula which use LT parameter, a difference of 0.20 mm may change the IOL power by 0.20 dioper. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Based on these findings, statistically significant differences between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 may not considered clinically significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevious studies show that Revo NX SD-OCT offers high repeatability and reproducibility in measuring ACDand LT in healthy eyes.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e It has been also reported to have a very strong correlation with the Lenstar LS 900 biometric measurements. However, AL and ACD measured with these devices were not considered interchangeable. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Similarly, we found a statistically and clinically significant difference between ACD measured with Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900 (0.10mm), but the AL measurement was in very good agreement. A newer version of Revo NX OCT was used in this study and there was a very good correlation between this device and IOL Master 700 in all measured biometric parameters (according to ICC). Also, narrower LoA was found between parameters measured using Revo NX and IOL Master 700 compared to the Revo NX and Lenstar LS 900. Strengths of the study include its prospective nature, the large number of eyes included and the inclusion of only eye per patient. However our study had a number of limitations including a lack of a healthy control group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, in eyes with cataract, despite the higher measurement failure rate, the Revo NX biometer showed very good agreement with the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 validated optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements can not be considered interchangeable between these devices.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was supported by the research deputy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (grant number: 960395).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors did not receive any financial support from any public or private sources.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors have no financial or proprietary interest in a product, method, or material described herein.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 1993;19(6):700\u0026ndash;712. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2000;26(8):1233\u0026ndash;1237. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00376-X\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00376-X\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKanclerz P, Hoffer KJ, Przewł\u0026oacute;cka K, Savini G. Comparison of an upgraded optical biometer with 2 validated optical biometers. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2021;47(7):859\u0026ndash;864. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000541\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000541\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2016;42(8):1165\u0026ndash;1172. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKanclerz P, Hoffer KJ, Rozema JJ, Przewł\u0026oacute;cka K, Savini G. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2019;45(11):1619\u0026ndash;1624. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShetty N, Kaweri L, Koshy A, Shetty R, Nuijts RMMA, Sinha Roy A. Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2021;47(5):585\u0026ndash;592. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000494\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000494\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArriola-Villalobos P, Almendral-G\u0026oacute;mez J, Garz\u0026oacute;n N, et al. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. \u003cem\u003eEye\u003c/em\u003e. 2017;31(3):437\u0026ndash;442. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1038/eye.2016.241\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/eye.2016.241\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong JS, Yoon DY, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. \u003cem\u003eKorean J Ophthalmol KJO\u003c/em\u003e. 2020;34(2):126\u0026ndash;132. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3341/kjo.2019.0102\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3341/kjo.2019.0102\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKanclerz P. Optical biometry in a commercially available anterior and posterior segment optical coherence tomography device. \u003cem\u003eClin Exp Optom\u003c/em\u003e. 2019;102(5):533\u0026ndash;534. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/cxo.12880\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/cxo.12880\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. \u003cem\u003eArch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960\u003c/em\u003e. 1993;111(6):831\u0026ndash;836. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2010;36(4):644\u0026ndash;648. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSikorski BL, Suchon P. OCT Biometry (B-OCT): A New Method for Measuring Ocular Axial Dimensions. Queiros A, ed. \u003cem\u003eJ Ophthalmol\u003c/em\u003e. 2019;2019:9192456. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1155/2019/9192456\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1155/2019/9192456\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuang J, Chen H, Li Y, et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry. \u003cem\u003eJ Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. 2019;35(2):115\u0026ndash;120. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOlsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. \u003cem\u003eActa Ophthalmol Scand\u003c/em\u003e. 2007;85(5):472\u0026ndash;485. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcLintock Franzco C, Niyazmand H, Seo S, Barrett Franzco G, Nilagiri VK, McKelvie Franzco J. Agreement between two swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometry devices. \u003cem\u003eJ Cataract Refract Surg\u003c/em\u003e. Published online March 24, 2022. doi:\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000942\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000942\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"cataract, biometry, agreement","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049518/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049518/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain OCT optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated Swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOL Master 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.0.02 and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.02\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03 for AL, 0.01\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03 and 0.10\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) for ACD, -0.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.03 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and 0.001\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.04 for LT, and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2.29\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.92 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and 0.73\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.43 for CCT. There was a good correlation between devices for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (ICC\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.75). Bland-Altman analysis showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOL Master 700 in measuring AL.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements can not be considered interchangeable between these devices.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Agreement between a swept-source ocular coherence tomography biometrer, a spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography biometrer, and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer in eyes with cataract","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-10-04 17:55:02","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049518/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"bb888c17-a32d-4d75-8795-179d32589419","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 4th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-10-26T10:35:42+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-10-04 17:55:02","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-2049518","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-2049518","identity":"rs-2049518","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}