Characterising the vegetation-rainfall relationship in the Northeast Himalaya, India
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Ecosystems are complex systems and are characterised by positive and negative feedbacks between the abiotic and biotic components. The response of an ecosystem to its environment can be determined by examining state diagrams, which are plots of the state variable as a function of the environmental driver. For instance, tree cover as a function of rainfall is widely used to characterise vegetation patterns. Previous studies have shown that tree cover shows bimodal distributions for intermediate rainfall regimes in Africa and South America. In this study, we construct a vegetation state diagram – by plotting vegetation cover as a function of mean annual rainfall – for Northeast India, which is part of the Eastern Himalaya and the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. We use remotely sensed satellite data of Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) as a proxy for vegetation cover. We obtain Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) from the CHIRPS data (Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data). We find that EVI increases monotonically as a function of MAP in the range 1000-2000 mm, after which it plateaus. The 1000 to 2000 mm MAP corresponds to the vegetation transitional zone (1200-3700 m), whereas >2000 MAP region covers the greater extent of the tropical forest ( < 1200 m) of NEI. In other words, we find no evidence for bimodality in tree cover or vegetation states at coarser scales in North Eastern India. Our characterisation of the state diagram for vegetation in northeast India is important to understand response to ongoing change in rainfall patterns.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (41)
- doi:10.1016/j.actao.2011.03.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s12594-015-0362-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.013 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6444-9_18 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.07.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.limno.2012.07.007 via crossref
- doi:10.1029/2018jd029625 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7055-3_6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.06.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1654-109x.2010.01103.x via crossref
- doi:10.1029/2005rg000183 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ecs2.1956 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1210657 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00096-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6749-7_26 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13239 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/ecy.2722 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.061 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104697 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2997558 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01771.x via crossref
- doi:10.1038/35002501 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3218-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0305 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/9781316335420.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10661-014-4167-x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature04070 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/35098000 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02858183 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s10021-016-0011-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1210465 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/gcb.12279 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07213.x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x via crossref
- doi:10.1111/geb.12707 via crossref
- doi:10.2307/2845367 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/btp.12915 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-27T01:00:18.091723+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0