{"paper_id":"eac2ba01-8fb7-4fa8-afad-d5d78d344362","body_text":"Cutibacterium acnes  ( C. acnes ) is a Gram-positive, anaerobic bacterium, and a common member of the skin microbiota, found to colonize sebaceous areas.  C. acnes  was initially observed to be an “acne bacillus” in 1896 by  Unna (1986) , who discovered this bacterium in the histological sections of acne comedones ( Douglas & Gunter, 1946 ). Later, this bacterium was formally named  Bacillus acne  in 1900 by  Gilchrist (1900) . However in 1909, Orla-Jensen placed this bacteria under the genus  Propionibacterium  based on its ability to produce propionic acid as one of the end products during the fermentation process ( Orla-Jensen, 1909 ). This bacteria was subsequently placed under the genus  Corynebacterium  due to its morphological relationship to other bacterial species is this group ( Bergey et al., 1923 ). In 1946,  Douglas & Gunter (1946)  showed evidences of  C. acnes  exhibiting anaerobic metabolism and similar biochemical properties closely resembled those of other species within the genus  Propionibacterium.  One of the shared biochemical properties reported was the ability to ferment lactose into propionic acid. Subsequently, Douglas and Gunter reclassified  Corynebacterium acnes  into the genus Propionibacterium as  Propionibacterium acnes , based on its characteristic catabolic process in relation to oxygen whereby it produces propionic acid in an oxygen-inhibited environment ( Douglas & Gunter, 1946 ). In 2016, the advent of more comprehensive genome analysis which included 16S rRNA sequences, DNA G+C content, genome size, and peptidoglycan content, revealed significant differences between the cutaneous members of the  Propionibacteriaceae  family which were part of the human skin microbiota, and the classic  Propionibacteria  which were generally isolated from dairy sources. This resulted in the transfer of the cutaneous species into a new genus  Cutibacterium , resulting in the reclassification of  Propionibacterium acnes  into  Cutibacterium acnes  ( Scholz & Kilian, 2016 ). Based on these findings, the new genus,  Cutibacterium  gen. nov. which accommodated the previous cutaneous species including  Cutibacterium acnes ,  Cutibacterium avidum, Cutibacterium granulosum, Cutibacterium namnetense  and  Cutibacterium humerusii,  was defined ( Scholz & Kilian, 2016 ). In 2020,  Cutibacterium modestum , a minor member of the skin microbiome, was also included in the genus  Cutibacterium  ( Dekio et al., 2021 ). For easy understanding, the classification of  C. acnes  over time until the present has been summarized in  Fig. 1 .\nStudies:  Unna (1986) ;  Gilchrist (1900) ;  Orla-Jensen (1909) ;  Bergey et al. (1923) ;  Douglas & Gunter (1946) ;  Scholz & Kilian (2016) .\nBased on the diverse cell wall compositions,  Cutibacterium acnes  can be classified into several ribotypes ( Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ), whereby specific ribotypes have been shown to have strong correlation with acne lesions, underscoring the pathogenic potential of select ribotypes ( McDowell et al., 2013 ).\nC. acnes , a Gram positive bacteria, has a characteristically thick peptidoglycan (PGN) cell wall layer. The PGN is composed of N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid, forming a mesh-like structure through cross-linked peptide chains ( Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ). Embedded within this layer are teichoic acids, crucial in maintaining ion homeostasis to keep the cell wall integrity intact. The PGN layer in  C. acnes  also contains unique components which include L-acid L-diaminopelic and D-alanine in the peptide layer which are not found in other Gram positive bacteria ( Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ). Furthermore,  C. acnes  posseses two unique lipids, phosphatidylinositol and triglycerol, in addition to the common lipids, making the cell wall and envelope distinctive ( Jeon et al., 2018 ). Further analyses have also revealed the presence of a lipid anchor composed of fatty acids and a polysaccharide moeity containing significant amounts of mannose, glucose, galactose, and an amino sugar, likely to be diaminohexuronic acid ( Whale et al., 2004 ).  Figure 2  illustrates a schematic diagram of the  C. acnes  cell wall.\nCreated using Inkscape 1.2 (Inkscape Project. (2020) based on  Mayslich, Grange & Dupin (2021) ,  Sagar et al. (2019)  and  Kaiser et al. (2023) .\nThe genome of  C acnes  encodes for at least 12 putative lipases ( Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ). Out of these, glycerol-ester hydrolase A (GehA), a triacylglycerol lipase, thought to be present on the cell membrane of  C. acnes,  was the first molecule to be identified as a putative virulence factor for this bacteria ( Palmieri et al., 2021 ). These lipases, particularly GehA, digest the sebum on human skin, to release free fatty acids which induce inflammation through the increase in the production of inflammatory cytokines ( Li et al., 2017 ). Lipases facilitate the adherence of  C. acnes  to one another and to other surfaces, hence enhancing their attachment to in-dwelling medical devices such as surgical implants ( Scott & Burkhart, 2023 ).\nInitially,  C. acnes  was divided into two serotypes based on serological agglutination tests and the sugar content in the cell wall. Type 1 contained glucose, mannose and galactose, whereas Type II lacked galactose in the cell wall ( Johnson & Cummins, 1972 ).\nHowever,  C acnes  was further divided into phyloptypes I, II and III based on the different cellular properties, biochemical characteristics, immune-inducing abilities and virulence factors, all of which were closely associated to their roles in diseases ( Dreno et al., 2024 ). Using the whole-genome sequencing data, the type I phylotype was further subdivided into four subphylotypes; IA 1 , IA 2 , IB and IC, totaling up to six phylotypes ( Corvec et al., 2019 ;  Dréno et al., 2018 ;  Dreno et al., 2024 ;  McLaughlin et al., 2019 ).\nThe different  C. acnes  phylotypes have been linked to specific skin conditions. Phylotype IA 1  is predominantly found in acne-prone skin, while phylotypes IB, II, and III are more common on healthy skin ( Dagnelie et al., 2018 ;  Dessinioti & Katsambas, 2024 ;  Dréno et al., 2018 ). The reduction in phylotype diversity on acneic skin, with IA 1  being the dominant strain, alters the skin’s microenvironment and promotes inflammation, leading to comedone formation ( Dreno et al., 2024 ). Phylotype IA 1  is also known to be the most potent producers of biofilm, thus making this phylotype to be more likely to mature into three-dimensional biofilms, sticking to surfaces ( Ruffier d’Epenoux et al., 2024 ).\nOther  C. acnes  phylotypes have been linked to other types of infections: IB and II are associated with orthopedic infections, while IB and IC are frequently found in urinary tract and prostate infections ( Boisrenoult, 2018 ;  Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ).\nOne important aspect of  C. acnes’  pathogenicity is its ability to develop biofilms. Biofilms aid in the development of resistance towards antibiotics, which make infections challenging to treat using these therapeutic agents. In addition, biofilms shield the bacteria from environmental stress and the host immune system, this increasing the survival of these pathogens ( Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ). Due to these reasons, it is vital to conduct research on the processes of biofilm formation since antibiotic-resistant  C. acnes  infections are increasingly found among implantable medical devices.\nThis narrative review provides a comprehensive analysis of the biofilm-forming capabilities of  C. acnes  and the implications for antibiotic resistance. This review also explores the impact of biofilm-related infections on implantable devices and discussing recent advances in therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing antibiotic efficacy. In addition, this review explored some potential therapeutic avenues that could lead to more effective management of  C. acnes -associated infections, particularly those complicated by biofilm formation.\n\nThis narrative review systematically examined existing research on  C. acnes  biofilm development in medical implants, antibiotic resistance in  C. acnes  and therapeutic interventions to minimize this issue. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases like NCBI, Google Scholar, and Research Gate, with inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined in  Table 1 . The methodology for data collection in this review involved systematically extracting relevant information from each primary study related to the anti-biofilm activity and  C. acnes , included in the sample, focusing on information pertinent to the topic. Subsequently, the review team collated, summarized, and organized, the extracted evidence to synthesize a comprehensive understanding of the topic.\n\nThe ability of  C. acnes  to form biofilms was first described by  Tunney et al. (1999) , who found this on prosthetic hip implants. Subsequent studies demonstrated that biofilm formation by  C. acnes  occurred on a variety of other implants and highlighted the detrimental effects of this characteristic on treatment options, including antibiotic therapy ( Rieger et al., 2013 ;  Rieger et al., 2014 ).\nBiofilms are complex communities of bacteria encased in a self-produced matrix of substances like polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA. This matrix creates a unique microenvironment with gradients of nutrients, oxygen, and pH, that provides a niche which shields bacteria from external threats, including antibiotics ( Uruén et al., 2020 ). This protective layer cause the bacteria to become significantly more resistant to antimicrobial agents compared to their planktonic counterparts. Biofilms provide a safe haven for bacteria to survive and multiply, thus becoming reservoirs for recurrent infections leading to chronic and persistent infections even after treatment ( Wood et al., 2012 ;  Sharma et al., 2024 ).\nC. acnes  biofilm production is characterized by the increased secretion of virulence factors such as lipases compared to the planktonic version of  C. acnes  ( Coenye, Peeters & Nelis, 2007 ). The biofilms pose a significant challenge to antibiotic therapy by hindering drug absorption and action efficacy, which is one of the main drug mechanisms ( Dessinioti & Katsambas, 2017 ;  Mayslich, Grange & Dupin, 2021 ).\nThe production of biofilms by  C. acnes  is especially alarming in relation to orthopedic implant-associated infections and other device-related problems. Multiple factors can affect the capacity of  C. acnes  to develop biofilms on medical devices including implant surfaces, bone microenvironment and bacterial internalization ( Varin-Simon et al., 2025 ). Different implant materials such as titanium alloys and polymers, have different surface roughness that influences biofilm formation of  C. acnes . The presence of osseous tissue can influence biofilm properties, with some strains known to modify adhesion and biofilm composition when subjected to bone microenvironments. This was demonstrated in a study by  Mongaret et al. (2020)  who showed that commensal  C. acnes  strains significantly increased the biofilm formation (2.8-fold) after internalization into bone cells, an effect that was further amplified on titanium surfaces. Different phylotypes of  C. acnes  also demonstrate differing capacities in biofilm formation. Using microtiter plate experiments,  Kuehnast et al. (2018)  showed that IA 1  isolates exhibited the largest quantities of biofilm, followed by isolates of the IC, IA 2 , and II phylotypes. Another interesting finding was that a community comprising of two distinct phylotypes of  C. acnes  that displayed unique transcriptional profiles exhibited enhanced biofilm formation compared to a single-strain community ( Bjerg et al., 2024 ). A recent report showed  C. acnes  isolates from a deep seated infection in a prosthetic joint belonged to the IA 1  phylotype, indicating this particular phylotype’s ability to cause invasive infections ( Both et al., 2023 ).\nC. acnes  have been found to form biofilms on many prosthesis-related materials, including polymethylmethacrylate bone cement as well as the materials used in prothesis fabrication such as titanium alloys (TiA), cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and stainless steel ( Bidossi et al., 2020 ;  Garcia et al., 2020 ;  Ramage et al., 2003 ). The formation of biofilms on medical devices often leads to chronic infections and implant failures, particularly in older populations where neurosurgical implants are common. This issue is gaining prominence, highlighting the urgent need for effective strategies to counter biofilm-related complications ( Caldara et al., 2022 ;  Gharamti & Kanafani, 2017 ;  Conen et al., 2020 ).\nIn addition,  C. acnes  has been found to be a major cause of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt infections. Diagnosing  C. acnes  infections can be challenging due to difficulties in culturing the bacterium ( Prozan et al., 2020 ;  Beaver et al., 2021 ). Elevated inflammatory markers were observed in both CSF and brain tissues of rats inserted  C. acnes -infected catheters ( Beaver et al., 2021 ). Additionally, infections of postoperative central nervous system (CNS) and cranial neurosurgeries are frequently associated with  C. acnes , emphasizing its importance as a causative agent ( Prozan et al., 2020 ;  Strahm et al., 2018 ).\nC. acnes  has also been implicated in infections related to cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), representing a significant portion of atypical pathogen cases. Strains isolated from device surfaces have shown a propensity to form biofilms, contributing to persistent infections ( Kohli et al., 2021 ;  Okuda et al., 2018 ). Furthermore,  C. acnes -infective endocarditis cases often involve prosthetic valve endocarditis or infections associated with annuloplasty rings ( Banzon et al., 2017 ). These findings underscore the necessity to improve diagnostic methods and to increase awareness of  C. acnes  infections, particularly in the context of CNS and cardiovascular device-related infections.\nC. acnes  has also been found to be a causative agent in chronic breast implant infection and related capsular contractures complication. This could lead to post-operative infectious complications which are among the leading causes of surgical readmission ( Hanna et al., 2023 ). In orthopedic settings, the Debridement Antibiotic Pearls and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) technique aims to combat infections by removing intra-articular biofilm using antibiotic-loaded beads, resulting in a high success rate in preventing periprosthetic joint (PJI) infections ( Indelli et al., 2023 ). An example is using synthetic calcium sulfate beads loaded with antibiotics which efficiently inhibit bacterial growth, preventing and minimizing biofilm formation—the main factor contributing to periprosthetic infections. Although antibiotic-loaded beads have the potential to reduce biofilms, total eradication is still difficult, highlighting the importance of early intervention to stop infection ( Howlin et al., 2015 ). In a related study, using combined titanium implants with local drug delivery systems have shown promise in enhancing orthopedic therapies by improving antibacterial effects and stimulating osseointegration ( Ma et al., 2021 ). These novel methods of treating biofilm-related infections in patients with surgical implants could improve the overall outcome of the patient by reducing such complications.\nNonetheless, future research should prioritize conducting  in vivo  studies to better replicate clinical conditions, as current investigations are predominantly limited to  in vitro  environments that may not fully capture the complexity of biofilm-associated infections. A deeper understanding of the genetic and biochemical pathways involved in biofilm formation and maintenance is essential, which can be achieved through multi-omics approaches—including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics—to comprehensively unravel host-pathogen interactions and microbiome dynamics. Additionally, developing sophisticated animal models and  ex vivo  systems that closely mimic human skin and implant environments can provide more physiologically relevant platforms for testing therapeutic interventions.\nIn addition, despite the major advances in therapeutic options, the treatment of biofilm-related infections is further complicated by the increase in antibiotic-resistance among the biofilm-forming  C. acnes  isolates.\n\nThe first antibiotic resistance case in acne was observed in the 1970s and involved  C. acnes  isolates ( Pannu et al., 2011 ). In the 1980s, the cases of antibiotic resistance in acne increased to a point that they became a main concern in dermatology ( Humphrey, 2012 ). Studies have highlighted varying levels of antibiotic resistance among  C. acnes  strains isolated from acne patients from diverse geographic regions, underscoring the global significance of this issue. Given that biofilm formation has been observed in acne samples, understanding the antibiotic resistance profiles of these isolates is crucial.  Table 2  summarizes data from studies conducted worldwide on antibiotic resistance among  C. acnes  isolates.\nBased on  Table 2 , data collected from various regions showed that  C. acnes  consistently exhibited resistance to clindamycin and erythromycin possibly due to the frequent usage of both antibiotics for treatment of acne vulgaris ( Coates et al., 2002 ), who noted that these isolates were resistant to both these antibiotics in the samples tested. The data analyzed showed that in India  C. acnes  had the highest resistance to clindamycin which accounted for 90.4% of the patients’ samples analyzed. The data in  Table 2  also showed that  C. acnes  developed the highest resistance against erythromycin particularly among the patients from Jordan and Israel.  C. acnes  isolated from Thailand, India, and Jordan, exhibited equally high resistance to multiple antibiotics, highlighting the urgent need for effective treatment strategies. Particularly alarming is the increasing resistance to newer antibiotics like doxycycline and minocycline, which if not kept in check, will limit the already restricted treatment options.\nBased on data from 39 studies conducted globally, there is a marked increase in resistance towards erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole ( Beig et al., 2024 ). The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the  C. acnes  differ in resistance patterns due to the varied antibiotic prescribing regime of the individual countries.\nGiven the limitations of conventional antibiotic therapy in treating  C. acnes , studies have explored various strategies to enhance antibiotic efficacy, including synergistic combinations and alternative agents. Using a combination of antibiotics with different mechanisms of action could enhance treatment efficacy. For instance, combining antibiotics with agents that disrupt the biofilm matrix could improve drug penetration to erradicate biofilm-forming bacteria ( Bari et al., 2023 ). Developing agents specifically targeting the biofilm matrix or the biofilm-forming process in  C. acnes  can prevent biofilm formation or promote biofilm dispersal. Enzymes that degrade extra polymeric substances (EPS) components within the biofilm or molecules that inhibit quorum sensing are potential candidates in these strategies ( Sikdar & Elias, 2020 ). Using combined antibiotics like rifampin with β-lactams or clindamycin, and combinations of antibiotics with calcium sulfate, or with povidone-iodine have been shown to successfully treat periprosthetic joint infections caused by biofilm-associated  C. acnes  ( Kusejko et al., 2021 ). A clinical trial in USA showed that dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, was effective in reducing biofilm formation by other similar Gram positive bacteria ( Goodman-Meza et al., 2025 ), highlighting the potential of this agent as a promising antibiotic against  C. acnes  biofilms which merits further investigation ( Gatti et al., 2021 ).\nOn top of developing new agents to combat antibiotic resistance in  C. acnes , continuous monitoring of antibiotic resistance patterns particularly to the front-line acne antibiotics such as clindamycin, erythromycin, and doxycycline, should be implemented through global and regional surveillance networks. These surveillance efforts must extend beyond traditional approaches by studying the dynamics of resistance development within biofilms  versus  planktonic cells, as biofilm-associated bacteria often exhibit distinct resistance mechanisms and profiles compared to their planktonic counterparts. Furthermore, investigating the impact of antibiotic stewardship programs on resistance rates in dermatological practice can provide valuable insights into how prudent antibiotic usage can slow or prevent the emergence of resistant strains, ultimately contributing towards evidence-based prescribing guidelines and preserving the efficacy of existing therapeutic options.\n\nWith the increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance, researchers are looking towards alternative antibacterial agents to inhibit biofilm formation and subsequently curb bacterial infections. Medicinal plants and other natural compounds have been the focus of such research, offering novel therapeutic options to address antimicrobial resistance ( Himanshu et al., 2023 ;  Kong et al., 2022 ). Some of these studies have been summarized in  Table 3 .\nAlgae, particularly red algae, are rich in bioactive compounds like polysaccharides and terpenoids, exhibiting potent  in-vitro  anti-inflammatory effects. However studies regarding the antibacterial activity of these Rhodophyta sp. against  C. acnes  and  S. epidermidis  are limited ( Januário et al., 2021 ). Green macroalgae have also been shown to exhibit antibacterial activity against  C. acnes . Polysaccharide and oligosaccharide fractions from  Ulva  sp. at 1,000 µg/mL were shown to reduce the inflammation on both acneic and non-acneic  C. acnes  strains on keratinocytes ( in-vitro ) by up to 39.8%, demonstrating promising biological activity for potential dermo-cosmetic applications ( Fournière et al., 2021 ). However, before these compounds can be considered as potential cosmeceutical products, these compounds need to be assessed for long-term safety, and compatibility with human skin. Further investigations especially on crude plant extracts with regards to biofilm development in  C. acnes , and subsequently, pre-clinical and clinical trials are required.\nMedicinal plants have been used throughout the centuries as therapeutic agents against various ailments particularly infections. These category of plants are rich in phytochemical compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and tannins, which exhibit antimicrobial properties effective against a broad spectrum of pathogens, including those forming biofilms. The following examples highlight medicinal plants that have shown antibacterial effects against  C. acnes.\nHelichrysum odoratissimum  combats acne by directly inhibitng the growth of  C. acnes  and also the formation of biofilm where the extract exerted a strong anti-adherence effect ( De Canha et al., 2020 ).  Callicarpa americana  leaf extracts inhibit the growth of  C. acnes , whereby 30–40% drop in biofilm formation was observed ( Pineau et al., 2019 ).  Humulus lupulus , or Hop extract was shown to inhibit  in vitro  biofilm formation of multidrug-resistant  C. acnes , thus indicating this plants promising usage to treating skin conditions including acne ( Di Lodovico et al., 2020 ).\nTraditional medicinal plants like black ginger,  Cotoneaster  species, and  Psidium guajava  were reported to contain antimicrobial properties against  C. acnes  in  in vitro  experiments. Among the three,  Cotoneaster  species extracts not only exhibited antibacterial activities against  C. acnes , but also antibiofilm properties and are non-cytotoxic ( Krzemińska et al., 2022 ;  Sitthichai et al., 2022 ).\nPropolis, a resinous secretion from bees, is a substance rich in plant-derived phytochemicals. Propolis has been shown to exhibit significant anti-biofilm activity against several skin pathogens including  C. acnes  by downregulating genes essential for bacterial attachment and colonization, while maintaining the natural biodiversity of the skin microbiome ( Athanasopoulou et al., 2025 ).\nPsidium guajava , although not studied extensively, possesses phytochemicals with potential antibiofilm mechanisms ( Gutierrez-Montiel et al., 2023 ). Witch hazel ( Hamamelis virginiana  l.), while lacking direct antibacterial or antibiofilm effects against  C. acnes , possesses potent anti-inflammatory properties, that could alleviate acne symptoms ( Piazza et al., 2022 ).\nEssential oils (EO) from various plants have extensive industrial applications, with thyme EO showing potent bactericidal and antibiofilm effects against  C. acnes  and  S. epidermidis , attributed to thymol ( Abdelhamed et al., 2022 ;  Zhang et al., 2022 ). Oregano EO exhibits similar potency, while tea tree EO demonstrates synergistic effects with other constituents ( Bungau et al., 2023 ;  Nascimento et al., 2023 ). Green tea extracts inhibit  C. acnes  biofilm formation by modulating autoinducer 2 (AI-2) production ( Cañellas-Santos et al., 2023 ).\nWhile essential oils have shown promising antimicrobial properties, they also have several disadvantages, whereby the antimicrobial activity of essential oils can vary depending on factors such as plant species, geographic origin, extraction method, and storage conditions. Furthermore, essential oils often exhibit a narrow spectrum antimicrobial activity. Volatility, skin sensitivity, interactions with medications, and resistance development are some of the factors that should be considered when working with essential oils as potential antimicrobial agents ( Swamy, Akhtar & Sinniah, 2016 ).\nThese  in vitro  studies highlight how plant-derived compounds offer promising alternatives to combat microbial infections and biofilm formation effectively. However, further investigations using  in vivo  models should carried out before actual therapeutic application can be achieved.\nOther natural antimicrobial compounds derived from bacterial cells represent another promising alternative. Certain bacteria can produce metabolites and bioactive substances capable of inhibiting  C. acnes  growth and disrupting biofilm formation.\nBacillus circulans  fermentation with glucose showed promising results in inhibiting  C. acnes  growth and biofilm formation through the generation of  Kao et al. (2022) . In an  in vivo  study,  C. acnes  culture was injected into the ears of mice to induce an inflammatory response. The subsequent administration of  B. circulans  fermentation culture resulted in an increased electrical production, leading to a reduction in  C. acnes  population, demonstrating a novel way of treating bacterial acne infections ( Kao et al., 2022 ).\nRecent research on a marine actinobacteria  Promicromonospora  sp. extract showed strong quorum quenching activities against various bacterial species including skin pathogens such as  S. epidermidis  and  S. aureus  ( Hoz-Romo et al., 2025 ). In addition, the  Promicromonospora  sp. extracts also exhibited anti-biofilm and anti-oxidant activites, which could be beneficial as a potential therapeutic option for skincare management.\nMicroorganisms are also known to secrete biosurfactants, that possess the ability to reduce interfacial tension and inhibit biofilm formation. A glycolipid biosurfactant from the  Acinetobacter  M6 strain effectively reduced biofilm formation by 82.5% in MRSA bacteria ( Karnwal et al., 2023 ). The possibility of using biosurfactant as an antimicrobial agent to combat  C. acnes  infections should be further researched. Similarly, sophorolipids, a type of glycolipid biosurfactant embedded in plant-based composites, demonstrated antimicrobial efficiency against  C. acnes  ( Cho et al., 2022 ).\nOther compounds including indoles and farnesol, have been researched as potential antibacterial agents. Indoles are common natural compounds that have a bicyclic structure consisting of a pyrrole ring linked to a benzene ring. They can be found among humans as well as in bacteria and plants. Most remarkably, indoles serve as critical signaling molecules in bacterial and eukaryotic species alike. An investigation into 20 indoles’ antibacterial properties revealed that 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM) significantly inhibited planktonic cell growth and biofilm formation in  C. acnes . DIM also suppressed multispecies biofilm formation and repressed biofilm-related genes in  C. acnes  suggesting a promising avenue for future research ( Kim et al., 2022 ). Farnesol, with its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, showed promise in acne treatment through topical application, even though this compound was not directly tested on  C. acnes  biofilms but nonetheless, is worth mentioning as  C. acnes  biofilm has a significant role in acne formation ( Wu et al., 2021 ).\nBacteriophages are viruses that infect and replicate within bacteria before lysing the bacterial cells. Since bacteriophages are highly specific to their host target which are bacteria, they can act as potential therapeutic agents against bacterial infections, including those caused by  C. acnes  ( Fernández et al., 2019 ). One of the most crucial advantage of utilising phages is that phages are highly specific to their target bacterial species or even strains, which allow for precise targeting of pathogens like  C. acnes  while sparing other beneficial bacteria. Upon infecting a bacterial cell, phages inject their genetic material, which then hijacks the host bacterial machinery to replicate phage components. As a result, the bacterial cell lyses, releasing new phage particles to infect neighboring bacteria ( Lin et al., 2022 ). An  in vitro  study using bacteriophages, PAP 1-1 and TCUCAP1, have shown promise in combating  C. acnes  infections. PAP 1-1 was shown to effectively control  C. acnes  proliferation, either as a single compound or in combination with other antimicrobial compounds such as nicin ( Han, Khan & Moon, 2023 ). TCUCAP1, isolated from healthy volunteers’ skin, was shown to significantly reduce inflammatory lesions caused by multi-drug-resistant (MDR)  C. acnes  on mice model with induced skin inflammation ( Lam et al., 2021 ). Efforts to formulate TCUCAP1 into a hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) cream suggest the potential of commercialising a product developed from bacteriophage as a novel antibacterial and antibiofilm agent to treat acne infections ( Sá et al., 2023 ). A recent study on a novel lytic bacteriophage Corretto demonstrated a near-complete eradication of biofilms produced by multiple strains of  C. acnes  ( Frantar et al., 2025 ). Since this isolate was obtained from human saliva, this  in vitro  study highlighted the potential of using this bacteriophage to treat persistent  C. acnes  infections in dental implants where conventional antibiotics fail.\nThe potential therapeutic benefits of the groups of natural agents based on effectiveness, safety and scalability has been summarized in  Table 4 . Overall, bacteriophages have the greatest therapeutic potential due to its superior effectiveness and specificity, despite moderate scalability challenges. Bacterial compounds and biosurfactants, on the other hand, offer a good balance of safety, effectiveness and scalability, which is more ideal commercially. Plant extracts provide the best scalability with proven safety, along with a moderate to high effectiveness. However, there is the issue of standardization and quality control as active compounds in plants vary among species, geographical distribution, climate, soil conditions, which would negatively impact commercial production. Nonetheless, there are many plant-based topical products available in the market, such as antibacterial creams and formulations which are neem-based, tea tree oil, tumeric-based products, all of which do not have available clinical data. In addition, liposome- and niosome-based formulations as antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents for topical usage progressing into the late preclinical stages ( Teo et al., 2025 ). Nonetheless, all the natural agents will require further testing and  in vivo  validation before clinical application can be considered.\nA summary table comparing the groups of natural substances based on effectiveness, safety and scalability as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of  C. acnes  infections.\n\nDermatological strategy of using a 30% supramolecular salicylic acid peel, targets to redress the skin microbiota imbalance which is associated with acne. Clinical trials revealed a decreased abundance of  C. acnes  and Staphylococcus after treatment, suggesting potential therapeutic effects ( Shao et al., 2023 ).\nAnother  in vitro  study evaluated a serum’s efficacy in eliminating the formation of biofilm by  C. acnes . The active ingredients in this serum were Niacinamide (4%),10-Hydroxydecanoic acid, Sebacic acid, Ceramide 3, Phytosphingosine, Ceramide 6 II, Ceramide 1, Dimethylmethoxy Chromanol, D-d-tocopherol-containing compounds alongside emollients and occlusive agents to address skin barrier function. The serum was reported to effectively eradicate preformed biofilms, based on experimental data on  C. acnes  grown on both two-dimensional HaCaT keratinocyte monolayer cultures and three-dimensional tissue models including Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) and Human Corneal Epithelium (HCE) ( Sommatis et al., 2022 ). The results showed that the antibiofilm effect was concentration-dependent, indicating its potential to disrupt biofilm formation and mitigate acne pathogenesis ( Sommatis et al., 2022 ).\nAn  in vitro  study on combating common scalp microorganisms like  C. acnes  using a non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) formulation, Hydro Deluxe, was evaluated. The HA formulation was assessed on a three-dimensional Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) model infected with bacterial strains to induce an inflammatory response. The HA formulation was shown to exhibit potent antibiofilm activity without causing cytotoxicity and significantly reduced the expression of the pro-inflammatory marker Interleukin-8 (IL-8) ( Sommatis et al., 2021 ).\nVarious nanoparticle techniques including antimicrobial peptides, photothermal treatment, and polymer-based drug delivery systems offer promising solutions against bacterial infections and biofilm-related resistance. Nanoparticles like liposomes and micelles increase drug bioavailability and enhance antibacterial properties against  C. acnes  biofilms. Liposomes loaded with DNase I and proteinase K have demonstrated antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities, while chitosan and hyaluronic acid nanoparticles could deliver clindamycin effectively to target sites, inhibiting bacterial growth ( Himanshu et al., 2023 ;  Singh et al., 2021 ).\nLiposomes, known for their industrial-scale production and biocompatibility, are nanocarriers for nutraceuticals, and can serve as effective carriers for antibacterial agents. Enzyme-loaded cationic liposomes exhibit antibacterial and antibiofilm properties against  C. acnes . Chitosan and hyaluronic acid nanoparticles loaded with clindamycin were shown to efficiently inhibit bacterial growth at the hair follicle unit, demonstrating potential for acne treatment ( Makhlouf, Ali & Al-Sayah, 2023 ).\nNanomaterials combined with photothermal and photodynamic therapies, known as photo-nanodermatology, offer new avenues for acne treatment. Curcumin encapsulated in liposomal gold nanoparticles allow the delivery of plant extracts to the hair follicles. Once it reaches the target site, photothermal transduction will be induced, destroying sebaceous glands and exerting a bactericidal effect ( Chakraborty, Narayanan & Gautam, 2022 ). However this was not tested directly on  C. acnes  biofilms and requires further research.\nIn the realm of acne treatment, nanoparticles offer innovative solutions targeting both the bacteria and inflammation associated with acne vulgaris. Immunomodulatory nanoparticles, exemplified by nitric oxide-releasing formulations, effectively combat  C. acnes  by inhibiting bacterial growth and suppressing the inflammatory response triggered by microbial invasion ( Qin et al., 2015 ). Similarly, solid lipid nanoparticles used in conjunction with chitosan and tretinoin, demonstrate potent inhibition of  C. acnes  while ensuring compatibility with skin cells, showcasing their potential for topical application ( Latter et al., 2019 ).\nRecent studies explore the efficacy of plant-derived nanoparticles in acne management. Herbal topical gels incorporating silver nanoparticles derived from Neem ( Azadirachta indica ) and  Curcuma caesia  rhizome have been shown to exhibit significant antibacterial activity against  C. acnes , presenting promising therapeutic options with minimal adverse effects ( Baby et al., 2022 ;  Chutoprapat, Kopongpanich & Chan, 2022 ).\nNiosomes have the potential in acne treatment due to their ability to penetrate the skin effectively and release drugs continuously, In a clinical study, 45 Egyptian patients with acne vulgaris were treated using methylene blue niosomal hydrogel photodynamic therapy. It was reported the formulation effectively targeted acne lesions and reduce inflammation ( El-Mahdy et al., 2020 ) with minimal adverse effects observed ( Vyas, Kumar Sonker & Gidwani, 2014 ).\nAntimicrobial peptides (AMPs) serve as key effectors in the innate immune response. A study by  Kim et al. (2025)  showed two peptides, DAP-7 and DAP-10, specifically designed against  C. acnes , demonstrated significant anti-microbial activity against both antibiotic resistant and sensitive strains of  C. acnes . These two novel AMPs disrupt the bacterial cell membranes of  C. acnes , resulting in cell rupture. In addition, the AMPs were shown to reduce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in  C. acnes,  while exhibiting minimal toxicity to human cells. This research offers a potential new therapeutic approach for treating  C. acnes  infections, particularly important given the growing problem of antibiotic resistance ( Kim et al., 2025 ). The dual action of these peptides—both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory—are especially valuable for treating acne and prosthetic joint infections where  C. acnes  is implicated as the causative agent. In another study,  Karnwal et al. (2023)  has developed and synthesized a series of peptides P1: Rhamnolipids, P2: Sophorolipids, P3: Mannosylerythritol lipids (MELs), P4: Lipopeptides, P5: Trehalolipids, P6: Glycolipids. P1 to P6 with demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy against  C. acnes  and  Staphylococcus aureus , suggesting their potential in combating dermal infections ( Karnwal et al., 2023 ). All six peptides showed no cytotoxicity, antimicrobial, or antioxidative properties based on their structural characteristics. All the peptides with the exception of P1 and P3 showed different bioactivity when adsorbed onto bacterial cellulose scaffolds, demonstrating the potential to be develop into topical application ( Golonka et al., 2021 ). In addition, C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) potentially affect  C. acnes , biofilm metabolism through zinc competition within the biofilms structure ( Ovcharova et al., 2023 ).\nSeveral cosmetic interventions targeting  C. acnes  biofilms have been developed including MPA-RegulTM (vegetal polysaccharide rich in gluconic acid), PS291 ® , UTW ® , and ACNILYS ® . These interventions have been found to suppress biofilm formation, decrease biofilm thickness and density, and disrupt biofilm structure, thus offering effective and promising solutions for managing  C. acnes -related conditions ( Fournière et al., 2020 ;  Ionescu et al., 2015 ;  Enault et al., 2014 ;  Gannesen et al., 2019 ;  Wunnoo, Saising & Voravuthikunchai, 2017 ). The properties of these four products are summarized in  Table 5 .\nEach of the four products indicates the mechanism of action and their effects on biofilms produced by  C. acnes .\n\nRecent advancements in electrochemical devices have shown promising potential in combating  C. acnes  biofilms and other microbial biofilms without relying on antibiotics.\nOne such innovation is the electrochemical bandage (e-bandage) composed of carbon fabric, that continuously releases low levels of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) to target bacterial biofilms. The e-bandage was tested on  C. acnes  as individual and co-culture with results showing a reduction in viable cell counts  in vitro  study, after 48 h of treatment. This demonstrates the potential of the e-bandage as an antibiotic-free treatment for chronic wound infections ( Raval et al., 2021 ).\nA new electrochemical scaffold, called an e-scaffold, can target microbial biofilms by continuously releasing safe dosages of HOCl. This device was tested against biofilms developed from 33 single bacterial isolates, and combinations of two bacterial species, including those resistant to antibiotics. When energized at 1.5 V, the e-scaffold effectively reduced the number of viable bacterial cells in both single-species and dual-species biofilms, highlighting its efficacy against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The HOCl production was achieved by electrochemically converting chloride ions to chlorine, which then formed HOCl in water. These findings suggest that electrochemical devices utilizing H 2 O 2  and HOCl have promising applications in combating microbial biofilms and may offer alternative strategies for managing infections ( Flurin et al., 2021 ).  Figure 3  illustrates the mechanism of action of these innovative electrochemical devices against biofilms. The e-bandage and the e-scaffold offer an antibiotic-free strategy for targeting  C. acnes  and other microbial biofilms. However, these innovative devices require further refinement to optimize its safety, efficacy, and clinical usability before it can be integrated as therapeutic options in the clinical setting. After establishing this foundation, pilot studies targeting wound care and implant-related infections, especially chronic cases, can be initiated.\nPolystyrene surfaces coated with plasma, serum, or albumin, were studied for their impact on  C. acnes  adhesion and biofilm formation. Protein pre-adsorption or simultaneous addition with bacterial cells significantly reduced  C. acnes  attachment and biofilm formation compared to controls. Blood components with calcium was found to be able to inhibit the bacterial adhesion process whilst zinc was reported to reduce biofilm formation of  C. acnes . Interestingly,  C. acnes  cells did not adhere to erythrocytes, suggesting a preference for environments with lower plasma content ( Polyudova, Eroshenko & Korobov, 2018 ). The real-world impact of surface coatings and blood component treatments in actual implant settings need to be further investigated to bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical applications.\n\nC. acnes  produces biofilms that contribute to its virulence and ability to establish chronic infections, particularly on indwelling medical devices. Understanding how these biofilms develop is crucial for finding better ways to prevent and treat these infections. Researchers are exploring new treatment options, particularly because antibiotic resistance is making current treatments less effective.\nAlthough some studies have shown promising results with plant-based and nanomaterial treatments, there are still challenges. Many studies use lab models that do not fully reflect real-life conditions, and lack further validation in the way of pre-clinical and clinical trials to accurately measure treatment effectiveness. Additionally, plant-based treatments face issues such as variability in their active ingredients, difficulty in creating stable formulations, and slow regulatory approval. Nanomaterials also raise concerns on its safety, environmental impact, and the risk of bacteria developing resistance over time ( Ngoepe, Schoeman & Roux, 2025 ).\nTo improve future treatments options,  in vitro  research need to be developed and further refined into  in vivo  studies using animal models and eventually in actual patients. Subsequently, larger-scale clinical trials with heterogeneous participant groups are required to establish the reliability and clinical effectiveness of these therapeutic approaches against  C. acnes , with particular focus on deep-tissue infections and implant-associated biofilm formation. Standardizing plant extracts, optimizing dosages, and understanding how these treatments work will help refine them. An option to minimize the variability of plant sources from different soil types and geographic regions would be the use of large-scale tissue culture that can control these parameters and provide plant material with standardized chemical composition, reliable potency, and batch-to-batch consistency. Combining different therapies may also enhance their effectiveness. Overcoming these challenges can make these alternative treatments to become valuable options for managing  C. acnes  infections which would prove beneficial for clinicians, including dermatologists.\nIn conclusion, despite the fact that these studies offer promising insights into acne biofilm-related infection treatments, further research is needed to bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical applications. With the consideration of many dynamic factors, larger clinical trials with diverse participants is crucial to confirm the effectiveness and safety of each of these approaches. Standardized extracts, optimized dosing, and thorough studies on how these extracts work will guide future drug development. In addition, overcoming formulation challenges and exploring combination therapies with other acne treatments are promising paths to overcome the incidence of drug-resistance when treating  C. acnes  infections. By addressing these points, such therapies and techniques will have the potential to become a strong addition to the  C. acnes  infection treatment regimen, offering patients wider choices for managing their condition.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}