The branching code: a model of actin-driven dendrite arborisation
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Summary Dendrites display a striking variety of neuronal type-specific morphologies, but the mechanisms and principles underlying such diversity remain elusive. A major player in defining the morphology of dendrites is the neuronal cytoskeleton, including evolutionarily conserved actin-modulatory proteins (AMPs). Still, we lack a clear understanding of how AMPs might support developmental phenomena such as neuron-type specific dendrite dynamics. To address precisely this level of in vivo specificity, we concentrated on a defined neuronal type, the class III dendritic arborisation (c3da) neuron of Drosophila larvae, displaying actin-enriched short terminal branchlets (STBs). Computational modelling reveals that the main branches of c3da neurons follow a general growth model based on optimal wiring, but the STBs do not. Instead, model STBs are defined by a short reach and a high affinity to grow towards the main branches. We thus concentrated on c3da STBs and developed new methods to quantitatively describe dendrite morphology and dynamics based on in vivo time-lapse imaging of mutants lacking individual AMPs. In this way, we extrapolated the role of these AMPs in defining STB properties. We propose that dendrite diversity is supported by the combination of a common step, refined by a neuron type-specific second level. For c3da neurons, we present a molecular model of how the combined action of multiple AMPs in vivo define the properties of these second level specialisations, the STBs. In brief A quantitative morphological dissection of the concerted actin-modulatory protein actions provides a model of dendrite branchlet outgrowth. Highlights Actin organisation in small terminal branchlets of Drosophila class III dendritic arborisation neurons Six actin-modulatory proteins individually control the characteristic morphology and dynamics of branchlets Quantitative tools for dendrite morphology and branch dynamics enable a comparative analysis A two-step computational growth model reproduces c3da dendrite morphology
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
References (100)
- Achieving functional neuronal dendrite structure through sequential stochastic growth and retraction via crossref
- A developmental stretch-and-fill process that optimises dendritic wiring via crossref
- Distinct relations of microtubules and actin filaments with dendritic architecture via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.274.33.23549 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m503957200 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e14-02-0712 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/jcs.038125 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1285-y via crossref
- doi:10.1093/biomet/93.3.491 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.015 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.097 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.018 via crossref
- doi:10.1681/asn.2010050518 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.118.2.401 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.211 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.348 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1703145114 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000711 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e14-06-1086 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.020 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.014423 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745273.003.0017 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1742-4682-4-21 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000877 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000251 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1200430109 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.003 via crossref
- doi:10.7554/elife.55351 via crossref
- doi:10.1534/genetics.117.300393 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/jcs.224618 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.08.028 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071746 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.82 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.099655 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.038 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(03)00078-x via crossref
- doi:10.1101/gad.13.19.2549 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.129.12.2867 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.131.5.1243 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.201003014 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114126 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.201007095 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.200511093 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nrn2836 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/gtc.12700 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.149.2.471 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s12021-009-9052-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e12-12-0857 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/fncel.2017.00147 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.038 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/jcs.00218 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.34 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.12.005 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182184 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.261 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80478-x via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.146.5.1097 via crossref
- doi:10.1091/mbc.e16-06-0461 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79496-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.056515 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.077800 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.207 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1541-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.201711136 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112907 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1074/jbc.m710475200 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0301-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-18-07129.2003 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1072309 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.200706196 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.110817 via crossref
- doi:10.1042/ebc20190015 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70037-6 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05871-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.122.8.2375 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/srep04415 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.04.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1211164110 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn811 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/dev.171397 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.201112113 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4276-10.2010 via crossref
- doi:10.1242/jcs.203455 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.038 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.05.003 via crossref
- doi:10.1083/jcb.200603013 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005615 via crossref
- doi:10.3791/57139-v via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00280.2007 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1322093111 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.034 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.4099 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nature11685 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.069 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2005-05.2005 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.022 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006593 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-26T01:00:20.537748+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0