Transvaginal Repair of Apical Vesicovaginal Fistula via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES): A Modified Surgical Technique and Its Outcomes

Transvaginal Repair of Apical Vesicovaginal Fistula via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES): A Modified Surgical Technique and Its Outcomes | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Transvaginal Repair of Apical Vesicovaginal Fistula via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES): A Modified Surgical Technique and Its Outcomes Xin Song, Chen Jiang, Jian-wei Lv This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4958059/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 28 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 14 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Objective To report the procedure of an alternative modified transvaginal repair technique (V-NOTES) and their outcomes in apical vesicovaginal fistula. Methods Between January 2020 and January 2023, gynecological procedures resulted in the diagnosis of apical VVFs in 26 patients, 17 of whom had undergone transvaginal repair of apical vesicovaginal fistula via vaginal V-NOTES. Those patients were contacted and followed up. Outcomes included operative time, blood loss, success rate, postoperative hospital stay. Results The average age of the patients was 45.82(36–53) yr. The mean duration between onset of fistula and repair was 7.18(3–12) mo. The mean estimated blood loss was 10.45 ± 3.23ml, and the average operative time was 104.2 ± 12.2min. Patients’ postoperative hospital stay was 3.34 ± 0.72 days on average. The VVF was successfully repaired in 15(88.2%) cases, and failure was observed in 2 patients. All the 2 initial failures were cured in the second repair. No major complications developed in all 17 patients. There were also no fever (> 38℃), urge incontinence or infection in incision area. Conclusions Our study suggest that the transvaginal repair of apical VVF via V-NOTES is effective and safety, and offers anticipated results without obvious complications. Health sciences/Diseases Health sciences/Health care Health sciences/Urology Apical vesicovaginal fistula V-NOTES Surgical technique Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 1. Introduction A vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is defined as a pathological anatomical junction between the dorsal bladder wall and the anterior vagina. The pathophysiological mechanism for this abnormal anatomic connection is a necrosis of both organ walls as a result of ischemia. 1 VVF has remained a disaster and of public health significance, causing remarkable morbidity, and psychological and physical problems to the patient. 2 The incidence in the developed world is estimated between 0.3% and 2.0%. 3 Although VVFs are the most commonly diagnosed fistulae of the urinary tract, there is no standardized surgical technique for their treatment. 4 The fistula which is smaller than 2cm can be treated conservatively, but the possibility of spontaneous recovery for the fistula which is larger than 3cm istiny. 5 If most of the urine escapes from the catheter after indwelling catheterization, then preservation therapy may be attempted. However, conservative treatment of fistulas following radiotherapy should be carefully considered. Most fistulae will not close spontaneously and require operative closure. For fistula from surgery or birth injury, we recommend to undergo surgery after 12 weeks, while fistula from radiotherapy, the recommended time is one year later. 6 , 7 As for the best surgical approach, there are three ways can be considered typically. They are traditional transvaginal repair, extra peritoneal transvesical repair and laparoscopic trans-vesical repair respectively. Firstly, for traditional transvaginal repairs, there are advantages such as low blood loss, less trauma, no need to open the bladder and no effect of intestinal adhesion. 3 , 8 , 9 But given the small space, difficult exposure of high orifice fistula and inconvenient operation, traditional transvaginal repairs is primarily suitable for repairing low vesicovaginal fistula. 10 – 12 In addition, for extraperitoneal trans-vesical repair, the surgical field presents a top view. The bladder needs to be opened and the trauma is large. Besides it is hard to fully expose the lateral vaginal fistula, and there is no suitable surrounding tissue to block. 13 Finally, at present, most surgeons still prefer to open the bladder to locate the fistula or repair laparoscopically. 14 In most cases ,the approach to VVF repair is often dictated by surgeons’ preference, location or complexity of the VVF 15 . The aim of this manuscript is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of an alternative modified transvaginal repair technique(V-NOTES) for apical vesicovaginal fistula. 2. Patients and methods 2.1. Study population and design In our institution, a retrospective single-center study was carried out. Between January 2020 and January 2023, gynecological procedures resulted in the diagnosis of apical VVFs in 26 patients, 17 of whom had undergone fistula repair in our center. Strict exclusion criteria, such as a fistula with a diameter greater than 2 cm, sepsis, and/or fecaluria, were used to define minimally invasive repair. Every patient had undergone a normal preoperative evaluation, which included an assessment of their medical history, a physical examination, a urine culture, a vaginoscopy, and an upper urinary tract ultrasound. Patients’ records have been retrieved from the hospital archive. Baseline patient characteristics are listed in Table 1 . All methods in this study were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All patients gave written informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, Renji Hospital of ShangHai JiaoTong University, No. 20511105403. Table 1 Patients’ characteristics at the time of first surgery. Patient Age (yr) Duration (mo) Etiology Fistula location Fistula number Fistula size(cm) Perifistula fibrosis 1 42 12 cervical carcinoma 1cm posterior to the left ureter; bladder triangle 2 1.5/0.8 Moderate-severe 2 46 3 Hysteromyoma 1cm posterior to the left ureter 1 0.8 Mild/ no fibrosis 3 51 11 cervical carcinoma 1cm posterior to the right ureter 1 0.8 Moderate- severe 4 43 5 Uterine leiomyoma 1cm posterior to the right ureter; bladder triangle 2 1.2/0.7 Mild/ no fibrosis 5 44 8 Adenomyosis 2cm posterior to the left ureter 1 1.0 Mild/ no fibrosis 6 36 9 Hysteromyoma interureteral ridge 1 0.8 Moderate- severe 7 47 5 Cesarean section 1cm posterior to the left ureter 1 0.5 Mild/ no fibrosis 8 52 5 Cesarean section 1cm posterior to the right ureter 1 0.5 Mild/ no fibrosis 9 42 10 cervical carcinoma 2cm posterior to the left ureter 1 0.8 Moderate- severe 10 37 6 Adenomyosis bladder triangle 1 0.8 Mild/ no fibrosis 11 53 6 Hysteromyoma bladder triangle 1 1.2 Mild/ no fibrosis 12 41 12 cervical carcinoma 2cm posterior to the left ureter 1 1.8 Moderate- severe 13 46 6 Hysteromyoma bladder triangle 1 0.8 Moderate- severe 14 52 5 Hysteromyoma bladder triangle 1 1.0 Mild/ no fibrosis 15 53 3 Adenomyosis Posterior left ureter; bladder triangle 2 1.0/0.8 Mild/ no fibrosis 16 46 8 cervical carcinoma 2cm posterior to the right ureter 1 1.5 Moderate- severe 17 48 8 Hysteromyoma bladder triangle 1 1.0 Moderate- severe 2.2. Preoperative evaluation A standard preoperative evaluation had been performed in all patients, including medical history assessment, physical examination, urineculture, vaginoscopy, and ultrasound of the upper urinary tract. Computer tomography urography (CTU) was performed to exclude concomitant ureteral injury. 2.3. Surgical techniques The v-NOTES procedure differs from conventional laparoscopic surgery in its particular surgical approach. The patient was in the dorsal lithotomy position, her legs supported by knee supports, following general anesthesia. The hips were flexed and the thighs were comparatively abducted. It is imperative to refrain from excessive flexion and abduction of the thighs as this may result in nerve damage caused by the position (Fig. 1 A). Between the patient's legs were the chief surgeon and the camera assistant. While the assistant surgeon stood on the left or right side of the patient, the camera assistant sat on the chief surgeon's right or left side and used the surgical scope (Fig. 1 B,C). Pneumoperitoneum was established when a V-NOTES port was introduced via the vagina into the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 1 D). Two endoscopic tools were employed through the other two trocars, while a typical stiff 30-degree 10-mm laparoscope was used through one trocar. In contrast to traditional transvaginal repair, V-NOTES can effectively expose high vesicovaginal fistulas (Fig. 2 A,B). In order to prevent the fistula from growing larger and causing further bleeding, the excess scar tissue and vault epithelium are removed, but a ring of scar tissue that is extremely near to the fistula is kept. After that, a 3 − 0 Monocryl suture is used to seal the fistula (Fig. 2 C,D). We add 300 milliliters of saline solution to the bladder to ensure there is no leaking. After confirming that the bladder is impermeable, we use a Halsted suture to close the perivesical tissue (Fig. 2 E). The third layer of closure is created by suturing the perivesical tissue. Lastly, a 3 − 0 Monocryl suture is used to seal the vaginal mucosa (Fig. 2 F). This updated approach involves the creation of three layers of closure in perivesical tissue, increasing the distance between the vaginal mucosa and the fistula tract mucosa. After surgery, antibiotics are applied for 2 wk, and antimuscarinics such as to lterodine are prescribed for 4 wk. Foley catheter is kept for 4 wk to drain. 2.4. Postoperative follow-up Follow-up data were obtained from hospital records, outpatient visits, and phone calls. In the last postoperative visit, symptom assessment, physical examination, and vaginoscopy are performed. Success was defined as the absence of leakage at cystography on the 14th postoperative day. External incontinent urinary diversions as first procedures were not considered a success. Secondarily, we evaluated urinary incontinence at a minimum follow-up of 12 mo. 2.5. Data analysis A statistical analysis was performed. Normally distributed continuousparameters were presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and analyzed using paired Student t test in the pre- and postoperative comparison; non-normal distribution parameters were presented asmedian (range); and categorical parameters were presented as number(percentage). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results Seventeen patients participated in our medical review and undergo physical examination. The characteristics of patients and fistulas at the time of first surgery are carefully summed(Table 1 ). The average age of the patients was 45.82(36–53) yr. The mean duration between onset of fistula and repair was 7.18(3–12) mo. Among these fistulas,10(58.8%) had a benign pathology, and 5(29.4%) were malignant. Two patients developed VVFs after cesarean section. The VVF was mostly located at bladder triangle and the posterior wall of the ureter. Of the patients, 14(82.4%) only has one fistula and 3(17.6%) has two fistulas. All fistulas were small in size(< 2cm in diameter). Among these patients, 9(52.9%) has mild or no perifistula fibrosis while 8(47.1%) developed moderate to severe perifistula fibrosis. Surgical data, perioperative complications, and follow-up are shown in Table 2 . The mean estimated blood loss was 10.45 ± 3.23ml, and the average operative time was 104.2 ± 12.2min. Patients’ postoperative hospital stay was 3.34 ± 0.72 days on average. The VVF was successfully repaired in 15(88.2%) cases, and failure was observed in 2 patients. All the 2 initial failures were cured in the second repair. No major complications developed in all 17 patients. There were also no fever (> 38℃), urge incontinence or infection in incision area. Only 1 patient had minor complications. Table 2 – Surgical data, perioperative complications, and follow-up. Parameter Data Estimated blood loss, ml 10.45 ± 3.23 Operative time,min 104.2 ± 12.2 Postoperative hospital stay, days 3.34 ± 0.72 Success rate, no. (%) First repair 15/17(88.2%)) Second repair 2/2(100%)) Complications, n (%) Major complications 0 Minor complications 1/17(5.9%)) Fever > 38 C 0 Infection in incision area 0 Urge incontinence 0 4. Discussion Incontinence due to VVF is the most miserable of all possible types of this disorder affecting women. Continuous and unrelenting incontinence secondary to VVF has a powerful and understandably negative impact on the quality of life of the woman with this disorder. The most common cause of VVF in North America is injury to the bladder during a hysterectomy. 16 In underdeveloped countries, childbirth is the leading etiology of these fistulae. 16 The timing of repair of the VVF is dependent on its etiology, comorbidities, and the anticipated approach for repair of the fistula. The transvaginal approach is more amenable to an early repair, is less invasive, and is accompanied by a 90% or higher success rate. 16 Fortunately, fistulae associated with gynecologic procedures are commonly amenable not only to early correction, but are most likely reparable by the less invasive transvaginal approach. The methods for the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula are conservative treatment and surgical treatment. Laparoscopic/open transvesical repair is currently one of the recommended method. Most surgeons still choose to open the bladder to locate the fistula. It is vividly called "overlooking", which could expose the fistula more fully on the side of the bladder. The success rate of open transabdominal repair is higher. However, the surgical trauma is larger, the postoperative recovery time is longer, and postoperative patients are prone to intestinal complications. For extraperitoneal trans-vesical repair, the surgical field presents a top view. It is suitable for the vesicovaginal fistula with the fistula located in the upper part and the bottom of the bladder, the vesicovaginal fistula repaired by vaginal stricture exposure difficulty, the vesicovaginal fistula and the recurrent fistula with failed transvaginal repair. This operation does not need to open the abdominal cavity and avoids the difficulty of free adhesion of abdominal organs. Compared with the transvaginal approach, we can clearly see the relationship between ureteral fistula and ureteral fistula, which reduces the possibility of ureteral injury. However, The bladder needs to be opened and the trauma is large. Besides it is hard to fully expose the lateral vaginal fistula, and there is no suitable surrounding tissue to block. And this procedure is not recommended when the fistula is relatively narrow, complicated with ureteral injury or severe tissue injury and adhesion around the fistula with infection. When the surgical field is not big enough or the operation is inconvenient, it is still necessary to open the peritoneum, which may lead to larger surgical trauma. Transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistula is a traditional surgical method. The visual field of the operation is "looking up", less bleeding, less trauma, no need to cut open the bladder, and no effect on intestinal adhesion. Even if the repair fails, we can still choose other ways to repair. But the space is small, the exposure of high fistula is difficult, and the operation is difficult. So it is suitable for repairing low vesicovaginal fistula. In this context, for the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula patients, we made innovative improvements and adjustments to the conventional sling technique and proposed a modified transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) surgical technique that would overcome the limitations of vaginal surgery by allowing a complete exploration of the peritoneal cavity and a constant visual control of the adjacent structures, which was successfully applied to the treatment of male urinary incontinence patients, and achieved good efficacy. V-NOTES would allow full exploration of the peritoneal cavity and continuous visual control of the surrounding tissues, so overcoming the limits of vaginal surgery. By using the benefits of endoscopic surgery, the V-NOTES treatment gets around the surgical and technical challenges of traditional vaginal surgery. Moreover, V-NOTES eliminates issues with abdominal wall incisions and trocar-related difficulties by using low-cost, reusable, handcrafted traditional laparoscopic equipment. Fistulae repaired in this manner will have a success rate ranging between 82% and 100% Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a significant innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery. Transvaginal NOTES (V-NOTES) has gained the most popularity than other transluminal natural orifices such as mouth, rectum, urinary tract or vagina 17 . The V-NOTES procedure overcomes the surgical and technical difficulties of conventional vaginal surgery by incorporating the advantages of endoscopic surgery. Moreover, V-NOTES uses inexpensive, reusable, handmade conventional laparoscopic instruments and avoids those problems related to abdominal wall incisions and trocar-related complications. Overall, this procedure results in high patient satisfaction, cosmetic advantages, and decreased postoperative pain 17 . Compared with conventional laparoscopy, V-NOTES eliminates the need of penetrating abdominal muscles and fascia and possible complications related to the trocar 18 . Besides the length of hospital stay was much shorter in the transvaginal NOTES groups compared to the traditional laparoscopic groups. It has the advantage of fewer complications, ease of decontamination, and provision of safe entry and simple closure 19 . In fact, because hybrid V-NOTES is performed through natural orifices, it decreases the inflammatory and neuroendocrine responses 20 . Exactly, there are also some disadvantages about VNOTES. For example, V-NOTES is an emerging surgical method and previous studies were mostly single-center retrospective studies, and there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled studies with large multi-center samples 18 . With regards to surgery, the transvaginal NOTES groups experienced longer surgical times compared to traditional laparoscopic because NOTES require more surgical skills compared to open surgery or traditional laparoscopy 18 . On the other hand, ethical issues, including exposing patients to unnecessary risks during the complex procedures, high risk of intra-abdominal infection, potential influence on the female genital system, and conservation opinions about manipulating through female genital area, also limit the development of pure vNOTES 18 . Because of the single-hole laparoscopic model, the operation cost may be higher 21 . In summary, V-NOTES has a bright future ahead of it as one of the biggest advancements in minimally invasive surgery since its inception. Furthermore, we think that VVF repair using V-NOTES is a workable, safe, and efficient substitute for conventional procedures. Declarations Conflicts of interest disclosure There were no conflicts of interest among all authors Ethical approval Ethical approval was obtained from Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, Renji Hospital of ShangHai JiaoTong University. Sources of funding This study was sponsered by Top-level Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong(No.PWYgf 2021-06)；Pudong New Area Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine collaborative flagship Department (Urology) construction plan (YC-2023-0405). Data availability statement Data are available from the corresponding author if justification for the requirement is justified. Author contribution S.X.: conceptualization, methodology, data collection, data analysis, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing; S.X. and J.C.: methodology, software, and writing–original draft; L.-J.W.: investigation, data analysis, writing–review and project administration. References Randazzo, M. et al. Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology. Eur. Urol. 78 , 432–442. 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029 (2020). Malik, M. A., Sohail, M., Malik, M. T., Khalid, N. & Akram, A. Changing trends in the etiology and management of vesicovaginal fistula. Int. J. urology: official J. Japanese Urol. Association . 25 , 25–29. 10.1111/iju.13419 (2018). Lee, D. & Zimmern, P. Vaginal Approach to Vesicovaginal Fistula. Urologic. Clin. North. Am. 46 , 123–133. 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.010 (2019). Bodner-Adler, B., Hanzal, E., Pablik, E., Koelbl, H. & Bodner, K. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one . 12 , e0171554. 10.1371/journal.pone.0171554 (2017). Tayler-Smith, K. et al. Obstetric fistula in Burundi: a comprehensive approach to managing women with this neglected disease. BMC pregnancy childbirth . 13 10.1186/1471-2393-13-164 (2013). Breen, M. & Ingber, M. Controversies in the management of vesicovaginal fistula. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 54 , 61–72. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.005 (2019). Pushkar, D. Y., Dyakov, V. V. & Kasyan, G. R. Management of radiation-induced vesicovaginal fistula. Eur. Urol. 55 , 131–137. 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.044 (2009). Blaivas, J. G., Heritz, D. M. & Romanzi, L. J. Early versus late repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: vaginal and abdominal approaches. J. Urol. 153 , 1110–1112 (1995). discussion 1112–1113. Gedik, A., Deliktas, H., Celik, N., Kayan, D. & Bircan, M. K. Which Surgical Technique Should be Preferred to Repair Benign, Primary Vesicovaginal Fistulas? Urol. J. 12 , 2422–2427 (2015). McKay, E., Watts, K. & Abraham, N. Abdominal Approach to Vesicovaginal Fistula. Urologic. Clin. North. Am. 46 , 135–146. 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.011 (2019). Hillary, C. J., Osman, N. I., Hilton, P. & Chapple, C. R. The Aetiology, Treatment, and Outcome of Urogenital Fistulae Managed in Well- and Low-resourced Countries: A Systematic Review. Eur. Urol. 70 , 478–492. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.015 (2016). Rajaian, S., Pragatheeswarane, M. & Panda, A. Vesicovaginal fistula: Review and recent trends. Indian J. urology: IJU : J. Urol. Soc. India . 35 , 250–258. 10.4103/iju.IJU_147_19 (2019). Han, J. H., Kim, H. W., Rha, K. H. & Kim, J. H. Feasibility of Transvesical Robotic VVF Repair in Porcine Model. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 27 , e36–e39. 10.1097/sle.0000000000000407 (2017). Mancini, M. et al. Successful Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistulas via an Abdominal Transvesical Approach: A Single-center 50-yr Experience. Eur. Urol. focus . 7 , 1485–1492. 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.017 (2021). Miklos, J. R., Moore, R. D. & Chinthakanan, O. Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol. 22 , 727–736. 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.001 (2015). Hadley, H. R. Vesicovaginal fistula. Curr. Urol. Rep. 3 , 401–407. 10.1007/s11934-002-0085-5 (2002). Li, C. B. & Hua, K. Q. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: A systematic review. Asian J. Surg. 43 , 44–51. 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014 (2020). Huang, L. et al. Application of the prone position in myomectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery other miniinvasive techniques . 16 , 234–242. 10.5114/wiitm.2020.95397 (2021). Song, Z. J. et al. Pure transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A case report. World J. Clin. cases . 9 , 1714–1719. 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i7.1714 (2021). Terzi, H., Turkay, U., Uzun, N. D. & Salıcı, M. Hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) assisted by an umbilical camera: Case report and new hybrid technique in gynecology. Int. J. Surg. case Rep. 51 , 349–351. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.053 (2018). Qin, Z. et al. A preliminary clinical report of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse. Front. Surg. 9 , 931691. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.931691 (2022). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 28 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 11 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 08 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 27 Oct, 2024 Reviews received at journal 24 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 23 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 23 Oct, 2024 Reviews received at journal 23 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 10 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 09 Oct, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 09 Oct, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 09 Oct, 2024 Editor invited by journal 05 Sep, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 03 Sep, 2024 First submitted to journal 22 Aug, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4958059","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":361891205,"identity":"5d3b24ce-beb5-471a-bead-924978a07f61","order_by":0,"name":"Xin Song","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Gongli Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xin","middleName":"","lastName":"Song","suffix":""},{"id":361891207,"identity":"c95090e7-2bc2-4bc1-b329-9e75542e97a3","order_by":1,"name":"Chen Jiang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chen","middleName":"","lastName":"Jiang","suffix":""},{"id":361891209,"identity":"2cfc73cc-d59a-43c2-a299-e67c557d7ffd","order_by":2,"name":"Jian-wei Lv","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Gongli Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jian-wei","middleName":"","lastName":"Lv","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-22 12:29:42","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4958059/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4958059/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82366-y","type":"published","date":"2024-12-28T15:57:26+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":67155316,"identity":"7eeb232f-caad-432d-a566-fb177e6310b7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-21 17:49:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":65508,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSurgical positioning and operating room setup for vNOTES. A. Surgical positioning. B. Renderings of Operating room setup. C. Surgical appearance diagram of V-NOTES. D. Actual operation diagram ofoperating room setup\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"groupimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4958059/v1/072a9c86dc23aa93c93ffe06.jpeg"},{"id":67155317,"identity":"0a3f6afc-bd9e-4f99-997a-2637534256c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-21 17:49:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":94017,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eProcedure for Transvaginal Repair of Apical Vesicovaginal Fistula via vNOTES. A.A high vesicovaginal fistula(VVF) in our surgical field; B. On the outside of the fistula,a circular incision is made at the normal mucosa. Then free the flap to the outside, but the scar and sinus tract on the inside of the incision are not necessary to cut; C. Use 3-0 Monocryl suture to close the fistula; D. Use 3-0 Monocryl again to close the incision for 2~3 layers; EF. Finally, close the vaginal mucosa with a 3-0 Monocryl suture.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"groupimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4958059/v1/7803301c4db3bc4fc71f3c3c.jpeg"},{"id":72640561,"identity":"78650b13-b6d9-4b5a-af25-1fb88ef58b64","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-12-30 16:06:55","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":673432,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4958059/v1/2f3ee312-e745-4475-920a-58f19e2263df.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Transvaginal Repair of Apical Vesicovaginal Fistula via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES): A Modified Surgical Technique and Its Outcomes","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eA vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is defined as a pathological anatomical junction between the dorsal bladder wall and the anterior vagina. The pathophysiological mechanism for this abnormal anatomic connection is a necrosis of both organ walls as a result of ischemia.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e VVF has remained a disaster and of public health significance, causing remarkable morbidity, and psychological and physical problems to the patient.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The incidence in the developed world is estimated between 0.3% and 2.0%.\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e Although VVFs are the most commonly diagnosed fistulae of the urinary tract, there is no standardized surgical technique for their treatment.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe fistula which is smaller than 2cm can be treated conservatively, but the possibility of spontaneous recovery for the fistula which is larger than 3cm istiny.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e If most of the urine escapes from the catheter after indwelling catheterization, then preservation therapy may be attempted. However, conservative treatment of fistulas following radiotherapy should be carefully considered. Most fistulae will not close spontaneously and require operative closure.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor fistula from surgery or birth injury, we recommend to undergo surgery after 12 weeks, while fistula from radiotherapy, the recommended time is one year later.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e As for the best surgical approach, there are three ways can be considered typically. They are traditional transvaginal repair, extra peritoneal transvesical repair and laparoscopic trans-vesical repair respectively. Firstly, for traditional transvaginal repairs, there are advantages such as low blood loss, less trauma, no need to open the bladder and no effect of intestinal adhesion.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e But given the small space, difficult exposure of high orifice fistula and inconvenient operation, traditional transvaginal repairs is primarily suitable for repairing low vesicovaginal fistula.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR11\" citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003eIn addition, for extraperitoneal trans-vesical repair, the surgical field presents a top view. The bladder needs to be opened and the trauma is large. Besides it is hard to fully expose the lateral vaginal fistula, and there is no suitable surrounding tissue to block. \u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003eFinally, at present, most surgeons still prefer to open the bladder to locate the fistula or repair laparoscopically.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In most cases ,the approach to VVF repair is often dictated by surgeons\u0026rsquo; preference, location or complexity of the VVF\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The aim of this manuscript is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of an alternative modified transvaginal repair technique(V-NOTES) for apical vesicovaginal fistula.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Patients and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1. Study population and design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn our institution, a retrospective single-center study was carried out. Between January 2020 and January 2023, gynecological procedures resulted in the diagnosis of apical VVFs in 26 patients, 17 of whom had undergone fistula repair in our center. Strict exclusion criteria, such as a fistula with a diameter greater than 2 cm, sepsis, and/or fecaluria, were used to define minimally invasive repair. Every patient had undergone a normal preoperative evaluation, which included an assessment of their medical history, a physical examination, a urine culture, a vaginoscopy, and an upper urinary tract ultrasound. Patients\u0026rsquo; records have been retrieved from the hospital archive. Baseline patient characteristics are listed in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. All methods in this study were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All patients gave written informed consent. Ethical approval was obtained from Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, Renji Hospital of ShangHai JiaoTong University, No. 20511105403.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatients\u0026rsquo; characteristics at the time of first surgery.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"8\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatient\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge (yr)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuration (mo)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEtiology\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFistula location\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFistula number\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFistula size(cm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePerifistula fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ecervical carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1cm posterior to the left ureter;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.5/0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-severe\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHysteromyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1cm posterior to the left ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ecervical carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1cm posterior to the right ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e43\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUterine leiomyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1cm posterior to the right ureter;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.2/0.7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdenomyosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2cm posterior to the left ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHysteromyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003einterureteral ridge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e47\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCesarean section\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1cm posterior to the left ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCesarean section\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1cm posterior to the right ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ecervical carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2cm posterior to the left ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdenomyosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHysteromyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ecervical carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2cm posterior to the left ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHysteromyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHysteromyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdenomyosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePosterior left ureter;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.0/0.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMild/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eno fibrosis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ecervical carcinoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2cm posterior to the right ureter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e48\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHysteromyoma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ebladder triangle\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esevere\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2. Preoperative evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA standard preoperative evaluation had been performed in all patients, including medical history assessment, physical examination, urineculture, vaginoscopy, and ultrasound of the upper urinary tract. Computer tomography urography (CTU) was performed to exclude concomitant ureteral injury.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3. Surgical techniques\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe v-NOTES procedure differs from conventional laparoscopic surgery in its particular surgical approach. The patient was in the dorsal lithotomy position, her legs supported by knee supports, following general anesthesia. The hips were flexed and the thighs were comparatively abducted. It is imperative to refrain from excessive flexion and abduction of the thighs as this may result in nerve damage caused by the position (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA). Between the patient's legs were the chief surgeon and the camera assistant. While the assistant surgeon stood on the left or right side of the patient, the camera assistant sat on the chief surgeon's right or left side and used the surgical scope (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB,C). Pneumoperitoneum was established when a V-NOTES port was introduced via the vagina into the peritoneal cavity (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD). Two endoscopic tools were employed through the other two trocars, while a typical stiff 30-degree 10-mm laparoscope was used through one trocar.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast to traditional transvaginal repair, V-NOTES can effectively expose high vesicovaginal fistulas (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA,B). In order to prevent the fistula from growing larger and causing further bleeding, the excess scar tissue and vault epithelium are removed, but a ring of scar tissue that is extremely near to the fistula is kept. After that, a 3\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0 Monocryl suture is used to seal the fistula (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC,D). We add 300 milliliters of saline solution to the bladder to ensure there is no leaking. After confirming that the bladder is impermeable, we use a Halsted suture to close the perivesical tissue (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eE). The third layer of closure is created by suturing the perivesical tissue. Lastly, a 3\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0 Monocryl suture is used to seal the vaginal mucosa (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eF). This updated approach involves the creation of three layers of closure in perivesical tissue, increasing the distance between the vaginal mucosa and the fistula tract mucosa. After surgery, antibiotics are applied for 2 wk, and antimuscarinics such as to lterodine are prescribed for 4 wk. Foley catheter is kept for 4 wk to drain.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4. Postoperative follow-up\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollow-up data were obtained from hospital records, outpatient visits, and phone calls. In the last postoperative visit, symptom assessment, physical examination, and vaginoscopy are performed. Success was defined as the absence of leakage at cystography on the 14th postoperative day. External incontinent urinary diversions as first procedures were not considered a success. Secondarily, we evaluated urinary incontinence at a minimum follow-up of 12 mo.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5. Data analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA statistical analysis was performed. Normally distributed continuousparameters were presented as the mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation, and analyzed using paired Student t test in the pre- and postoperative comparison; non-normal distribution parameters were presented asmedian (range); and categorical parameters were presented as number(percentage). P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eSeventeen patients participated in our medical review and undergo physical examination. The characteristics of patients and fistulas at the time of first surgery are carefully summed(Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The average age of the patients was 45.82(36\u0026ndash;53) yr. The mean duration between onset of fistula and repair was 7.18(3\u0026ndash;12) mo. Among these fistulas,10(58.8%) had a benign pathology, and 5(29.4%) were malignant. Two patients developed VVFs after cesarean section.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe VVF was mostly located at bladder triangle and the posterior wall of the ureter. Of the patients, 14(82.4%) only has one fistula and 3(17.6%) has two fistulas. All fistulas were small in size(\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;2cm in diameter). Among these patients, 9(52.9%) has mild or no perifistula fibrosis while 8(47.1%) developed moderate to severe perifistula fibrosis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSurgical data, perioperative complications, and follow-up are shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. The mean estimated blood loss was 10.45\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.23ml, and the average operative time was 104.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.2min. Patients\u0026rsquo; postoperative hospital stay was 3.34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.72 days on average. The VVF was successfully repaired in 15(88.2%) cases, and failure was observed in 2 patients. All the 2 initial failures were cured in the second repair. No major complications developed in all 17 patients. There were also no fever (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;38℃), urge incontinence or infection in incision area. Only 1 patient had minor complications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ndash; Surgical data, perioperative complications, and follow-up.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParameter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eData\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEstimated blood loss, ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.45\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.23\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperative time,min\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e104.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePostoperative hospital stay, days\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSuccess rate, no. (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst repair\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15/17(88.2%))\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecond repair\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2/2(100%))\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComplications, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMajor complications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinor complications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1/17(5.9%))\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFever\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;38 C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInfection in incision area\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUrge incontinence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIncontinence due to VVF is the most miserable of all possible types of this disorder affecting women. Continuous and unrelenting incontinence secondary to VVF has a powerful and understandably negative impact on the quality of life of the woman with this disorder. The most common cause of VVF in North America is injury to the bladder during a hysterectomy.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In underdeveloped countries, childbirth is the leading etiology of these fistulae.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The timing of repair of the VVF is dependent on its etiology, comorbidities, and the anticipated approach for repair of the fistula. The transvaginal approach is more amenable to an early repair, is less invasive, and is accompanied by a 90% or higher success rate.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Fortunately, fistulae associated with gynecologic procedures are commonly amenable not only to early correction, but are most likely reparable by the less invasive transvaginal approach.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe methods for the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula are conservative treatment and surgical treatment. Laparoscopic/open transvesical repair is currently one of the recommended method. Most surgeons still choose to open the bladder to locate the fistula. It is vividly called \"overlooking\", which could expose the fistula more fully on the side of the bladder. The success rate of open transabdominal repair is higher. However, the surgical trauma is larger, the postoperative recovery time is longer, and postoperative patients are prone to intestinal complications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor extraperitoneal trans-vesical repair, the surgical field presents a top view. It is suitable for the vesicovaginal fistula with the fistula located in the upper part and the bottom of the bladder, the vesicovaginal fistula repaired by vaginal stricture exposure difficulty, the vesicovaginal fistula and the recurrent fistula with failed transvaginal repair. This operation does not need to open the abdominal cavity and avoids the difficulty of free adhesion of abdominal organs. Compared with the transvaginal approach, we can clearly see the relationship between ureteral fistula and ureteral fistula, which reduces the possibility of ureteral injury. However, The bladder needs to be opened and the trauma is large. Besides it is hard to fully expose the lateral vaginal fistula, and there is no suitable surrounding tissue to block. And this procedure is not recommended when the fistula is relatively narrow, complicated with ureteral injury or severe tissue injury and adhesion around the fistula with infection. When the surgical field is not big enough or the operation is inconvenient, it is still necessary to open the peritoneum, which may lead to larger surgical trauma.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistula is a traditional surgical method. The visual field of the operation is \"looking up\", less bleeding, less trauma, no need to cut open the bladder, and no effect on intestinal adhesion. Even if the repair fails, we can still choose other ways to repair. But the space is small, the exposure of high fistula is difficult, and the operation is difficult. So it is suitable for repairing low vesicovaginal fistula.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this context, for the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula patients, we made innovative improvements and adjustments to the conventional sling technique and proposed a modified transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) surgical technique that would overcome the limitations of vaginal surgery by allowing a complete exploration of the peritoneal cavity and a constant visual control of the adjacent structures, which was successfully applied to the treatment of male urinary incontinence patients, and achieved good efficacy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eV-NOTES would allow full exploration of the peritoneal cavity and continuous visual control of the surrounding tissues, so overcoming the limits of vaginal surgery. By using the benefits of endoscopic surgery, the V-NOTES treatment gets around the surgical and technical challenges of traditional vaginal surgery. Moreover, V-NOTES eliminates issues with abdominal wall incisions and trocar-related difficulties by using low-cost, reusable, handcrafted traditional laparoscopic equipment. Fistulae repaired in this manner will have a success rate ranging between 82% and 100%\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a significant innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery. Transvaginal NOTES (V-NOTES) has gained the most popularity than other transluminal natural orifices such as mouth, rectum, urinary tract or vagina\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The V-NOTES procedure overcomes the surgical and technical difficulties of conventional vaginal surgery by incorporating the advantages of endoscopic surgery. Moreover, V-NOTES uses inexpensive, reusable, handmade conventional laparoscopic instruments and avoids those problems related to abdominal wall incisions and trocar-related complications. Overall, this procedure results in high patient satisfaction, cosmetic advantages, and decreased postoperative pain\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Compared with conventional laparoscopy, V-NOTES eliminates the need of penetrating abdominal muscles and fascia and possible complications related to the trocar\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Besides the length of hospital stay was much shorter in the transvaginal NOTES groups compared to the traditional laparoscopic groups. It has the advantage of fewer complications, ease of decontamination, and provision of safe entry and simple closure\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. In fact, because hybrid V-NOTES is performed through natural orifices, it decreases the inflammatory and neuroendocrine responses\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExactly, there are also some disadvantages about VNOTES. For example, V-NOTES is an emerging surgical method and previous studies were mostly single-center retrospective studies, and there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled studies with large multi-center samples\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. With regards to surgery, the transvaginal NOTES groups experienced longer surgical times compared to traditional laparoscopic because NOTES require more surgical skills compared to open surgery or traditional laparoscopy\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. On the other hand, ethical issues, including exposing patients to unnecessary risks during the complex procedures, high risk of intra-abdominal infection, potential influence on the female genital system, and conservation opinions about manipulating through female genital area, also limit the development of pure vNOTES\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Because of the single-hole laparoscopic model, the operation cost may be higher\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn summary, V-NOTES has a bright future ahead of it as one of the biggest advancements in minimally invasive surgery since its inception. Furthermore, we think that VVF repair using V-NOTES is a workable, safe, and efficient substitute for conventional procedures.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflicts of interest disclosure\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere were no conflicts of interest among all authors\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical approval\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEthical approval was obtained from Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, Renji Hospital of ShangHai JiaoTong University.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSources of funding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was sponsered by Top-level Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong(No.PWYgf 2021-06)；Pudong New Area Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine collaborative flagship Department (Urology) construction plan (YC-2023-0405).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData are available from the corresponding author if justification for the requirement is justified.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contribution\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eS.X.: conceptualization, methodology, data collection, data analysis, writing\u0026ndash;original draft, and writing\u0026ndash;review and editing; S.X. and J.C.: methodology, software, and writing\u0026ndash;original draft; L.-J.W.: investigation, data analysis, writing\u0026ndash;review and project administration.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRandazzo, M. et al. Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology. \u003cem\u003eEur. Urol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e78\u003c/b\u003e, 432\u0026ndash;442. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.029\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMalik, M. A., Sohail, M., Malik, M. T., Khalid, N. \u0026amp; Akram, A. Changing trends in the etiology and management of vesicovaginal fistula. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. urology: official J. Japanese Urol. Association\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e25\u003c/b\u003e, 25\u0026ndash;29. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1111/iju.13419\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/iju.13419\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, D. \u0026amp; Zimmern, P. Vaginal Approach to Vesicovaginal Fistula. \u003cem\u003eUrologic. Clin. North. Am.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e46\u003c/b\u003e, 123\u0026ndash;133. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.010\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.010\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBodner-Adler, B., Hanzal, E., Pablik, E., Koelbl, H. \u0026amp; Bodner, K. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. \u003cem\u003ePloS one\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, e0171554. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1371/journal.pone.0171554\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0171554\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTayler-Smith, K. et al. Obstetric fistula in Burundi: a comprehensive approach to managing women with this neglected disease. \u003cem\u003eBMC pregnancy childbirth\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e13\u003c/b\u003e \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/1471-2393-13-164\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/1471-2393-13-164\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBreen, M. \u0026amp; Ingber, M. Controversies in the management of vesicovaginal fistula. \u003cem\u003eBest Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e54\u003c/b\u003e, 61\u0026ndash;72. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePushkar, D. Y., Dyakov, V. V. \u0026amp; Kasyan, G. R. Management of radiation-induced vesicovaginal fistula. \u003cem\u003eEur. Urol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e55\u003c/b\u003e, 131\u0026ndash;137. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.044\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.044\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBlaivas, J. G., Heritz, D. M. \u0026amp; Romanzi, L. J. Early versus late repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: vaginal and abdominal approaches. \u003cem\u003eJ. Urol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e153\u003c/b\u003e, 1110\u0026ndash;1112 (1995). discussion 1112\u0026ndash;1113.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGedik, A., Deliktas, H., Celik, N., Kayan, D. \u0026amp; Bircan, M. K. Which Surgical Technique Should be Preferred to Repair Benign, Primary Vesicovaginal Fistulas? \u003cem\u003eUrol. J.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, 2422\u0026ndash;2427 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcKay, E., Watts, K. \u0026amp; Abraham, N. Abdominal Approach to Vesicovaginal Fistula. \u003cem\u003eUrologic. Clin. North. Am.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e46\u003c/b\u003e, 135\u0026ndash;146. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.011\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.011\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHillary, C. J., Osman, N. I., Hilton, P. \u0026amp; Chapple, C. R. The Aetiology, Treatment, and Outcome of Urogenital Fistulae Managed in Well- and Low-resourced Countries: A Systematic Review. \u003cem\u003eEur. Urol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e70\u003c/b\u003e, 478\u0026ndash;492. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.015\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.015\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRajaian, S., Pragatheeswarane, M. \u0026amp; Panda, A. Vesicovaginal fistula: Review and recent trends. \u003cem\u003eIndian J. urology: IJU : J. Urol. Soc. India\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e35\u003c/b\u003e, 250\u0026ndash;258. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.4103/iju.IJU_147_19\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4103/iju.IJU_147_19\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHan, J. H., Kim, H. W., Rha, K. H. \u0026amp; Kim, J. H. Feasibility of Transvesical Robotic VVF Repair in Porcine Model. \u003cem\u003eSurg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e27\u003c/b\u003e, e36\u0026ndash;e39. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1097/sle.0000000000000407\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/sle.0000000000000407\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMancini, M. et al. Successful Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistulas via an Abdominal Transvesical Approach: A Single-center 50-yr Experience. \u003cem\u003eEur. Urol. focus\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e7\u003c/b\u003e, 1485\u0026ndash;1492. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.017\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.017\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMiklos, J. R., Moore, R. D. \u0026amp; Chinthakanan, O. Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Vesicovaginal Fistula Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature. \u003cem\u003eJ. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e22\u003c/b\u003e, 727\u0026ndash;736. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHadley, H. R. Vesicovaginal fistula. \u003cem\u003eCurr. Urol. Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e3\u003c/b\u003e, 401\u0026ndash;407. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11934-002-0085-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11934-002-0085-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2002).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi, C. B. \u0026amp; Hua, K. Q. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: A systematic review. \u003cem\u003eAsian J. Surg.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e43\u003c/b\u003e, 44\u0026ndash;51. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuang, L. et al. Application of the prone position in myomectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. \u003cem\u003eWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery other miniinvasive techniques\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e16\u003c/b\u003e, 234\u0026ndash;242. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.5114/wiitm.2020.95397\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5114/wiitm.2020.95397\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong, Z. J. et al. Pure transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A case report. \u003cem\u003eWorld J. Clin. cases\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e, 1714\u0026ndash;1719. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.12998/wjcc.v9.i7.1714\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.12998/wjcc.v9.i7.1714\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTerzi, H., Turkay, U., Uzun, N. D. \u0026amp; Salıcı, M. Hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) assisted by an umbilical camera: Case report and new hybrid technique in gynecology. \u003cem\u003eInt. J. Surg. case Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e51\u003c/b\u003e, 349\u0026ndash;351. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.053\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.053\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQin, Z. et al. A preliminary clinical report of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse. \u003cem\u003eFront. Surg.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e, 931691. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fsurg.2022.931691\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fsurg.2022.931691\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Apical vesicovaginal fistula, V-NOTES, Surgical technique","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4958059/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4958059/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eObjective\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo report the procedure of an alternative modified transvaginal repair technique (V-NOTES) and their outcomes in apical vesicovaginal fistula.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBetween January 2020 and January 2023, gynecological procedures resulted in the diagnosis of apical VVFs in 26 patients, 17 of whom had undergone transvaginal repair of apical vesicovaginal fistula via vaginal V-NOTES. Those patients were contacted and followed up. Outcomes included operative time, blood loss, success rate, postoperative hospital stay.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe average age of the patients was 45.82(36\u0026ndash;53) yr. The mean duration between onset of fistula and repair was 7.18(3\u0026ndash;12) mo. The mean estimated blood loss was 10.45\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.23ml, and the average operative time was 104.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.2min. Patients\u0026rsquo; postoperative hospital stay was 3.34\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.72 days on average. The VVF was successfully repaired in 15(88.2%) cases, and failure was observed in 2 patients. All the 2 initial failures were cured in the second repair. No major complications developed in all 17 patients. There were also no fever (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;38℃), urge incontinence or infection in incision area.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur study suggest that the transvaginal repair of apical VVF via V-NOTES is effective and safety, and offers anticipated results without obvious complications.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Transvaginal Repair of Apical Vesicovaginal Fistula via Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES): A Modified Surgical Technique and Its Outcomes","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-21 17:49:03","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4958059/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-11-11T07:29:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-11-09T03:09:04+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-10-28T00:43:26+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-10-24T09:53:11+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"321341531699059391119973733275318277606","date":"2024-10-23T21:09:43+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"243484751716095827768710342357074618092","date":"2024-10-23T05:32:08+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-10-23T04:42:27+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"302662064213174889329216973868971161977","date":"2024-10-10T05:54:33+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"190616300545472756826048983969759169496","date":"2024-10-10T03:50:33+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-10-10T00:35:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-10-10T00:28:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2024-09-06T02:47:22+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-09-03T08:30:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2024-08-22T12:27:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7542d4ba-3ed8-4f1d-b775-6b172af61dcd","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 21st, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":38500767,"name":"Health sciences/Diseases"},{"id":38500768,"name":"Health sciences/Health care"},{"id":38500769,"name":"Health sciences/Urology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-12-30T16:01:02+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4958059","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82366-y","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2024-12-28 15:57:26","publishedOnDateReadable":"December 28th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-21 17:49:03","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-024-82366-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82366-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4958059","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4958059","identity":"rs-4958059","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"ehx78VzkSd0WSzXnipQa-","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}