{"paper_id":"d8ca1e11-be77-4d04-9467-c8f6b040bd23","body_text":"Combined with the limited data on reproductive health trends, there is a very poor understanding of the causes of these disorders and the environmental factors that may influence them. One reason for this uncertainty concerning the etiology of reproductive disorders is the historical genocentric views of both developmental biology and disease predisposition. Only recently have we acknowledged the major role of the environment in dictating phenotype via at least three pathways: [1] a direct induction of gene expression, whereby environmental agents act directly as hormones or disrupt the metabolism or synthesis of endogenous hormones, [2] a neuroendocrine route, whereby the nervous system monitors the environment and sends signals to the endocrine system, and [3] an epigenetic route, whereby environmental agents alter transcriptional capabilities without changing DNA sequence ( 19 ). Human disease researchers now consider these environmentally mediated mechanisms, and recent focus on epigenetic mechanisms has provided insight into disease onset( 18 ,  20 ,  21 ). In epigenetic disruption, the environmental agent modifies chromatin packaging by either modifying histones (thus altering the DNA-nuclear protein interactions) or by promoting DNA methylation (resulting most often in repressed transcription by inhibiting interaction with specific transcription factors). It has been suggested recently thatthese chromatin modifications acquired from environmental signals during the individual’s development can be passed on to future generations ( 22 ), reminiscent of the idea of inheritance of acquired characteristics promoted by the 16th- and 17th-century biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. Epigenetic modifications help explain how developmental exposure to a toxicant can increase the likelihood of a disease state later in life ( 23 - 26 ) and possibly even promote disease across several generations ( 22 ).\nEpigenetic-induced changes permit developmental plasticity that is evolutionarily adaptive because it allows the developing fetus to alter the course of organogenesis in anticipation of later life needs. For instance in our hominid ancestors, increased maternal dietary cholesterol would suggest ample nutrients in the environment, and the developing fetus would respond to this information by altering function of pancreatic  b  cells, hepatocytes, and adipocytes in anticipation. The increased maternal dietary cholesterol often parallels elevated maternal E concentrations and “imprints” greater E sensitivity in female offspring, a condition that would increase reproductive output. If later life demands match those prescribed by the fetus, health is expected. On the contrary, a mismatch would lead to disorders. Today, novel anthropogenic compounds are introduced to the fetal environment, and, although many such compounds do not cause genetic mutations, many likely contribute to adult disease through “misinforming” fetal developmental plasticity. This emerging theory of early origins of adult disease due to the “mismatch” between fetal exposures and adult has received increased attention ( 27 ,  28 ). The literature from EDC research supports this mismatch theory of disease.\nBesides the relatively new understanding of genetic-environmental interactions on adult phenotype and disease, another reason that the etiologies of many reproductive disorders have not been elucidated is due to the complexity associated with ontogeny of reproductive organs. Endocrine-disrupting compounds can have varying effects throughout development because of variations in tissue hormone receptor isoforms and concentrations at different developmental stages. For example, the grape phytoestrogen resveratrol acts as an E agonist in many cell types expressing E receptor (ER)- a  or ER- b  but also acts as an E antagonist for ER- a  with the E response elements (EREs) EREc38 and PR1148 ( 29 ). Thus, in vitro data suggest that resveratrol will have an antiestrogenic effect when organs express ER- a  isoforms with EREc38 or PR1148 but an estrogenic effect when other EREs are expressed. This is confirmed in in vivo studies of rats, where resveratrol acts as an E agonist on gonads but an E antagonist in the brain ( 30 ,  31 ). Indeed, the effects of many EDCs are dictated by the complement of ER isoforms, coactivators, and corepressors in cells and tissues, and these components vary with developmental stage.\nA combined understanding of both developmental plasticity and ontogenetic complexity helps clarify the role of EDCs in the onset of reproductive disturbances. To illustrate, we begin with disruptions of ovarian function.\n\nIn males, poor semen quality and testicular cancer are measurable and increasing ( 32 ,  33 ); in contrast, changes in oocyte quantity and quality are considerably more difficult to measure because of differences in male and female gametogenesis and the fact that female organs and their function are largely inaccessible. However, we can gain some insight into the etiology of ovarian dysfunction by defining the critical developmental processes that could be disrupted by exposure to EDCs.\nThe human female germ cell begins differentiation in the first trimester, and primordial follicles form between the second and third trimester. These follicles then enter an extended dormancy, which may last 15 to 50 years. Indeed, oocytes are the longest-lived, nonregenerating cells in the body and are subject to a lifetime of environmental exposures that are difficult to quantify. Thus, measuring oocyte quality and the impact of environmental factors on fertility is a significant challenge, given the timing of follicle formation, the longevity of follicle existence, and the relative inaccessibility of these cells for analysis. In spite of these obstacles, the overall body of knowledge of normal ovarian development, trends from human epidemiologic studies, and laboratory animal studies suggests that the female ovary is sensitive to disruptions by EDCs.\nProper formation of ovarian follicles in the fetus depends on a balance between systemic E and local inhibin and activin in the fetus ( 34 ,  35 ), and therefore estrogenic exposures during the critical timeframe of follicle formation can alter follicle dynamics in the adult. For example, laboratory rodents and American alligators ( Alligator mississippiensis ) exposed during early developmental stages to estrogenic EDCs have a specific failure of normal follicle formation called multioocytic follicle. In normal follicle formation, a single layer of somatic granulosa cells (that are derived from the cortical sex cords) surround a maturing meiosis I oocyte. In a multioocytic follicle, more than one oocyte is surrounded by a single granulosa sheath, and numerous estrogenic EDCs can induce this follicular pathology ( Table 1 ). Mice treated with DES and 17 b -E 2  during follicle formation on postnatal day 1 to 5 develop multioocytic follicles as a consequence of suppressing activin expression ( 36 ). Thus, maintaining the homeostatic balance of local and systemic hormones during follicle development is necessary for normal follicle development and oocyte quality. The precise mechanisms that alter early follicle formation and their impact on adult ovarian function remain to be determined.\nAn interruption of the steroid or peptide hormonal control of ovarian function is a plausible mechanism for observed ovarian disturbances. Following the hypothesis that EDCs are contributing to ovarian disorders and declining conception rates, two key questions arise: What are the likely human ovarian targets, and how are these interactions manifested? Reproductive disorders that provide insight into these questions are aneuploidy, PCOS, premature ovarian failure (POF), and altered cyclicity and fecundability.\nAneuploidy (an abnormal number of chromosomes) is the leading cause of miscarriage, congenital defects, and mental retardation in humans ( 37 ). In humans, meiosis is initiated in the fetal ovary but arrests in the diplotene stage of late prophase, and the meiotic divisions do not occur until just before ovulation (meiosis I) and after fertilization (meiosis II). Although certain genetic factors are known to disrupt female meiosis, very few environmental compounds have been investigated for their ability to cause meiotic disturbance ( 38 ). More than 10 years ago, an observation that mice housed in damaged polycarbonate plastic cages had a high incidence of oocytes with meiotic disturbances led to investigations into the oocyte-damaging effect of the estrogenic plasticizer bisphenol A (BPA) ( 39 ). It was determined that BPA was leaching into the water of animals in damaged cages, and when BPA purposely was added to the water in non-damaged cages similar oocyte meiotic disturbances were induced ( 39 ). Some of these meiotic disturbances resulted in aneuploidy. In oocytes from adult female mice exposed to BPA during meiotic maturation, abnormalities were noted in the alignment of chromosomes on the meiotic spindle, likely through altering the structural integrity of meiotic spindle microtubules ( 40 ). More recent studies of oocytes exposed either in vitro or in vivo support the finding that BPA exposure leads to disturbances in spindle formation and chromosome alignment but suggest that these defects are more likely to lead to cell cycle arrest and death of the oocyte rather than to give rise to aneuploid eggs ( 41 ). Regardless of the timing of the loss (i.e., loss of gametes before oogenesis is completed or the fertilization of chromosomally abnormal eggs and subsequent loss of the conceptus), experimental data from three different laboratories support the conclusion that BPA exposure has a detrimental impact on the maturing oocyte. Besides BPA, other EDCs have been shown to cause meiotic disturbances. For example, DES causes spindle defects during meiosis II ( 42 ).\nThe aforementioned studies illustrate meiotic disruption in follicles of adult animals, but alterations also occur with exposure to environmentally relevant doses of BPA during the fetal period of oogenesis. When pregnant mice were exposed to BPA during meiotic prophase, synapsis and recombination were altered in oocytes developing in the fetal ovary; moreover, the resultant female offspring had an increased incidence of aneuploidy in their oocytes and embryos ( 43 ). The disturbances in oogenesis induced by BPA during fetal development have been postulated to be caused by interference with the actions of ER- b  ( 43 ). To date, there have been no human studies examining aneuploidy rates in women exposed in utero to BPA or other EDCs.\nTwo disorders involving the human ovary that result in ovarian-dependent infertility are PCOS and POF. Polycystic ovary syndrome is considered the most common endocrine abnormality in reproductive-aged females, occurring in 4% to 8% of women ( 44 ,  45 ). A major cause of infertility, PCOS is characterized by hyperandrogenemia, hyperinsulinemia, and premature pubic hair growth (pubarche). Thus, this syndrome is characterized by both metabolic and reproductive disorders (see  Fig. 1 ). Women with PCOS have higher risk of development of insulin resistance, diabetes, endometrial cancer, and anovulatory infertility ( 44 ). Although the latter may be treated with ovulation induction medications, women with PCOS are at higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with such treatments, and their pregnancy complications (i.e., miscarriage, hypertension, gestational diabetes) are more frequent than in normo-ovulatory women ( 44 ,  46 ). Premature ovarian failure is characterized by cessation of menstruation before age 40 years and occurs in approximately 1% of women ( 47 ).\nAlthough ovarian function is dependent on appropriate steroid signals, the pathogenesis of PCOS and POF is unknown. Although these disorders are not considered to have common underlying mechanisms, both have been linked to changes in endocrine signaling during critical windows of follicle formation and follicle activation, and both disorders are characterized by dysregulated follicle selection and growth mechanics. Ovarian follicles in women with PCOS have accelerated transition from primordial to primary follicles, withincreased number of granulosa cells per primary follicle ( 48 ). The follicles then accumulate in the ovarian cortex without transitioning to dominance or atresia. Follicle disposition in POF is less clear and may result from an inadequate ovarian reserve at birth or follicles that activate early and undergo atresia, via apoptotic mechanisms, because of inadequate gonadotropin support ( 49 ). In some women, a genetic predisposition to both diseases clearly is present. Where might environmental exposure alter follicle dynamics? Follicle formation during fetal development and follicle activation during postnatal development are two potential intersections for hormone alteration. Our prediction is that both time frames are ones during which in utero and neonatal steroid imbalances can contribute to adult disease.\nOne hypothesized etiology for PCOS is excessive prenatal T exposure ( 50 ) resulting from both a genetic predisposition to hypersecretion of T and exposure to environmental factors that increase embryonic T ( 51 ). More than 70 genes have been investigated for their role in the etiology of PCOS ( 52 ). Although no single genetic mutation has been linked directly to PCOS, mutations in genes that normally lead to embryonic protection from maternal androgens, such as 21-hydroxylase, could cause PCOS ( 53 ). Indeed, a common genetic variation in the aromatase gene, CYP19, is associated with both prepubertal androgen excess in girls and PCOS in girls and young women ( 54 ). Similarly, a polymorphism in the promoter of the sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) gene results in increased bioavailable T and is associated with increased incidence of PCOS in some Greek women ( 55 ).\nExperimental evidence from studies of rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta ) and sheep supports environmental induction of PCOS due to excessive T. When pregnant rhesus monkeys were exposed to 10 to 15 mg of T propionate on gestational days 40 to 60 or 100 to 115, the resultant female offspring had elevated plasma T concentrations and an increased incidence of PCOS ( 56 ). Similar effects were seen in female lambs exposed in utero to T ( 57 ). Prenatally androgenized lambs at 8 months of age had a decreased percentage of primordial follicles and an increased percentage of primary follicles, suggesting that prenatal androgens can have a direct impact on folliculogenesis ( 58 ). The fact that excessive exposure to T in utero causes adult PCOS in sheep and rhesus monkeys indicates that PCOS is a disease state resulting, in part, from the inherent developmental plasticity of the fetus. Thus, PCOS serves as a good model of a reproductive disorder with both genetic and environmental mechanisms of onset.\nOne EDC that has been associated with PCOS is BPA. Bisphenol A has been measured in serum and follicular fluid (1-2 ng/mL), as well as in fetal serum and term amniotic fluid, confirming passage through the placenta ( 59 ). An approximately fivefold higher concentration was revealed in amniotic fluid at 15 to 18 weeks gestation when compared with other fluids. Additionally, there is a significant increase in serum BPA levels in women with PCOS ( 60 ). However, it is possible that the elevated BPA is a consequence, and not a cause, of PCOS. Women with PCOS have higher circulating T levels than healthy women, and elevated androgen concentrations decrease BPA clearance ( 61 ).\nPremature ovarian failure is believed to be due to a limited follicle pool during development or an accelerated loss of follicles during the natural process of atresia in utero between midgestation and birth and thereafter ( 47 ). Individuals who have a 45,XO karyotype have gonadal dysgenesis, and deletions of specific segments of the X chromosome and mutations in some X-chromosome genes are associated with POF ( 62 ). In addition, carriers of the FMR1 premutation (55-200 CGG repeats) are at risk for primary ovarian insufficiency (decreased ovarian reserve), early menopause, and ovarian dysfunction (decreased fertility) ( 63 ). In addition to gene mutations, deletions, and permutations involving the X chromosome, toxicity to the oocyte can affect follicle complement and fertility, as the oocyte is the master regulator of folliculogenesis. A recent study on a mouse model with oocyte-specific deletion of the tumor suppressor PTEN reveals premature activity of the primordial follicle pool and early ovarian senescence ( 64 ). Theoretically, EDCs inhibiting PTEN expression and subsequent signaling through the PI3-kinase pathway in the oocyte could result in accelerated follicle loss. This remains to be determined in women with POF or premature ovarian insufficiency.\nInterference with the hormonal regulation of the menstrual cycle resulting in long or irregular cycles will reduce fecundability (the ability to conceive in a menstrual cycle) ( 65 ). Endocrine-disrupting compounds could reduce fecundability by interfering with hormonal regulation of the menstrual cycle. There are limited human data suggesting that fetal and neonatal exposure to EDCs can alter cyclicity ( 66 ,  67 ), but data from laboratory animals support this thesis. In utero exposure to estrogenic compounds such as the plasticizer BPA, the mycotoxin zearalenone, or the phytoestrogen resveratrol increases the length of the mouse estrous cycle ( 68 ). Similarly, exposure of neonatal mice to physiologically relevant concentrations of the phytoestrogen genistein causes prolonged and abnormal cycles in adult animals ( 69 ). Perinatal exposure to BPA causes irregular cycles in mice ( 70 ) and early cessation of cyclic activity in rats ( 71 ), and this is probably due to hypothalamic alterations in the circuitry that controls LH secretion and ovulation ( 72 ).\nIn humans, altered cyclicity and adult exposures to persistent organic pollutants and contemporary-use pesticides have been linked (see  Table 2 ). Studies examining the influence of organochlorine pesticide exposure on cyclicity and fecundity suggest that organochlorine exposure shortens menstrual cycles ( 73 ,  74 ). In contrast, women who are exposed to contemporary-use hormonally active pesticides (nonorganochlorine) have a 60% to 100% increased odds of long cycles, inter-menstrual bleeding, and missed periods ( 75 ).\nThe varied menstrual cycle responses to different EDCs in women could be explained by the fact that cycle disruptionscan be caused by multiple mechanisms including alterations in hormone synthesis, release, storage, transport, and excretion-biotransformation, as well as modified hormone receptor recognition or binding and postreceptor activation. In addition to alterations in the function of the “reproductive hormones” such as the sex steroids, gonadotropins and inhibin-activin system, altered thyroid function, and central nervous system function can lead to changes in reproductive cyclicity ( 76 ). On the basis of the previously described animal studies, we hypothesize that such changes can be initiated during fetal development. This hypothesis is further supported by cycle irregularities noted in women whose mothers were exposed in utero to DES ( 77 ).\nA review of the developmental ontogeny of the uterus will help the reader to understand the potential contributions of prenatal or neonatal EDC exposures in adult uterine dysfunction. In the human female fetus between 9.5 and 11.5 weeks in gestation, the M€ullerian ducts differentiate and proliferate rostral-caudally as the Wolffian ducts degenerate. As the M€ullerian ducts differentiate into the oviducts (fallopian tubes), uterus, cervix, and upper vagina, the epithelial component is simple columnar epithelium in the endometrium and stratified squamous epithelium in the upper vagina ( 78 ). Uterine endometrial gland development (adenogenesis) in humans begins in utero, gradually extending into the myometrium postnatally (forming the junctional zone), and is completed during puberty ( 78 ). Adenogenesis is influenced by growth factors, tissue remodeling factors, and steroid hormones that alter cell proliferation and extracellular matrix remodeling ( 79 ). Thus, similar to ovarian and breast development, altering hormonal signaling before puberty can have a detrimental effect on adult uterine morphology and function.\nTiming of uterine gland development is species specific, ranging from initiation in the first trimester in humans to after birth in rodents and ungulates ( 79 ). Adenogenesis continues into puberty for full structural and histologic maturity in most species. In contrast to humans, in which reproductive tract development occurs primarily in utero, the majority of rodent uterine differentiation and maturation occurs after birth ( 80 ). At birth, the rat uterus is composed of the luminal epithelial layer of the endometrium and a randomly ordered, undifferentiated uterine mesenchyme. From birth through the onset of puberty (approximately day 35 in the rat), the uterine mesenchyme follows an ordered pattern of differentiation, which results in the formation of the uterine myometrium and endometrial stroma and glands. During early postnatal life, uterine development in rats is E independent, even though Es are present in neonatal blood. This is due to high levels of E-binding proteins, such as  a -fetoprotein (AFP) ( 81 ), which bind to and inactivate endogenous E, thus protecting developing tissues from E exposure ( 82 - 84 ). The neonatal rat begins to produce endogenous E near the end of the first week of postnatal life, but AFP levels do not begin to decline until between neonatal days 12 and 16, when it is cleared by the liver. On AFP clearance, the uterus becomes exposed to circulating E and begins to acquire E responsiveness as it prepares for the onset of puberty ( 82 ).\nAlthough several studies in animal models demonstrate that early postnatal uterine glandular development is hormone independent ( 82 ,  85 ), exposure to steroid hormones after birth can severely compromise endometrial adenogenesis. For example, in ewe lambs, postnatal chronic exposure to a synthetic progestin results in complete uterine gland knockout ( 86 ), believed to be due, in part, to down-regulated ER- a . In the pig, endometrial glandular genesis and branching morphogenesis occur after birth and involve epithelial ER- a  and PRL receptor activation ( 87 ). In the human fetus, data linking ER expression and endometrial development are limited. Estrogen receptor- a  messenger RNA expression is first detected in the fetal uterus at 13 weeks gestation and continues through 23 weeks ( 88 ). Cellular localization by immunohistochemical analysis revealed expression of ER- a  in nuclei of mesenchymal cells at the interface between the uterine stroma and myometrium in 17- to 22-week gestation uteri but no immunostaining in the epithelium ( 88 ). These studies demonstrate that in humans and in animal models, glandular genesis, glandular morphogenesis, and mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in the junction between the myometrium and endometrium (site of future junctional zone in the adult) are vulnerable to actions of E and EDCs. In addition, studies of adenogenesis show that uterine tissues can be programmed epigenetically during perinatal life for either normal or disrupted function ( 89 ).\nStudies of DES daughters provide further information on the ability of EDCs to interfere with uterine development by altering adenogenesis. In women exposed in utero to DES, the zone differentiating the cervix and vagina is not well defined, resulting in an elevated incidence of uterine glandular tissue being present in the upper vagina (vaginal adenosis) ( 90 ). In addition to the abnormal finding of vaginal adenosis in young women exposed in utero to DES, vaginal adenosis also was found with increased prevalence (80%) in stillborn infants and neonates exposed in utero to DES in the first half of gestation ( 91 ). Whereas most studies of in utero DES exposure have focused on pubertal and adult outcomes, the observations of abnormalities in the fetus emphasize the importance of early effects of DES exposure on the developing M€ullerian tract in humans, which later results in vaginal adenosis and clear cell cancer of the vagina.\nEndometriosis is characterized by ectopic endometrium (presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus) and is a major cause of infertility and chronic pelvic pain in women. The etiology of this disease depends on the combined effect of genetic, hormonal, immunologic, and environmental factors ( 92 ,  93 ). Estimates for the incidence of endometriosis vary, but most studies find that between 10% and 15% of reproductive-age women have endometriosis( 94 ,  95 ). Incidence is much higher (between 35% and 50%) in women with pelvic pain, infertility, or both ( 96 ). Health care costs for treating infertility and pain associated with endometriosis are tremendous, with an estimated $22 billion being spent in the United States in 2002 alone ( 97 ). A distinction can be made between the pathology of peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis (involving transformation of serosal or mesothelial cells to endometrial cells or invagination of surface endometriosis into the ovarian capsule), and rectovaginal endometriosis (arising from M€ullerian nests), and it is likely that each has a distinct etiopathogenesis ( 92 ). Peritoneal endometriosis is the most diagnosed and most studied form and is the primary focus in this review.\nSampson’s hypothesis ( 98 ) that peritoneal endometriosis is initiated by retrograde menstruations (backflow of menstrual flow through the fallopian tubes into the peritoneal cavity) is accepted widely as the major pathogenesis leading to peritoneal endometriosis, but the fact that retrograde menstruation occurs in the majority of women ( 99 ) leads to the question of why endometriosis develops in only 10% to 15% of women. One hypothesis is that women in whom endometriosis develops have retrograde menstruation and altered hormonal and immune environments. Thus, most research has focused on endometriosis incidence relative to adult endogenous hormones and EDC levels. However, two observations suggest that fetal exposures also are involved: [1] with use of data collected from the Nurses’ Health Study II (an ongoing prospective cohort study of 84,046 women with no previous diagnosis of endometriosis, infertility, or cancer at baseline), DES daughters were found to have an 80% increased risk (relative risk [RR] 1.8, confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.8) of the development of endometriosis ( 100 ); and [2] in mice, exposure to the dioxin 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- p -dioxin (TCDD) on gestational day 8 increases the size of implanted endometriotic lesions when combined with an adult exposure ( 101 ). We hypothesize that during embryogenesis, EDC exposure has an organizational effect that increases susceptibility for endometriosis, but subsequent adult hormone, immune, and/or EDC irregularities are required for disease onset.\nEndometriosis is a hormone-(and thus possibly EDC-) dependent disorder, and evidence for this is provided by observations that [1] endometriosis manifests during reproductive years and largely regresses after oophorectomy or menopause, [2] ectopic endometrial tissue has increased expression of aromatase enzyme and decreased expression of 17 b -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) type 2, [3] treatment with the T-derivative danazol causes lesion regression, but discontinuation causes lesion growth, [4] the expression patterns of ER and P receptor (PR) subtypes are altered in ectopic endometrial lesions ( 102 ), and [5] gene expression profiles of eutopic endometrium reveal a fingerprint of E-regulated genes not suppressed by P ( 103 ).\nAlthough E is necessary for the progression of endometriosis ( 104 ), other factors also influence this progression. For instance, the unintentionally produced industrial byproduct TCDD (one of the most toxic of the dioxins) fails to induce endometriosis in ovariectomized, E-supplemented mice that are implanted with endometrial tissue ( 105 ) but promotes endometriosis in mice with an intact ovary ( 106 ). Furthermore, dysfunction of the immune system influenced by EDCs (e.g., TCDD) has been considered because, despite high levels of activated macrophages and inflammatory cytokines in the peritoneal environment, in women with peritoneal endometriosis the immune system fails to prevent implantation of endometrial debris ( 92 ). Thus, the progression of endometriosis is dependent on both hormonal and immune environments, but the exact etiology of endometriosis onset is unclear.\nOverwhelming evidence from laboratory animal studies suggests that endometriosis can be promoted by many organochlorines, a class of xenobiotic chemicals including the dioxin TCDD, the pesticides methoxychlor and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and many polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) with dioxin-like effects ( 107 ). However, data linking organochlorine exposure and endometriosis in humans are equivocal, with some studies concluding significant correlations and others failing to find any significant relationship ( 108 ) ( Table 3 ). This could be due to the inherent weaknesses of observational epidemiology studies. Particularly problematic in such studies are thelimited sample sizes and potential confounding variables. Thus, to answer the question of whether EDCs promote endometriosis, we turn to experiments using model animals.\nSeveral studies in primates have examined the role of organochlorines in promoting endometriosis after adult exposures. The rhesus macaque ( M. mulatta ) is a common model species used in endometriosis studies, as rhesus monkeys both menstruate and spontaneously develop peritoneal endometriosis. The first primate study to link organochlorine exposure to endometriosis was a 15-year study of 20 rhesus monkeys (six control, seven low dose, seven high dose)( 109 ). After 4 years of daily dietary treatment of adults with TCDD, animals were followed for 11 subsequent years to determine any detrimental effects. Two of the control animals did develop endometriosis, but both the incidence and severity of endometriosis were increased in animals treated with this dioxin. A subsequent analysis on preserved tissues from these monkeys found that animals with elevated serum dioxin toxic equivalents had a high prevalence of endometriosis (see  Table 4 ) ( 110 ). However, the results of Rier et al.( 110 ) have been criticized because of [1] inappropriate statistical analysis due to low sample sizes and lack of statistical normality, [2] numerous confounding variables such as parity status, and [3] the retrospective addition of endometriosis as a defined endpoint ( 111 ). Despite such valid criticism, it is clear that dioxin exposure can promote endometriosis in primates. Another study in the cynomolgus monkey ( Macaca fascicularis ) found that implants of endometrial tissue in the pelvic cavity survived longer and grew larger in animals exposed for 1 year to high doses (17.86 ng/kg per day) of TCDD ( 112 ).\nExperiments on rodents suggest that both adult and in utero exposure to dioxin can promote endometriosis during adulthood. Cyclicity in primates and rodents differ, and rodents neither menstruate nor spontaneously develop endometriosis. However, the disease can be induced in rodents via surgical implantation of endometrial tissue into the peritoneum, and, thus, rodents serve as an appropriate model organism for endometriosis experiments ( 113 ). When adult rodents were exposed to TCDD before implantation of endometrial tissue, significant postimplantation endometrial growth was noted in both mice and rats ( 106 ). Similarly, increased endometriotic lesion size was observed in mice exposed to TCDD during both perinatal and adult life stages ( 101 ).\nThe mechanism by which dioxin promotes endometriosis is unclear. In utero and lactational exposure to TCDD reduces circulating E 2  in vivo ( 114 ) and decreases ovarian E 2  production in cultures ( 115 ). Exposure to TCDD does not appear to reduce E 2  by inhibiting ovarian steroidogenic enzyme expression ( 115 ) or serum gonadotropin production ( 116 ). In addition to reducing circulating E 2 , TCDD also causes degradation of ER- a  ( 117 ), reducing not only the amount but also the response of endogenous E 2 . It is possible that fetal exposure to TCDD promotes adult endometriosis through altered P action, because PR expression is reduced in the uterus of adult mice that were exposed to TCDD in utero ( 118 ) and P insensitivity is characteristic of women with endometriosis( 92 ,  119 ). It is also possible that TCDD promotes endometriosis through altered immune function. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo- p -dioxin is an immunosuppressant ( 120 ) and may diminish efficient immune surveillance in the peritoneal cavity for removal of menstrual debris, thereby enabling establishment and growth of peritoneal endometriosis under the influence of E 2 , proangiogenic, proliferative, and antiapoptotic factors. Alternatively, TCDD could activate specific signaling pathways that promote endometriosis, as a recent study showed that overexpression of K-ras in the ovarian surface and uterotubal junction of mice resulted in peritoneal endometriosis ( 121 ).\nAlthough the detailed modes of action through which organochlorines promote endometriosis are unknown, we hypothesize that some EDCs can influence developmental plasticity of uterine tissue toward enzymatic and signaling cascades that promote the development of endometriosis after subsequent adult exposures are given. Endometriotic lesions have increased expression of aromatase and 17 b -HSD type 1 and decreased expression of 17 b -HSD type 2 and 4, resulting in an increase in production of E 2  ( 122 ). If this expression pattern is established during fetal development via epigenetic mechanisms, then endometriosis could manifest during adulthood after estrogenic exposures. In ectopic endometrial tissue, ER- b  is up-regulated and acts as the mediator of endometrial proliferation ( 123 ,  124 ). Therefore, adult exposures to high doses of ER- b  agonists are hypothesized to promote ectopic endometrium growth after retrograde menstruation.\nIn summary, experimental studies on rodents and primates indicate that adult exposure to organochlorines (particularly dioxin-like compounds) that have been shown to interfere with both hormonal regulation and immune function can promote endometriosis. Furthermore, in utero exposure to DES increases the risk of developing endometriosis. Several questions remain: [1] what role does fetal exposure to EDCs have on the development of endometriosis, [2] is there a programming of endometrial cells during developmental adenogenesis and mesenchyme-epithelial interactions that confersa survival advantage in eutopic endometrium and subsequently ectopic endometrium in adulthood, [3] do any contemporary-use EDCs (such as the estrogenic chemicals, BPA, or atrazine) contribute to the onset and/or progression of endometriosis, and [4] through what mechanism are these conducted within the endometrium and perhaps other tissues? These are data gaps in our understanding of the development of endometriosis that require further research attention.\nUterine fibroids (leiomyomas) arise from the uterine myometrium and are the most common tumor of the female reproductive tract ( 125 ). Like pituitary adenomas and many neuronal tumors, uterine leiomyomas belong to a class of tumors whose primary morbidity is associated with local disease rather than distant metastasis. However, unlike these somewhat rarer cancers, uterine leiomyomas occur in 25% to 50% of all women, although estimates from autopsy specimens in which microscopic lesions were assessed histologically place the incidence as high as 77% of reproductive-aged women ( 126 ). They are the number one cause of hysterectomy in reproductive-aged women, accounting for >200,000 of these surgeries annually in the United States alone ( 127 ) at an estimated cost of $1.7 billion per year. In addition, they are a significant cause of pelvic pain, menorrhagia, abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility, and complications of pregnancy including placental abruption ( 128 - 133 ). Therefore, the fact that these tumors do not metastasize beyond the uterus belies the extent of their negative impact on women’s health ( 132 ).\nThe risk of the development of leiomyoma tumors increases with age during the premenopausal years, but tumors typically regress and/or become asymptomatic with the onset of menopause ( 126 ,  134 ). In addition to menopausal status, several other hormone-associated risk factors for uterine leiomyoma have been identified. Obesity, age at menarche, and unopposed E exposure have been linked to an increased risk for uterine leiomyoma, whereas cigarette smoking, use of oral contraceptives, and parity have been identified as protective factors ( 131 ,  135 - 141 ). In the case of pregnancy, the risk of uterine leiomyoma in parous women is approximately half that in nulliparous women, and the risk of development of this disease decreases significantly with increased number of pregnancies ( 131 ,  137 ,  139 ,  141 ). Taken together, these data suggest that, as in other tumors and disorders of the female reproductive tract, hormones (and possibly EDCs) play a significant role in the etiology of this disease.\nUterine leiomyomas are present in mice, some dogs ( 142 ), and Baltic gray seals that have high organochlorine body burdens ( 143 ), but the best-characterized animal model for study of uterine leiomyoma is the Eker rat ( 125 ,  144 - 147 ). Susceptibility to tumor development in Eker rats is the result of a germline mutation in the rat homologue of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (Tsc2) tumor suppressor gene. Female Eker rats develop spontaneous uterine leiomyomas that are hormone dependent and occur with a similar frequency and are phenotypically similar to human tumors ( 144 ). The development of these tumors in intact and reproductively competent female Eker rats makes this a useful animal model for investigating the potential impact of xenoestrogens.\nStudies in both mice and rats have demonstrated that early exposure to some EDCs can increase the incidence of uterine fibroids. CD-1 mice exposed before birth or as neonates to DES have significantly increased incidence of uterine fibroids ( 148 ). In studies of Eker rats, developmental programming by DES can enhance the penetrance of a tumor suppressor gene defect in adulthood to increase the risk of developing fibroids ( 149 ). Developmental exposure to DES causes rats genetically predisposed to uterine leiomyomas to develop increased tumor incidence, multiplicity, and size but fails to induce tumors in wild-type rats. Importantly, DES exposure imparts a hormonal imprint on the developing uterine myometrium in both wild-type and carrier rats, causing an increase in expression of E-responsive genes before the onset of tumors. Thus, when developmental programming of E-responsive genes was combined with the presence of a tumor suppressor gene defect, the result was an increased risk of developing hormone-dependent leiomyomas in adult females.\nTo understand what defines the critical developmental risk period for this effect, neonatal Eker rats were exposed to DES on differing postnatal days, followed by examination of the reproductive tract ( 150 ). Leiomyomas were induced with DES exposures on either postnatal days 3 to 5 or 10 to 12 but not 17 to 19. Gene expression analysis revealed that, in adult myometrium, expression of the E-responsive genes calbindin D(9)K and PR had been reprogrammed during the sensitive windows of postnatal days 3 to 5 and 10 to 12 but not during the resistant window of postnatal days 17 to 19. In the sensitive time periods, developmental reprogramming in response to DES exposure resulted in a hyperresponsiveness of these genes to ovarian hormones that could be prevented by ovariectomy before sexual maturity. Interestingly, the resistant time period coincided with the time at which reproductive tract tissues are exposed to endogenous E, suggesting that target tissues are most vulnerable to developmental programming of disease during the period in which they normally would be maintained in an E-na€ive state.\nThe potential for DES to cause uterine fibroids in humans is less clear. If fetal exposure to DES causes uterine fibroids in humans, then we would expect to see an increased incidence of leiomyomas in DES daughters. Two recent studies addressed this question and arrived at different conclusions based on using different methods of fibroid detection. In a study of 2,579 women born during the period when DES was being prescribed (1,731 exposed, 848 unexposed), no association was found ( P =.68) between prenatal DES exposure and uterine fibroids when positive histologic confirmation after surgical removal of fibroids was used as the detection criterion ( 151 ). Another study in 1,188 women founda significant relationship (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, CI 1.1-5.4) between DES exposure and uterine fibroid presence due to the use of ultrasound detection of fibroids ( 152 ). On the basis of their results, Baird and Newbold concluded an “increased risk of uterine fibroids in women prenatally exposed to DES, and DES-exposed women tended to have larger fibroids” ( 152 ). Although histologic confirmation is certainly a more conservative detection approach, ultrasound examination is a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of leiomyomas. The increased incidence of leiomyomas detected by this method suggests that prenatal estrogenic exposures could contribute to the development of this disease in women.\nThe potential role of estrogenic EDCs in increasing uterine fibroids led several researchers to examine the relationship between phytoestrogen consumption and leiomyoma incidence. A study in Japanese women who consumed a moderate amount of soy found that individuals consuming the most soy had a decreased incidence of hysterectomy ( 153 ). Because the leading diagnosis for patients receiving a hysterectomy is uterine fibroids, this study suggests a protective effect of modest phytoestrogen consumption. Compared with Asian diets, typical Western diets contain lower amounts of phytoestrogens, and a study in US women found an inverse association between uterine fibroid risk and lignan excretion( 154 ). Lignan is one of the two main classes of phytoestrogens (isoflavones such as genistein from soy are the other class), and these data suggest that increased lignan consumption decreased the incidence of uterine fibroids. Similarly, a case-control study in 2,400 Italian women found a significant inverse relationship between consumption of green vegetables and fruit and incidence of uterine fibroids ( 135 ). These two studies suggest a protective effect of phytoestrogens on leiomyoma formation when consumed during reproductive maturity. This protective nature of phytoestrogens could be due to dietary consumption during reproductive maturity (activational impact), and this can be contrasted with the aforementioned results of fetal DES exposure studies (organizational impact).\nIn addition to in vivo studies, in vitro studies suggest that EDCs contribute to the growth of uterine fibroids. Rat uterine leiomyoma cells are extremely sensitive to estrogenic EDCs, with physiologically relevant concentrations of Kepone,  a -endosulfan, and 2,2-bis-( p -hydroxyphenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (a breakdown product of methoxychlor) stimulating cell proliferation and 2,2-bis-( p -hydroxyphenyl)-1,1, 1-trichloroethane, methoxychlor, Kepone,  a -endosulfan,  b -endosulfan, toxaphene, and dieldrin increasing transcription in an E-sensitive reporter gene assay ( 155 ). Diethylstilbestrol also induces proliferation of rat uterine leiomyoma cells, indicating that such cells are sensitive to estrogenic pesticides and pharmaceutical agents ( 145 ).\nIn summary, both in vitro and in vivo studies suggest a role of estrogenic EDCs in promoting uterine leiomyoma in women. Data from laboratory animals show that EDC exposures during critical periods of development, both prenatal and neonatal, can induce leiomyoma in adulthood. There are data gaps in our understanding of how similar exposures in humans might result in uterine fibroids, and this is identified as a research need.\nSeveral reproductive disorders arise from dysfunction of the uterus or other M€ullerian-derived tissues (oviduct, cervix, and upper vagina) and result in infertility, pregnancy loss, or fetal compromise. Abnormal uterine development, as seen in DES daughters, can compromise pregnancy outcomes (e.g., with a higher incidence of preterm delivery). However, of the numerous disorders of pregnancy, miscarriage, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction are the most common and are primarily disorders of implantation (abnormal placentation and abnormal decidual-placental interactions) ( 156 ,  157 ).\nMiscarriage affects up to 21% of clinically recognized pregnancies, with recurrent pregnancy loss (more than three miscarriages) affecting 1% to 2% of women ( 158 - 160 ). The causes of miscarriage are diverse and include chromosomal abnormalities such as aneuploidy (approximately 50% of miscarriages), environmental and dietary exposures, male factors, and anatomic, endocrine, or immune disruption( 161 ). However, the majority of postimplantation, first-trimester miscarriages share a single fundamental mechanism based on oxidative damage. In miscarriage, the trophoblast is fragmented, does not invade the endometrium deeply, fails to fully remove smooth muscle and endothelial cells from endometrial spiral arteries, and does not plug maternal spiral arteries completely during early gestation ( 156 ). This situation allows maternal blood flow to begin too early, exposing the embryo and placenta prematurely to oxygen and consequently causing oxidative damage. During the first trimester, the antioxidant capacity of the placenta and embryo is extremely limited. Interestingly, maternal diabetes is associated with increased production of oxygen free radicals, which partially may explain the higher miscarriage rates in women with diabetes ( 162 ).\nFurthermore, if the embryo survives beyond the first trimester but trophoblast extension into the spiral arteries is shallow or second-trimester removal of the spiral artery plugs is delayed or incomplete, subsequent placental blood flow is reduced ( 156 ). This scenario can cause repeated ischemia-reperfusion and transient hypoxia in the fetus and placenta, resulting in progressive placental damage, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm birth of the fetus, and preeclampsia in the mother ( 156 ,  163 ).\nSurprisingly few studies have examined the role of EDCs in fetal growth restriction and pregnancy loss, but evidence suggests that exposure to some EDCs during pregnancy can contribute to incomplete placentation. For example, unintentional pregnancies that occur 1 to 2 months after administration of the injectable progestin contraceptive Depo-Provera are at increased risk for fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, and neonatal death ( 164 ,  165 ). Inlaboratory animal studies, early exposure to Es has been shown to induce trophoblast degeneration (both apoptosis and placental labyrinth destruction) in pregnant Wistar rats infused intraperitoneally with a physiologic dose of E 2  benzoate during gestational days 12 to 19 ( 166 ). At 20 days gestation, the exposed pups had reduced weight compared with control pups, indicating fetal growth restriction associated with the trophoblast degeneration. Poor placentation, miscarriage, and increased neonatal mortality also were observed in mice exposed during early gestation to BPA ( 167 ). In vitro studies with JEG-3 cells (human choriocarcinoma cell line used as a model for the placental syncytiotrophoblast) exposed to the pesticides Roundup or methoxychlor or the Es DES or E 2 , at concentrations relevant to human or animal exposures, exhibited reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis ( 168 ,  169 ). These in vivo and in vitro studies suggest that early E or xenobiotic exposure could limit trophoblast invasion of the endometrium, placing the fetus at risk for intrauterine growth restriction and neonatal mortality. However, more studies are needed to understand the effects of inappropriate hormone or xenobiotic exposure on first-trimester placentation, spiral artery remodeling, oxidative damage, and subsequent placental function.\nBreast development begins before birth and progresses through different growth and differentiation stages in puberty, pregnancy, and lactation. This development has been elucidated by study of the mouse model ( 170 ) and is described briefly here. In mice, the five paired mammary glands emerge as ectodermal placodes at gestational day 11.5 of a typical 20-day gestation, and by gestational day 15.5 these placodes have formed into epithelial mammary sprouts that begin to invade the underlying fat pad precursor. By gestational day 18, significant branching of the mammary sprout has occurred, and a ductal lumen is present. Mammary gland growth continues isometrically with respect to body growth until 3 weeks after birth, when circulating E concentrations rise. These Es direct extensive ductal growth during this peripubertal time, characterized by the growth and progression of terminal end buds into the surrounding stroma (adipose and other connective tissue). Thus, at puberty the mammary gland ductal network is established, and a few alveolar buds are present at the terminal ends. Minimal structural changes occur in the adult during each estrous cycle, but during pregnancy the alveolar buds and lobuloalveolar units proliferate tremendously. On cessation of lactation, there is widespread epithelial apoptosis and remodeling of the stroma leading to mammary gland involution and a return to the prepregnant adult state.\nThus, mammary gland development in the mouse is a continual process characterized by major changes during embryonic development, peripubertal maturation, and pregnancy. A similar process occurs in humans. In the first trimester, fetal epithelial tissue begins thickening and branching into mammary gland ducts, and, by birth, adipose deposits form pectoral fat pads. Mature secretory glandular epithelium does not develop until pregnancy, and, thus, in a nonpregnant woman breast size primarily reflects the amount of adipose deposition and to a much less extent the epithelial ducts. Between birth and puberty, mammary gland progression is limited to minimal ductal elongation into the mammary fat pad. At puberty, steroid hormones cause significant ductal branching, formation of the terminal duct lobular unit, and expansion of the stroma. During pregnancy the luminal epithelial cells of the terminal end buds differentiate into lobuloalveolar epithelial cells, which are inhibited from secreting milk by high circulating E concentrations through negative feedback. At birth, these high maternal steroid concentrations plummet, allowing PRL to stimulate milk production by the glandular alveolar epithelial cells.\nOvarian and pituitary hormones play a pivotal role in mammary gland development during fetal development, puberty, adulthood, and pregnancy. Studies using ER-knockout mice suggest that prenatal development of the female genital tract and mammary gland is apparently normal in the absence of ER- a  and ER- b . However, the fetal mammary gland is responsive to sex steroids, because positional effects have been shown to occur in female fetuses placed between two males and those placed between two females ( 171 ). During puberty, elongation and terminal branching requires GH, E 2 , and ER- a  whereas lateral branching requires P and PR as does lobular alveolar development during pregnancy( 172 ).\nIn summary, the development of the mammary gland starts in the fetus and continues until menopause. The three periods of active developmental change and, thus, increased sensitivity are [1] fetal, when mammary gland architecture is established; [2] peripubertal, when stromal and epithelial proliferation occurs; and [3] pregnancy, when milk-secreting alveolar cells differentiate.\nThere are three theories used to explain the onset of breast cancer: [1] the somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis states that progressive accumulation of genetic alterations ultimately conveys a growth advantage over normal cells, [2] the epigenetic theory proposes a fetal origin of disease where changes in the epigenome play a central role in carcinogenesis, and [3] the tissue organization field theory postulates that cancers arise because of disruptions in tissue organization, altering the dynamic interaction between neighboring cells and tissues during early development and throughout adulthood ( 170 ). Both the somatic mutation theory and the epigenetic theory imply that cancer originates in a single cell that has undergone genetic or epigenetic changes, which ultimately result in dysregulated growth. In contrast, from the perspective of the tissue organization theory, cancer is a supracellular phenomenon akin to organogenesis goneawry; mutations would not be necessary for neoplastic development ( 173 ). The latter two theories are the focus of EDC research.\nThe known endogenous risk factors for development of breast cancer include age at menarche, first pregnancy, menopause, lactation, and parity. All of these factors are related to lifetime exposures to ovarian hormones, mostly Es, beginning before birth. Exposure to excessive E across a woman’s lifespan increases the risk of breast cancer ( 174 ). The recently reported decline in breast cancer for non-Hispanic white women over the age of 50 years from 1999 to 2004( 175 ) has been proposed to be associated with decreased use of hormone replacement therapy, although other factors currently are being considered including the use of the drugs raloxifene and selective ER modulators, aspirin and other anti-inflammatories, and vitamin D. Additional time is needed to discern the impact of decreased use of hormone replacement therapy, but the current data support the notion that exposure to exogenous hormonally active compounds can promote the development of breast cancer.\nMore than 200 chemicals have been associated with increased incidence of mammary gland tumors ( 176 ), but an understanding of the modes of action for these chemicals is far from complete. Exposures occurring during critical developmental windows (primarily prenatal and pubertal) are hypothesized to increase the risk of breast cancer development. If fetal exposure to estrogenic EDCs is associated with adult breast cancer, then we would expect an increased breast cancer incidence in DES daughters. Indeed, a systematic review of studies of daughters exposed in utero to DES finds an increased risk of breast cancer( 177 ). The risks are higher for older women, with women older than 50 years of age having greater risk (incidence rate ratios [IRR] 3.0; 95% CI 1.01-8.98) ( 178 ) than women older than 40 years of age (IRR 1.83; 95% CI 1.1-3.2)( 179 ). Studies of the DES cohort as they continue to age will provide insight into the role of fetal exposure to DES in the onset of breast cancer at advanced age.\nExperiments on laboratory rodents provide evidence for the role of prenatal and perinatal exposures in the development of adult breast cancer. It long has been recognized that altered perinatal hormone milieus in rodents can induce spontaneous and carcinogen-induced mammary tumorigenesis ( 180 ). Fetal influence on adult breast cancer is also a possibility, because prenatal DES exposure reduces the ability of ovariectomy to control induced breast cancer in adult rats( 181 ). The fact that breast cancer and other adult reproductive disruptions are related to prenatal and perinatal DES exposure is not surprising and has led to examination of less-potent, more widely available EDCs.\nRecent studies in laboratory rodents have raised suspicion of a link between breast cancer incidence and the use of the ubiquitous endocrine-disrupting plasticizer, BPA. These studies also have helped to define how EDCs may interfere with mammary gland development and differentiation.\nRats exposed in utero to environmentally relevant doses of BPA as low as 2.5  m g/kg per day develop precancerous lesions (intraductal hyperplasias), and perinatal exposure at higher doses also resulted in the development of carcinomas in situ at postnatal day 50 and 95 ( 182 ). In addition, prenatal exposure to 25  m g/kg per day BPA sensitized the mammary gland to the effect of subcarcinogenic doses of nitrosomethylurea during adulthood ( 183 ). In utero exposure to BPA causes 6-month old virgin mice to have mammary gland tissue resembling that of pregnant mice, with increased secretory products in the alveoli and a 300% increase in the mammary gland area composed of alveolar buds ( 184 ). The number of terminal end buds and terminal ducts also was increased in these mice, leading to concern because this is correlated with increased mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer ( 185 ). Similarly, terminal end bud density relative to the ductal area was seen at puberty in mice exposed in the perinatal period to low, environmentally relevant doses of BPA ( 186 ), and these changes are due to an increased sensitivity to Es during puberty ( 187 ). This increased sensitivity, in turn, induces the expression of PR in the luminal cells, which may be the mediator of increased lateral branching and ductal density. These effects of fetal exposure to BPA were already apparent at gestational day 18 (2 days before birth) in mice ( 171 ). Fetuses of mothers exposed to 250 ng/kg per day BPA exhibited an altered growth pattern of the mammary gland. Changes in the appearance of the mammary epithelium were observed, such as decreased cell size and delayed lumen formation, as well as increased ductal area. In the stroma, BPA exposure promoted advanced maturation of the fat pad and altered localization of fibrous collagen. Because maturation of the fat pad is the driving event for ductal growth and branching, it is likely that the increased ductal area in BPA-exposed animals is due to the accelerated formation of their fat pads ( 171 ). Similar to the effects of BPA, 4-day exposure of fetal CD-1 mice to 0.5 mg/kg per day zearalenone, an estrogenic mycotoxin, results in accelerated mammary gland differentiation with an apparent, although unquantitated, increase in terminal end buds and alveolar differentiation ( 68 ). Thus human epidemiologic studies and laboratory animal studies support the hypothesis that exposures to EDCs during mammary gland organogenesis can result in breast alterations manifested after puberty.\nIt is difficult to evaluate the role of embryonic EDC exposure and future breast cancer incidence in humans because of the difficulty of reconstructing past exposures during critical periods, and therefore few studies exist. For example, the observation that atrazine (a widely used herbicide) increases the incidence of mammary gland tumors in adult rats ( 188 ) resulted in human research studies looking for a similar association. These epidemiology studies have not found an association between adult atrazine exposure and female breast cancer ( 189 ,  190 ). However, this could be due to a lack of data about fetal exposure to atrazine. Research does suggest that higher body burdens of estrogenic toxicants are associated with breast cancer ( 191 ), but most studies examine the relationship of adult body burdens and breastcancer risk. An illustration of the importance of assessing early life-stage exposure is the relationship between breast cancer risk and DDT exposure. A meta-analysis found no link between adult DDT concentrations and breast cancer risk ( 192 ). However, a recent study has shown a statistically significant fivefold increase in the risk of breast cancer in women who were under the age of 14 years when exposed to high levels of  p,p ′-DDT (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-8.0) ( 193 ). Women who were not exposed before the age of 14 years (those who turned 14 years of age by 1945, when widespread use began) showed no association between DDT levels and breast cancer. Indeed, when assessing the effect of EDCs on breast cancer incidence, both level of exposure and timing of exposure are critical ( 194 ).\nIn addition to the importance of fetal and neonatal developmental imprinting for adult mammary cancer, puberty also represents a sensitive window for breast development. Limited laboratory animal studies find that exposures during puberty can increase the risk of subsequent breast cancer. Studies of exposure to radiation and dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene show an increased risk of mammary cancer from pubertal exposure compared with early life or adult exposure ( 195 ). Similarly, in mice transgenic for the rat wild-type  erbB-2  gene, exposure of reproductive-age mice to E 2  causes mammary tumors to develop at an earlier age (reduced latency period) when exposures occurred during puberty compared with other ages ( 196 ).\nThis review emphasizes the role of early life-stage exposure on breast cancer incidence, but, as with other reproductive disorders, it is the combination of fetal, neonatal, pubertal, and adult exposures that likely is important in contributing to and/or dictating disease onset. If early life-stage exposure to EDCs causes altered transcriptional patterns during adulthood, then we would expect all life stages to be critical windows. Future research should clarify the roles of EDCs on breast carcinogenesis.\nConsumption of breast milk is associated with numerous health benefits in offspring and, despite the widespread presence of EDCs in breast milk, breastfeeding is recommended over formula feeding because of these benefits (including decreased incidence of childhood obesity, immune protection, and early programming of glucose metabolism) ( 197 ). As a result, any EDCs that reduce the duration of lactation could compromise the health of the infant. Duration of lactation is reduced in women with elevated serum concentrations of PCBs and the DDT breakdown product dichlorodiphenyldi-chloroethylene (DDE). The effect of DDE and PCBs on duration of lactation is dose dependent, with each additional part per million increase in serum concentration being associated with a 1-week reduction in lactation duration ( 198 ). Thus, reduced lactation duration is noted in populations exposed to elevated DDE and PCBs, such as in women of a northern Mexico agricultural town in the late 1980s ( 199 ) and in females who consumed high amounts of Lake Michigan sport-caught fish ( 200 ).\nExperimental studies examining the cellular-level mechanisms through which DDE and/or PCBs reduce the duration of lactation are lacking because of the absence of such an organochlorine effect in laboratory rats ( 201 ). One possible mechanism is the E-mimicking effect of DDE on mammary glands, as it is known that endogenous Es inhibit milk secretion during lactation. Whereas E and E agonists cause enlargement of the breasts by promoting fat deposition, other stromal tissue development, and the growth of ducts during pregnancy, elevated circulating levels of Es inhibit lactation. Besides acting as an E agonist, other mechanisms for DDE’s reduction of lactation are possible. Dichlorodiphenyldi-chloroethylene is antiandrogenic in male rodents ( 202 ) and possibly females. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane metabolites could also be antiprogestogenic although few studies have examined the interaction of DDE with other steroid receptors, such as the PRs of humans. One study examining the alligator PR showed that the seldom-measured DDT metabolite, DDOH, binds to the PR and can displace P from the receptor, as do the herbicide atrazine and related compounds( 203 ).\nIt is also possible that earlier life-stage exposures to environmental agents contribute to reduced lactation duration. Data from humans are lacking because of the absence of early life-stage exposure data and subsequent lactation data, but several recent studies in rodents have shown that prenatal exposures to environmental agents disrupt mammary gland development and subsequent lactation throughout life. In rats, exposure to environmentally relevant doses of atrazine at gestational day 17 to 19 (during the period of epithelial outgrowth) has been shown to delay pubertal and adult development of the mammary glands independently of circulating hormone levels or weight gain ( 204 ). This delay results in inadequate milk production in F1 individuals and decreased weight gain in the F2 generation ( 204 ). Further studies have demonstrated that prenatal exposure to low doses of atrazine metabolites (a mixture of hydroxyatrazine, diaminochlorotriazine, deethylatrazine, and deisopropylatrazine) also inhibits mammary gland development ( 205 ). Although the detailed mechanism is unknown, the fact that atrazine increases aromatase activity in many cells ( 206 ) suggests an endocrine-disrupting role.\nThe role of pubertal exposures in altering lactation is less supported, although there is a paucity of data on the subject. When high doses of Es were administered during adolescence to reduce the adult height of abnormally tall girls, these females exhibited no alteration in lactation during adulthood ( 207 ).\nIn summary, at this time it appears that disruption of lactation by environmental contaminants is possible after both embryonic and adult exposures. We propose that embryonic exposures alter breast architecture, as supported by the discovery that pesticide-exposed girls exhibit breastdevelopment that is associated with adipose deposition and not ductal or glandular growth ( 208 ), and that adult exposures alter the initiation or progression of lactation in the same manner as endogenous Es. The limited data in humans comprise a data gap and should be the subject of further research.\n\nPuberty is characterized as a cascade of events leading to the attainment of adult reproductive capacity and involves maturation of the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary, ovary, uterus, and breast. The pubertal cascade is initiated by activation of the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator, which results in anterior pituitary release of FSH and LH. Secretion of these gonadotropins stimulates ovarian E 2  production that initiates breast development (thelarche) and, subsequently, uterine-endometrial maturation. Simultaneous with the pituitary-gonadal activation, the adrenal glands increase the secretion of androgens (adrenarche), which results in pubic hair growth (pubarche) approximately 6 months after breast budding. Approximately 2 years after pubertal onset, first menstruation (menarche) occurs as a late pubertal event. Although there are many associated pubertal events, the three notable characteristics that have been used to indicate puberty onset in human females (which are different from pubertal markers in nonhuman animals) are breast development, pubarche, and menarche ( 209 ).\nThere is considerable variation among human populations in the age at puberty, and this variation has not been sufficiently explained solely by genetic influences. For girls, the age of puberty onset has declined over the last half century in the United States ( 210 ) and several other developed nations( 211 ). Indeed, the majority of an expert panel asked to evaluate secular trends in puberty onset concluded that the weight of evidence supported trends in earlier breast development and earlier menarche ( 212 ). In a recent review of the timing of puberty in populations around the world ( 211 ), mean age at first measured breast development (Tanner stage B2) in 15 developed-nation populations ranged from 8.9 to 11.2 years. Age at menarche in these populations was slightly less variable, ranging from 12.0 to 13.5 years. On average, age at first breast development occurred several years before age at menarche (median 2.5, range 1.7 to 3.3 years). However, in developing countries these pubertal markers occurred considerably later, with menarcheal age ranging from 12.9 to 16.1 years. These data demonstrate the considerable variability in age of breast development compared with age at menarche and suggest a role for environmental factors in the timing of pubertal onset.\nThe occurrence of early puberty can have a detrimental effect on a woman’s health. Precocious puberty has been associated with increased incidence of depression ( 213 ,  214 ), sexual victimization ( 215 ), substance abuse ( 213 ), and adult breast cancer ( 216 ). As a result, recent studies have given deserved attention to the environmental factors shown to influence precocious puberty. These factors include obesity, increased psychosocial stressors, and increased exposure to environmental pollutants ( 211 ). The human data linking EDCs to early breast development and early age at menarche are limited; however, data from animal models have lent more certainty to this association.\nPeripubertal breast development in females progresses through five stages, termed Tanner stages following the criteria outlined in the early 1960s ( 209 ), and the earliest indication of puberty is breast development from Tanner stage B1 (prepubertal) to Tanner B2 (breast budding). There is considerable evidence that the age of Tanner B2 attainment has declined significantly, particularly in the United States. A significant reduction in age of onset for breast development has been shown in US girls ( 210 ), especially African American females ( 210 ,  217 ). The well-established contributors to such precocious breast development include childhood obesity ( 218 ,  219 ) and obesity-associated hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance( 220 ). Studies also have suggested links to exposure to estrogenic chemicals. The roles of EDCs and obesity in promoting early breast development are complex, and an emerging hypothesis links EDC exposure to obesity in animal models ( 71 ,  221 ,  222 ).\nOne way to examine environmental influences on premature breast development is to study populations that have increased incidence of precocious breast development. For the past 25 years, researchers have examined females in Puerto Rico because of an increased incidence of thelarche (breast development before 8 years of age) that is estimated to be 8 in 1,000 live births ( 223 ). This increased rate does not appear to be of genetic origin, because the incidence is independent of ethnic group ( 224 ), and multiple environmental factors have been used to explain the elevated occurrence of thelarche in this population. All such factors are associated with increased cumulative estrogenic exposure: [1] consumption of phytoestrogen-laden soy-based formula ( 224 ), [2] maternal history of ovarian cysts ( 224 ), [3] elevated serum zearalenol, a nonsteroidal E ( 225 ), and [4] elevated serum phthalate concentrations ( 226 ). The association with elevated phthalates is intriguing, as phthalates are EDCs present in plastics and personal care products, and human exposure to phthalates is high and common ( 227 ,  228 ). Although di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was not detected in serum from all the girls with thelarche, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was significantly elevated in cases (average 450 ppb) compared with controls (70 ppb) ( 226 ). These results of Colon et al.( 226 ) have been criticized on the basis that phthalates were measured in serum, and such measures are subject to contamination in the collection process. Moreover, phthalates are rapidly metabolized and excreted from the body, and, thus, any phthalate measured in the serum had no influence on the already existing condition ( 229 ). However, recently similar results were found in girls with precocious puberty in Shanghai ( 230 ). Thus, the hypothesis that phthalate exposureis associated (through either causation or correlation) with early breast development is still viable.\nAnother population experiencing early breast development is children who immigrate from developing to developed countries. A study in Belgium found that 28% of patients with precocious puberty were children who immigrated from developing countries where organochlorine exposure is high, and these children had significantly elevated  p,p’ -DDE concentrations ( 231 ). Similarly increased incidence of precocious puberty has been noted in adoptees in Denmark, although the contributions of genetic and environmental influences are unknown ( 232 ).\nBoth in utero and neonatal time periods are sensitive windows of susceptibility for effects on early puberty in humans( 233 ) and rodents (see  Table 5 ). In a study examining breast development in girls exposed both in utero and lactationally to differing amounts of the flame retardant polybrominated biphenyl, there was an increased OR (2.2, 95% CI 0.5-9.8) of early breast development in girls exposed to moderate, but not high or low, concentrations of polybrominated biphenyl ( 233 ). Similarly, a study in girls in Sonora, Mexico, indicates that it is possible that fetal, neonatal, or childhood exposure to contemporary pesticides can alter the pattern of breast development ( 208 ). The role of peripubertal EDC exposure on female breast development is less clear, but data from rodents show that mammary gland tissue is altered after acute, peripubertal exposure to DES, genistein, or DDT, with these EDCs acting as potent morphogens ( 234 ).\nNumerous laboratory animal studies indicate that embryonic and neonatal exposure to natural and synthetic Es can accelerate puberty. In rodents, vaginal opening is the earliest visible sign of puberty occurring in response to elevated Es, being analogous to Tanner B2 breast development in humans. Accelerated, early vaginal opening is seen in rodents exposed in utero or after birth to E 2 , the synthetic E DES, phytoestrogens, and many plasticizers (see  Table 5 ). Vaginal opening is not the only indicator of early puberty in rodents; when theyare exposed to environmentally relevant doses of BPA, vaginal opening itself is not altered but the number of days between vaginal opening and first estrus is reduced, indicating an acceleration of postpubertal ovulation ( 235 ).\nConsistent with the findings that prepubertal exposure to Es can induce early breast development, exposure to compounds that block Es can delay breast development. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo- p -dioxin has an antiestrogenic effect on breast development, and exposure of girls to PCBs with dioxin-like activity results in retarded breast development ( 236 ). Results from laboratory animals support these studies, because mice exposed in utero to TCDD have delayed puberty ( 237 ) and mammary gland development( 238 ).\nAge at menarche is much easier to record in large-scale epidemiologic studies when compared with other pubertal indices, but menarcheal age is less likely to be sensitive to EDCs than age at onset of breast development. Menarche occurs only after several years of endogenous E 2  stimulation of the endometrial tissues, whereas breast budding is the result of E stimulation of prepubertal glandular tissues na€ive to Es. Thus, while menarche is clinically easier to measure, early breast development is a more sensitive and earlier pubertal index.\nAge at menarche is reduced in girls exposed to estrogenic organochlorines, but the exact contribution of organochlorines to precocious menarche is unknown because of the numerous environmental variables influencing menarche (see  Fig. 2 ). A study of women exposed to DDE (one breakdown product of DDT) through Great Lakes fish consumption found a 1-year reduction in age at menarche for each increase of 15  m g/L serum DDE ( 239 ), and a study of Chinese textile workers determined that a 10  m g/L serum DDT increase was associated with 0.2-year reduction in menarcheal age ( 74 ). However, predictions of exact age reductions in puberty by specific EDCs are confounded by the fact that other environmental variables (including other EDCs) also contribute to pubertal onset ( Fig. 2 ).\nDetermining the role of particular xenobiotics and phytoestrogens in promoting early menarche (and other reproductive disorders) is complicated by the fact that humans are exposed to numerous xenobiotics, each of which could have a different effect. For instance, what is the result of simultaneous exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of lead (which delays menarche) and DDE (which accelerates menarche)? Such a question was asked for girls residing in the Akwesasne Mohawk Nation ( 240 ). Girls with elevated circulating estrogenic PCBs were more likely to have reached menarche compared with those with lower PCB concentrations. Conversely, girls with higher blood lead concentrations attained menarche at a later age. Thus, the cumulative effect of all EDCs is what appears important, with compounds likely having additive or subtractive influences.\nIt has been suggested that a reduction in environmental lead levels, one of the environmental success stories of the past 30 years, may contribute to recently documented decreases in menarcheal age in the United States. Peripubertal lead exposure is associated with delayed sexual maturation in rats ( 241 ,  242 ) and humans ( 240 ,  243 ,  244 ). Thus, it is possible that reduced circulating lead concentrations as a result of US regulation ( 245 ) could be a contributing factor to the occurrence of earlier menarche seen in US girls.\nThe lack of knowledge, until recently, about human embryonic EDC exposures has hampered our understanding of the role of contemporary-use EDCs in reducing age at menarche. As illustrated in this review, most EDCs examined for their role in altering age of puberty are the well-characterized organochlorines, phytoestrogens, and pharmaceutical Es. These studies clearly illustrate the potential for fetal and neonatal exposures to influence breast development and menarche, but, in some cases (such as DES exposure), menarche itself may not be altered but menstrual regularization may be delayed ( 77 ). Thus a data gap exists for understanding the effects of contemporary-use EDCs in early menarche.\nThe mechanisms for EDC-accelerated puberty are characterized as either central (with the EDC causing hypothalamic and/or pituitary maturation) or peripheral (with the EDC acting directly on the ovary or breast independent of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis) ( 246 ). Data supporting the central hypothalamic maturation hypothesis come from studies of genetically similar populations exposed to different environmental conditions. For children emigrating from countries having higher EDC exposure, it is proposed that estrogenic EDC exposure accelerates maturation of the hypothalamus at the same time as inhibiting gonadotropin production, and the absence of EDC exposure initiates early puberty ( 211 ). The role of EDCs in initiating hypothalamic maturation is seen in rats, where early postnatal exposure to either E 2  or  o,p’ -DDT caused early GnRH secretion and subsequent puberty ( 247 ).\nEarly breast development could be due either to proliferation of ducts and periductal stroma (gynecomastia) or excessive adipose-tissue deposition (lipomastia). Most studies ignore such distinctions, but the few that have considered the tissue-level cause of early breast development have indicated lipomastia. When breast development was compared for two populations—one exposed to contemporary pesticides and the other not—the pesticide-exposed girls exhibited large breast fields with breast size not being related to glandular development, as it was in non-pesticide-exposed girls ( 208 ). Such lipomastia may precede gynecomastia, as mammary gland epithelial cell differentiation is dependent on induction by adipose tissue ( 248 ).\nStudies in the 1990s led to the hypothesis that occurrence of early breast development in obese girls could be influenced by elevated Es associated with obesity. When pregnant rats are fed high-fat diets, maternal E 2  concentrations are significantly higher and the offspring of these females have puberty onset at a younger age ( 249 ). However, plasma E 2  concentrations are not consistently elevated in obese girls, raising doubts about this hypothesis. Recent studies do show that perinatal E exposure is associated with altered adiposity and weight homeostasis later in life ( 250 ). Thus, the mechanisms through which nutrition and EDCs promote early breast development are likely conserved, both involving elevated exposure to Es.\nNumerous studies confirm that prenatal and neonatal exposure to xenoestrogens affect breast development, but the amount of exposure to xenoestrogens required to elicit such effects is unknown. Morphometric measurements indicate that embryonic exposure to E 2  results in a nonmonotonic dose-response in the mouse, such that intermediate doses promoted terminal end bud formation and ductal elongation, but low and high doses had an inhibitory effect ( 251 ). Such nonmonotonic dose-response curves are likely due to the interaction of two or more monotonic dose-response curves and make hazard modeling and subsequent risk assessment difficult ( 251 ).\n\nObesity, diet, and physical activity are external factors relevant to multiple female reproductive endpoints, and they may modify or exacerbate the effects of EDCs. New studies are finding links between obesity and incidence of hysterectomy ( 252 ) and stillbirths ( 253 ,  254 ), and some of the specific reproductive disorders mentioned in this article show an increased incidence in obese and physically inactive individuals. For instance, higher body mass index is associated with earlier puberty in girls ( 255 ), and low physical activity in working women has a significant influence on incidence of both deep endometriotic nodules (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.80-11.62) and peritoneal endometriosis (OR 5.61, 95% CI 1.90-16.60) ( 256 ). One explanation is that higher physical activity reduces circulating E 2  in females ( 257 ); therefore, the reduced physical activity associated with modern society could increase E exposure. Diet is also a contributor to the progression of endometriosis, primarily through the action of phytoestrogens and/or dietary suppression of enzymes (cyclooxygenase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-2) or growth factors (tumor necrosis factor- a , interleukin-6, interleukin-8) that promote endometriosis ( 258 ). These associations may be linked to increased “estrogenicity” in adults, as adipose tissue has high aromatase activity that produces more Es( 259 ), but the complexity of reproductive system organogenesis suggests that early exposure to EDCs could be associated simultaneously with obesity and adult reproductive problems. Instead of obesity being a causative factor in reproductive disorders, it may be the result of early developmental channeling, just as is the reproductive disorder. The observed correlation between EDC exposure, obesity, and female reproductive failure should be examined and clarified.\nWe believe that clarity for disease onset amidst developmental complexity is possible if associations among diseases are carefully studied and considered. Recent studies in women with PCOS and their offspring illustrate this. When women with PCOS become pregnant, the offspring are more likely to be exposed to elevated prenatal androgen concentrations and also to have an increased likelihood for low birth weight ( 260 ,  261 ). This low birth weight is often compensated for with postnatal catch-up growth, which is a risk factor for insulin insensitivity, obesity, and diabetes later in life ( 262 ), particularly in children who are not breastfed or who are weaned from the breast early ( 263 - 265 ). Furthermore, reduced fetal growth appears to be associated with precocious adrenarche, early puberty, poor fertility, and PCOS during later life stages ( 266 ). Clearly, female reproductive problems develop through a complex link between genetics, EDCs, and other factors such as obesity. Much more research is needed to assess the multigenerational effects of early exposure to hormonally active agents. The documented associations among PCOS, early androgen exposure, fetal growth restriction, catch-up growth, and consequent metabolic and reproductive disorders, for example, suggest that early hormonal disruption can manifest in multiple ways.\n\nExperimental data from animal models of human reproduction have shown that numerous ubiquitous environmental chemicals (including banned or highly regulated chemicals such as DES, DDT, and PCBs, as well as contemporary-use chemicals such as BPA, atrazine, and phthalates) have detrimental effects on female reproduction. Given that the reproductive physiology of humans and other mammals is remarkably similar, it is reasonable to predict that human female reproductive disruption can occur after exposure to these compounds. A number of human epidemiology studies support these predictions. However, there remains uncertainty as to the nature and scope of the influence of EDCs on human reproductive health. We suggest several specific research directions that can elucidate the relative impact of EDC exposure on female reproductive disorders ( Table 6 ) and emphasize three larger-scale needs: [1] studies of early life exposures with sufficient follow-up tounderstand links to adult onset of disease, [2] national and international coordination of samples and data, and [3] establishment of an interdisciplinary consortium to improve research, policies, and education.\nFirst, the major factor limiting the certainty of EDC disruption on human female reproduction is the paucity of data linking human fetal exposures to adult-onset reproductive disorders, and this should be a focus of future studies. The data from DES exposure are compelling; however, EDCs in lower concentrations than DES exposure or with comparably lower, similar, or higher affinity for ER- a  and ER- b  should be investigated. Human exposure data concerning the reproductive system are essential for risk assessment, and although serum and follicular fluid have been analyzed for many environmental contaminants, few studies have examined associations between measured physiologic EDC concentrations or history of environmental exposure and particular reproductive disorders. Studies of cohorts with strong exposure assessment data during prenatal, neonatal, and pubertal development are needed. However, these types of epidemiologic studies take much time and resources, and we need also to pursue both model animal studies and development of new techniques to clarify the links between early perturbations and future female reproductive disorders.\nSecond, although we are certain that fetal and neonatal exposures to particular EDCs contribute to specific reproductive disorders in adults, the links among the various female reproductive disruptions are less clear. If, as we hypothesize, adult female reproductive disruptions result from similar windows of exposure for EDCs (see  Fig. 3 ), then multiple outcomes and endpoints could share etiologies (although time of onset likely will differ for different disorders). This would be analogous to the role of EDCs during embryogenesis in males, which is hypothesized to result in a number of different adverse outcomes (hypospadias, cryptorchidism, reduced spermatogenesis, and testicular cancer) collectively referred to as the “testicular dysgenesis syndrome” ( 267 ). This hypothesis can be tested most effectively through national and international coordination of research laboratories that can share samples through a tissue bank repository and share results through centralization of a database. Currently, most studies (and research laboratories) focus on a single disorder (e.g., endometriosis) as an endpoint of interest and a single biomarker for disorder detection. Although this focus improves diagnosis and understanding of a particular disorder, it fails to address the larger issue of total female reproductive system disruption. Establishment of a “laboratory without walls” would maximize knowledge gained about EDC-associated reproductive disorders by increasing the efficiency of both time and money used in such studies.\nThird, a multidisciplinary, coordinated approach is needed to reduce the detrimental impact of EDCs on reproductive health. Numerous private, governmental, and academic organizations currently work to clarify and reduce the detrimental effects of EDCs, but no coordinated consortium exists to organize and focus such efforts. We suggest the establishment of an interdisciplinary consortium that can coordinate research, policy, and education pertaining to the role of EDCs on reproductive health.\nCollectively, the data reviewed in this article illustrate the role of EDCs in numerous human female reproductive disorders and emphasize just how sensitive the embryo, fetus, neonate, and adolescent are to EDCs. To reduce the risk of reproductive disorders in the next generation of women, we as a society must commit to reducing EDC contamination of air, water, and land by the products we use. We also must focus on collaborative research and solution-based efforts as we have described and provide easily accessible information about EDCs to the public. It is of concern that the endocrine-disrupting potential of the majority of chemicals in production, including those that are found in common consumer products, has not been assessed systematically for their effects on reproduction. Although there is much information on EDCs available from the US Food and Drug Administration ( http://edkb.fda.gov ), US Environmental Protection Agency ( http://www.epa.gov/endo ), and private organizations (e.g.,  http://www.ourstolenfuture.org ,  http://www.silentspring.org ,  http://www.nrdc.org ,  http://www.healthandenvironment.org ), there is not yet an easily accessible format for centralized public information about how to reduce EDC exposure, why it is important, and when it is most critical. The combination of regulatory effortsto reduce exposures to EDCs and increased public education about EDCs is likely to improve the reproductive health of women and future generations.","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}