China's Fiscal Response to the COVID-19 Shock: Policy Review and Effect Estimation
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This paper reviews China's fiscal policy responses to the COVID-19 shock and estimates their effects.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Fiscal policy is at the core of most rescue packages worldwide to cope with the economic shock caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the fiscal policy options of China, which first identified and responded to the pandemic, is of importance to policy makers not only from China but also from other countries. In 2020, China spent around 5.06 trillion CNY (4.76% of its gross domestic product) in additional government purchases, infrastructure investment, consumption stimulus, income subsidies, and industrial support to ensure the economy’s recovery from the shock of COVID-19. This study reviews China’s fiscal response to the pandemic and estimates the impacts of its policies. Using an input–output framework to model the economy with industrial structure details, the empirical results suggest that: (1) government purchases and infrastructure investment expand output while imposing the least net fiscal burden; (2) consumption stimulus and income subsidies are more advantageous in protecting people’s livelihoods; and (3) industrial support performs a prominent role in sustaining employment and ensuring enterprise survival. Compared with Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, China's fiscal policy package is less intensive and pays more attention to employment and business. Based on the findings, we advance policy suggestions regarding the need to expand infrastructure investment, guarantee the basic living needs of low-income residents, design a support policy targeted at specific industries, reshape international economic relationships, and improve the data available for statistical analysis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (24)
- doi:10.1016/0304-3932(92)90045-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1257/aer.102.3.225 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.qref.2021.06.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1468-2362.00079 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2014.07.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/003355302320935043 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cbrev.2020.03.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05905-y via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109939 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2118388 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00522-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.11.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0140-9883(95)98908-m via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.05.031 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.12.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/jae.1079 via crossref
- doi:10.1257/aer.20121660 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.eap.2021.07.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1086/261857 via crossref
- doi:10.3386/w17967 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101561 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-06-01T01:00:34.988202+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-07T06:39:35.550527+00:00