{"paper_id":"ed8ff2c3-e182-4d5a-8489-23ed2d2e3c0d","body_text":"Abstract\nCesarean delivery is a common procedure, currently accounting for one-third of live births in the US. In the acute post-operative setting, it can be difficult to distinguish changes of the expected recovery of the uterus from those of complications. A radiologist should be able to recognize expected postoperative findings and their evolution, such as endometrial cavity debris, small hematoma, or peri-incisional edema, when interpreting images at various stages of recovery. Commonly seen acute complications after cesarean delivery include subfascial and bladder flap hematomas, uterine dehiscence or rupture, endometritis, septic thrombophlebitis, retained products of conception, and vascular complications such as uterine artery pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and ovarian vein thrombosis. On the contrary, delayed complications include uterine scar niche, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, bowel obstruction, that occur beyond the post-partum period and are often manifested during subsequent pregnancies. This review aims to familiarize radiologists with the pathophysiology and timeline of the expected post-cesarean imaging findings and complications, to aid accurate diagnosis and prompt patient management.\nGraphical abstract\nData availability\nNo datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.\nReferences\nBetran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J (2021) Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671\nOsterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. Births: Final Data for 2021. In: Services Usdohah, ed. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2023.\nHager RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Oian P, Henriksen T. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190(2):428–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037\nMurphy DJ (2023) Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 5th edn. Elsevier, pp 435–445\nGonzalo-Carballes M, Ríos-Vives M, Fierro EC, Azogue XG, Herrero SG, Rodríguez AE, Rus MN, Planes-Conangla M, Escudero-Fernandez JM, Coscojuela P (2020) A pictorial review of postpartum complications. Radiographics 40(7):2117–2141. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200031\nAl-Muzrakchi A, Jawad N, Crofton M, Ahmed S, Dick E, Gedroyc W, Bharwani N. Imaging in the post-partum period: clinical challenges, normal findings, and common imaging pitfalls. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017;42(5):1543–1555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1090-y\nWang SS, Shum D, Kennedy A. Imaging of Postpartum/Peripartum Complications. Radiol Clin North Am 2020;58(2):431–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2019.10.007\nMatsumoto MM, Caridi TM. Uterine Vascular Anomalies: Management and Treatment Overview. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023;40(4):342–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770714\nRosa F, Perugin G, Schettini D, Romano N, Romeo S, Podestà R, Guastavino A, Casaleggio A, Gandolfo N. Imaging findings of cesarean delivery complications: cesarean scar disease and much more. Insights Imaging 2019;10(1):98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0780-0\nRodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ, Horrow MM. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics 2012;32(6):1693–1712. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125516\nAran S, Daftari Besheli L, Karcaaltincaba M, Gupta R, Flores EJ, Abujudeh HH. Applications of dual-energy CT in emergency radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(4):W314-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.11682\nSierra A, Burrel M, Sebastia C, Radosevic A, Barrufet M, Albela S, Buñesch L, Domingo MA, Salvador R, Real I. Utility of multidetector CT in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Radiographics 2012;32(5):1463–1481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.325115113\nBekiesinska-Figatowska M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2020;11(1):75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00876-5\nMoshiri M, Osman S, Bhargava P, Maximin S, Robinson TJ, Katz DS. Imaging evaluation of maternal complications associated with repeat cesarean deliveries. Radiol Clin North Am 2014;52(5):1117–1135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.05.010\nAboughalia H, Basavalingu D, Revzin MV, Sienas LE, Katz DS, Moshiri M. Imaging evaluation of uterine perforation and rupture. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021;46(10):4946–4966. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03171-z\nRezvani M, Shaaban AM, Kennedy AM. The role of multimodality imaging after cesarean delivery. Ultrasound Q 2015;31(1):5–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ruq.0000000000000075\nWu T, Lin B, Li K, Ye J, Wu R. Diagnosis and treatment of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm: Case series and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100(51):e28093. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000028093\nLo TS, Wijaya T, Lo LM, Kao CC, Wu PY, Cortes EF, Huang SY, Lin CH. Clinical Relevance and Treatment Selection of Ureteral Injury After Cesarean Section. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22(5):303–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000275\nAhmed HA, Bu Shurbak ZS, Babarinsa IA, Hussain Saleh HA, Khenyab N, Ahmed Z, Minisha F (2022) Small bowel injury during peritoneal entry at cesarean section: a five-year case series. Cureus 14(11):e31072. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31072\nUstunsoz B, Ugurel S, Duru NK, Ozgok Y, Ustunsoz A. Percutaneous management of ureteral injuries that are diagnosed late after cesarean section. Korean J Radiol 2008;9(4):348–353. doi: https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.348\nJonard M, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Boyle E, Aucourt M, Gasan G, Jourdain M, Mignaux V, Tillouche N, Fourrier F. Postpartum acute renal failure: a multicenter study of risk factors in patients admitted to ICU. Ann Intensive Care 2014;4:36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0036-6\nKim J, Choi JH, Shin BS, Nam JY, Kang EA, Kim JS, Hwang JH, Kim J. A Case of Idiopathic Severe Acute Pancreatitis following Cesarean Section Delivery. Korean J Gastroenterol 2016;68(3):161–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2016.68.3.161\nBudny-Winska J, Pomorski M. Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods. Ginekol Pol 2021;92(10):726–730. doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0195\nArmstrong F, Mulligan K, Dermott RM, Bartels HC, Carroll S, Robson M, Corcoran S, Parland PM, Brien DO, Brophy D, Brennan DJ. Cesarean scar niche: An evolving concern in clinical practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023;161(2):356–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14509\nTanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture - Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;59:115–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009\nKok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42(2):132–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12479\nAlamo L, Vial Y, Denys A, Andreisek G, Meuwly JY, Schmidt S. MRI findings of complications related to previous uterine scars. Eur J Radiol Open 2018;5:6–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.01.001\nWhittington JR, Slaton KB, Rhomberg ME, Ghahremani T, Thomas SL, Magann EF. Uterine Dehiscence and Subsequent Pregnancy Management: A Review of the Literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2021;76(1):48–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000000856\nKennedy A, Debbink M, Griffith A, Kaiser J, Woodward P. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Do-Not-Miss Diagnosis. Radiographics 2024;44(7):e230199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230199\nHuang J, Phillips C, Moshiri M. Scarred for life: a review of cesarean section scar pregnancy and potential pitfalls in diagnosis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023;48(8):2672–2683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03953-7\nTimor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, D’Antonio F, Kaelin Agten A. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2019;46(4):797–811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.07.009\nLin R, DiCenzo N, Rosen T. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: nuances in diagnosis and treatment. Fertil Steril 2023;120(3 Pt 2):563–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.018\nLiu L, Ross WT, Chu AL, Deimling TA. An updated guide to the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020;32(4):255–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000644\nCalì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Monteaugudo A, Buca D, Forlani F, Familiari A, Scambia G, Acharya G, D’Antonio F. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51(2):169–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17568\nAbdelwahab M, Cackovic M. Placenta Accreta Spectrum and Postpartum Hemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023;66(2):399–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000000783\nHorgan R, Abuhamad A. Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Prenatal Diagnosis and Management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2022;49(3):423–438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2022.02.004\nShainker SA, Coleman B, Timor-Tritsch IE, Bhide A, Bromley B, Cahill AG, Gandhi M, Hecht JL, Johnson KM, Levine D, Mastrobattista J, Philips J, Platt LD, Shamshirsaz AA, Shipp TD, Silver RM, Simpson LL, Copel JA, Abuhamad A. Special Report of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Placenta Accreta Spectrum Ultrasound Marker Task Force: Consensus on definition of markers and approach to the ultrasound examination in pregnancies at risk for placenta accreta spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224(1):B2-b14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.001\nPatel-Lippmann KK, Planz VB, Phillips CH, Ohlendorf JM, Zuckerwise LC, Moshiri M (2023) Placenta accreta spectrum disorders: update and pictorial review of the SAR-ESUR joint consensus statement for MRI. Radiographics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220090\nGidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, Hines JJ, Alexeeva V, Donovan V, Katz DS. Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. Radiographics 2012;32(7):2031–2043. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.327125024\nZhang P, Sun Y, Zhang C, Yang Y, Zhang L, Wang N, Xu H. Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review. BMC Womens Health 2019;19(1):14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0711-8\nLyell DJ. Adhesions and perioperative complications of repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(6 Suppl):S11-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.029\nShafti V, Azarboo A, Ghaemi M, Gargari OK, Madineh E. Prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions in repeated cesarean sections: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023;287:97–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.039\nAcknowledgements\nWe would like to thank Dr Mindy Horrow, MD for her help and cases.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nContributions\nNZ = Literature review and wrote the manuscript AP = Conception and critical review AE = Critical review MR = Critical review YA = Conception, prepared the figures, and critical review.\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nCompeting interests\n: The authors received no dedicated funding in direct support of the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no financial or non-financial disclosures relevant to this work.\nAdditional information\nPublisher’s note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nZacharias, N.A., Panda, A., Elmahdy, A. et al. Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review. Abdom Radiol 51, 1489–1505 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05118-0\nReceived:\nRevised:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05118-0","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}