{"paper_id":"e77f42db-76b0-4b4e-808a-d959bab6421b","body_text":"References\nLessey BA, Savaris RF, Ali S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytokeratin 19 fragment for endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(5):551–555.\nDela Cruz C, Del Puerto HL, Rocha ALL, et al. Expression of Nodal, Cripto, SMAD3, phosphorylated SMAD3, and SMAD4 in the proliferative endometrium of women with endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(5):527–533.\nKhan KN, Kitajima M, Inoue T. 17ß-Estradiol and lipopolysaccharide additively promote pelvic inflammation and growth of endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(5):585–594.\nSalmeri FM, Laganà AS, Sofo V, et al. Behavior of TNFα and TNFR1/TNFR2 system in mononuclear cells recovered from peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis at different stages. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(2):165–172.\nKurt RK, Pinar N, Karateke A, et al. Protective effects of colchicine in an experimental rat endometriosis model: histopathological evaluation and assessment of TNF-α levels. Reprod Sci. 2015; 22(2):258–263.\nYuan DZ, Yu LL, Qu T, et al. Identification and characterization of progesterone and estrogen regulated microRNAs in mouse endometrial epithelial cells. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(2):223–234.\nZanatta A, Pereira RM, Rocha AM, et al. The relationship among HOXA10, estrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, and progesterone receptor-B proteins in rectosigmoid endometriosis: a tissue microarray study. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(1):31–37.\nDi Spiezio Sardo A, Florio P, Fernandez LM, et al. The potential role of endometrial nerve fibres in the pathogenesis of pain during endometrial biopsy at office hysteroscopy. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(1): 124–131.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nMaduro, M.R. In the Spotlight. Reprod. Sci. 22, 517–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115578655\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115578655","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}