AP2/ERF transcription factors enriched in the drought-response transcriptome of the Thar desert treeProsopis cinerariashow higher copy number and greater DNA-binding affinity than orthologs in drought-sensitive species
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
We sequenced the drought-response transcriptome of the keystone tree species Prosopis cineraria from the Indian Thar desert to understand the key factors in its drought tolerance mechanism. We identified a network of genes activated in P. cineraria involved in osmotic stress response, phytohormone, calcium, and phosphorelay signal transduction. Of these, up-regulation of 54 APETALA2/Ethylene-Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factor genes, validated by real-time PCR, suggests their key role in the drought tolerance of P. cineraria. We conducted a genome-wide study of the AP2/ERF superfamily in P. cineraria , classifying its 232 proteins into 15 clades and analyzing their protein structures, gene structure, and promoter organization. The P. cineraria genome contains more copies of AP2/ERF genes than drought-sensitive plants. Further, we identified sequence polymorphisms in AP2/ERF genes between Arabian and Indian cultivars of P. cineraria . We modeled the DNA-protein complex structures of AP2/ERFs from drought-tolerant and sensitive species using AlphaFold to compare their DNA binding ability. Though the DNA binding domain (DBD) is relatively conserved across species, the unstructured region of these proteins possesses different charge distributions, which might contribute differently to their DNA search and binding. Using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we teased out a higher number of specific DBD-DNA hydrogen bonds in P. cineraria, leading to a stronger DNA-binding affinity compared to drought-sensitive Arabidopsis thaliana . These results directly support copy number expansion of AP2/ERF transcription factors and the evolution of their structures for more efficient DNA search and binding as drought adaptation mechanisms in P. cineraria .
Full text
1,869 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
We sequenced the drought-response transcriptome of the keystone tree species Prosopis cineraria from the Indian Thar desert to understand the key factors in its drought tolerance mechanism. We identified a network of genes activated in P. cineraria involved in osmotic stress response, phytohormone, calcium, and phosphorelay signal transduction. Of these, up-regulation of 54 APETALA2/Ethylene-Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factor genes, validated by real-time PCR, suggests their key role in the drought tolerance of P. cineraria. We conducted a genome-wide study of the AP2/ERF superfamily in P. cineraria, classifying its 232 proteins into 15 clades and analyzing their protein structures, gene structure, and promoter organization. The P. cineraria genome contains more copies of AP2/ERF genes than drought-sensitive plants. Further, we identified sequence polymorphisms in AP2/ERF genes between Arabian and Indian cultivars of P. cineraria. We modeled the DNA-protein complex structures of AP2/ERFs from drought-tolerant and sensitive species using AlphaFold to compare their DNA binding ability. Though the DNA binding domain (DBD) is relatively conserved across species, the unstructured region of these proteins possesses different charge distributions, which might contribute differently to their DNA search and binding. Using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we teased out a higher number of specific DBD-DNA hydrogen bonds in P. cineraria, leading to a stronger DNA-binding affinity compared to drought-sensitive Arabidopsis thaliana. These results directly support copy number expansion of AP2/ERF transcription factors and the evolution of their structures for more efficient DNA search and binding as drought adaptation mechanisms in P. cineraria.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (100)
- From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.006130 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/pbi.12520 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/emboj/17.18.5484 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/23818107.2021.1981437 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/ijms160715811 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.129 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0405-z via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167660 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2020.101527 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s12033-014-9828-z via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s13353-021-00675-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.16.00025 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.006494 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf00027338 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.750761 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/gks405 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12870-015-0700-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/srep37379 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2009554117 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.12.3.393 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.252637799 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2023.153923 via crossref
- doi:10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/aob/mch150 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nbt.1883 via crossref
- doi:10.17221/108/2022-cjgpb via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161322 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116820 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/int via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142203 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.273.41.26857 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2023.03.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/07391102.2021.1894980 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00970 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/int via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.07.017 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11103-013-0054-z via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01326 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-118 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x via crossref
- doi:10.1002/pro.4362 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221422 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00207 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.18.01185 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/gkad347 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/srep18878 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jxb/err016 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/jxb/err210 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.325 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/nar/gkab301 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/plants12173166 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.106.080580 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/intjbiolmacromol19113637 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pld.2016.03.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12864-021-07799-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1923-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cj.2023.05.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12864-023-09585-x via crossref
- doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-1-r1 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.023 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1334 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/ct300418h via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2023.147215 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.737490 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.105.073783 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2020.144514 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113715 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/prot.20033 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007867 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.978310 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1289-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1104/pp.105.066324 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49245-4 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/int via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66002-x via crossref
- doi:10.1023/b:plan.0000040903.66496.a4 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01765 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s12355-023-01337-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00468-020-02073-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00425-014-2111-5 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01553 via crossref
- doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6299 via crossref
- doi:10.1105/tpc.105.035881 via crossref
- doi:10.7717/peerj.6810 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/treephys/tpy153 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/pce.14629 via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/s42397-021-00102-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf00303516 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/ja00172a038 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-28T01:00:28.149130+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-08T06:39:30.753600+00:00