WHY STOP? Quantifying Cognitive-Behavioural factors that influence the impact of PCR-POCT results on antibiotic cessation in ICU

Suveer Singh, Martine Nurek, Sonia Mason, Luke Moore, Nabeela Mughal, Marcela Vizcaychipi, WHY STOP Consortium
2022 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1932248/v1
preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rapid Point of Care Tests for infection (POCT) do not consistently improve antibiotic stewardship (ASP) of suspected ICU infection. We measured 1) the effect of a negative PCR-POCT on antibiotic stop decisions, and 2) clinico-behavioural factors that prevent stopping. METHODS: Vignettes of antibiotic treated respiratory infection, with 4 distinct trajectories were presented to ICU clinicians: overall improvement, clinical improvement/biological worsening, clinical worsening/biological improvement, overall worsening. Initial and post PCR-POCT antibiotic decisions (stop or continue) /confidence levels were recorded. The PCR-POCT offer was voluntary but always presented and negative. Linear regression determined association of their final decision with influencing factors. RESULTS: Seventy clinicians responded. A negative PCR-POCT increased stop decisions in all scenarios ( p <0.001) except improvement (already high); especially in discordant clin worse (49% pre-POCT vs 74% post-POCT). Inclination to stop was reduced by an ambiguous/worsening trajectory( p =0.015), initial confidence to continue( p <0.001), and involuntary receipt of POCT( p <0.001), not clinician experience or risk averseness. CONCLUSIONS: Negative PCR-POCT increases the inclination to stop antibiotics, particularly in ambiguous/worsening trajectories of ICU infection. Clinician intuition to continue and disinterest in POCT reduce its influence to stop. Highlighting and quantifying the predictive impact of behavioural-trajectorial factors can improve antibiotic stewardship and study design in ICU related infection.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (19)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-22T01:00:16.658266+00:00
europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0