{"paper_id":"f1fe4f8a-94e3-4779-824b-744fcfffcb41","body_text":"Abstract\nObjectives\nAdenomyosis is a disorder defined by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is currently the first-line examination for this condition and the aim of this paper is to relate a pilot experience that was conducted using TVU to evaluate adenomyosis and which started from the assumption that tissues with anatomopathological differences show different elasticity values.\nMethods\nUsing standard B-mode analysis and elastosonography, we evaluated 30 consecutive women with suspected uterine adenomyosis. In 15 cases the diagnosis was confirmed by histology .\nResults\nThe adenomyotic area presented more softness (red and green) compared with the surrounding uterine tissue (blue); the borders of the adenomyotic area corresponded to the borders of the green area.\nConclusions\nThese preliminary results suggest that elastosonography could be considered a useful tool in the diagnosis of adenomyosis because it is non-invasive, easy to understand, easy to perform, and has a short learning curve towards becoming skilled at the procedure.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nKepkep K, Tuncay YA, Göynümer G, Tutal E (2007) Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:341–345\nMeredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(107):e1–e6\nAndreotti RF, Fleischer AC (2005) The sonographic diagnosis of adenomyosis. Ultrasound Q 21:167–170\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S (1992) Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 58:94–97\nDueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sørensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 76:588–594\nFleury Ede F, Roveda D Jr, Fleury JC, do Carmo Queiroz M, Piato S (2009) Elastography: theory into clinical practice. Breast J 15:564–566\nArnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ, Simon JA (1995) The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol 86:461–465\nAtzori E, Tronci C, Sionis L (1996) Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 42:39–41\nAscher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH et al (1994) Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190:803–806\nAzziz R (1989) Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 16:221–235\nBotsis D, Kassanos D, Antoniou G, Pyrgiotis G, Karakitsos P, Kalogirou D (1998) Adenomyoma and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 26:21–25\nCho S, Nam A, Kim H et al (2008) Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:e1–e7\nAtri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM (2000) Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study. Radiology 215:783–790\nReinhold C, Arti M, Mehio A et al (1995) Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology 197:609–614\nBrosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG et al (1995) Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:471–474\nVanhoutte A, Fellah L, Galant C, d'Hoore W, Berlière M, Leconte I (2008) Contribution of sonoelastography to the characterization of breast lesions. JBR-BTR 91:187–194\nGiuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, Baldassarre S (2005) Elastosonography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report. Radiol Med 110:69–76\nRago T, Vitti P (2009) Potential value of elastosonography in the diagnosis of malignancy in thyroid nodules. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:455–464\nRubaltelli L, Corradin S, Dorigo A, Stabilito M, Tregnaghi A, Borsato S, Stramare R (2009) Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography. Ultraschall Med 30:175–179\nTranquart F, Bleuzen A, Pierre-Renoult P, Chabrolle C, Sam Giao M, Lecomte P (2008) Elastosonography of thyroid lesions. J Radiol 89:35–39\nMiyagawa T, Tsutsumi M, Matsumura T, Kawazoe N, Ishikawa S, Shimokama T, Miyanaga N, Akaza H (2009) Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:394–398\nThomas A, Kümmel S, Gemeinhardt O, Fischer T (2007) Real-time sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix. Acad Radiol 14:193–200\nAmi O, Lamazou F, Mabille M, Levaillant JM, Deffieux X, Frydman R, Musset D (2009) Real-time transvaginal elastosonography of uterine fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:486–488\nHobson MA, Kiss MZ, Varghese T, Sommer AM, Kliewer MA, Zagzebski JA, Hall TJ, Harter J, Hartenbach EM, Madsen EL (2007) In vitro uterine strain imaging: preliminary results. J Ultrasound Med 26:899–908\nTamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K (2006) Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:583–602\nAcknowledgements\nThe authors thank Mrs Debra Levine for her linguistic advice.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nTessarolo, M., Bonino, L., Camanni, M. et al. Elastosonography: a possible new tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis?. Eur Radiol 21, 1546–1552 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2064-z\nReceived:\nRevised:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2064-z","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}