{"paper_id":"ec1b5b61-dfbd-4944-9dc3-b53f6d4f2615","body_text":"Citation: Pai, N. R., & Shalini, C.  (2026). Complementary Application of Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) Healing in an \nEndometriosis Patient with Recurrent IVF Failure: A Case Report . Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, 9(9), 219-225. \nhttps://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2026.v09i09.002 \n \n       219 \n \n \n \nScholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology \nAbbreviated Key Title: Sch Int J Obstet Gynec \nISSN 2616-8235 (Print) | ISSN 2617-3492 (Online) \nScholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates \nJournal homepage: https://saudijournals.com  \n \n Case Report \n \nComplementary Application of Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) Healing in an \nEndometriosis Patient with Recurrent IVF Failure: A Case Report \nMrs Neeta Ramesh Pai1, Dr Shalini C2* \n \n1Associate Certified YPV Healer and Arhat Yogi, Bangalore, Karnataka, India \n2BAMS, MD (Ayu), Associate Certified YPV Healer and Arhat Yogi, Mysuru, Karnataka, India  \n \nDOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2026.v09i09.002    | Received: 07.07.2026 | Accepted: 01.09.2026 | Published: 07.09.2026 \n \n*Corresponding author: Dr Shalini C \nBAMS, MD (Ayu), Associate Certified YPV Healer and Arhat Yogi, Mysuru, Karnataka, India \n \nAbstract  \n \nInfertility affects a significant proportion of reproductive -age couples worldwide, with multifactorial etiologies including \nhormonal imbalance, structural abnormalities, endometriosis, and psychosocial stress. Despite advancements in assisted \nreproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), repeated implantation failure remains a major clinical \nconcern, often associated with both physiological and psychological determinants. This case report describes a 31-year-old \nfemale with primary infert ility and underlying endometriosis who experienced two unsuccessful IVF cycles. Prior to a \nsubsequent IVF attempt, corrective hysteroscopic intervention for cervical factors was performed. In addition, Yoga Prana \nVidya (YPV), a non-touch, biofield-based complementary therapy, was introduced alongside conventional treatment.  The \nYPV intervention included structured energy-based protocols aimed at emotional regulation, stress reduction, and targeted \nenergizing of reproductive -related energy centers. During th is cycle, the patient demonstrated improved psychological \nstability and reduced perceived stress.  The third IVF cycle resulted in successful conception. The observed temporal \nassociation suggests that YPV may have a supportive role in modulating psychophysiological parameters relevant to \nimplantation success \nKeywords: Yoga Prana Vidya System®, In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), Endometriosis, Repeated Implantation Failure, \nComplementary Therapy, Energy Healing, Primary Infertility. \nCopyright © 2026 The Author(s): This is an open -access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International \nLicense (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non -commercial use provided the original \nauthor and source are credited. \n \nINTRODUCTION \nEndometriosis is a common, chronic, estrogen -\ndependent gynecological disorder affecting \napproximately 10% of women of reproductive age \nworldwide. It is characterized by the presence of \nendometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity [1]. The \netiology of  endometriosis is multifactorial, involving \ngenetic predisposition, metabolic and microbiomic \ninfluences, immune dysfunction, endocrine disruption, \nand environmental factors [2 -4]. The most common \npresenting symptoms include chronic pelvic pain and \ninfertility, along with additional symptoms depending on \nthe organs involved [5]. \n \nThe prevalence of endometriosis ranges from \n2% to 10% among women of reproductive age, \nincreasing to 20% –50% in infertile populations [6 -9]. \nBased on anatomical and pathological features, \nendometriosis is broadly classified into ovarian/adnexal \nendometriomas (OMAs), superficial peritoneal \nendometriosis, and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) \n[10]. More than 20% of affected women are estimated to \nhave DIE, which is considered the most severe form and \noften requires complex clinical management. \n \nDeep infiltrating endometriosis is defined by \nthe infiltration of endometrial tissue more than 5 mm \nbeneath the peritoneal surface [11]. It commonly \ninvolves the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral and utero -\novarian ligaments, and the muscular walls of pelvic  \norgans. Bowel involvement occurs in approximately \n3.8% to 37% of cases [12, 13]. Ovarian endometriomas \nare also prevalent and significantly impact quality of life, \nfertility, and may increase the risk of malignancy [14]. \n \nThe classification of DIE remains challenging \nbut is essential for accurate diagnosis, surgical planning, \n\n\n \n \nPai, N. R., & Shalini, C.; Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, Sep. 2026; 9(9): 219-225 \n© 2026 | Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates                                                                                       220 \n  \n \nand effective communication among multidisciplinary \nteams [15]. Management of DIE should be \nindividualized based on symptom severity, fertility \ndesires, and associated comorbidities. Medical treatment \noptions include combined oral contraceptives, \nprogestogens, and gonadotropin -releasing hormone \n(GnRH) agonists or antagonists. These therapies aim to \ncreate a hypoestrogenic environment, induce atrophy or \nsuppression of endometriotic lesions, and reduce chronic \ninflammation [16]. \n \nHowever, surgical intervention is often \nconsidered the primary treatment for symptomatic DIE, \nparticularly in cases with bowel involvement. The \nprimary objective of surgery is to restore normal pelvic \nanatomy through complete excision of endometriotic \nlesions [17]. Laparoscopic cystectomy remains the gold \nstandard for the definitive management of ovarian \nendometriomas [18, 19]. Nevertheless, its use is \ncontroversial due to the potential risk of iatrogenic \ndamage to ovarian reserve. Systematic reviews indica te \nthat laparoscopic cystectomy is associated with a 38% \nreduction in anti -Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels \npostoperatively, with bilateral cystectomy increasing the \nrisk of premature ovarian insufficiency by approximately \n2.9-fold [20, 21]. \n \nAlthough current evidence supports \ncystectomy-related decline in ovarian reserve, it remains \nunclear whether ovarian endometriomas themselves \ncontribute to diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) through \nchronic inflammation-induced follicular apoptosis [22]. \nFurthermore, multiple systematic reviews have shown \nthat performing cystectomy prior to in vitro \nfertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection \n(IVF/ICSI) does not significantly improve reproductive \noutcomes [23-25]. \n \nYoga Prana Vidya (YPV) System as an \nAlternative/Complementary Modality: \n“In recent years, there has been increasing \ninterest in integrative and non -invasive therapeutic \napproaches, including energy healing and mind –body \ninterventions, as complementary strategies in clinical \nmanagement [26].” Yoga Prana Vidya system of healing \nhas been found to be effective in treating various human \nailments owing to its holistic and integrated nature [27]. \nYoga Prana Vidya is derived from an ancient art and \nscience of energy healing, as an integrated holistic \nsystem without any drugs or touch. Besides applying \nenergy healing techniques, it includes physical exercises, \nbreathing techniques, forgiveness sadhana, diet, and \nmeditation [28]. The energy body, often referred to in \ntraditional yogic literature as the Pranamaya Kosha, is \ndescribed as an energetic field that interpenetrates and \nextends beyond the physical body, as illustrated in \nFigures 1 and 2. This model conceptualizes the energy \nbody as comprising an inner aura, an outer aura, and \nhealth rays that are believed to co nnect these layers. A  \ncomparison of Figures 1 and 2 is intended to illustrate \ndifferences in the energy field patterns between \nindividuals described as healthy and those experiencing \nillness. \n \nWithin this framework, the energy body is \nproposed to consist of energy centers, commonly termed \nchakras, along with nadis (channels) that are believed to \nfacilitate the distribution of vital energy to different \nregions of the body (Figure 4). Figure 3 pre sents an \nimage obtained using Gas Discharge Visualization \n(GDV) technology, which has been explored in some \nstudies as a method for assessing biofield -related \nparameters, although its clinical validity and reliability \nremain subjects of ongoing investigation. \n \nYoga Prana Vidya (YPV) healing is described \nas a biofield-based complementary practice that involves \ntechniques such as energy scanning, cleansing, and \nenergizing of the aura and chakras by trained \npractitioners. It is hypothesized that such interventions \nmay help modulate perceived energy imbalances, which \nare suggested, within this framework, to be associated \nwith physical or psychological conditions. \n \nReported outcomes from practitioners and \nobservational reports indicate that some individuals \nexperience symptomatic relief following YPV sessions. \nHealing sessions typically last 10 –20 minutes and may \nbe administered once or multiple times per day, \ndepending on practitioner assessment and individual \ncondition [29]. \n \n\n \n \nPai, N. R., & Shalini, C.; Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, Sep. 2026; 9(9): 219-225 \n© 2026 | Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates                                                                                       221 \n  \n \n \nFig: 1. energy body of a healthy person \n \n \nFig. 2: showing energy body of an Unhealthy person \n \n \nFig. 3: Picture of energy taken using GDV camera \n \n\n\n \n \nPai, N. R., & Shalini, C.; Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, Sep. 2026; 9(9): 219-225 \n© 2026 | Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates                                                                                       222 \n  \n \n \nFig. 4: Chakras (wheels) in the energy body \n \nCASE HISTORY \nA 31-year-old female with 8 years of married \nlife presented with primary infertility and a known \nhistory of endometriosis. She sought complementary \nsupport through Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) healing while \nundergoing her third in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle . \nThe clinical details were obtained from the patient’s \nmedical records with consent. \n \nShe had regular menstrual cycles and no \nsignificant medical comorbidities. Autoimmune \nscreening (ANA, APLA, anti -TPO) was negative. Her \nsurgical history included laparoscopic bilateral \nendometriotic cystectomy with adhesiolysis in 2021, \nfollowed by laparos copic adhesiolysis, radical excision \nof deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), ureterolysis, \nand bilateral salpingectomy in 2022. As part of the \ninfertility workup prior to subsequent IVF attempts, she \nwas found to have cervical factors requiring correctio n. \nAccordingly, she underwent hysteroscopic internal os \nresection in 2024 and a repeat hysteroscopic internal os \nresection in October 2025 to improve cervical access and \nfacilitate embryo transfer during future IVF cycles. \n \nIn 2022, she underwent her first IVF cycle (6 \nembryos), followed by two failed frozen embryo \ntransfers (FET). In March 2023, a second IVF cycle (4 \nembryos) with two FET attempts also failed. In \nNovember 2025, donor oocyte IVF was initiated, and the \nfirst donor oocyte FET (DO-FET) failed. \n \nShe was subsequently planned for a second DO-\nFET cycle with hormonal endometrial preparation \n(estradiol, progesterone), along with adjunct medications \nincluding low -dose aspirin and vitamin E. G -CSF gel \nwas initiated on 18/01/2026. She was admitted on \n20/01/2026, and on 21/01/2026, two Day -3 embryos \nwere transferred under monitored anesthesia care. \nAt presentation, the patient reported significant \nanxiety related to conception. Physical examination \nfindings were within normal limits. Alongside ongoing \nconventional treatment, she opted for YPV healing as a \ncomplementary intervention. \n \nYPV Healing Intervention Protocol: The \npatient received Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) healing as a \ncomplementary intervention alongside conventional IVF \ntreatment. Healing sessions were administered by \nAssociate certified YPV Healer with frequency adjusted \nbased on clinical status and patient-reported condition. \n \nInitially, the patient underwent daily healing \nsessions for 10 consecutive days, followed by 14 \nsessions conducted on alternate days. During early \npregnancy, the patient developed choriodecidual \nseparation, following which the frequency of healing \nwas increased to daily sessions for 20 days. After clinical \nresolution of this condition, healing sessions were \ncontinued on an alternate -day basis as a maintenance \napproach. \n \nThe healing protocol comprised structured \ncomponents of YPV, including YPV Psychotherapy, \nYPV Advanced Healing utilizing color prana techniques, \nand special protocol from the Healer Development \nProgram (HDP) Level 1. These interventions were \ndelivered as c omplementary support alongside ongoing \nconventional medical management. \n \nPsychotherapy was considered a foundational \ncomponent of the intervention to address stress and \nemotional imbalance. The protocol involved systematic \ncleansing and energizing of key chakras, including the \nback heart (front heart, only cleansing), front and  back \nsolar plexus, throat, ajna, crown, sex, and basic chakras. \nThis approach was consistently applied during all \n\n\n \n \nPai, N. R., & Shalini, C.; Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, Sep. 2026; 9(9): 219-225 \n© 2026 | Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates                                                                                       223 \n  \n \nhealing sessions to support emotional regulation and \noverall well-being. \n \nAdvanced Healing Techniques: \nAdvanced healing methods, including the use \nof color prana (prior to pregnancy confirmation), were \napplied to enhance the intervention. These included \ngeneral energy body cleansing, blood cleansing \ntechniques, internal organ healing, and thorough \ncleansing, energizing, and balancing of relevant chakras. \nSpecial emphasis was given to healing and energizing \nthe female reproductive organs. \n \nHealer Development Program (HDP) – Level 1 \nAs part of HDP Level 1, a specialized colour \nprana combinations for regeneration was applied to the \npatient. This technique was incorporated into all healing \nsessions with the objective of supporting reproductive \norgan recovery. \n \nRESULTS \nDuring the course of Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) \nhealing, the patient reported progressive improvements \nin both physical symptoms and emotional well-being, as \ndocumented through structured feedback collected after \nhealing sessions. In the initial phase, the patient reported \nrelief from pelvic discomfort, noting a reduction in \ncramps and absence of lower abdominal pain. Early \nfeedback also indicated improved emotional state, with \nthe patient describing a sense of calmness and reduced \nstress. As healing sessions p rogressed, further \nimprovements were observed. The patient reported \nbetter sleep quality, reduced fatigue, and increased \nenergy levels. Gastrointestinal discomfort, including \nsensations of heaviness and uneasiness, also showed \nimprovement. The patient additionally noted a subjective \nsense of lightness and overall well -being. During \nsubsequent sessions, the patient reported absence of \nvomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain, which had been \npresent earlier. Emotional stability continued to improve, \nwith reduced irritability and better stress tolerance. Sleep \npatterns normalized, and the patient reported feeling \nmore relaxed and peaceful. Following conception, the \npatient experienced an episode of choriodecidual \nseparation, during which healing frequency was \nincreased. Subsequent feedback indicated stabilization \nof symptoms and improvement in overall condition. The \npatient continued to report a sense of physical comfort \nand emotional reassurance. At later stages, the patient \nreported reduced anxiety, improved mood,  and a \nsustained sense of calmness. She expressed feeling more \nsecure during pregnancy and attributed her emotional \nstability to the ongoing healing sessions. At the time of \nreporting, the patient had successfully conceived twins \nand continued with mainten ance healing sessions. \nOverall, the observations suggest an association between \nYPV healing sessions and improvements in patient -\nreported physical symptoms and psychological well -\nbeing. However, these findings are based on subjective \nfeedback and concurren t medical treatment, and causal \nrelationships cannot be definitively established. \n \nDISCUSSION \nEndometriosis is a complex, chronic \ngynecological disorder characterized by the ectopic \npresence of endometrial -like tissue outside the uterus, \nfrequently associated with chronic pelvic pain, \nadhesions, ovarian cysts, and infertility. The disease \nadversely affects reproductive potential through \ndistorted pelvic anatomy, inflammatory changes, \nimpaired implantation, and altered ovarian reserve. \nStudies have shown that women with moderate to severe \nendometriosis often experience significantly reduced \nspontaneous conception and IVF success rates compared \nto unaffected women [30, 31]. Several studies have \nhighlighted the negative influence of psychological \nstress, anxiety, and depression on reproductive outcomes \nand assisted reproductive techniques. Stress -related \nneuroendocrine dysregulation may impair ovulation, \nimplantation, and pregnancy maintenance. Therefore, \nsupportive mind–body interventions aimed at improving \nemotional well -being and stress reduction are \nincreasingly being explored as adjunctive approache s \nduring fertility treatment [32, 33]. \n \nIn the present case, Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) \nhealing was administered alongside conventional IVF \nmanagement. YPV is a biofield -based complementary \npractice involving non -touch techniques such as \nscanning, cleansing, and energizing of the aura and \nchakras by  trained practitioners. Previous Yoga Prana \nVidya (YPV) case reports have documented supportive \noutcomes in several female reproductive health \nconditions, including PCOS [29-34], endometriosis [35], \nadenomyosis [36], ovarian cysts [27 -37], infertility, \nrecurrent miscarriages [38], and IVF -associated \nconception [39]. These reports suggest that YPV \nprotocols may contribute to improved emotional well -\nbeing, stress reduction, and supportive reproductive \nhealth management when used as a complementary \napproach al ongside conventional medical treatment. \nHowever, the currently available evidence is largely \nobservational and based on individual case studies, \nwarranting further controlled clinical research. \n \nIn this patient, subjective improvements were \nobserved in stress levels, emotional stability, sleep \nquality, and overall mental well-being during the healing \nperiod. Considering the chronic nature of endometriosis \nand the history of repeated IVF failures, achieving \nsuccessful conception in such cases is often clinically \nchallenging. However, because YPV healing was \nadministered concurrently with standard medical and \nIVF treatment, no direct causal relationship can be \nestablished between YPV intervention and  successful \npregnancy outcome. Larger controlled clinical studies \nare necessary to scientifically evaluate the efficacy, \nmechanisms, and reproducibility of YPV as a \n\n \n \nPai, N. R., & Shalini, C.; Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, Sep. 2026; 9(9): 219-225 \n© 2026 | Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates                                                                                       224 \n  \n \ncomplementary supportive therapy in endometriosis -\nassociated infertility. \n \nCONCLUSION \nThis case report suggests that Yoga Prana \nVidya (YPV) healing may serve as a supportive \ncomplementary approach alongside conventional IVF \ntreatment in a patient with endometriosis and recurrent \nimplantation failure. The patient reported improvements \nin emo tional well -being, stress reduction, and overall \ncomfort during the treatment course. While a successful \ntwin conception was achieved, these observations \nhighlight the potential role of integrative approaches in \nenhancing patient -centered care and psycholo gical \nsupport during fertility treatment. Further systematic \nresearch is warranted to explore its clinical applicability. \n \nPatient Consent: Written informed consent was \nobtained from the patient for publication of this case \nreport and the accompanying images. \n \nFunding: The authors received no financial support or \nfunding for this study. \n \nConflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have \nno conflicts of interest related to this work. \n \nAuthorship: All authors attest that they meet the current \nauthorship criteria of the International Committee of \nMedical Journal Editors. \n \nAcknowledgements \nThe authors are grateful to the patient for \nconsenting to share the case details and feedback while \nmaintaining anonymity. The authors also thank Sri \nRamana Trust (Thally -635118, Tamil Nadu, India) for \ngranting permission to use the copyrighted term Yoga \nPrana Vidya System®. \n \nREFERENCES \n1. Giudice LC. Clinical practice. Endometriosis. New \nEngl J Med. (2010) 362:2389 –98. doi: \n10.1056/NEJMcp1000274, PMID:  [DOI] [ PMC free \narticle] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n2. Alio L, Angioni S, Arena S, Bartiromo L, Bergamini \nV, Berlanda N, et al. Endometriosis: seeking optimal \nmanagement in women approaching menopause. \nClimacteric. (2019) 22:329 –38. doi: \n10.1080/13697137.2018.1549213, PMID:  [DOI] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n3. Deiana D, Gessa S, Anardu M, Daniilidis A, Nappi L, \nD’Alterio MN, et al. Genetics of endometriosis: a \ncomprehensive review. Gynecological Endocrinol. \n(2019) 35:553 –58. doi: \n10.1080/09513590.2019.1588244, PMID:  [DOI] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n4. Saunders PTK, Horne AW. Endometriosis: Etiology, \npathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell. (2021) \n184:2807–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.041, \nPMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n5. Kido A, Himoto Y, Moribata Y, Kurata Y, Nakamoto \nY. MRI in the diagnosis of endometriosis and related \ndiseases. Korean J Radiol 2022;23(04):426–445 \n6. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge \nC, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: \nmanagement of women with endometriosis. Hum \nReprod (Oxford England). (2014) 29:400 –12. doi: \n10.1093/humrep/det457, PMID:  [DOI] [ PubMed] \n[Google Scholar] \n7. Fuldeore MJ, Soliman AM. Prevalence and \nsymptomatic burden of diagnosed endometriosis in the \nUnited States: national estimates from a cross-sectional \nsurvey of 59,411 women. Gynecologic obstetric Invest. \n(2017) 82:453 –61. doi: 10.1159/000452660, \nPMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n8. Cramer DW, Missmer SA. The epidemiology of \nendometriosis. Ann New York Acad Sci. (2002) \n955:11–22; discussion 34 -6, 396 -406. doi: \n10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02761.x, PMID:  [DOI] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n9. Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, Spiessens C, \nTimmerman D, D’Hooghe T. High prevalence of \nendometriosis in infertile women with normal \novulation and normospermic partners. Fertility \nsterility. (2009) 92:68 –74. doi: \n10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.056, PM ID: [DOI] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n10. Ghosh S, Mann K, Nakrour N, Ray LJ, Movilla PR, \nHarisinghani MG, et al. Endometrioma: A \ncomprehensive review of its varied presentations, \ncomplications, and impact on patient management. J \nGastrointest Abdom Radiol ISGAR. 2026;9(1):69 -89. \ndoi:10.1055/s-0045-1809315. \n11. .D’Alterio MN, D’Ancona G, Raslan M, Tinelli R, \nDaniilidis A, Angioni S (2021) Management \nChallenges of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. Int J \nFertil Steril. 15(2):88 –94 [DOI] [ PMC free article ] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n12. Nezhat C, Li A, Falik R, Copeland D, Razavi G, Shakib \nA et al (2018) Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and \nmanagement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218(6):549 –\n562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n13. Nezhat C, Falik R, McKinney S, King LP (2017) \nPathophysiology and management of urinary tract \nendometriosis. Nat Rev Urol 14(6):359 –372 [DOI] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n14. Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, \nDonnez J. Deep pelvic endometriosis: clinical features, \ndiagnosis, and treatment - a comprehensive review. \nFertil Steril. 2012;98(3):564 -571. \ndoi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031. \n15. Rafique S, DeCherney AH (2017) Medical \nmanagement of endometriosis. Clin Obstetr Gynecol. \n60(3):485–496 [DOI] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed] \n[Google Scholar] \n16. Donnez O, Roman H (2017) Choosing the right \nsurgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, \ndisc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril \n108(6):931–942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n17. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge \nC, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: \nmanagement of women with endometriosis. Hum \n\n \n \nPai, N. R., & Shalini, C.; Sch Int J Obstet Gynec, Sep. 2026; 9(9): 219-225 \n© 2026 | Published by Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates                                                                                       225 \n  \n \nReprod (Oxford England). (2014) 29:400 –12. doi: \n10.1093/humrep/det457, PMID:  [DOI] [ PubMed] \n[Google Scholar] \n18.  Riemma G, De Franciscis P, La Verde M, Ravo M, \nFumiento P, Fasulo DD, et al. Impact of the hemostatic \napproach after laparoscopic endometrioma excision on \novarian reserve: Systematic review and network meta-\nanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J \ngynaecology obstetrics. (2023) 162:222 –32. doi: \n10.1002/ijgo.14621, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google \nScholar] \n19. Raffi F, Metwally M, Amer S. The impact of excision of \novarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a \nsystematic review and meta -analysis. J Clin \nEndocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:3146 –54. doi: \n10.1210/jc.2012-1558, PMID:  [DOI] [ PubMed] \n[Google Scholar] \n20. Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Capezzuoli T, Evangelisti P, \nCozzi C, Petraglia F. Bilateral endometrioma \nexcision: surgery-related damage to ovarian reserve. \nReprod Sci (Thousand Oaks Calif.). (2019) 26:543–50. \ndoi: 10.1177/1933719118777640, PMID:  [DOI] \n[PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n21. Máté G, Bernstein LR, Török AL. Endometriosis is a \ncause of infertility. Does reactive oxygen damage to \ngametes and embryos play a key role in the \npathogenesis of infertility caused by endometriosis? \nFront Endocrinol. (2018) 9:725. doi: \n10.3389/fendo.2018.00725, PMID:  [DOI] [ PMC free \narticle] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n22.  Hamdan M, Dunselman G, Li TC, Cheong Y. The \nimpact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a \nsystematic review and meta -analysis. Hum Reprod \nUpdate. (2015) 21:809 –25. doi: \n10.1093/humupd/dmv035, PMID:  [DOI] [ PubMed] \n[Google Scholar] \n23. Yang C, Geng Y, Li Y, Chen C, Gao Y. Impact of \novarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness and \nIVF: a systematic review and meta -analysis. Reprod \nbiomedicine Online. (2015) 31:9 –19. doi: \n10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.03.005, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] \n[Google Scholar] \n24. Nickkho-Amiry M, Savant R, Majumder K, Edi -\nO’sagie E, Akhtar M. The effect of surgical \nmanagement of endometrioma on the IVF/ICSI \noutcomes when compared with no treatment? A \nsystematic review and meta-analysis. Arch gynecology \nobstetrics. (2018) 297:1043 –57. doi: 10.1007/s00404 -\n017-4640-1, PMID: [DOI] \n25. Alshehre SM, Narice BF, Fenwick MA, Metwally M. \nThe impact of endometrioma on  in \nvitro fertilisation/intra-cytoplasmic injection IVF/ICSI \nreproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-\nanalysis. Arch gynecology obstetrics. (2021) 303:3 –\n16. doi: 10.1007/s00404 -020-05796-9, PMID:  [DOI] \n[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] \n26. Kataria R, Nanduri VS. Non -Surgical Resolution of \nOvarian Cysts Using Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) \nHealing: a Case Study. Int J Pharm Bio Med Sci. \n2025;5(10):557-560. doi:10.47191/ijpbms/v5-i10-04. \n27. Nayak L, Nanduri VS. Successful treatment of septated \ncystic lesion in left ovary with echogenic nodule \nwithin-probable dermoid cyst using Yoga Prana Vidya \nhealing: a case study. Int J Dent Med Sci Res. \n2021;4(1):884-889. doi:10.35629/5252-0401884889 \n28. Bhuvaneshwari Hari, Nanduri VS. “Successful \napplication of Yoga Prana Vidya Protocols to \nnormalize Kidney function: A case study of stage 2 \nkidney disease.” World Journal of Biology Pharmacy \nand Health Sciences. 2022;10(01):001–007. \n29. Gupta Y, Nanduri VS. A case of PCOS (Polycystic \nOvarian Syndrome) treated successfully by the \napplication of Yoga Prana Vidya healing system \nthrough sustained self -practice, self -healing and self -\nbelief. Int J Med Sci Health Res. 2022;6(2):24-31. \n30. Giudice LC. Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N Engl J \nMed. 2010;362(25):2389-98.  \n31. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. \nEndometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244-56.  \n32. Rooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between \nstress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. \n2018;20(1):41-47.  \n33. Louis GM, Lum KJ, Sundaram R, et al. Stress reduces \nconception probabilities across the fertile window. \nHum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1866-72 \n34. Mukesh S, Nanduri VS. Role of Yoga Prana Vidya \nSystem protocols in successful distal healing treatment \nof PCOS symptoms and hormonal imbalance in a 22 -\nyear-old female patient: a case study. Innov J Med \nHealth Sci. 2022;12(9):1968 -1972. \ndoi:10.52845/IJMHS/2022/12-9-2 \n35. Ashwin V, Ramya A, Nanduri VS. A case of Yoga \nPrana Vidya healing treatment of an endometriosis \nfemale patient: successful outcome of normal \npregnancy and child birth. Int J Pharm Bio Med Sci. \n2022;2(9):358-365. doi:10.47191/ijpbms/v2-i9-05 \n36. Shah P, Dholakia MD. Successful healing treatment of \nadenomyosis using Yoga Prana Vidya (YPV) system. \nInt J Med Sci Health Res. 2022;6(4). \ndoi:10.51505/ijmshr.2022.6404. \n37. Shah T, Nanduri VS. A case of chocolate ovarian cyst \nsuccessful healing using Yoga Prana Vidya healing \nprotocols as alternative medicine. World J Pharm Life \nSci. 2022;8(9):150-154. \n38. Bindal S, Nanduri VS. Role of Yoga Prana Vidya \n(YPV) system protocols in infertility treatment: a case \nstudy of a 29 -year-old housewife with history of \nrecurrent spontaneous miscarriages and ovarian cysts. \nInt J Pharm Bio Med Sci. 2022;2(10):414 -418. \ndoi:10.47191/ijpbms/v2-i10-06. \n39. Nayak SY, Shah F, Nanduri VS. Role of Yoga Prana \nVidya protocols as complementary medicine for \nfemale reproductive system: a successful confirmed \npregnancy case of IVF patient. Int J Pharm Bio Med \nSci. 2022;2(11):489-494. doi:10.47191/ijpbms/v2-i11-\n08.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}