Assessment of Rhizopus arrhizus RL (OR398886) chitosan-based films as a sustainable option for fresh beef packaging
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract Meat spoilage is a significant concern in the food industry, prompting the need for effective preservation methods to prolong shelf life and maintain product quality. This study aimed to investigate the effects of fungal-based chitosan films at different concentration levels (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) on the sensory, chemical, and microbiological characteristics of beef meat stored at 4°C ± 1 for 12 days. The results showed that the Rhizopus arrhizus RL (OR398886) chitosan-based films, especially at higher concentrations, improved the moisture retention, lipid preservation, and sensory attributes of the meat samples. Moreover, these films exhibited notable antimicrobial properties against bacteria, yeast, and fungi. The survival test and the chemometric analysis confirmed that the samples wrapped in 15% and 20% fungal chitosan-based films maintained the highest acceptability and quality for 12 days, therefore demonstrating their potential as an effective strategy for extending the shelf-life and enhancing the quality of meat products.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (45)
- doi:10.1002/jsfa.9416 via crossref
- doi:10.1155/2019/4726510 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.126 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108137 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123209 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/antiox10020228 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11694-021-00875-0 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11694-021-01055-w via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.022 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02106 via crossref
- doi:10.21608/ejchem.2024.253543.8953 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2013.01.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s13197-014-1318-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0014-3057(01)00039-8 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/app.1992.070460206 via crossref
- doi:10.3791/3064 via crossref
- doi:10.1128/aem.66.3.1066-1076.2000 via crossref
- doi:10.1201/ebk1439804063 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.2012.00696.x via crossref
- doi:10.1590/1678-457x.0020 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.5.899s via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.036 via crossref
- doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07868 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121380 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2008.00173.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.057 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.065 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.03.024 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.02.002 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/app.41871 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2007.10.014 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.031 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2175-4_5 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394601-0.00009-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.058 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.012 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/bit.22363 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.009 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2010.01.025 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.650598 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/molecules26237136 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/polym3041875 via crossref
- doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20180797 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2008.12.021 via crossref
- doi:10.3390/foods11111657 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-27T01:00:14.167068+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0