Francisco Carmona (702867)

DEPs between external adenomyosis and internal adenomyosis a) Volcano plot external vs internal b) PCA external vs internal c) Heatmaps external vs internal.

Significantly activated (Z score>2) or inhibited (Z score <-2) canonical pathways associated with DEPs in external vs internal adenomyosis.

Two separate phenotypes of adenomyosis have been recognized, determined by the anatomical position of the adenomyotic lesions within the myometrium. This suggests that adenomyosis impacting the inner myometrium and that affecting the outer…

Two separate phenotypes of adenomyosis have been recognized, determined by the anatomical position of the adenomyotic lesions within the myometrium. This suggests that adenomyosis impacting the inner myometrium and that affecting the outer…

Top 10 significantly enriched Gene Ontology Biological Processes (GO_BP) terms in external adenomyosis versus internal adenomyosis.

Top 25 activated upstream regulators in external vs internal adenomyosis.

Top 25 inhibited upstream regulators in external vs internal adenomyosis.

Volcano-plots illustrating DEPs between (a) external adenomyosis and controls and (b) internal adenomyosis and controls.

Samples with undetectable levels of NKG2D ligands have been excluded. The peritoneal fluid MICA and MICB ratio levels among groups [DIE (n = 48), OMA (n = 31); SUP (n = 39) and controls (n = 78)] was significantly different by the Kruskal-W…

Samples with undetectable levels of NKG2D ligands have been excluded. The peritoneal fluid MICA and MICB ratio levels among groups was significantly different by the Mann Whitney test (P = 0.035 and P<0.001 respectively). Peritoneal NKG2D l…

Analyses were performed both including samples with undetectable levels of NLG2D ligands (i.e. below lower limit of detection of the assay) and without these samples.Results are expressed as median (range)Values are expressed in pg/mgu. Sta…