{"paper_id":"d4480d3f-fb11-4122-afbb-ecc654e77bcc","body_text":"Hemoptysis is the expectoration of blood from the pulmonary parenchyma or the tracheobronchial tree below the level of the glottis. The expectoration of blood can vary from a small amount of blood-streaking sputum to massive bleeding with life-threatening consequences. The clinical diagnostic algorithm should aim to differentiate and identify the etiology of hemoptysis, since massive hemoptysis may result in a fatal outcome ( 1 , 2 ).\nThe common causes of hemoptysis include pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), malignancy, bronchiectasis, chronic bronchitis, pneumonia, and fungal infections. The other rare causes are vasculitis due to collagen vascular diseases and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, essential cryoglobulinemia, Behcet’s disease, acute lung transplantation rejection, drug-induced (e.g., chemotherapeutic agents, propylthiouracil), idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis, and toxin or inhalation injury ( 3 ).\nAbout 30% of cases attending respiratory clinics and presenting with hemoptysis pose a problem in clinical diagnosis, and the histopathology plays a vital role in diagnosing these conditions. The condition can be localized or diffuse depending upon the underlying etiology ( 4 ). Intra alveolar hemorrhage, fibrin deposition, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages associated with or without capillaritis are the common findings observed in cases of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) ( 5 ). Radiologically, DAH shows patchy/ diffuse bilateral areas of lung consolidation mainly involving the lower lobes and perihilar regions ( 6 ).\nA literature search revealed only a few reports on using histopathological interpretation in diagnosing unknown causes of hemoptysis. This is vital to diagnose and treat the condition earlier, as it prevents disease progression, and constituted the reason for conducting the current study. This study aims to identify the various uncommon aetiologies of hemoptysis based on histopathological features and the pathologist’s approach in diagnosing this condition.\n\nAll lung biopsies, including lobectomy specimens received in the department of pathology, between Jan 2018 to Jan 2020 (2 years duration) were retrospectively reviewed. Of the received 243 specimens, 20 cases had hemoptysis with undetermined causes. The obtained specimens were derived from various procedures and included 117 transbronchial lung biopsies (TBLB), 62 endo bronchial lung biopsies (EBLB), 28 guided (Ultra sonogram /CT) biopsies, 19 thoracoscopic/Video-assisted (VATS) biopsies, and 17 lobectomies. The cases with a history of hemoptysis associated with common causes such as tuberculosis (TB), carcinoma, bronchitis, bronchiectasis, and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) were excluded from the study. The clinical data obtained were age, sex, presenting complaints, clinical diagnosis/differential diagnosis, and significantly associated co-morbidities. Laboratory investigations such as autoimmune workup (ANCA, ANA, etc.), sputum for culture & acid-fast bacilli (AFB), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for culture and cytology, and other relevant information were collected. The findings of imaging (high-resolution computerized tomography - HRCT) and bronchoscopic findings were recorded if available (not always performed).\nEthical approval for this study was obtained from PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (Approval number: 20/117, Date: 27.05.2020).\n\nOut of 243 lung biopsies received, a total of 20 cases with symptoms of hemoptysis due to undetermined etiology were included in our study.\nBased on imaging and histopathological findings, the etiology of hemoptysis was divided into localized and diffuse/bilateral pulmonary involvement ( Table 1 ). Depending upon the histological findings, the causes of hemoptysis were further divided into\n- Hemoptysis with capillaritis ( Table 2 )\n- Hemoptysis without capillaritis ( Table 3 )\n- Unusual tumors and tumor-like lesions ( Table 4 )\n- Miscellaneous uncommon causes\nEtiological classification based on imaging & histopathological findings.\nCauses of hemoptysis\nLocalized\nNumber of cases\nDiffuse /bilateral\nNumber of cases\nPulmonary hamartoma\n1\nGPA\n3\nAspergillosis\n1\nSilicosis\n3\nMyelolipoma\n1\nEGPA\n2\nMucor\n1\nInvasive aspergillosis\n1\nPulmonary endometriosis\n1\nInvasive mucor+aspergillosis\n1\nMucoepidermoid carcinoma\n1\nMultiple metastases from a leiomyosarcoma\n1\nProbably benign mesenchymal neoplasm\n1\nPAM\n1\nPulmonary intravascular hemangioma\n1\nGPA:  Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis / Wegener’s,  EGPA:  Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis / Churg-Strauss syndrome,  PAM:  Pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis.\nCauses of hemoptysis with capillaritis.\nGranulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA)\nEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA)\nCase - 1\nCase-2\nCase-3\nCase 1\nCase 2\nAge, sex\n40, M\n46, F\n51, F\n43, M\n42, M\nComplaints\nCough, hemoptysis, and dyspnoea\nSerology\nAnti-CCP, PR3-ANCA&RF: positive\nPR3-ANCA positive\nPR3-ANCA positive\nRF: positive\nPR3-ANCA: weakly positive\nImaging studies\nBilateral nodules\nGround glass changes, calcified nodule\nBilateral consolidation with few nodules\nBilateral nodules\nBilateral nodular and cavitating lesions.\nType of biopsy\nEBLB\nCT guided biopsy\nCT guided biopsy\nTBLB\nVATS lung biopsy\nHPE findings:\nVascular changes:\n• Capillaritis, venulitis\n• Fibrinoid necrosis\n( Figure 2 )\nVague outlines of thrombosed blood vessels\nVasculitis and\nFibrin thrombi\n( Figure 2 )\nEosinophilic infiltration of the vessel wall\n• Necrosis of the vessel walls with inflammatory cells infiltration\n( Figure 3 )\n• Organizing, recanalizing and fibrin thrombi\nParenchymal changes\n• Granulomatous inflammation with MNG cells\n( Figure 2 )\n• Interstitial inflammation\n• Necrosis, karyorrhexis,\nhematoxyphilic nuclear dust\n• Neutrophilic micro abscess\n• Necrosis, karyorrhectic debris\n• Granulomatous response with MNG cells\n• Neutrophilic micro abscess\n• Eosinophilic microabscess\n• Palisading granuloma\n• Intraalveolar hemorrhage ( Figure 3 )\n• Eosinophilic microabscess, parenchymal necrosis\n• Perl's stain highlights the hemosiderin-laden macrophages ( Figure 4 )\nMNG cells:  Multinucleate giant cells,  HPE:  Histopathological examination,  EBLB:  Endobronchial lung biopsy,  CT:  Computed tomography,  VATS:  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery,  TBLB:  Transbronchial lung biopsy.\nCauses of hemoptysis without capillaritis.\nSilicosis\nFungal infection\nCase -1\nCase-2\nCase-3\nCase-1\nCase-2\nCase-3\nCase-4\nAge, sex\n61, M\n54, M\n58, M\n28, M\n56, M\n45, F\n15, F\nComplaints\nCough, hemoptysis and dyspnoea.\nCough, hemoptysis, and dyspnoea\nAnother relevant history\nExposure to silicon dust +\nPost Koch’s sequelae\nDM, CKD\nPost TB, DM.\nDM,\nDKA+,\nMild PAH\nImaging studies\nBilateral lung nodules&hilar nodes\nCalcified nodes\nB/L nodules, calcification\nNA\nCavitatory consolidation\nB/L subpleural nodules\nB/L cavitating consolidations\nType of biopsy\nTBLB\nRight upper lobe segmentectomy\nEBLB\nRight lower lobectomy\nTBLB\nHPE\nFindings\n• Nodules of epithelioid and pigment laden histiocytes, predominantly around the vascular channels\n( Figure 5 )\n• Dilated bronchi forming a cavity containing the fungal ball\n• Tissue, angioinvasion & infarct\n• Fibrosis, chronic granulomatous inflammation\n• Oxalate crystals ( Figure 6 )\nSpecial study\nPolarizer: birefringent crystals\n( Figure 5  inset)\nGMS & PAS stains: septate, acute-angled branching hyphae of\naspergillus\nPAS & GMS stains: broad, aseptate and wide-angle branching hyphae of mucor\nPAS & GMS stains: Tangles of fungal elements, consistent with aspergillus and mucor\nDM:  Diabetes Mellitus,  CKD:  Chronic kidney disease,  TB:  Tuberculosis,  NA:  Not available,  DKA:  Diabetic ketoacidosis,  PAH:  Pulmonary artery hypertension,  B/L:  Bilateral,  HPE:  Histopathological examination,  EBLB:  Endobronchial lung biopsy,  TBLB:  Transbronchial lung biopsy,  GMS:  Grocott Methenamine Silver Stain.\nUnusual tumors and tumor-like lesions of the lung.\nDiagnosis\nPulmonary hamartoma (n=1)\nHigh-grade Spindle cell sarcoma - metastatic LMS (n=1)\nBenign mesenchymal neoplasm (n=1)\nPulmonary myelolipoma (n=1)\nEndobronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma, high grade (n=1)\nAge, sex\n46, F\n59, M\n51, M\n65, M\n39, F\nComplaints\nCough, hemoptysis, and dyspnoea\nImaging studies\nSolitary pulmonary nodule.\nNodular masses in both lungs - suggested metastases.\n-\nEndobronchial nodules -? TB/sarcoidosis\n-\nBronchoscopy\nNA\nNA\nIrregularisation in left lingula?\na blood clot? growth\n-\nLeft main bronchus tumor with a possible endobronchial carcinoid.\nType of biopsy\nLobectomy\nEBLB\nEBLB\nEBLB\nLeft Pneumonectomy\nGross\nGlistening lobulated mass of 3x2.5 cm\n-\n-\n-\nEndobronchial ulcerated solid, yellow-white polypoidal mass\nHPE\nfindings\nCircumscribed lesion of mature cartilage interspersed by adipose tissue, smooth muscle, and fibrovascular tissue. Foci of ossification, chondromyxoid area.\n• Pleomorphic spindle cells\n• Coagulative necrosis. Positive  for SMA and desmin.\n• Polypoidal lesion\n• Fascicles of spindle cells\n• Cellular myxoid stroma.\n• Express Vimentin and SMA\n• Circumscribed lesion of thin trabecular bone enclosing adipocytes and hematopoietic elements\n• MPO-highlighting the myeloid cells\n( Figure 7 ).\n• Infiltrating neoplasm,\n• Solid nests, cribriform pattern, and mucin filled acini.\n• Squamoid morules\n( Figure 8 ).\n• Positive for Pan CK and P63\nLMS:  Leiomyosarcoma,  NA:  Not available,  SMA:  Smooth muscle actin,  MPO:  Myeloperoxidase,  HPE:  Histopathological examination,  EBLB:  Endobronchial lung biopsy,  TB:  Tuberculosis.\nBronchial endometriosis.  A)  Bronchial mucosa with a focus of endometrial glands and stroma (H&E; x4).  B)  High power view (H&E; x40).  C)  CD10 positive stromal cells (IHC; x40).  D)  ER positive epithelial & stromal cells (IHC; x40).\nGranulomatosis with polyangiitis.  A)  Capillaritis with fibrin thrombi (H&E; x10).  B)  Scattered multinucleated giant cells, karyorrhectic debris & parenchymal necrosis (H&E; x40).  C)  Mediumsized vessel wall with neutrophilic infiltration and destruction (H&E; x10).  D)  Verhoeff-Van Gieson (VVG) stain highlights the outline of a vessel wall (VVG; x40).\nEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.  A-B)  A medium-sized artery infiltrated by eosinophils and histiocytes with partial destruction of a vessel wall (H&E; x10 & x20) . C)  (PAS stain; x40).  D)  Intra-alveolar hemorrhage (H&E; x10).\nHemosiderin-laden macrophages  A)  (H&E; x40).  B)  (Perl’s stain; x40).\nSilicosis.  A)  Multiple, patchy silicotic nodules (H&E; x10).  B)  Perivascular nodular collection of pigmented histiocytes (Inset-birefringent crystals under polarized light) (H&E; 40).\nFungal infection.  A)  Intravascular plugs of fungal organisms (H&E; x4).  B)  Septate, acute angle branching hyphal fungal organisms consistent with aspergillus with oxalate crystals (PAS; x10).\nMyelolipoma.  A)  Bronchial mucosa with squamous metaplasia and a fairly circumscribed lesion composed of adipocytes admixed with hematopoietic elements (H&E; x4).  B)  High power view (H&E; x10).  C)  Myeloperoxidase stain (IHC; x10).\nEndobronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma.  A)  Showing admixture of squamous and glandular elements (H&E; x4).  B)  High power view (H&E; x10).\nHRCT of a 34-year-old male who presented with hemoptysis showed bilateral ground-glass densities with septal calcification -? Interstitial lung disease. TBLB sections showed distended alveoli containing concentric lamellated, calcific material with few hemosiderin-laden macrophages.\nA 43-year-old man with a history of cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis ‘C’ had recurrent episodes of hemoptysis. Bronchoscopy revealed a mucosal white patch in the left lingular segment. The biopsied lesion showed lung tissue intimately admixed with a focus of endometrial glands and stroma. CD 10 immunostaining of the stroma, as well as estrogen and progesterone receptor staining of the glandular component, were both consistent with endometriosis ( Figure 1 ).\nHRCT of an elderly male showed multiple small nodules in both the lungs and a lobulated enhancing soft tissue lesion attached to the anterior wall of the right atrium-? Malignancy. TBLB sections showed lung parenchyma with medium to large-sized vessels containing an intraluminal, adherent lesion of tubular vascular spaces lined by endothelial cells. CD31 & CD34 immunostaining highlighted the endothelial cells. Since the right atrial mass could not be biopsied, the clinical/imaging findings were correlated and the final HPE diagnosis made was intravascular capillary haemangioma/?fragmented from cardiac haemangioma.\n\nHaemoptysis is considered to be a serious medical condition and has a broad differential diagnosis. All cases with microscopic evidence of hemorrhage do not present with hemoptysis clinically. Similarly, all patients who presented with hemoptysis will not show alveolar hemorrhage histologically ( 4 ).\nPulmonary vasculitis is characterized by inflammation of the small and medium-sized vessel wall, causing pulmonary hemorrhage. Imaging studies show multiple lung cavitary nodules/masses, which may mimic metastasis. Also in some conditions, the lung infiltrates are transitory making the diagnosis a challenging one ( 7 ).\nSchnabel et al. stated that histopathological findings may vary depending upon the type of biopsy. They found out that the yield of guided lung biopsy is high when compared to TBLB since gross lesions are easily visible. Similarly, most of our cases had undergone guided biopsies and were adequate ( 8 ).\nTravis et al. suggested that capillaritis is a morphologic marker of DAH in their study. They concluded that capillaritis and necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate were pathognomonic features of GPA. Parenchymal necrosis, extravasated fibrin, and scattered multinucleate giant cells in a biopsy could suggest the diagnosis of a GPA even in the absence of granuloma. The destruction of the vessel wall can be highlighted by VVG elastic stains. However, correct sampling is essential for the maximum yield ( 9 , 10 ).\nThe diagnosis of EGPA can be made if the biopsy shows granulomatous vasculitis with extravasated eosinophils and evidence of eosinophilic pneumonia ( 11 ). Correspondingly, three cases in our series showed capillaritis and the remaining two were diagnosed based on relevant clinical and imaging findings.\nFungal Infection:  Alveolar hemorrhage resulting from fungal infection is infrequent. The possible pathogenesis of hemoptysis in fungal infection could be 1) due to chronic inflammation as the granulation tissue lining the cavity is rich in capillaries, 2) these new vessels are rather fragile and can rupture easily, and 3) erosion of the blood vessels adjacent to the cavity ( 12 ). The presence of calcium oxalate crystals in a patient with a cavitary lesion will raise suspicion of a fungal infection and the pathologist should search for the same in the adjacent area ( 13 ). Likewise, our cases also had similar histology which would have led to hemoptysis.\nSilicosis:  An autopsy case study by Kyeong et al. revealed that unlike silicosis which affects mainly the lung parenchyma, silico - tuberculosis also affects the pulmonary vasculature causing hemoptysis ( 14 ). Our cases did not have evidence of tuberculosis. Streak-type hemoptysis seen in our cases could be explained by the destruction of small-sized blood vessels by fibrosis and chronic inflammation ( 15 ).\nPrimary Pulmonary Mesenchymal Tumors:  Accounts for less than 1% of all lung malignancy. These tumors show lineage differentiation and can be diagnosed in the lung with similar histological and immunological criteria as in other sites (soft tissue) ( 16 ). Pulmonary hamartoma is the most common benign mesenchymal tumor of the lung, and is predominantly seen in older males .  Geramizadeh et al. and Ahmed et al. in their study stated that the occurrence of hemoptysis in hamartoma is very rare and results from giant or endobronchial tumors causing erosion of the vessels ( 17 , 18 ). In contrast to their findings, our patient was a middle-aged female with a small peripherally located pulmonary hamartoma.\nAccording to Hashimoto et al., it is important to identify and differentiate metastatic mesenchymal tumors correctly, since most mesenchymal tumors presented as occult/unknown primary with pulmonary metastatic foci ( 19 ). Identically, one of our cases had metastatic LMS with a known diagnosis of primary LMS of the thigh.\nMucoepidermoid Carcinoma (MEC):  MEC is a rare salivary gland type endobronchial tumor with mucous secreting cells, squamous cells, and intermediate cells. A definitive diagnosis requires bronchoscopy and representative biopsy as this tumor exhibits morphological heterogeneity. It can be misdiagnosed as primary non-small cell lung carcinoma if the biopsy is inadequate ( 20 , 21 ). The diagnosis of this rare neoplasm was possible since ours was a pneumonectomy specimen.\nMyelolipoma:  Pulmonary myelolipoma is distinctly unusual and rarely presents with hemoptysis. Embolic origin, reticuloendothelial cell metaplasia, and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells are possible mechanisms of histogenesis. Tumour arising adjacent to the bronchial cartilage may show bony trabeculae and this explains the possible histogenesis of the metaplastic theory ( 22 ). Our case also revealed a similar histology.\nPulmonary Endometriosis:  Pulmonary endometriosis is a rare form of extra pelvic endometriosis, occasionally reported in men. Cases of male endometriosis have typically been linked to increased circulating estrogen levels. Peripheral conversion of androstenedione and testosterone to the circulating estrogens was noted in men with cirrhosis of the liver ( 23 ). Our patient had a history of cirrhosis, possibly leading to an altered hormonal state that interacted with a reactive/metaplastic process.\nPulmonary Alveolar Microlithiasis (PAM):  PAM is a rare autosomal recessive lung disease characterized by the accumulation of concentrically laminated calcospherites within the alveolar spaces. Lauta in his study stated that there is a striking clinico-radiologic disparity in this condition ( 24 ). Since our patient did not have other system involvement, the possibility of PAM over secondary calcification was favored by correlating the clinical and imaging features.\nPulmonary Intravascular Haemangioma:  The co-existence of cardiac and pulmonary haemangioma is very rare and very few reports of such an association have been described so far. Imaging studies may help in diagnosing cardiac haemangioma while histopathology is essential for confirmation. Complete excision is the treatment of choice in resectable cardiac haemangioma and solitary pulmonary haemangioma ( 25 ). Since the general condition of the patient was poor, resection was not possible in our case. Fragmented emboli from a cardiac haemangioma could also be considered as a differential.\nIn conclusion, in immunologic causes of hemoptysis, histopathological findings may support the diagnosis in correlation with the clinical/imaging features. However, in cases of non-immunologic causes of hemoptysis, a histopathologic examination is mandatory over clinical/imaging studies. The cases presented here are incredibly rare diseases with an uncommon presentation. The diagnosis is often missed or delayed, due to a low index of suspicion. Histopathological examination is imperative in unexplained cases of hemoptysis as it plays a vital role in therapy decisions.\n\nThe authors declare no conflict of interest.\n\nThe authors declared that this study has received no financial support.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}