A Neural Signature of the Bias Towards Self-Focus
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
People are remarkably self-focused, disproportionately choosing to think about themselves relative to other topics. Self-focus can be adaptive, helping individuals fulfill their needs. It can also go haywire, with maladaptive self-focus a risk and maintenance factor for internalizing disorders like depression. Yet, the drive to focus on the self remains to be fully characterized. We discovered a brain state that when spontaneously brought online during a quick mental break predicts the desire to focus on oneself just a few seconds later. In Study 1, we identified a default network neural signature from pre-trial activity that predicts multiple indicators of self-focus within our sample. In Study 2, we applied our neural signature to independent resting-state data from the Human Connectome project. We found that individuals who score high on internalizing, a form of maladaptive self-focus, similarly move in-and-out of this pattern during rest, suggesting a systematic trajectory towards self-focused thought. This is the first work to “decode” the bias to focus on the self and paves the way towards stopping maladaptive self-focus in its course. Significance Statement Self-help aisles in bookstores, the popularity of self-care culture, curating identities on social media, and the mental health crisis surrounding the rise in depression and anxiety are all symptoms of modern life’s emphasis on the self. Why are people so preoccupied with themselves? Our results suggest self-focus may emerge spontaneously because of the brain state people enter in the default network as soon as they have a mental break. The brain state participants entered in the first few seconds of rest could be used to decode whether they next chose to focus on themselves, as well as subjective and neural markers of self-focus. Moreover, internalizing, a maladaptive form of self-focus, corresponded with systematic timing of the pre-self pattern during a resting state scan, perhaps shaping the timecourse of spontaneous, self-focused thought.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (100)
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.046 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1518931113 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jn.00830.2009 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/emo0001117 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/scan/nsq080 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf00289744 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/h0043805 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0212-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1155/2011/203462 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002180 via crossref
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.10059041 via crossref
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.3937849 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9375-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00102 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/1948550612456046 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00233 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf02912493 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/2167702617720747 via crossref
- doi:10.1080/14792779108401861 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/da.23142 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04387-2 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116828 via crossref
- doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.11.1938 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.045 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/10127-024 via crossref
- doi:10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170325 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.019 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.036 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/wcs.142 via crossref
- doi:10.1177/0963721419831992 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/scan/nsz052 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.156 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf01173040 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2306295121 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/pspa0000114 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(82)80037-3 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01619-w via crossref
- doi:10.1080/17470919.2010.507948 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.106.2.221 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0027525 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/08989290260138672 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.009 via crossref
- doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5055-13.2014 via crossref
- doi:10.1017/s0033291799001282 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/h0071502 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085658 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.421 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.062 via crossref
- doi:10.1126/science.1131295 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.030 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.340 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy071 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01232 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.07.006 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.040 via crossref
- doi:10.1145/1718918.1718953 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.4.569 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0021-843x.109.3.504 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.92 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hipo.20663 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/hbm.26696 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030 via crossref
- doi:10.1037//0022-3514.35.9.677 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077554 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad106 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.concog.2021.103244 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06213-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.04.001 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1210467109 via crossref
- doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.10.1263 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0812686106 via crossref
- doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf00992551 via crossref
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044423 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn.2112 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1212218110 via crossref
- doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00700 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.008 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/a0028232 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102570 via crossref
- doi:10.1073/pnas.2100920118 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114869 via crossref
- doi:10.1056/nejmoa1204471 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/wcs.1482 via crossref
- doi:10.1002/wcs.1183 via crossref
- doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103573 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/ncomms6380 via crossref
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-26T01:00:14.652803+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0