{"paper_id":"ed530d0a-1c05-4868-9ff8-691f7f2f9235","body_text":"Abstract\nEndometriosis is a chronic benign disease that affects women of reproductive age. Medical therapy is often the first line of management for women with endometriosis in order to ameliorate symptoms or to prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. Currently, there are several medical options for the management of patients with endometriosis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, being efficacious in relieving primary dysmenorrhea. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and progestins, available for multiple routes of administration, are effective first-line hormonal options. In fact, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that they succeed in improving pain symptoms in the majority of patients, are well tolerated and not expensive. Second-line therapy is represented by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Even if these drugs are efficacious in treating women not responding to COCs or progestins, they are not orally available and have a less favorable tolerability profile (needing an appropriate add-back therapy). The use of danazol is limited by the large availability of other better-tolerated hormonal drugs. Because few data are available on long-term efficacy and safety of aromatase inhibitors they should be administered only in women with symptoms refractory to other conventional therapies in a clinical research setting. Promising preliminary data have emerged from multicenter Phase III trials on elagolix, a new oral GnRH antagonist but non-inferiority RCT data are required to compare elagolix with first-line therapies for endometriosis.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nVercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(5):261–75.\nFerrero S, Arena E, Morando A, Remorgida V. Prevalence of newly diagnosed endometriosis in women attending the general practitioner. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110(3):203–7.\nGuerriero S, Condous G, Van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FP, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):318–32.\nVan Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Guerriero S, Savelli L, Paladini D, Lissoni AA, et al. Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(6):730–40.\nBazot M, Darai E. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):886–94.\nJacobson TZ, Duffy JM, Barlow D, Koninckx PR, Garry R. Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD001300.\nShakiba K, Bena JF, McGill KM, Minger J, Falcone T. Surgical treatment of endometriosis: a 7-year follow-up on the requirement for further surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1285–92.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Berlanda N, Borruto F, Frontino G. Tailoring radicality in demolitive surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):114–7.\nDunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400–12.\nBarra F, Scala C, Ferrero S. Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018;14(4):399–415.\nMarjoribanks J, Ayeleke RO, Farquhar C, Proctor M. Nonsteroidal anti–inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD001751.\nKauppila A, Ronnberg L. Naproxen sodium in dysmenorrhea secondary to endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(3):379–83.\nBrown J, Crawford TJ, Allen C, Hopewell S, Prentice A. Nonsteroidal anti–inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD004753.\nFerrero S, Alessandri F, Racca A, Maggiore ULR. Treatment of pain associated with deep endometriosis: alternatives and evidence. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):771–92.\nHarada T, Momoeda M, Taketani Y, Hoshiai H, Terakawa N. Low–dose oral contraceptive pill for dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1583–8.\nVercellini P, Trespidi L, Colombo A, Vendola N, Marchini M, Crosignani PG. A gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus a low-dose oral contraceptive for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(1):75–9.\nVercellini P, De Giorgi O, Mosconi P, Stellato G, Vicentini S, Crosignani PG. Cyproterone acetate versus a continuous monophasic oral contraceptive in the treatment of recurrent pelvic pain after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(1):52–61.\nSesti F, Pietropolli A, Capozzolo T, Broccoli P, Pierangeli S, Bollea MR, et al. Hormonal suppression treatment or dietary therapy versus placebo in the control of painful symptoms after conservative surgery for endometriosis stage III–IV. A randomized comparative trial. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(6):1541–7.\nParazzini F, Di Cintio E, Chatenoud L, Moroni S, Ardovino I, Struzziero E, et al. Estroprogestin vs. gonadotrophin agonists plus estroprogestin in the treatment of endometriosis–related pelvic pain: a randomized trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dell’Endometriosi. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;88(1):11–4.\nGuzick DS, Huang LS, Broadman BA, Nealon M, Hornstein MD. Randomized trial of leuprolide versus continuous oral contraceptives in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1568–73.\nCheewadhanaraks S, Choksuchat C, Dhanaworavibul K, Liabsuetrakul T. Postoperative depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus continuous oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized comparative trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;74(2):151–6.\nScala C, Maggiore ULR, Barra F, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Norethindrone acetate versus extended-cycle oral contraceptive (Seasonique((R))) in the treatment of endometriosis symptoms: A prospective open-label comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;222:89–94.\nVercellini P, Barbara G, Somigliana E, Bianchi S, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Comparison of contraceptive ring and patch for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2150–61.\nMaggiore ULR, Remorgida V, Scala C, Tafi E, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Desogestrel-only contraceptive pill versus sequential contraceptive vaginal ring in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: A prospective open-label comparative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(3):239–47.\nBrown J, Kives S, Akhtar M. Progestagens and anti-progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD002122.\nVercellini P, Pietropaolo G, De Giorgi O, Pasin R, Chiodini A, Crosignani PG. Treatment of symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis with an estrogen-progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1375–87.\nFerrero S, Camerini G, Ragni N, Venturini PL, Biscaldi E, Remorgida V. Norethisterone acetate in the treatment of colorectal endometriosis: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):94–100.\nVercellini P, Somigliana E, Consonni D, Frattaruolo MP, De Giorgi O, Fedele L. Surgical versus medical treatment for endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia: I. Effect on pain during intercourse and patient satisfaction. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3450–9.\nVercellini P, Frattaruolo MP, Somigliana E, Jones GL, Consonni D, Alberico D, et al. Surgical versus low-dose progestin treatment for endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia II: effect on sexual functioning, psychological status and health–related quality of life. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(5):1221–30.\nMorotti M, Venturini PL, Biscaldi E, Racca A, Calanni L, Vellone VG, et al. Efficacy and acceptability of long-term norethindrone acetate for the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;213:4–10.\nFedele L, Arcaini L, Bianchi S, Baglioni A, Vercellini P. Comparison of cyproterone acetate and danazol in the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73(6):1000–4.\nScala C, Maggiore ULR, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Drug safety evaluation of desogestrel. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013;12(3):433–44.\nRazzi S, Luisi S, Ferretti C, Calonaci F, Gabbanini M, Mazzini M, et al. Use of a progestogen only preparation containing desogestrel in the treatment of recurrent pelvic pain after conservative surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(2):188–90.\nMorotti M, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Progestin-only contraception compared with extended combined oral contraceptive in women with migraine without aura: a retrospective pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;183:178–82.\nWalch K, Unfried G, Huber J, Kurz C, van Trotsenburg M, Pernicka E, et al. Implanon versus medroxyprogesterone acetate: effects on pain scores in patients with symptomatic endometriosis—a pilot study. Contraception. 2009;79(1):29–34.\nTelimaa S, Puolakka J, Ronnberg L, Kauppila A. Placebo-controlled comparison of danazol and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1987;1(1):13–23.\nTelimaa S, Ronnberg L, Kauppila A. Placebo-controlled comparison of danazol and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometriosis after conservative surgery. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1987;1(4):363–71.\nBergqvist A, Theorell T. Changes in quality of life after hormonal treatment of endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(7):628–37.\nHarrison RF, Barry-Kinsella C. Efficacy of medroxyprogesterone treatment in infertile women with endometriosis: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(1):24–30.\nVercellini P, De Giorgi O, Oldani S, Cortesi I, Panazza S, Crosignani PG. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus an oral contraceptive combined with very–low-dose danazol for long-term treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):396–401.\nWong AYK, Tang LCH, Chin RKH. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®) and Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depoprovera) as long-term maintenance therapy for patients with moderate and severe endometriosis: A randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(3):273–9.\nCrosignani PG, Luciano A, Ray A, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(1):248–56.\nSchlaff WD, Carson SA, Luciano A, Ross D, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):314–25.\nCurtis KM, Martins SL. Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review. Contraception. 2006;73(5):470–87.\nGuilbert ER, Brown JP, Kaunitz AM, Wagner MS, Berube J, Charbonneau L, et al. The use of depot–medroxyprogesterone acetate in contraception and its potential impact on skeletal health. Contraception. 2009;79(3):167–77.\nVestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and intrauterine device use on fracture risk in Danish women. Contraception. 2008;78(6):459–64.\nLanza LL, McQuay LJ, Rothman KJ, Bone HG, Kaunitz AM, Harel Z, et al. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and incidence of bone fracture. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):593–600.\nMeier C, Brauchli YB, Jick SS, Kraenzlin ME, Meier CR. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(11):4909–16.\nThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Bone Efects. Committee Opinion. 2014. https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Adolescent-Health-Care/Depot-Medroxyprogesterone-Acetate-and-Bone-Effects. Accessed 26 May 2018.\nHarada T, Taniguchi F. Dienogest: a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond). 2010;6(1):27–35.\nMedicines Evaluation Board. PUBLIC ASSESSMENT REPORT of the Medicines Evaluation Board in the Netherlands Visanne, tablets, 2 mg Bayer BV. 2010. https://db.cbg-meb.nl/Pars/h104058.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2018.\nBizzarri N, Remorgida V, Maggiore ULR, Scala C, Tafi E, Ghirardi V, et al. Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(13):1889–902.\nAndres Mde P, Lopes LA, Baracat EC, Podgaec S. Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis: systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(3):523–9.\nKitawaki J, Kusuki I, Yamanaka K, Suganuma I. Maintenance therapy with dienogest following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157(2):212–6.\nLang J, Yu Q, Zhang S, Li H, Gude K, von Ludwig C, et al. Dienogest for treatment of endometriosis in chinese women: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double–blind phase 3 study. J Women Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(2):148–55.\nMorotti M, Sozzi F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Dienogest in women with persistent endometriosis–related pelvic pain during norethisterone acetate treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;183:188–92.\nMaggiore ULR, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Vigano P, Vercellini P. Bladder endometriosis: a systematic review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation. Eur Urol. 2017;71(5):790–807.\nAngioni S, Nappi L, Pontis A, Sedda F, Luisi S, Mais V, et al. Dienogest. A possible conservative approach in bladder endometriosis. Results of a pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(5):406–8.\nLeonardo-Pinto JP, Benetti-Pinto CL, Cursino K, Yela DA. Dienogest and deep infiltrating endometriosis: The remission of symptoms is not related to endometriosis nodule remission. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;211:108–11.\nVercellini P, Bracco B, Mosconi P, Roberto A, Alberico D, Dhouha D, et al. Norethindrone acetate or dienogest for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: a before and after study. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):734–743.e3.\nLee DY, Lee JY, Seo JW, Yoon BK, Choi DS. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with add–back treatment is as effective and tolerable as dienogest in preventing pain recurrence after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(6):1257–63.\nMomoeda M, Harada T, Terakawa N, Aso T, Fukunaga M, Hagino H, et al. Long–term use of dienogest for the treatment of endometriosis. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res. 2009;35(6):1069–76.\nStrowitzki T, Marr J, Gerlinger C, Faustmann T, Seitz C. Dienogest is as effective as leuprolide acetate in treating the painful symptoms of endometriosis: A 24–week, randomized, multicentre, open-label trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(3):633–41.\nLuukkainen T, Toivonen J. Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a method of contraception with therapeutic properties. Contraception. 1995;52(5):269–76.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Portuese A, Raffaelli R. Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(3):485–8.\nPetta CA, Ferriani RA, Abrao MS, Hassan D, Rosa e Silva JC, Hassan D, Podgaec S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7):1993–8.\nLan S, Ling L, Jianhong Z, Xijing J, Lihui W. Analysis of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with endometriosis. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(3):548–58.\nLockhat FB, Emembolu JO, Konje JC. The efficacy, side–effects and continuation rates in women with symptomatic endometriosis undergoing treatment with an intra–uterine administered progestogen (levonorgestrel): a 3 year follow-up. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(3):789–93.\nAbu Hashim H. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and endometriosis: current strategies and new insights. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(4):314–21.\nBrown J, Pan A, Hart RJ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12:CD008475.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Bocciolone L, Di Nola G, Franchi D. Buserelin acetate in the treatment of pelvic pain associated with minimal and mild endometriosis: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(3):516–21.\nBergqvist A, Bergh T, Hogstrom L, Mattsson S, Nordenskjold F, Rasmussen C. Effects of triptorelin versus placebo on the symptoms of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(4):702–8.\nDlugi AM, Miller JD, Knittle J. Lupron depot (leuprolide acetate for depot suspension) in the treatment of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Lupron Study Group. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(3):419–27.\nMiller JD. Leuprolide acetate for the treatment of endometriosis. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;323:337–41.\nMiller JD. Quantification of endometriosis-associated pain and quality of life during the stimulatory phase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(6):1483–8.\nHarada T, Momoeda M, Taketani Y, Aso T, Fukunaga M, Hagino H, et al. Dienogest is as effective as intranasal buserelin acetate for the relief of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis—a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(3):675–81.\nFerreira RA, Vieira CS, Rosa ESJC, Rosa-e-Silva AC, Nogueira AA, Ferriani RA. Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on cardiovascular risk markers in patients with endometriosis: a comparative study with the GnRH analogue. Contraception. 2010;81(2):117–22.\nBayoglu Tekin Y, Dilbaz B, Altinbas SK, Dilbaz S. Postoperative medical treatment of chronic pelvic pain related to severe endometriosis: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):492–6.\nSoysal S, Soysal ME, Ozer S, Gul N, Gezgin T. The effects of post–surgical administration of goserelin plus anastrozole compared to goserelin alone in patients with severe endometriosis: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):160–7.\nMinaguchi H, Uemura T, Shirasu K. Clinical study on finding optimal dose of a potent LHRH agonist (buserelin) for the treatment of endometriosis—multicenter trial in Japan. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1986;225:211–25.\nHenzl MR, Corson SL, Moghissi K, Buttram VC, Berqvist C, Jacobson J. Administration of nasal nafarelin as compared with oral danazol for endometriosis. A multicenter double-blind comparative clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(8):485–9.\nAdamson GD, Kwei L, Edgren RA. Pain of endometriosis: effects of nafarelin and danazol therapy. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1994;39(4):215–7.\nHornstein MD, Yuzpe AA, Burry KA, Heinrichs LR, Buttram VL Jr, Orwoll ES. Prospective randomized double-blind trial of 3 versus 6 months of nafarelin therapy for endometriosis associated pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(5):955–62.\nLemay A, Maheux R, Huot C, Blanchet J, Faure N. Efficacy of intranasal or subcutaneous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist inhibition of ovarian function in the treatment of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(2):233–6.\nDmowski WP, Radwanska E, Binor Z, Tummon I, Pepping P. Ovarian suppression induced with Buserelin or danazol in the management of endometriosis: a randomized, comparative study. Fertil Steril. 1989;51(3):395–400.\nDawood MY, Spellacy WN, Dmowski WP, Gambrell RD Jr, Greenblatt RB, Girard Y, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of buserelin vs danazol in the treatment of endometriosis. Protocol 310 Study Group. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;323:253–67.\nAgarwal SK, Hamrang C, Henzl MR, Judd HL. Nafarelin vs. leuprolide acetate depot for endometriosis. Changes in bone mineral density and vasomotor symptoms. Nafarelin Study Group. J Reprod Med. 1997;42(7):413–23.\nDonaldson VH. Danazol. Am J Med. 1989;87(3N):49N–55N.\nWheeler JM, Knittle JD, Miller JD. Depot leuprolide versus danazol in treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis. I. Efficacy results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(5):1367–71.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Viezzoli T, Arcaini L, Candiani GB. Gestrinone versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1989;51(5):781–5.\nWong AY, Tang L. An open and randomized study comparing the efficacy of standard danazol and modified triptorelin regimens for postoperative disease management of moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1522–7.\nFerrero S, Remorgida V, Maganza C, Venturini PL, Salvatore S, Papaleo E, et al. Aromatase and endometriosis: estrogens play a role. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1317:17–23.\nFerrero S, Venturini PL, Ragni N, Camerini G, Remorgida V. Pharmacological treatment of endometriosis: experience with aromatase inhibitors. Drugs. 2009;69(8):943–52.\nFerrero S, Venturini PL, Gillott DJ, Remorgida V. Letrozole and norethisterone acetate versus letrozole and triptorelin in the treatment of endometriosis related pain symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:88.\nAlborzi S, Hamedi B, Omidvar A, Dehbashi S, Alborzi S, Alborzi M. A comparison of the effect of short-term aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and GnRH agonist (triptorelin) versus case control on pregnancy rate and symptom and sign recurrence after laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(1):105–10.\nSeal SL, Kamilya G, Mukherji J, De A, Ghosh D, Majhi AK. Aromatase inhibitors in recurrent ovarian endometriomas: Report of five cases with literature review. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):291.e15–.e18.\nCetel NS, Rivier J, Vale W, Yen SS. The dynamics of gonadotropin inhibition in women induced by an antagonistic analog of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(1):62–5.\nFinas D, Hornung D, Diedrich K, Schultze-Mosgau A. Cetrorelix in the treatment of female infertility and endometriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006;7(15):2155–68.\nTaniguchi F, Higaki H, Azuma Y, Deura I, Iwabe T, Harada T, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues reduce the proliferation of endometrial stromal cells but not endometriotic cells. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(1):9–15.\nAltintas D, Kokcu A, Tosun M, Cetinkaya MB, Kandemir B. Comparison of the effects of cetrorelix, a GnRH antagonist, and leuprolide, a GnRH agonist, on experimental endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(6):1014–9.\nKupker W, Felberbaum RE, Krapp M, Schill T, Malik E, Diedrich K. Use of GnRH antagonists in the treatment of endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(1):12–6.\nMelis GB, Neri M, Corda V, Malune ME, Piras B, Pirarba S, et al. Overview of elagolix for the treatment of endometriosis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(5):581–8.\nStruthers RS, Chen T, Campbell B, Jimenez R, Pan H, Yen SS, et al. Suppression of serum luteinizing hormone in postmenopausal women by an orally administered nonpeptide antagonist of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (NBI–42902). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3903–7.\nDiamond MP, Carr B, Dmowski WP, Koltun W, O’Brien C, Jiang P, et al. Elagolix treatment for endometriosis-associated pain: results from a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(3):363–71.\nCarr B, Dmowski WP, O’Brien C, Jiang P, Burke J, Jimenez R, et al. Elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist, versus subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for the treatment of endometriosis: effects on bone mineral density. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(11):1341–51.\nTaylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Kotarski J, Archer DF, et al. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):28–40.\nNakata D, Masaki T, Tanaka A, Yoshimatsu M, Akinaga Y, Asada M, et al. Suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis by TAK–385 (relugolix), a novel, investigational, orally active, small molecule gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist: studies in human GnRH receptor knock–in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;723:167–74.\nOsuga Y, Seki Y, Tanimoto M, Kusumoto T, Kodou K, Terakawa N, editors. Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, in women with endometriosis (EM)-associated pain: Phase 2 safety and efficacy 24–week results. In: 19th European Congress of Endocrinology; 2017; Lisbon, Portugal: Bioscientifica. 2017.\nSchweppe KW. Current place of progestins in the treatment of endometriosis–related complaints. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001;15(Suppl 6):22–8.\nHornstein MD. An oral GnRH antagonist for endometriosis—a new drug for an old disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):81–3.\nSimoens S, Hummelshoj L, D’Hooghe T. Endometriosis: cost estimates and methodological perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(4):395–404.\nWu B, Yang Z, Tobe RG, Wang Y. Medical therapy for preventing recurrent endometriosis after conservative surgery: a cost–effectiveness analysis. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2018;125(4):469–77.\nBarra F, Scala C, Mais V, Guerriero S, Ferrero S. Investigational drugs for the treatment of endometriosis, an update on recent developments. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(5):445–58.\nCosson M, Querleu D, Donnez J, Madelenat P, Konincks P, Audebert A, et al. Dienogest is as effective as triptorelin in the treatment of endometriosis after laparoscopic surgery: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(4):684–92.\nTakaesu Y, Nishi H, Kojima J, Sasaki T, Nagamitsu Y, Kato R, et al. Dienogest compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after conservative surgery for endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(9):1152–8.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nFunding\nThis paper was not funded.\nConflict of interest\nSimone Ferrero, Fabio Barra, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore declare that they have no conflict of interest.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nFerrero, S., Barra, F. & Leone Roberti Maggiore, U. Current and Emerging Therapeutics for the Management of Endometriosis. Drugs 78, 995–1012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0928-0\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0928-0","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}