{"paper_id":"f363c3b9-7335-47e8-9f56-407aba248232","body_text":"LETTER TO THE EDITOR\nComment on Case Report Entitled: Adenomyosis of Uterus\nwith Adenomyoma of Fallopian Tube\nJain Shaveta • Jain Nitin\nReceived: 2 August 2014 / Accepted: 30 August 2014 / Published online: 23 September 2014\n/C211Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2014\nTo the Editor\nI read an interesting case report titled ‘‘adenomyosis of\nuterus with adenomyoma of fallopian tube’’ by Ganitha\net al that appears in the recent issue of your journal. While\nreading this, I was pondering that it is adenomyoma in\nrudimentary horn of uterus instead of adenomyoma of\nfallopian tube. It may be due to wrong interpretation by\npathologist as sample sent might be labeled as uterus with\nfallopian tube and rudimentary horn may not be mentioned.\nAlthough the development of leiomyomas from uterine\nremnant is a rare finding, it is still possible and it should be\nconsidered in the list of differential diagnosis of pelvic\nmasses with mullerian dysgenesis [ 1].\nCompliance with Ethical Requirements and Conflict of inter-\nest Shaveta Jain and Nitin Jain declares that they have no conflict of\ninterest. Authors fully Compliance with Ethical Requirements of this\njournal.\nReference\n1. Metzger DA, Massad LS, Piscitelli JT. Leiomyoma in a Mullerian\nremnant. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1988;33(2):246–8.\nJain S. ( &), Assistant professor\nPt B. D Sharma, PGIMS, 124001 Rohtak, Haryana, India\ne-mail: dr_sangwan@yahoo.com\nJain N., Senior resident\nDepartment of Radiology, PGIMS, Pt. B. D Sharma University of\nHealth Sciences, 124001 Rohtak, Haryana, India\nThe Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (September–October 2014) 64(5):375\nDOI 10.1007/s13224-014-0603-7\n123","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}