ArabidopsisUGT76B1 glycosylatesN-hydroxy-pipecolic acid and inactivates systemic acquired resistance in tomato
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a mechanism that plants utilize to connect a local pathogen infection to global defense responses. N -hydroxy-pipecolic acid (NHP) and a glycosylated derivative are produced during SAR, yet their individual roles in the response have not yet been elucidated. Here we report that Arabidopsis thaliana UGT76B1 can generate glycosylated NHP (NHP-Glc) in vitro and when transiently expressed alongside Arabidopsis NHP biosynthetic genes in two Solanaceous plants. During infection, Arabidopsis ugt76b1 mutants do not accumulate NHP-Glc and accumulate less glycosylated salicylic acid (SA-Glc) than wild type plants. The metabolic changes in ugt76b1 mutant plants are accompanied by enhanced defense to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae , suggesting that glycosylation of SAR molecules NHP and SA by UGT76B1 plays an important role in defense modulation. Transient expression of Arabidopsis UGT76B1 with the Arabidopsis NHP biosynthesis genes ALD1 and FMO1 in tomato increases NHP-Glc production and reduces NHP accumulation in local tissue, and abolishes the systemic resistance seen when expressing NHP-biosynthetic genes alone. These findings reveal that the glycosylation of NHP by UGT76B1 alters defense priming in systemic tissue and provide further evidence for the role of the NHP aglycone as the active metabolite in SAR signaling.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (43)
- doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa160 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.15.00496 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10658-014-0424-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1701101114 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1805291115 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/tpj.12036 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/gkh133 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/srep46629 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/tpj.14037 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2019.02.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.041 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00479.x via crossref
- doi:10.1126/scisignal.aay3066 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/mp/ssu049 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(96)04541-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1094/mpmi-03-18-0067-cr via crossref
- doi:10.1002/anie.200702131 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.92.10.4076 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m109287200 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.15.00053 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00766 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00940.x via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.110.168617 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00957.x via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.112.103564 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.112.098343 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.12.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00558-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11103-013-0036-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.08.012 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature14907 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.004630 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/tpj.12464 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.molp.2017.07.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.104.023549 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.104.026690 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01973.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.03.020 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.111.088443 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04107.x via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.r113.475160 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-31T01:00:36.715267+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0