Tao, Shi-bo
No ORCID on file
· 21 papers in corpus
· active 2020
Study types
- article 19
- other 2
Condition tags
- endometriosis 21
Frequent coauthors
- Chang, Hong-yang 21
- Chu, Xi-ying 21
- Cao, Xue 21
- Geng, Xu-jing 21
- He, Yan 21
- Mao, Gen-hong 21
- Ni, Li-li 21
- Xiao, Bing 21
- Xu, Jun-yan 21
- Xiang, Yun-gai 21
article
2020
Additional file 10: Figure S6. Meta-analysis on CA125 in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol before down-regulation (A), and after down-regulation (B).
article
2020
Additional file 10: Figure S6. Meta-analysis on CA125 in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol before down-regulation (A), and after down-regulation (B).
article
2020
Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of the included studies.
article
2020
Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of the included studies.
article
2020
Additional file 2: Table S2. Risk of bias of included RCTs using the Cochrane risk assessment tool.
article
2020
Additional file 2: Table S2. Risk of bias of included RCTs using the Cochrane risk assessment tool.
article
2020
Additional file 3: Table S3. Quality assessment of included cohort studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.
article
2020
Additional file 3: Table S3. Quality assessment of included cohort studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.
article
2020
Additional file 4: Table S4. Basic characteristics of the included studies.
article
2020
Additional file 5: Figure S1. Meta-analysis on age: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol in RCTs (A) and non-RCTs (B).
article
2020
Additional file 5: Figure S1. Meta-analysis on age: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol in RCTs (A) and non-RCTs (B).
article
2020
Additional file 6: Figure S2. Meta-analysis on BMI in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol (A), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol (B).
article
2020
Additional file 6: Figure S2. Meta-analysis on BMI in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol (A), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol (B).
article
2020
Additional file 7: Figure S3. Meta-analysis on antral follicle count in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol (A), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol (B).
article
2020
Additional file 7: Figure S3. Meta-analysis on antral follicle count in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol (A), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol (B).
article
2020
Additional file 8: Figure S4. Meta-analysis on basal E2 levels: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol in RCTs (A) and in non-RCTs (B), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol in non-RCTs (C).
article
2020
Additional file 8: Figure S4. Meta-analysis on basal E2 levels: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol in RCTs (A) and in non-RCTs (B), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol in non-RCTs (C).
article
2020
Additional file 9: Figure S5. Meta-analysis on basal LH levels in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol (A), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol (B).
article
2020
Additional file 9: Figure S5. Meta-analysis on basal LH levels in non-RCTs: the ultra-long protocol versus long protocol (A), and the ultra-long protocol versus short protocol (B).
other
2020
Abstract Background To investigate the effectiveness of the GnRH-a ultra-long protocol, GnRH-a long protocol, and GnRH-a short protocol used in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in infertile women with endometriosis. Methods W…
other
2020
Abstract Background To investigate the effectiveness of the GnRH-a ultra-long protocol, GnRH-a long protocol, and GnRH-a short protocol used in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in infertile women with endometriosis. Methods W…