Mining of resistance gene analogue specific SSR markers (RGA-eSSRs) in pomegranate and their validation
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Pomegranate has been a highly nutritious and medicinally valued fruit for ages. Pomegranate cultivation is severely threatened by multiple biotic stresses, including bacterial blight and wilt, the major bottlenecks. Identifying candidate genes and markers linked to such genes is necessary to accelerate host resistance breeding. 132 resistance gene analogues (RGAs) specific simple sequence repeats (RGA-eSSRs) located on the coding regions of 103 RGAs were mined from 958 pomegranates RGAs. An average of 58.56 SSRs/Mb of RGA genes was observed with a relative density of 1170.84 bp of SSR motifs per Mb of RGA. Tri-nucleotide repeats were highly abundant in the RGA-eSSRs, followed by hexanucleotide repeats. The high density of RGAs was noticed on the RLK and CNL genes with an average of 3.34 and 3.0 SSRs per RGA, respectively. The abundance of RGA-eSSRs on each chromosome was correlated with the number of RGAs, with chromosome 08 bearing the highest RGA-eSSRs. Primers were designed for 121 of the 132 RGA-SSR and validated by both in silico and in vitro PCR. RGA-eSSRs exhibited high transferability with most markers amplified in four of the five genotypes tested under in silico PCR and 100% amplification in biological validation with eight genotypes. Pomegranate RGA-eSSRs also exhibited high polymorphism with an average polymorphic information content of 0.5. Discovered RGA-eSSRs are useful in the genetic mapping of biotic stress genes and diversity analysis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (36)
- doi:10.5958/2230-732x.2016.00082.6 via crossref
- doi:10.17660/actahortic.2011.890.81 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00620 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222747 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11103-007-9201-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00425-018-2863-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx665 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00122-011-1556-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.575 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91944-7_15 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12284-014-0034-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.113.110833 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature05286 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.108.063123 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067742 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.033 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/jipb.12037 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-15 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.106.044016 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.08.016 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0864-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00279-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11033-010-0452-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s12298-020-00825-y via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00468-020-01975-y via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11032-017-0753-2 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/ijms160819248 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163962 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00891 via crossref
- doi:10.4067/s0718-58392022000100003 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01780.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jhered/93.1.77 via crossref
- doi:10.2298/abs140902011y via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-30T01:00:46.708407+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0