Moral Appeals Reduce Simulated Panic Buying Behaviour
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
We report the results of an online experiment with a representative sample of Australians. After seeing a hypothetical scenario where a new COVID-19 outbreak has been announced and the government has imposed some restrictions, participants received one of three intervention messages (or a no-message control) designed to reduce panic buying. They were then asked about their intentions to buy more than they needed (i.e., panic buy). Participants were also given a simulated behaviour task, modelled on the prisoner’s dilemma, where they could elect to ‘buy’ more than an amount they had previously indicated was reasonable for them. We find that a message that emphasises norms and reciprocity reduces simulated panic buying behaviours but not intentions, whilst a message that makes an appeal to morals reduces both panic buying intentions and simulated behaviours. We discuss implications and opportunities for further research.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-22T01:00:29.181830+00:00
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-13T06:45:44.122212+00:00