{"paper_id":"f7feb265-eede-432e-a56c-eec19ad0a18b","body_text":"Abstract\nPurpose\nThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of Dienogest and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the recurrence of endometriosis lesions and clinical symptoms in women undergoing laparoscopic surgery.\nMethods\nThis single center clinical trial was conducted among 106 women with endometriosis undergoing laparoscopic surgery who candidate receiving post-surgery hormone therapy. Participants were allocated to two groups. The first group received Dienogest pills (2 mg) daily for the first three months and then cyclic for three months afterward. The second group received MPA pills twice daily (10 mg) for three months and then cyclic for the next three months. Six months after the intervention, the rate of endometriosis recurrence, the size of endometriosis lesions and pelvic pain were assess and compared between two groups.\nResults\nFinally, data were evaluated based on 48 and 53 women in the Dienogest and MPA groups, respectively. After 6 months follow-up assessments the pelvic pain score was significantly lower in Dienogest group than MPA group (P < 0.001). There was not statistically difference between two groups in terms of recurrence rate of endometriosis (P = 0.4). Although the size of endometriosis cyst recurrence was smaller in Dienogest group compared to MPA group (P = 0.02).\nConclusions\nThe findings showed that Dienogest treatment has better effect in reducing pelvic pain and the mean size of the recurrent endometriosis lesions after endometriosis laparoscopic surgery when compared to MPA treatment. Although the recurrent rate of endometriosis was similar between these treatments.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nData availability\nData are available upon request, and patient's privacy.\nReferences\nDaniels J, Gray R, Hills RK, Latthe P, Buckley L, Gupta J et al (2009) Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(9):955–961\nDunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Kiesel L, Nap A, Prentice A, Saridogan E, Soriano D, Nelen W (2014) ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Human Reprod (Oxf, Engl) 29(3):400–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det457\nPractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2014) Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 101(4):927–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.012\nKoga K, Takamura M, Fujii T, Osuga Y (2015) Prevention of the recurrence of symptom and lesions after conservative surgery for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 104(4):793–801\nTosti C, Pinzauti S, Santulli P, Chapron C, Petraglia F (2015) Pathogenetic mechanisms of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci 22(9):1053–1059\nSagsveen M, Farmer JE, Prentice A, Breeze A (2003) Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:cd001297. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001297\nAbdul Karim AK, Shafiee MN, Abd Aziz NH, Omar MH, Abdul Ghani NA, Lim PS, Md Zin RR, Mokhtar N (2019) Reviewing the role of progesterone therapy in endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 35(1):10–16\nSönmezer M, Atabekoğlu C, Cengiz B, Dökmeci F, Cengiz S (2005) Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in anticoagulated patients with previous hemorrhagic corpus luteum. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 10(1):9–14\nYamanaka K, Xu B, Suganuma I, Kusuki I, Mita S, Shimizu Y, Mizuguchi K, Kitawaki J (2012) Dienogest inhibits aromatase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production in human endometriotic stromal cells in spheroid culture. Fertil Steril 97(2):477–482\nSasagawa S, Shimizu Y, Kami H, Takeuchi T, Mita S, Imada K, Kato S, Mizuguchi K (2008) Dienogest is a selective progesterone receptor agonist in transactivation analysis with potent oral endometrial activity due to its efficient pharmacokinetic profile. Steroids 73(2):222–231\nKöhler G, Faustmann TA, Gerlinger C, Seitz C, Mueck AO (2010) A dose-ranging study to determine the efficacy and safety of 1, 2, and 4 mg of Dienogest daily for endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 108(1):21–25\nWong YYI, Lee MHM (2018) Dienogest versus medroxyprogesterone acetate for control of menstrual pain in Chinese women with endometriosis. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 18(2):91–97\nOh S (2015) The comparison between 2 mg Dienogest and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate on oral treatment of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(6):S170\nYamanaka A, Hada T, Matsumoto T, Kanno K, Shirane A, Yanai S, Nakajima S, Ebisawa K, Ota Y, Andou M (2017) Effect of Dienogest on pain and ovarian endometrioma occurrence after laparoscopic resection of uterosacral ligaments with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 216:51–55\nMurji A, Biberoğlu K, Leng J, Mueller MD, Römer T, Vignali M, Yarmolinskaya M (2020) Use of Dienogest in endometriosis: a narrative literature review and expert commentary. Curr Med Res Opin 36(5):895–907\nBedaiwy MA, Allaire C, Alfaraj S (2017) Long-term medical management of endometriosis with Dienogest and with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and add-back hormone therapy. Fertil Steril 107(3):537–548\nOta Y, Andou M, Yanai S, Nakajima S, Fukuda M, Takano M, Kurotsuchi S, Ebisawa K, Hada T, Ota I (2015) Long-term administration of Dienogest reduces recurrence after excision of endometrioma. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 7(2):63–67\nChandra A, Rho AM, Jeong K, Yu T, Jeon JH, Park SY, Lee SR, Moon H-S, Chung HW (2018) Clinical experience of long-term use of Dienogest after surgery for ovarian endometrioma. Obstet Gynecol Sci 61(1):111–117\nLiu Y, Gong H, Gou J, Liu X, Li Z (2021) Dienogest as a maintenance treatment for endometriosis following surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med 8:652505\nFunding\nThe study was not founded. This study was support by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nContributions\nMVD, HR, RH contributed to design. HR, RH conducted the study, LH and HR prepared the manuscript, HR analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nConflict of interest\nThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.\nEthical approval\nThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical sciences and IRCT number is IRCT20170917036227N5. All patients who agreed to participate in the study provided signed informed consent.\nConsent to participate\nInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.\nAdditional information\nPublisher's Note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nRights and permissions\nSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nVahid-Dastjerdi, M., Hosseini, R., Rodi, H. et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of Dienogest with medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic pain and recurrence of endometriosis after laparoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308, 149–155 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06898-2\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06898-2","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}