{"paper_id":"de70c17d-f987-4e02-a236-1d9470c82dfc","body_text":"Struma ovarii , is a specialized form of a mature cystic teratoma, defined as an ovarian teratoma composed predominantly (>50%) of thyroid tissue [ 1 ]. It accounts for approximately 1%–3% of all ovarian teratomas and only 0.3%–1% of all ovarian tumors [ 2 ]. The clinical presentation is often non-specific, including pelvic pain, a palpable mass, or abdominal distension. In about 5%–10% of cases, it can be associated with ascites and, rarely, with pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome (ascites and hydrothorax) [ 3 ].\nThe principal clinical challenge lies in its potential to mimic ovarian malignancy. Preoperative imaging frequently reveals complex, solid-cystic lesions with vascularity, and the serum tumor marker CA-125 can be significantly elevated [ 4 ]. This combination often leads to a preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer, potentially resulting in over-treatment. We present a case from Afghanistan where this diagnostic dilemma was encountered, highlighting the need for awareness of this rare entity in diverse clinical settings.\n\nA 53-year-old Afghan woman presented with abdominal swelling and pain. Ultrasound revealed a pelvic mass and severe ascites. CT showed a complex mass with cystic components and calcification, dimensions 88 × 65 × 21 mm, in favor of a tumoral lesion in the left ovary (O-RADS 5), accompanied by severe ascites due to presumed peritoneal seeding, suggestive of ovarian tumor with peritoneal carcinomatosis ( Fig. 1 ). The uterus, right ovary, and other abdominopelvic areas were reported normal.\nPelvic MRI: (left) sagittal T2-weighted image showing a left adnexal complex cystic-solid mass; (right) fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image showing enhancing solid component (arrow)—O-RADS 5.\nO-RADS 5 classification was assigned because of:(1) irregular solid tissue with contrast enhancement > signal of myometrium, (2) presence of ascites, and (3) peritoneal thickening mimicking implants.\nLaboratory test results were CA-125 = 381 U/ml, TSH = 3.4 mIU/l, T4 = 14 pmol/l, hemoglobin = 7.5 g/dL, hematocrit = 23.3%; other tests were within normal limits.\nThe patient underwent drainage of 5 liters of ascites and laparoscopic biopsy. The biopsy result was reported as thyroid tissue compatible with  struma ovarii  ( Fig. 2 ). Due to the discordance between strong radiologic suspicion (O-RADS 5) and limited biopsy sampling, the multidisciplinary tumor board concluded that sampling error could not be excluded. Consequently, empirical chemotherapy was initiated under the precautionary principle of ‘treating malignancy until proven otherwise.’ The patient was diagnosed with primary peritoneal carcinoma and received three cycles of chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Because the mass persisted and ascites increased, she received four more cycles (total seven cycles) and was referred for oncology consultation due to lack of response.\nIntraoperative photograph of the resected left ovarian specimen revealing a solid-cystic cut surface with glistening appearance, consistent with benign  struma ovarii .\nThe patient was re-examined. MRI showed a multilocular cystic lesion with solid and fatty foci, measuring 100 × 80 mm, color score III (O-RADS 5). Severe ascites with multiple fibrotic septa but without nodularity was reported. No other lesions were seen.\nThe resected left ovarian mass showed a solid-cystic cut surface with glistening appearance. Histopathological examination revealed variably sized thyroid follicles lined by bland follicular cells, with no nuclear atypia, no complex structures, and no mitosis to suggest malignancy ( Fig. 3 ).\nStruma ovarii  pathology. (A) Ovarian tumor with solid-cystic and glistening cut surface. (B) Photomicrograph showing variably sized thyroid follicles lined by bland follicular cells (H&E, ×100). C: Higher power view (H&E, ×100)—no nuclear atypia or mitosis.\nIHC demonstrated PAX8 positive, TTF1 positive, and WT1 negative, confirming thyroid follicular origin.\nThe absence of high-grade cytologic features, capsular or vascular invasion, and extra-ovarian spread distinguished benign  struma ovarii  from malignant  struma ovarii  or metastatic thyroid carcinoma.\nThe mass, which preoperatively mimicked advanced ovarian cancer with its solid and cystic components, is shown after salpingo-oophorectomy. Final histopathology confirmed the diagnosis, explaining the patient’s chemo-resistant ascites and elevated CA-125. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. The patient was discharged on the third postoperative day. At follow-up several days later, she was asymptomatic, and repeat CA-125 had normalized to 17 U/ml.  Table 1  summarizes the chronological diagnostic sequence.\nChronologic diagnostic sequence.\nThe patient’s general condition improved completely, and no recurrence or other problems were observed during 14 months of follow-up after surgery. She was counseled on the extremely low risk of recurrence, and long-term follow-up was advised.\n\nThis case illustrates a classic diagnostic pitfall in gynecologic oncology. The triad of a complex adnexal mass, severe ascites, and a significantly elevated CA-125 is highly suggestive of ovarian carcinoma [ 5 ]. However, as demonstrated, benign conditions like  struma ovarii  can present identically. Meigs syndrome is a rare phenomenon seen in approximately 1% of patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors [ 5–7 ].\nThe elevation of CA-125 is not specific to ovarian cancer. It can be elevated in various benign conditions, including endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and benign ovarian tumors. In  struma ovarii , the mechanism is thought to be related to peritoneal irritation from the tumor or the ascitic fluid itself [ 4 ]. Ascites is found in 15%–30% of  struma ovarii  cases, further confounding the clinical picture [ 3 ].\nRetrospective review of MRI revealed typical indicators of  struma ovarii  that were initially under-recognized: heterogeneous signal with hyperintense cystic components on T1-weighted imaging (due to colloid), iso- to hyperintense signal on T2-weighted imaging with a ‘stained-glass appearance,’ and vascular solid areas on fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced sequences. The absence of restricted diffusion was another suggestive clue. These features were initially overshadowed by the large size, solid nodularity, and ascites which biased classification toward malignancy.\nAccording to O-RADS MRI criteria (version 2022), category 5 is assigned when an enhancing solid component with contrast enhancement > signal of myometrium, ascites, and peritoneal thickening are present. However, O-RADS lacks specificity for rare benign teratomas with thyroid tissue. Therefore, correlation with thyroid function tests and functional imaging (e.g. thyroid scintigraphy) is essential when  struma ovarii  is suspected.\nThe novelty lies in the prolonged misclassification as O-RADS 5 malignancy leading to chemotherapy before definitive surgery, reflecting the diagnostic challenge in resource-limited settings without intra-operative frozen section capability. The paper emphasizes interdisciplinary communication and awareness that benign  struma ovarii  can fully mimic advanced ovarian cancer both biochemically and radiologically.\nOur case is particularly noteworthy due to the patient’s geographic and clinical context. In low -come region, where advanced diagnostic tools like MRI or PET-CT are not widely available, and intraoperative frozen section may be unreliable or absent, reliance on clinical judgment and basic imaging is high. This increases the risk of misdiagnosis and potentially unnecessary radical surgery, as was initially planned in some case. Typical indicators of  struma ovarii , heterogeneous signal with hyperintense cystic components on T1 due to colloid, iso- to hyperintense on T2 with stained-glass appearance, and vascular solid areas, were retrospectively present but under-recognized. These details are now described with sequence names (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced).\nThe literature confirms that  struma ovarii  frequently mimics ovarian malignancy. Yoo et al. reported that 40% of cases were preoperatively misdiagnosed as cancer [ 8 ]. Several case reports highlight pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome (ascites, pleural effusion) with elevated CA-125 as the primary driver of diagnostic error [ 4 ,  6 ,  9 ]. Erciyestepe et al. described a hormonally active  struma ovarii  in a 72-year-old woman presenting with a large multilobulated mass and ascites [ 7 ]. Liu et al. documented a giant  struma ovarii  with pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome [ 10 ]. Across all reports, the key lesson is identical: benign  struma ovarii  can clinically and radiologically mimic advanced ovarian cancer. Definitive diagnosis requires histopathology, and conservative surgery is curative in benign cases [ 1–5 ,  11 ].\nA clinical analysis by Yang and Yu examines the diagnosis and treatment of 11 cases of  struma ovarii , a rare, typically benign ovarian tumor composed of thyroid tissue, supplemented by a literature review. The study likely details the clinical and radiological presentation of these tumors, including the diagnostic challenges they pose, such as their potential to mimic ovarian malignancy through imaging or elevated tumor markers like CA-125, and emphasizes that a definitive diagnosis is achieved through postoperative histopathology. Their work reaffirms that the standard treatment is surgical, with the specific approach (cystectomy or oophorectomy) tailored to preserve fertility, when possible, based on patient age, tumor characteristics, and surgical findings [ 12 ].\nThe management of benign  struma ovarii  in a young woman wishing to preserve fertility is conservative surgery, such as cystectomy or oophorectomy [ 1–5 ]. In our patient, who was older and had completed her family, the performed surgery was ultimately adequate and because the uterus and ovaries were atrophic and normal, as well as the patient’s performance, there was no need for more extensive surgery.\nThyroid scintigraphy was unavailable locally at the time. Given the patient’s critical status and limited resources, management proceeded to chemotherapy without functional confirmation of the thyroid origin of the mass.\n\nThis case from Afghanistan serves as a crucial reminder for clinicians worldwide, especially in resource-limited settings, to include  struma ovarii  in the differential diagnosis of a complex ovarian mass. While the clinical and serological features can be alarmingly similar to ovarian carcinoma, definitive diagnosis rests on histopathology. Efforts should be made to secure a frozen section intraoperatively, when possible, to guide surgical extent and prevent overtreatment. Clinicians and radiologists should recognize that  struma ovarii  may mimic ovarian malignancy even when CA-125 is markedly elevated. MRI features such as T1 hyperintense cystic components (due to colloid) and a ‘stained-glass’ appearance on T2-weighted imaging should raise suspicion for this benign entity, and these findings must always be correlated with thyroid function tests and, when feasible, thyroid scintigraphy. Furthermore, O-RADS criteria should be applied with clinical flexibility and multidisciplinary consultation whenever an unusual imaging pattern (solid plus cystic components with ascites) is encountered in a suspected benign teratoma.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}